实用医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 62-67.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.01.012

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

极低出生体质量儿宫外生长发育迟缓的预测模型建立

肖玉联 韦茹 王静 杨延萍 胡丹丹   

  1. 广州市妇女儿童医疗中心儿童保健科(广州 510630)

  • 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 胡丹丹 E⁃mail:cjf19770315@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金项目(编号:B2021257)

Establishment of prediction model of extrauterine growth retardation of very low birth weight infants

XIAO Yulian,WEI Ru,WANG Jing,YANG Yanping,HU Dandan.    

  1. Department of Health Care,Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Centre,Guangzhou 510630,China

  • Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-10
  • Contact: HU Dandan E⁃mail:cjf19770315@126.com

摘要:

目的 观察极低出生体质量儿宫外生长发育情况,并建立发育迟缓的预测模型。方法 2019 1 月至 2021 1 月我院收治的 804 例极低出生体质量儿为研究对象。统计 804 例患儿宫外生长 发育迟缓(EUGR)发生率,依据是否发生 EUGR,将患儿分为 EUGR 组(n = 567)和非 EUGR 组(n = 237),对 比两组患儿住院期间各项基础资料信息差异,再将有差异变量纳入 logistic 回归分析,并进行量化赋值,以是否发生 EUGR 为因变量(Y,是=1,否=0),以 IUGR、出生体重、恢复出生体重时间、开始肠内营养时间、败 血症、NRDS、第 1 周末氨基酸量为自变量(X),明确极低出生体质量儿发生 EUGR 的危险因素,最后绘制危险因素的 ROC 曲线,建立极低出生体质量儿发生 EUGR 的预测模型。结果 804 例极低出生体质量儿中 发生 EUGR 567 例,占 70.52%,均纳入 EUGR 组,其中患儿 6 月龄时身高小于同年龄同性别 2 个标准差者 254 例,体质量小于同年龄同性别 2 个标准差者 285 例,头围小于同年龄同性别 2 个标准差者 154 例;未发 EUGR 237 例,占 29.48%,均纳入非 EUGR 组。两组性别、胎龄、出院体重、住院天数、Apgar 评分、肠外营 养持续时间、全经口喂养时间、全经口最大热量及第 1、2 周末脂肪乳量及能量摄入、第 2 周末氨基酸摄入、 是否合并化脓性脑膜炎、新生儿支气管肺发育不良(BPD)、脑血管病(ICH)各项信息对比均差异无统计学 意义(P > 0.05);EUGR 组出生体重、第 1 周末氨基酸量均显著低于非 EUGR 组,开始肠内营养时间、恢复出生体重时间均显著晚于非 EUGR 组,合并宫内生长发育迟缓(IUGR)、败血症、新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征 NRDS)患儿占比均显著高于非 EUGR 组(P < 0.05)。经 logistic 回归性分析证实,IUGR、出生体重、恢复出 生体重时间、开始肠内营养时间、败血症、NRDS、第 1 周末氨基酸量是极低出生体质量儿发生 EUGR 的独 立影响因素(P < 0.05)。经 ROC 分析证实,出生体重、恢复出生体重时间、开始肠内营养时间、第 1 周末氨 基酸量及联合预测的曲线下面积分别为 0.830、0.782、0.862、0.851、0.911,其中联合预测可获得更好的曲线 下面积(0.911)及95%CI(0.851~0.972),差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。结论 极低出生体质量儿EUGR 发生率高,其影响因素较多,临床工作中可参照公式 Y 联合=X 出生体重⁃2.134×X 恢复出生体重时间+ 3.451×X 开始肠内营养时间+4.160×+X 第1周末氨基酸量对极低出生体质量儿发生EUGR 进行预测。

关键词:

极低出生体质量儿, 宫外生长发育迟缓, 预测模型, 危险因素, logistic 回归分析

Abstract:

Objective To observe the extrauterine growth and development of very low birth weight infants and establish a prediction model of extrauterine growth retardation(EUGR). Methods A total of 804 very low birth weight infants admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2021 were included as the research objects and were divided into EUGR group(n = 567)and non⁃EUGR group(n = 237)based on the differential diagnosis of EUGR. The basic information of the patients was compared between the two groups during hospitalization,and then the variables with differences were included in the logistic regression analysis. The EUGR was taken as the dependent variable(Y,yes = 1,no = 0),and other variables like intrauterine growth retardation(IUGR),birth weight,time to recover birth weight,time to start enteral nutrition,sepsis,NRDS and amino acid content at the end of the first week as the independent(X). The risk factors of EUGR in the very low birth weight infants were analyzed,and finally the ROC curve of risk factors was drawn to establish the EUGR prediction model. Results Among the 804 very low birth weight infants,567 cases(70.52%)developed EUGR and they were all included in the EUGR group. Amongthem,the height of 254 cases was less than 2 standard deviations of the normal infants of the same age and sex at 6 months,the body weight of 285 cases had was less than 2 standard deviations of the normal infants of the same age and sex,and the head circumference of 154 cases was less than 2 standard deviations of the normal infants of same age and sex. There were 237 cases(29.48%)diagnosed with no EUGR and then assigned as the non⁃EUGR group. There were no significant differences in gender,gestational age,discharge weight,length of hospital stay,Apgar score,duration of parenteral nutrition,total oral feeding time,total oral maximum calorie,fat emulsion volume and energy intake at the first and second weekend,amino acid intake at the second weekend,purulent meningitis,BPD and ICH between the two groups(P > 0.05). The birth weight and amino acid content at the end of the first week in the EUGR group were both significantly lower than those in the non⁃EUGR group,the start time of enteral nutrition and the recovery time of birth weight in the EUGR group were both significantly later than those in the non ⁃EUGR group,and the rates of the infants combined with IUGR,sepsis and NRDS were significantly higher than those in the non⁃EUGR group(P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that IUGR,birth weight,time to recover to the birth weight,time to start enteral nutrition,sepsis,NRDS and amino acid content at the end of the first week were inde⁃ pendent influencing factors of EUGR in the very low birth weight infants(P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that birth weight,time to recover to the birth weight,time to start enteral nutrition,amino acid content at the end of the first week and area under the curve of combined prediction were 0.830,0.782,0.862,0.851 and 0.911,respectively. The area under the curve(0.911)and 95% IC(0.851⁃0.972)of combined prediction was better(P < 0.05). Conclusion The incidence of EUGR in very low birth weight infants is high,and it has many influencing factors. Clinically,the formula of(Y=Xbirth weight ⁃2.134×X + 3.451 × X start enteral nutrition time + 4.160 ×+ X amount of amino acid at the end of the first week)is suggested to use in the prediction of EUGR in the very low birth weight infants. 

Key words: very low birth weight infants,  , extrauterine growth restriction,  , prediction model,  , risk factors,  , logistic regression analysis