The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (21): 3442-3448.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.21.021

• Medical Examination and Clinical Diagnosis • Previous Articles    

Value of conventional radiological features and ct radiomics features in differentiating parotid adenolymphoma from malignant tumors

Guoliang WEN1,Hang FANG1,Wei. ZHANG2,3()   

  1. *.Department of Radiology,Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University,Guilin 541001,Guangxi,China
  • Received:2025-07-30 Online:2025-11-10 Published:2025-11-13
  • Contact: Wei. ZHANG E-mail:holly2yang@126.com

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the value of conventional radiological features and CT radiomics features to differentiate parotid adenolymphoma from malignant tumor. Methods Radiological data from 128 patients with adenolymphoma and 39 patients with parotid malignancy were collected between December 2018 and October 2023. Radiomics features were extracted to obtain Rad?score and construct a radiomics model. Conventional radiological features were analyzed to obtain independent predictors, and a conventional radiological model was constructed. Model performance was compared by the DeLong test, and the Rad?score was combined with radiological features to establish a comprehensive model and plot a nomogram. Results Based on CT venous phase images, 9 optimal radiomic features were selected. Conventional radiological features were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis and found that shape and degree of enhancement were independent predictors of adenolymphoma and malignant parotid tumors. The CT radiomics model is superior to the conventional radiological model(P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the radiomics model was 0.938 (95% CI: 0.887 ~ 0.988), and the specificity and sensitivity were 0.856 and 0.923, respectively. Conventional radiological features and Rad?score were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis and found that Rad?score and degree of enhancement were independent predictors of adenolymphoma and malignant parotid tumors. The difference between the diagnostic efficacy of the comprehensive model created by the Rad?score combined with the degree of enhancement and the diagnostic efficacy of the radiomics model was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion The CT radiomics model performed better than the conventional radiological model in discriminating parotid gland adenolymphoma from malignant tumors. The diagnostic performance of the comprehensive model has improved, aiding in clinical decision?making.

Key words: parotid gland, adenolymphoma, malignant tumor, radiomics

CLC Number: