Medical Examination and Clinical Diagnosis

Effect of contrast agent temperature on adverse effects of hysterosalpingo⁃contrast sonography

  • Ping YANG ,
  • Yue ZHONG ,
  • Yaping ZHANG ,
  • Xu FAN ,
  • Hong. SHI
Expand
  • Department of Ultrasound,the First People's Hospital of Neijiang,Neijiang 641000,China

Received date: 2023-06-20

  Online published: 2023-09-27

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of contrast agent temperature on adverse reactions of transvaginal four?dimensional hysterosalpingo?contrast sonography (TVS 4D?Hycosy) with pain as the main manifestation. Methods Double?blind randomized controlled study. A total of 220 patients who underwent TVS 4D?Hycosy examination were randomly assigned (1∶1) to receive preheated contrast agent (38 ℃) and normal temperature contrast agent (22 ~ 26 ℃) respectively. The Stacey scoring scale was used to comprehensively evaluate pain, nausea, vomiting and other adverse reactions and NRS scoring scale were used to evaluate pain alone, and the occurrence of adverse reactions after intrauterine catheterization and during the examination was compared between the two groups. After the inspection, compare the proportion of people with persistent pain at 0 h, < 0.5 h, < 1 h, 1 ~ 24 h, and > 24 h between the two groups. Result There was no significant difference in Stacey adverse reaction score and NRS pain score between the two groups after intrauterine catheterization (Z = 0.231, -0.341, both P > 0.05). During the examination, the Stacey adverse reaction score and NRS pain score in the preheated group were lower than those in the room temperature group (Z = 2.906, 3.837, both P < 0.05), and the proportion of moderate and severe adverse reactions in the preheated group was lower than that in the room temperature group (χ2 = 7.502, P < 0.05), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. After the examination, there was no significant difference in the proportion of people with persistent pain at 0 h, < 0.5 h, < 1 h, 1 ~ 24 h, and > 24 h between the two groups (χ2 = 0.141, 0.566, 0.697, 0.373, all P > 0.05). Conclusions Thermostatic preheated contrast agent reduces adverse reactions during the TVS 4D?Hycosy and is a simple and effective way to alleviate patient suffering.

Cite this article

Ping YANG , Yue ZHONG , Yaping ZHANG , Xu FAN , Hong. SHI . Effect of contrast agent temperature on adverse effects of hysterosalpingo⁃contrast sonography[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2023 , 39(17) : 2253 -2257 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.17.018

References

1 邢丽丽,赵白信,黄蕾. 子宫输卵管超声造影对受检不孕症患者疼痛的影响因素[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(5):714-717.
2 张婧,董冲亚,香钰婷,等. 经阴道四维子宫输卵管超声造影临床耐受性及相关因素分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(3):199-203.
3 ZHANG N, LIU Y, HE Y,et al. Transvaginal four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography: Pain perception and factors influencing pain severity[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2021,47(1):302-310.
4 不孕症“一站式”超声检查体系多中心研究专家团队.不孕症“一站式”子宫输卵管超声造影技术专家共识[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020,17(2):108-114.
5 KARCIOGLU O, TOPACOGLU H, DIKME O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? [J].Am J Emerg Med, 2018,36(4):707-714.
6 STACEY C, BOWN C, MANHIRE A, et al. HyCoSy: as good as claimed?[J] .Br J Radiol, 2000,73(866):133-136.
7 李亚丽,刘洁. 3D-CCI-HyCoSy技术在不孕症患者输卵管病变诊断中的价值[J]. 海南医学,2022,33(10):1278-1281.
8 唐超人. 经阴道3D子宫输卵管超声造影在不孕症诊疗中的研究进展[J]. 世界复合医学,2022,8(5):188-191.
9 QU E, ZHANG M, JU J,et al. Is hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) using sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles (sonovue) sufficient for the assessment of fallopian tube patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2023,42:7-15.
10 周秋兰,邓可妮,王伟群. 四维子宫输卵管超声造影联合宫腔推注生理盐水对不孕女性宫腔病变的诊断价值[J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(6):802-805.
11 查晓霞,邓晓杨,游岚岚,等. 造影液温度对输卵管超声造影副反应的影响分析[J]. 临床超声医学杂志,2013,15(5):318-320.
12 FENZL V. Effect of different ultrasound contrast materials and temperatures on patient comfort during intrauterine and tubal assessment for infertility[J]. Eur J Radiol,2012,81(12):4143-4145.
13 NIRMAL D, GRIFFITHS A N, JOSE G, et al. Warming Echovist contrast medium for hysterocontrastsonography and the effect on the incidence of pelvic pain. A randomized controlled study[J]. Hum Reprod, 2006,21(4):1052-1054.
14 ZHU Y Y, MAO Y Z, WU W L. Comparison of warm and cold contrast media for hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized study[J]. Fertil Steril,2012,97(6):1405-1409.
15 LI H, ZHANG M, QIANG Y, et al. Pain and side effects associated with 4-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography for evaluating of the fallopian tubes patency[J]. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon),2017,22(sup1):93-99.
16 MARCI R, MARCUCCI I, MARCUCCI A A, et al. Hysterosalpingocontrast sonography (HyCoSy): evaluation of the pain perception, side effects and complications[J]. BMC Med Imaging,2013,13:28.
17 邵明凤,苏京荣. 心血管疾病介入治疗过程中血管迷走神经反射的预防与处理[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2002,11(1):11-12.
18 王庭槐. 生理学(第九版)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:217-218.
19 DYDYK A M, GIVLER A. Central Pain Syndrome[M]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
20 HUANG M, YOO J K, STICKFORD A S L, et al. Early sympathetic neural responses during a cold pressor test linked to pain perception[J]. Clin Auton Res, 2021,31(2):215-224.
21 BARCIKOWSKA Z, RAJKOWSKA-LABON E, GRZYBOWSKA M E,et al. Inflammatory Markers in Dysmenorrhea and Therapeutic Options[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health,2020,17(4):1191.
22 储彩云,林赛月,江传林,等. 不同温度液体静脉输入对剖宫产术中穿刺局部疼痛的影响[J]. 护理与康复, 2015,14(1):6-9.
23 MEGHANA V S, VASUDEVARAO S B, KAMATH S S. The effect of combination of warm intravenous fluid infusion and forced air warming versus forced air warming alone on maternal temperature and shivering during cesarian delivery under spinal anesthesia[J]. Ann Afr Med, 2020,19(2):137-143.
24 张青,刘迎春. 二氧化碳加温加湿调节技术在肝移植手术中的应用[J]. 护理研究,2022,36(17):3127-3130.
25 WU S J, KAN W C, SHIAO C C.Warm-water footbath improves dysmenorrhoea and heart rate variability in college students: a randomised controlled trial[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2022,42(5):1204-1210.
Outlines

/