The Journal of Practical Medicine >
Effects of multiple shared decision⁃making mode on the mode of delivery for pregnancies with scarred uterus
Received date: 2023-11-04
Online published: 2024-03-08
Objective To explore the effects of the multiple shared decision?making mode using a decision aid manual in conjunction with online labor and delivery decision support on the delivery mode for pregnant women with a scarred uterus. Methods A total of 94 women with scarred uterus who received prenatal care at a tertiary hospital from September 2019 to October 2022 were enrolled and assigned to experimental and control groups using the random number table method. The control group received standard prenatal education， and the experimental group received multiple shared decision?making interventions in addition to standard prenatal education. The degree of conflict in decision?making for delivery， preference for delivery mode， postpartum decision regret， and the final delivery mode between the two groups were compared， respectively. Results Following the multiple shared decision intervention， decision conflict scores in the experimental group were significantly reduced （P < 0.001）. In the survey on delivery mode preferences， there was a reduction in the number of individuals in the experimental group expressing "uncertainty"， and an increase in those choosing vaginal delivery. Ultimately， in the experimental group， 30 women （68.2%） underwent cesarean sections， and 14 （31.8%） had vaginal deliveries. The level of post?decision regret in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group （P < 0.001）. Conclusions Multiple shared decision?making for women pregnant with a scarred uterus could reduce the level of decision?making conflict， increase the willingness for vaginal delivery， and assist them in making rational and scientifically informed decisions regarding childbirth.
Lili ZHOU , Jinguo ZHAI , Jie TAO , Lihua ZHOU , Xuantian. LIU . Effects of multiple shared decision⁃making mode on the mode of delivery for pregnancies with scarred uterus[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(4) : 561 -565 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.04.021
| 1 | 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩管理的专家共识（2016）［J］. 中华妇产科杂志， 2016， 51（8）： 561-564. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2016.08.001 |
| 2 | 黄秋香，刘燕燕，陈茜，等. 人工破膜在剖宫产后阴道分娩中的催产疗效［J］. 实用医学杂志， 2020， 36（2）： 175-179. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2020.02.009 |
| 3 | ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205： Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery［J］. Obstet Gynecol， 2019，133（2）： e110-e127. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003078 |
| 4 | 燕美琴，王竞，刘亦娜，等. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠孕妇对分娩方式选择的意愿调查［J］. 护理研究， 2018， 32（4）： 640-642. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.04.046 |
| 5 | 郑红颖，胡嘉乐，董柏君，等. 医护患共享决策相关理论模式的研究进展［J］. 中国护理管理， 2018， 18（11）： 1575-1580. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.11.031 |
| 6 | SHORTEN A， SHORTEN B， FAGERLIN A，et al. A Study to Assess the Feasibility of Implementing a Web-Based Decision Aid for Birth after Cesarean to Increase Opportunities for Shared Decision Making in Ethnically Diverse Settings［J］. J Midwifery Womens Health， 2019， 64（1）： 78-87. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12908 |
| 7 | CHEN S W， SHORTEN A， YEH C C，et al. An innovative web-based decision-aid about birth after cesarean for shared decision making in Taiwan： study protocol for a randomized control trial［J］. Trials，2023，24（1）：103. doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07103-8 |
| 8 | 李建琼，柏晓玲，罗忠琛. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩多元化决策辅助方案的构建及应用研究［J］. 护理研究， 2021， 35（4）： 625-629. doi:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.04.010 |
| 9 | HADIZADEH-TALASAZ F， GHOREYSHI F， MOHAMMADZADEH F，et al. Effect of shared decision making on mode of delivery and decisional conflict and regret in pregnant women with previous cesarean section： a randomized clinical trial［J］. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth， 2021， 21（1）： 144. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03615-w |
| 10 | SHORTEN A， SHORTEN B， KEOGH J，et al. Making choices for childbirth： a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean［J］. Birth， 2005， 32（4）： 252-261. doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00383.x |
| 11 | SHORTEN A， CHAMBERLAIN M， SHORTEN B，et al. Making choices for childbirth： development and testing of a decision-aid for women who have experienced previous caesarean［J］. Patient Educ Couns， 2004， 52（3）： 307-313. doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00106-x |
| 12 | CHEN S W， YANG C C， TE J C，et al. Birth choices after caesarean in Taiwan： A mixed methods pilot study of a decision aid for shared decision making［J］. Midwifery， 2021， 95： 102920. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2020.102920 |
| 13 | TORIGOE I， SHORTEN A. Using a pregnancy decision support program for women choosing birth after a previous caesarean in Japan： A mixed methods study［J］. Women Birth， 2018， 31（1）： e9-e19. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.06.001 |
| 14 | 陈芳，程晓姣. 中文版决策后悔量表应用于面部美容受术者的信效度评价［J］. 护理学报， 2018， 25（7）： 42-44. |
| 15 | PECANAC K E， BROWN R L， KREMSREITER H B. Decisional Conflict During Major Medical Treatment Decision-making： a Survey Study［J］. J Gen Intern Med， 2021， 36（1）： 55-61. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06125-1 |
| 16 | 廖宗峰，金迪，梅翠红，等. 患者决策冲突的研究进展［J］. 护理学杂志， 2018， 33（12）： 106-109. doi:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.12.106 |
| 17 | 李娅男，黄丽君，赵红花. 剖宫产后再次妊娠孕妇分娩方式相关知识、态度、行为状况调查及分娩方式影响因素分析［J］. 中国妇幼保健， 2020， 35（7）： 1319-1322. |
| 18 | THOMPSON-LEDUC P， TURCOTTE S， LABRECQUE M，et al. Prevalence of clinically significant decisional conflict： an analysis of five studies on decision-making in primary care［J］. BMJ Open， 2016， 6（6）： e11490. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011490 |
| 19 | 郑海霞，张清，刘淑霞. 共同决策视角下产妇分娩方式最佳决策的影响因素分析［J］. 中国妇幼保健， 2019， 34（20）： 4613-4616. |
| 20 | CHEN S W， HUTCHINSON A M， NAGLE C，et al. Women's decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan： a qualitative study［J］. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth， 2018， 18（1）： 31. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1661-0 |
| 21 | 罗忠琛，柏晓玲，李建琼. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠孕妇阴道试产决策求助体验的质性研究［J］. 中华护理杂志， 2019， 54（3）： 396-400. doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.03.014 |
| 22 | MILLER Y D， HOLDAWAY W. How communication about risk and role affects women's decisions about birth after caesarean［J］. Patient Educ Couns， 2019， 102（1）： 68-76. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.09.015 |
| 23 | NILSSON C， LALOR J， BEGLEY C，et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean： Views of women from countries with low VBAC rates［J］. Women Birth， 2017， 30（6）： 481-490. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.04.009 |
| 24 | 王婷婷，赖晓慧，林晓晓. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩对母婴结局的影响［J］. 中国妇幼保健， 2020， 35（24）： 4705-4707. |
| 25 | 方兰， 彭泽标. 剖宫产术后再妊娠妇女产前分娩恐惧、社会支持状况及其对分娩方式选择的影响［J］. 护理研究， 2019， 33（10）：1777-1779. doi:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2019.10.033 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |