Clinical Nursing

Effect of cognitive⁃behavioral intervention under the family⁃based care model on continuing care of patients after aortic dissection surgery

  • Cui JI ,
  • Qinying WANG ,
  • Lei WANG ,
  • Yuan. WANG
Expand
  • Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,Shanxi Provincial People′s Hospital,Xi′an 710068,China

Received date: 2023-08-21

  Online published: 2024-03-08

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of cognitive-behavioral intervention under the family-centered care (FCC) model on continuing care of patients after aortic dissection surgery. Methods One hundred and six patients undergoing aortic dissection in the Department of Cardiac Surgery of the hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were evenly divided into control group and observation group by using random number table method, with 53 cases in each group. The control group was given routine continuing care, and the observation group was treated with continuing care with the cognitive behavior intervention under the FCC mode based on the control group, and both groups intervened for 8 weeks. The control group was treated with routine continuity care, while the observation group received continuity care with cognitive-behavioral intervention based on the FCC model in addition to routine continuing care, with a intervention duration of 8 weeks for both groups. The two groups were compared in terms of blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), self-care ability (measured using the Self-Care Ability Scale-ESCA), quality of life (measured using the Short Form-36 Health Survey-SF-36), and levels of depression and anxiety (measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - HADS) before and after the intervention. Results The level of blood pressure, BMI, and level of depression and anxiety after the intervention were all significantly lower than before the intervention (P < 0.05) and the scores by ESCA and SF-36 were significantly higher than before intervention (P < 0.05). The blood pressure and BMI in the observation group were both significantly better than in the control group [(116.47 ± 28.23)mmHg vs. (124.48 ± 29.81)mmHg and (25.33 ± 1.11)kg/m2vs. 26.18 ± 1.35)kg/m2t = 7.193, 2.454, P < 0.01, respectively]. The scores of self-care ability and quality of life in the observation group were higher than in the control group [(121.15 ± 29.69) vs. (106.68 ± 24.71) and (67.92 ± 13.69) vs. (60.81±10.77), t = 8.243, 7.436, P < 0.01, respectively]. The scores of depression and anxiety in the observation group were significantly lower than in the control group[(11.07 ± 4.00) vs. (12.20 ± 4.28) and (12.39 ± 3.59) vs. (13.45 ± 4.15), t = 3.873, 2.852, P < 0.01, respectively]. Conclusion The cognitive-behavioral intervention under the FCC mode can significantly improve blood pressure, BMI, and psychological condition, as well as enhance patients' self-care ability and quality of life, when applied in the continuity of care for patients after aortic dissection. Therefore, it is worth promoting and applying in clinical practice.

Cite this article

Cui JI , Qinying WANG , Lei WANG , Yuan. WANG . Effect of cognitive⁃behavioral intervention under the family⁃based care model on continuing care of patients after aortic dissection surgery[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(4) : 566 -570 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.04.022

References

1 GUDBJARTSSON T, AHLSSON A, GEIRSSON A, et al. Acute type A aortic dissection-a review[J]. Scand Cardiovasc J, 2020, 54(1):1-13. doi:10.1080/14017431.2019.1660401
2 MORELLO F, SANTORO M, FARGION A T, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute aortic syndromes in the emergency department [J]. Intern Emerg Med, 2021, 16 (1): 171-181. doi:10.1007/s11739-020-02354-8
3 ROGERS R K, REECE T B, BONACA M P, et al. Acute aortic syndromes [J]. Cardiol Clin, 2021, 39(4): 495-503. doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2021.06.002
4 洪妙璇,张容,朱瑾,等. 自我效能在Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后患者社会支持和心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 实用医学杂志,2022,38(16):2056-2060. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.16.014
5 李洪宇. 高血压合并主动脉夹层的临床护理干预及效果分析[J]. 中国保健营养,2021,31(33):227.
6 ZHU YJ, LINGALA B, BAIOCCHI M, et al. Type A aortic dissectionexperience over 5 decades: JACC historical breakthroughs in perspective [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020, 76 (14): 1703-1713. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.061
7 WANG Y, PIAO H L, LI B, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in stanford type A aortic dissection [J]. Int Heart J, 2019, 60(4): 845-848. doi:10.1536/ihj.18-496
8 钱葛平,陆春梅,王珏,等. 新生儿科护士实施以家庭为中心护理体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志,2020,55(5):735-739. doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.05.021
9 WHITE D B, ANGUS D C, SHIELDS A M, et al. A randomized trial of a family-support intervention in Intensive Care Units[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(25):2365-2375. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1802637
10 郭志茹,李青青,夏爱娟. 基于认知行为干预结合以家庭为中心的延续性护理对妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖控制及母婴结局影响[J]. 糖尿病新世界, 2022,25(10):138-141+161.
11 DAVIDSON J E, ASLAKSON R A, LONG A C, et al. Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU[J]. Crit Care Med, 2017, 45(1):103-128. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000002169
12 GOLDFARB M J, BIBAS L, BARTLETT V, et al. Outcomes of patient- and family-centered care interventions in the ICU:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2017,45(10):1751-1761. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000002624
13 PARK M, GLAP T T, LEE M,et al.Patient- and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care:areview of systematic reviews[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2018,87:69-83. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.006
14 SALMASI M Y, AL-SAADI N, HARTLEY P,et al. The risk of misdiagnosis in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a review of current guidelines [J]. Heart, 2020,106(12):885-891. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316322
15 AXELSSON E, HEDMAN-LAGERL?F E. Cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety:systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and health economic outcomes[J]. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res, 2019,19(6):663-676. doi:10.1080/14737167.2019.1703182
16 BAVARIA J E, BRINKMAN W T, HUGHES G C,et al. Five-year outcomes of endovascular repair of complicated acute type B aortic dissections[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2022,163(2):539-548. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.162
17 SCHACHNER T, GARRIDO F, BONAROS N,et al. Factors limiting physical activity after acute type A aortic dissection[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2019,131(7/8):174-179. doi:10.1007/s00508-018-1412-2
18 ERANKI A, WILSON- SMITH A, WILLIAMS M L,et al. Quality of life following surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection: a systematic review[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2022,17(1):118. doi:10.1186/s13019-022-01875-x
19 GHAZY T, MAHLMANN A, FAJFROVA Z, et al. Anastomotic leak after surgical repair of type A aortic dissection - prevalence and consequences in midterm follow-up [J]. VASA Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten, 2017, 46(5): 377-382. doi:10.1024/0301-1526/a000644
20 杨丽丽,马会民,张文稳,等. 认知行为干预对主动脉夹层术后患者负性情绪和主观幸福感的影响 [J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(15):2066-2069. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200915-05376
Outlines

/