实用医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (23): 3222-3226.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2020.23.011

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

射血分数保留性心力衰竭合并终末期肾病不同透析方式下疗效对比

傅强, 付晓华, 李志樑, 刘云峰, 文俪桦, 严全能, 黄式义   

  1. 1南方医科大学深圳医院(广东深圳518101);2 南方医科大学珠江医院(广州510280)
  • 出版日期:2020-12-10 发布日期:2020-12-23
  • 通讯作者: 黄式义E⁃mail:1101264996@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(编号:81573732)

Comparison of therapeutic effects of ESRD with HFpEF under different dialysis methods

FU Qiang,FU Xiaohua,LI Zhiliang,LIU Yunfeng,WEN Lihua,YAN Quanneng,HUANG Shiyi#br#   

  1. Department of Cardiology,Shenzhen Hospital,Southern Medical University,Shenzhen 518101,China
  • Online:2020-12-10 Published:2020-12-23
  • Contact: HUANG Shiyi E⁃mail:1101264996@qq.com

摘要:

目的 回顾性观察射血分数保留性心力衰竭(heart failure with preserved ejection fraction,HF⁃pEF)合并终末期肾病(end stage renal disease,ESRD)患者血液透析与腹膜透析两种透析方式在随访终点时透析充分性、电解质、营养状态、心衰再住院次数、NYHA分级改善情况并进行对比。方法 收集2010年01月至2019年6月在南方医科大学珠江医院接受HD(n = 57)与PD(n = 60)患者的临床资料,排除透析时长<3 个月的患者,对两组进行比较。结果 两组在首次透析前年龄、性别、BMI、MAP、心率、血生化、NT⁃proBNP、NYHA分级、病史比较均无明显差异(P>0.05)。在随访终点时,HD组较CAPD组在NYHA分级、心衰再住院次数下降(P<0.05)。两组患者在随访终点时血清肌酐、尿素氮、尿酸水平均有明显下降(P<0.01),但HD 组血肌酐、尿素氮值比PD 组下降更加明显(P<0.01)。HD 组较PD 组在随访终点时血白蛋白、血钾水平上升(P<0.05)。两组平均动脉压、血脂等的变化无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 本研究中,随访终点时HD组在改善心功能分级、透析充分性、电解质紊乱、营养状态方面要优于PD组。

关键词: 心力衰竭, 射血分数保留心力衰竭, 终末期肾病, 血液透析, 腹膜透析

Abstract:

Objective Retrospective observation of hemodialysis(HD)and peritoneal dialysis(PD)inpatients ESRD with HFpEF compared in dialysis adequacy,electrolytes,nutritional status,the number of re⁃hospi⁃talization due to heart failure and the improvement of New York Heart Association grade at the end of follow⁃up.Methods Clinical data of patients treated with HD and PD in Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical Universityfrom January 2010 to June 2019 were collected. The patients with dialysis duration less than 3 months were excluded.The dialysis adequacy,electrolytes,nutritional status,times of re⁃hospitalization due to heart failure and the im⁃provement of New York Heart Association grade were compared between the two groups before the first dialysis andat the end point of follow⁃up. Results There was no significant difference in age,sex,BMI,MAP,heart rate,blood biochemistry and kidney function,NT⁃proBNP,New York Heart association grade and medication betweentwo groups(P > 0.05). At the end of follow⁃up,the NYHA grade and the number of rehospitalization due to heartfailure in the HD group were significantly lower than those in the CAPD group(P < 0.05). The levels of serumcreatinine,urea nitrogen and uric acid were decreased significantly in both groups(P<0.01),but the levels ofserum creatinine and urea nitrogen in HD group were much significantly lower than those in PD group(P < 0.01).The levels of serum albumin and serum potassium in HD group were significantly higher than those in PD group atthe end of follow⁃up. There was no significant difference in mean arterial pressure and blood lipid between the twogroups(P>0.05). Conclusion In this study group,We conclud that the improvement of cardiac function,dialysisadequacy,electrolyte disturbance and nutritional status in the HD group are superior to those in the PD group atthe end of follow⁃up

Key words: heart failure, ejection fraction preserved heart failure, end?stage renal disease, hemodi?alysis, peritoneal dialysis