Drugs and Clinic Practice

An observational study on the treatment of chronic kidney disease stage 5 with resistant hypertension with sacubitril/valsartan

  • Yanhong NING ,
  • Yuanshan XU ,
  • Xiaohua LI ,
  • Shihua LI ,
  • Zhenhua YANG ,
  • Yunhua LIAO ,
  • Ling. PAN
Expand
  • *.Department of Nephrology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Nanning 530021,China
    *.Department of Nephrology,the Second Nanning People′s Hospital,Nanning 530031,China

Received date: 2023-08-24

  Online published: 2024-03-08

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at stage 5 with resistant hypertension, and to explore the cardiovascular benefits and security of medical in the patients. Methods Patients with CKD5 resistant hypertension diagnosed and treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from September 2020 to March 2022 were selected and divided into the observation group (treated with routine treatment of kidney disease at end-stage and sacubitril/valsartan) and control group (include droutine treatment of renal disease at end-stage and ACEI or ARB drugs) according to treatment strategy. The patients in both two groups were treated with adequate dialysis treatment and conventional drug treatment of renal disease at end-stage. The patients were followed up for at least 3 months,the clinical efficacy of three months after treated with sacubitril/valsartan was observed, and the efficacy indicators and security indicators and adverse cardiovascular events were observed, the occurrence of adverse effects during the period of drug use were compared with the control group. Results A total of 110 patients were included in this study and there were 55 cases in each group.There were no significant differences in gender, age, age of dialysis, etiology, dialysis mode and blood pressure between the two groups (P > 0.05). The Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), b-type urinary natriuretic peptide precursor (Pro-BNP) and cardiac function grade in the observation group after treatment was significantly decreased compared with before treatment. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the ratio of LVEF < 50% in the observation group was significantly reduced after treatment (P < 0.05). SBP, DBP and Pro-BNP decreased 3 months after treatment compared with the baseline before treatment,and improved significantly in the first month after treatment(P < 0.05). The decrease of DBP and BNP before and after treatment was significantly different between the two groups, and the decrease of DBP and BNP was more significant in the observation group(P < 0.05). The difference of LVEF and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD)between the two groups before and after treatment was statistically significant, and the improvement was more obvious in the observation group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the safety indicators of serum potassium, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and liver function between two groups before and after treatment (P > 0.05). In terms of adverse reactions, only 1 case in the control group developed hyperkalemia within 3 months of follow-up, and no hypotension or other adverse reactions occurred in the two groups. Conclusions The treatment of patients with CKD stage 5 hypertension with sacubitril/valsartan has obvious cardiovascular benefits. Sacubitril/Valsartan has efficacy in lowering blood pressure, improving cardiac function and reducing volume load, with less adverse events and higher safety than control group.

Cite this article

Yanhong NING , Yuanshan XU , Xiaohua LI , Shihua LI , Zhenhua YANG , Yunhua LIAO , Ling. PAN . An observational study on the treatment of chronic kidney disease stage 5 with resistant hypertension with sacubitril/valsartan[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(4) : 543 -548 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.04.018

References

1 COLLABORATION G C K D. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2020,395(10225): 709-733.
2 2018 USRDS Annual Data Report: Executive Summary[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2019,73(3): A9-A22. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.002
3 EDMONSTON D, MORRIS J D, MIDDLETON J P. Working Toward an Improved Understanding of Chronic Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 4[J]. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis, 2018,25(5): 454-467. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2018.08.010
4 PEI M, AGUIAR R, PAGELS A A, et al. Health-related quality of life as predictor of mortality in end-stage renal disease patients: an observational study[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2019,20(1): 144. doi:10.1186/s12882-019-1318-x
5 MUNTNER P, ANDERSON A, CHARLESTON J, et al. Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in adults with CKD: results from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2010,55(3): 441-451. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.014
6 郭卿, 梁国庆, 郭琼, 等. 重组人脑利钠肽-沙库巴曲缬沙坦序贯治疗急性心力衰竭的效果分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021,37(7): 919-923.
7 PONIKOWSKI P, VOORS A A, ANKER S D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016,18(8): 891-975. doi:10.1002/ejhf.592
8 刘立天, 王家琦, 谢悦陶, 等. 沙库巴曲缬沙坦对慢性心力衰竭兔心室重构的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022,38(10): 1193-1197.
9 张相杰, 黄文平, 许有凡. 沙库巴曲缬沙坦和盐酸贝那普利片对心力衰竭患者心室重塑、炎症因子的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019,35(5): 795-799.
10 SANKHE R, KINRA M, MUDGAL J, et al. Neprilysin, the kidney brush border neutral proteinase: a possible potential target for ischemic renal injury[J]. Toxicol Mech Methods, 2020,30(2): 88-99. doi:10.1080/15376516.2019.1669246
11 MCMURRAY J J, PACKER M, DESAI A S, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014,371(11): 993-1004. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1409077
12 SOLOMON S D, ZILE M, PIESKE B, et al. The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2012,380(9851): 1387-1395. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61227-6
13 LI X, LINDHOLM B. Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Chronic Kidney Disease[J]. Am J Nephrol, 2022,53(10): 730-739. doi:10.1159/000528560
14 KONSTANTINIDIS I, NADKARNI G N, YACOUB R, et al. Representation of Patients With Kidney Disease in Trials of CardiovascularInterventions: An Updated Systematic Review[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2016,176(1): 121-124. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6102
15 RONG S, QIU X, JIN X, et al. Risk factors for heart valve calcification in chronic kidney disease[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018,97(5): e9804. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000009804
16 HILL N R, FATOBA S T, OKE J L, et al. Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2016,11(7): e158765. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158765
17 SARAN R, ROBINSON B, ABBOTT K C, et al. US Renal Data System 2017 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2018,71(3 ): A7. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.03.001
18 NICOLAS J, CLAESSEN B, MEHRAN R. Implications of Kidney Disease in the Cardiac Patient[J]. Interv Cardiol Clin, 2020,9(3): 265-278. doi:10.1016/j.iccl.2020.03.002
19 PARNHAM S F, GLEADLE J M, De PASQUALE C G, et al. Myocardial Ischemia Assessment in Chronic Kidney Disease: Challenges and Pitfalls[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2014,1: 13. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2014.00013
20 DASS B, BEAVER T M, SHIMADA M, et al. Natriuretic peptides in acute kidney injury-A sojourn on parallel tracks?[J]. Eur J Intern Med, 2020,71: 39-44. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2019.11.025
21 CHENG Y J, YAO F J, LIU L J, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis of end-stage renal disease: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2013,8(11): e79302. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079302
22 MCCULLOUGH P A, ROBERTS W C. Influence of Chronic Renal Failure on Cardiac Structure[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2016,67(10): 1183-1185. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.065
23 SINGH J, BURRELL L M, CHERIF M, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan: beyond natriuretic peptides[J]. Heart, 2017,103(20): 1569-1577. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311295
24 CHANG H Y, FENG A N, FONG M C, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients: Real world experience on advanced chronic kidney disease, hypotension, and dose escalation[J]. J Cardiol, 2019,74(4): 372-380. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.03.010
25 HAYNES R, JUDGE P K, STAPLIN N, et al. Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Irbesartan in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease[J]. Circulation, 2018,138(15): 1505-1514. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.034818
26 COLLABORATION G B O M. Cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mortality burden of cardiometabolic risk factors from 1980 to 2010: a comparative risk assessment[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2014,2(8): 634-647. doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(14)70102-0
27 FU S, XU Z, LIN B, et al. Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2021,8: 657067. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.657067
28 WANG A Y, WANG M, LAM C W, et al. Heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2013,61(6): 975-983. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.12.030
Outlines

/