实用医学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (16): 2555-2559.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.16.009

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

3D打印技术在腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术中的应用

刘文瑛1, 杨剑2, 朱剑华1, 谭勇1, 欧阳再兴1, 刘欣1, 朱玉珍1, 黄从云1   

  1. 1汕头大学附属粤北人民医院(广东韶关 512025);
    2南方医科大学珠江医院(广州 510280)
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-14 出版日期:2019-08-27 发布日期:2019-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 黄从云 E-mail: hcy804@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81601576); 韶关市卫生计生科研项目(编号:Y19020,Y16027); 韶关市科技计划项目(编号:2016CX006)

Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in laparoscopic splenic-preserving distal pancreatectomy

LIU Wenying*, YANG Jian, ZHU Jianhua, TAN Yong, OUYANG Zaixing, LIU Xin, ZHU Yuzhen, HUANG Congyun   

  1. *Yuebei People′s Hospital of Shantou University, Shaoguan 512025, China
  • Received:2019-04-14 Online:2019-08-27 Published:2019-08-27
  • Contact: HUANG Congyun E-mail: hcy804@qq.com

摘要: 目的 探讨3D打印技术在腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除手术中的临床应用价值。方法 回顾性分析粤北人民医院2014年10月至2018年12月50例腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术患者临床资料,其中3D打印技术指导手术组(3D组)22例,对照组28例。观察分析两组患者的手术方法、手术时间、术中出血量、术后腹腔引流量、术后住院时间、并发症等指标。结果 3D组19例、对照组22例患者成功施行腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除手术,3D组的手术成功率和Kimura法手术率高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);3D组的手术时间[(126.8 ± 24.1)min vs. (143.8 ± 26.9)min]、术中出血量[(107.3 ± 27.7)mL vs. (131.5 ± 31.8)]mL、术后腹腔引流量第1天[(28.4 ± 12.3)mL vs. (37.0 ± 13.9)mL]、第2天[(16.8 ± 6.7)mL vs. (21.8 ± 7.5)mL]均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);无手术相关并发症。术后住院时间[(6.8 ± 1.8)d vs. (7.6 ± 2.1)d],3D组低于对照组,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论 3D打印技术可提高腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术的成功率和安全性,手术更加精准和微创。

关键词: 3D打印, 精准胰腺外科, 腹腔镜

Abstract: Objective To study the practical value of three-dimensional printing technology in laparoscopic splenic-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Methods The clinical data of 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic splenic-preserving distal pancreatectomy in the guiding of three-dimensional printing technology between Oct, 2014 and Dec. 2018 in Yuebei People′s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Three-dimensional printing technology was applied in 22 patients (3D group), the other 28 patients were distributed in the control group. The clinical therapeutic Results including operation method, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospitalization and complications were observed and analyzed. Results Laparoscopic splenic-preserving distal pancreatectomy was successfully performed in 19 patients in 3D group and 22 patients in control group. The success rate of operation and Kimura method in 3D group were higher than those in the control group, but there was no statistical difference between these two groups (P > 0.05). The operation time in 3D group [(126.8 ± 24.1)min vs. (143.8 ± 26.9)min], intraoperative blood loss volume[(107.3 ± 27.7)mL vs. (131.5 ± 31.8)]mL, post-operative drainage volume in first day [(28.4±12.3)mL vs (37.0±13.9)mL] and in second day [(16.8 ± 6.7)mL vs. (21.8 ± 7.5)mL] were less than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The days of postoperative hospital stay in 3D group [(6.8 ± 1.8)d vs. (7.6 ± 2.1)d] was shorter than that in the control group, despite that there was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). In addition, both of these two groups didn′t have any operative complication. Conclusion The success rate and the operation security of laparoscopic splenic-preserving distal pancreatectomy were improved under the guiding of three-dimensional printing technology, which contributes to the surgery to become more precise and have minimal invasion.

Key words: three-dimensional printing, precise pancreatectomy, laparoscopy