实用医学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (16): 2641-2644.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.16.028

• 医学检查与临床诊断 • 上一篇    下一篇

趋化因子γ干扰素诱导蛋白-10和巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-3a在肝癌患者外周血中的表达及诊断价值

刘娜, 张长庚, 李伟, 孙巨勇   

  1. 衡水市人民医院检验科(河北衡水 053000)
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-22 出版日期:2019-08-27 发布日期:2019-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 张长庚 E-mail:13831839080@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    衡水市科技计划项目(编号:2017014013C-18)

Expression and clinical significance of chemokines IP-10 and MIP-3a in peripheral blood of patients with liver cancer

LIU Na, ZHANG Changgeng, LI Wei, SUN Juyong   

  1. Clinical Laboratory, Hengshui People′s Hospital, Hengshui 053000, China
  • Received:2019-01-22 Online:2019-08-27 Published:2019-08-27
  • Contact: ZHANG Changgeng E-mail: 13831839080@163.com

摘要: 目的 研究肝细胞肝癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)患者外周血中趋化因子γ干扰素诱导蛋白-10(interferon-inducible protein-10,IP-10)和巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-3a(macrophage inflammatory protein-3 alpha,MIP-3a)的表达水平,探讨其诊断价值。方法 应用液相芯片技术(Luminex)检测118例乙肝相关肝细胞癌患者(HCC组)、100例乙肝肝硬化患者(LC组)、100例慢性乙型肝炎患者(CHB组)及100例健康体检人员(健康对照组)血清中趋化因子IP-10和MIP-3a的水平,统计学分析各组间表达差异及其与临床病理特征的关系,受试者工作曲线分析两者对肝癌的诊断价值。结果 HCC组血清MIP-3a、IP-10水平显著高于LC组、CHB组及健康对照组(均P < 0.05)。HCC组患者血清IP-10、MIP-3a的表达水平在肿瘤TNM分期、肿瘤分化以及有无远处转移之间与差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05),而在性别、年龄、肿瘤大小及血清AFP水平之间差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。血清趋化因子IP-10、MIP-3a、IP-10与MIP-3a联合诊断及AFP的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.832、0.734、0.772、0.920,联合诊断的敏感性和特异性均高于任一单一指标。结论 HCC患者血清趋化因子IP-10和MIP-3a的表达升高,可能与HCC发生发展有关,联合检测血清趋化因子IP-10、MIP-3a有可能成为HCC新的诊断肿瘤标志物。

关键词: 肝细胞癌, γ干扰素诱导蛋白-10, 巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-3a, 诊断

Abstract: Objective To study the expression level of gamma interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) and macrophage inflammatory protein-3 alpha (MIP-3a) in peripheral blood of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Method liquid-phase chip technology (Luminex) were used to detect serum levels of chemokines IP-10 and MIP-3a in 118 patients with hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC group), 100 patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis (LC group), 100 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB group) and 100 healthy medical personnel (Healthy control group). The differences between the groups and their relationship with pathological features were analyzed statistically. Receiver operative characteristic curve (ROC) were used to analyze the diagnostic value of them for HCC. Results The levels of serum MIP-3a and IP-10 in HCC group were significantly higher than those in LC group, CHB group and healthy control group (P < 0.05). The expressions of serum IP-10 and MIP-3a in HCC group were correlated with tumor TNM stage, tumor differentiation and distant metastasis (P < 0.05), but not related to gender, age, tumor size and serum AFP level (P > 0.05). The diagnostics value of serum chemokines IP-10, MIP-3a, IP-10 combined with MIP-3a and AFP were 0.832, 0.734, 0.772, and 0.920, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the IP-10 combined with MIP-3a were higher than that of single indicator. Conclusion The expression of serum IP-10 and MIP-3a is elevated in HCC patients. The expression of them may be related to the development of HCC. Combined detection of serum IP-10 and MIP-3a may be a new diagnostic tumor marker for HCC.

Key words: hepatocellular carcinoma, γ-interferon-inducible protein-10, macrophage inflammatory protein-3a, diagnosis