Feature Reports:carcinoma of cervix

Efficacy of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in open radical hysterectomy

  • Shenglong YUAN ,
  • Huanhuan HU ,
  • Zhen GONG
Expand
  • Department of Gynecology,Women′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital,Nanjing 210004,China

Received date: 2023-08-21

  Online published: 2024-03-06

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the complications predicting efficacy of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) surgical risk calculator for cervical cancer patients undergoing open radical hysterectomy in China. Methods This study enrolled the cervical cancer patients (139 cases) undertaken open radical hysterectomy at Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January to December in 2021. Preoperative risk factors were abstracted from medical records and the surgical risk scores were calculated using ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator. The association between risk scores and actual outcomes were assessed using logistic regression together with the c-statistic (area under ROC) and Brier score. Results The ACSNSQIP calculator did not predict accurately for serious complications, any complications, venous thromboembolism (VTE), readmission, return operation room and surgical site infection (SSI) compared with actual outcomes. There was significantly difference in the predicted and actual length of stay (3.93 ± 0.42 days vs. 13.11 ± 4.71 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions The ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator failed to predict the postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay for cervical cancer patients undergoing open radical hysterectomy.

Cite this article

Shenglong YUAN , Huanhuan HU , Zhen GONG . Efficacy of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in open radical hysterectomy[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(2) : 140 -145 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.02.003

References

1 方艳惠, 康晓丽, 朱巧英, 等 . miR-496靶向调控DCUN1D1抑制宫颈癌发生发展机制研究[J]. 实用医学杂志,2022, 38(2): 139-144.
2 SUNG H , FERLAY J , SIEGEL R L , et al . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
3 GU X , SUN G , ZHENG R , et al . Incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in China in 2015 [J]. J Nat Cancer Cent, 2022, 2(2): 70-77. doi:10.1016/j.jncc.2022.01.002
4 文丽芳, 丁洁 . 宫颈癌组织SLIT3、SPARCL1表达及与术后复发的关系[J]. 实用医学杂志,2023, 39(15): 1907-1912. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.15.009
5 RAMIREZ P T , FRUMOVITZ M , PAREJA R , et al . Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(20): 1895-1904. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1806395
6 MELAMED A , MARGUL D J , CHEN L , et al . Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(20): 1905-1914. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1804923
7 陈春林, 郎景和, 向阳,等 . 子宫颈癌腹腔镜手术治疗的中国专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2020, 55(9): 579-585. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200310-00202
8 LI R Z , SUN L F , LI R , et al . Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. BJOG, 2023, 130(2): 176-183. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17339
9 陈春林, 郎景和 . 中国专家“关于宫颈癌腹腔镜手术相关问题”的几点意见[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2019, 35(2): 188-193.
10 EDELSTEIN A I , KWASNY M J , SULEIMAN L I , et al . Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Knee and Hip Arthroplasty? [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(9 ): 5-10. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.057
11 CHUDGAR N , YAN S , HSU M , et al . The American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator performs well for pulmonary resection: A validation study [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2022, 163(4): 1509-1516.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.036
12 KONGWIBULWUT M , CHIANG K , LEE J M , et al . Life after 90: Predictors of mortality and performance of the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator in 4,724 nonagenarian patients undergoing emergency general surgery [J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2019, 86(5): 853-857. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000002219
13 GOLAN S , ADAMSKY M A , JOHNSON S C , et al . National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator poorly predicts complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion [J]. Urol Oncol, 2018, 36(2): 77.e1-77.e7. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.015
14 HATIPOGLU E , ERGINOZ E , ASKAR A , et al . Accuracy of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator for Predicting Postoperative Complications in Gastric Cancer Following Open Gastrectomy [J]. Am Surg, 2023:31348231206581. doi:10.1177/00031348231206581
15 RIVARD C , NAHUM R , SLAGLE E , et al . Evaluation of the performance of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 141(2): 281-286. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.015
16 HAMADE S , ALSHIEK J , JAVADIAN P , et al . Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator to predict outcomes after hysterectomies [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2022, 158(3): 714-721. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14075
17 MANNING-GEIST B , CATHCART A M , SULLIVAN M W , et al . Predictive validity of American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Project risk calculator in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing interval debulking surgery [J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2021, 31(10): 1356-1362. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2021-002772
18 ZIEGLER M A , BAUMAN J C , WELSH R J , et al . Can the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator Predict Outcomes for Urgent Colectomies? [J]. Am Surg, 2022, 88(1): 65-69. doi:10.1177/0003134820973392
19 BOYD S S , O'SULLIVAN D M , LASALA C . Evaluating Postoperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator [J]. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2020, 26(6): 364-369. doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000000715
20 陈春林, 李朋飞 . 子宫颈癌腹腔镜手术与开腹手术争议的解决之道——临床试验研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2020, 36(1): 36-39.
21 WHERLEY S D , CHAPMAN G C , MAHAJAN S T , et al . Evaluation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2020, 31(10): 2089-2094. doi:10.1007/s00192-020-04364-8
22 VOS E L , RUSSO A E , HOHMANN A , et al . Performance of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator for Total Gastrectomy [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2020, 231(6): 650-656. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.09.023
23 卢文宁, 高龄根, 刘朝阳, 等 . 美国外科风险计算器预测老年前列腺癌患者手术风险的价值[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志,2020, 9(2): 125-129.
24 SHAKER S , RIVARD C , NAHUM R , et al . The American College of Surgeon's surgical risk calculator's ability to predict disposition in older gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy [J]. J Geriatr Oncol, 2019, 10(4): 618-622. doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2019.02.008
25 TEOH D , HALLOWAY R N , HEIM J , et al . Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24(1): 48-54. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.005
26 刘亚芬, 纪妹, 赵曌, 等 . 机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗ⅠB_1~ⅡA_2期宫颈癌的比较及术后并发症的影响因素分析[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2023, 4(5): 397-406.
27 谢嘉欣, 朱洪磊, 高萌, 等 . 经脐单孔腹腔镜在超重肥胖患者卵巢囊肿剥除术中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(8): 997-1000. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.08.016
28 PATANKAR S , BURKE W M , HOU J Y , et al . Risk stratification and outcomes of women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 138(1): 62-69. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.037
29 UPPAL S , IGWE E , RICE L W , et al . Frailty index predicts severe complications in gynecologic oncology patients [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 137(1): 98-101. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.532
30 H?HN P , RUNDE F , LUU A M , et al . Applicability of the surgical risk calculator by the American College of Surgeons in the setting of German patients undergoing complete pancreatectomy: multicentre study using data from the StuDoQ|Pancreas registry [J]. BJS Open, 2023, 7(2): zrac164. doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zrac164
31 BLAIR B M , LEHMAN E B , JAFRI S M , et al . Predicted versus observed 30-day perioperative outcomes using the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma [J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2018, 50(7): 1249-1256. doi:10.1007/s11255-018-1898-6
Outlines

/