实用医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (14): 1811-1814.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2021.14.007

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

内界膜剥除治疗顽固性糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效以及对视功能的影响

苏锐锋, 李晓红, 李新秀, 谭小波   

  1. 承德医学院附属医院眼科(河北承德 067000)

  • 出版日期:2021-07-25 发布日期:2021-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 谭小波 E⁃mail:Tanxiaobo@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    河北省自然科学基金项目(编号:H2020406019);承德市自筹经费项目(编号:202006A037


Effect of inner limiting membrane peeling on refractory diabetic macular edema and visual function

SU Ruifeng,LI Xiaohong,LI Xinxiu,TAN Xiaobo.   

  1. Department of OphthalmologyAffiliated Hospital of Chengde Medi⁃ cal CollegeChengde 067000China
  • Online:2021-07-25 Published:2021-07-25
  • Contact: TAN Xiaobo E⁃mail:Tanxiaobo@163.com

摘要:

目的 观察玻璃体切割(PPV)联合或不联合内界膜剥除治疗顽固性糖尿病性黄斑水肿 DME)的疗效及对视功能的影响。方法 回顾性分析我院 2018 5 月至 2020 5 月确诊为顽固性 DME 并接受 PPV 联合或不联合内界膜剥除的患者 40 例,其中 PPV 联合内界膜剥除的患者 20 例作为联合组,不 联合内界膜剥除的患者 20 例作为对照组。比较两组患者术前,术后 1、3、6 个月最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄 斑中心视网膜厚度(CMT)、黄斑视网膜敏感度(RMS)、固视稳定性及并发症。结果 末次随访时,两组患者 BCVA 较术前提高(均 P < 0.05),联合组 BCVA 优于对照组(P < 0.05)。治疗后 1 个月两组 CMT 较同组治 疗前均下降(均 P < 0.05);1 个月、3 个月、6 个月时,联合组 CMT 较对照组薄(均 P < 0.05)。联合组患者患 眼术后 RMS 增加(P < 0.05);术后 6 个月,联合组的对侧眼 RMS 优于术眼(P < 0.05)。治疗后联合组术眼 固视稳定性提高,但与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论 治疗顽固性 DME 时采用 PPV 联合 内界膜剥除术,能更有效提高患者BCVA 及降低 CMT,一定程度上提高固视稳定性。

关键词: 内界膜剥除,  , 玻璃体切割术,  , 顽固性糖尿病性黄斑水肿,  , 微视野,  , 黄斑中心视网 , 膜厚度

Abstract:

Objective To observe the effect of pars plana vitrectomy(PPV)combined with or without in⁃ ner limiting membrane peeling in the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema(DME)and its effect on visual function. Method We conducted a retrospective analysis of 40 patients with refractory DME diagnosed in our hos⁃ pital from May 2018 to May 2020 who received PPV combined with or without inner limiting membrane peeling including 20 patients received PPV combined with inner limiting membrane peeling as the combination group,and 20 patients received PPV combined without inner limiting membrane peeling as the control group. The best correct⁃ ed visual acuity(BCVA),central macular thickness(CMT),retinal mean sensitivity(RMS),fixation stability and complications were compared between the two groups. Result In the last follow⁃up,BCVA of the two groups was significantly higher than that before operation(P < 0.05),and BCVA of the combination group was better than that of the control group(P < 0.05). The CMT of the combined group and the control group decreased 1 month after the operation(P < 0.05);at 1,3 and 6 month,the CMT in the combination group was thinner than that in the control group(P < 0.05). The RMS of the combined group increased after surgery(P < 0.05),and the RMS of the contralateral eye in the combination group was better than that in the surgical eye 6 month after operation(P < 0.05). After treatment,the fixation stability of the combined group was improved,but the difference was not statis⁃ tically significant(P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of refractory DME,PPV combined with inner limiting membrane peeling can effectively improve BCVA and reduce CMT and improve fixation stability to a certain extent.

Key words:

"> inner limiting membrane peeling, pars plana vitrectomy, refractory diabetic macular edema, microperimeter, central macular thickness