The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (17): 2241-2247.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.17.016

• Drugs and Clinic Practice • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical value of quantitative detection of serum HBsAg and HBeAg to evaluate the viral response of entecavir in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis complicated with primary liver cancer

Xinyi ZHANG,Guoliang ZHANG,Guanglin. ZHANG()   

  1. Department of Hepatology,Anhui Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Hefei 230000,China
  • Received:2023-02-24 Online:2023-09-10 Published:2023-09-27
  • Contact: Guanglin. ZHANG E-mail:fy21g7@126net.com.cn

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical value of quantitative detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B virus E antigen (HBeAg) serum levels to evaluate the viral response (HBV?DNA) of entecavir in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis complicated with primary liver cancer. Methods From April 2020 to July 2021, 80 patients with moderate liver cirrhosis complicated with primary liver cancer were treated in our hospital. According to whether virological response occurred at the 8th week of treatment, the patients were divided into response group (n = 47) and non?response group (n = 33). The correlations between serum HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV?DNA levels were compared before and after treatment. The value of serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels in predicting viral response was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The 1?year survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan?Meier method. Results The serum levels of HBsAg and HBeAg were positively correlated with the level of HBV?DNA before treatment. There were significant differences in serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels at 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks and 48 weeks after treatment. At the 48th week of treatment, the maximum area under the ROC curve of viral response predicted by serum HBsAg level was 0.818 (95% CI:0.709 ~ 0.965). The best cut?off point was (40.63 ± 10.28) ng/mL. The sensitivity is 91.34%. The specificity is 71.93%. At the 8th week of treatment, the area under the ROC curve predicted by serum HBeAg level was up to 0.801 (95% CI:0.673 ~ 0.979). The best cut?off point was (53.38 ± 9.86) NCU/mL. The sensitivity is 88.52% and the specificity is 83.42%. The results of survival analysis showed that the 1?year survival rate of the response group was 87.31% higher than that of the non?response group 62.18%, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels were correlated with viral response in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis complicated with primary liver cancer treated with entecavir. Quantitative detection of serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels to evaluate the viral response of patients has high clinical value.

Key words: hepatitis B cirrhosis, primary liver cancer, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B e antigen, viral response

CLC Number: