The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 1352-1360.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.09.012
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles
Hongji CHEN1,Juan SONG1,Mohong DENG2()
Received:
2024-12-31
Online:
2025-05-10
Published:
2025-05-20
Contact:
Mohong DENG
E-mail:dengmohong@163.com
CLC Number:
Hongji CHEN,Juan SONG,Mohong DENG. Effects of lingual Tie⁃plasty combined with Twin⁃block orthodontic appliance for the treatment of patients with mandibular retraction during growth spurt[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(9): 1352-1360.
Tab.3
Comparison of tongue and hyoid position indicators between the two groups of patients"
指标 | 对照组 | 观察组 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 差值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 差值 | |
T-S | 61.85 ± 1.35 | 63.01 ± 0.97? | 1.17 ± 0.75 | 61.87 ± 1.19 | 63.64 ± 1.10? | 1.76 ± 0.47# |
E-T | 72.84 ± 3.22 | 72.40 ± 2.53 | -0.44 ± 1.30 | 72.63 ± 3.29 | 73.15 ± 3.63 | 0.52 ± 0.92 |
Tu-ET | 34.07 ± 2.16 | 34.97 ± 2.49 | 0.90 ± 0.68 | 34.23 ± 2.46 | 35.07 ± 2.56 | 0.84 ± 0.96 |
H-NP | 31.41 ± 4.04 | 36.33 ± 5.09? | 4.91 ± 3.02 | 31.24 ± 3.98 | 36.50 ± 3.69? | 5.26 ± 2.17 |
H-CVP | 22.35 ± 1.21 | 23.83 ± 1.67? | 1.48 ± 1.06 | 22.16 ± 1.11 | 24.08 ± 1.72? | 1.91 ± 0.68 |
H-Or | 31.54 ± 2.48 | 34.15 ± 2.63? | 2.61 ± 1.02 | 31.52 ± 2.61 | 35.31 ± 2.97? | 3.79 ± 0.96# |
H-PP | 41.63 ± 3.25 | 45.85 ± 3.85? | 4.22 ± 1.68 | 41.70 ± 3.09 | 47.41 ± 3.79? | 5.71 ± 1.39# |
H-MP | 7.23 ± 0.78 | 8.34 ± 0.64? | 1.11 ± 0.20 | 7.21 ± 0.53 | 8.55 ± 0.64? | 1.34 ± 0.27 |
H-FH | 60.47 ± 3.96 | 64.17 ± 3.86? | 3.70 ± 1.96 | 60.66 ± 4.44 | 65.97 ± 3.89? | 5.31 ± 1.23# |
H-PNS | 41.14 ± 2.85 | 46.90 ± 3.66? | 5.76 ± 3.84 | 41.26 ± 2.86 | 47.01 ± 3.88? | 5.75 ± 4.71 |
Tab.4
Comparison of upper airway indices between the two groups of patients"
指标 | 对照组 | 观察组 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | |
上气道总体积/mm3 | 10 863.01 ± 2 074.24 | 12 970.40 ± 2 189.35* | 2 107.41 ± 857.91 | 10 909.80 ± 2 044.71 | 13 950.90 ± 2 404.66* | 3 041.10 ± 879.01# |
腭咽体积/mm3 | 6 062.08 ± 1 645.97 | 7 425.33 ± 1 057.18* | 1 363.25 ± 840.23 | 6 093.42 ± 1 186.29 | 8 097.42 ± 1 316.65* | 2 004.00 ± 464.55# |
舌咽体积/mm3 | 5 051.10 ± 914.01 | 5 835.40 ± 672.24* | 784.30 ± 435.17 | 5 106.71 ± 686.32 | 6 422.10 ± 897.50* | 1 315.39 ± 667.12# |
IP-CP/mm | 6.28 ± 0.42 | 4.60 ± 0.25* | -1.68 ± 0.20 | 6.30 ± 0.59 | 4.34 ± 0.50* | -1.96 ± 0.51 |
IP-RP/mm | 34.30 ± 0.90 | 29.38 ± 1.81* | -4.91 ± 1.43 | 34.18 ± 0.95 | 30.06 ± 1.43* | -4.11 ± 1.53 |
CL-CR/mm | 21.21 ± 1.28 | 23.17 ± 1.46* | 1.96 ± 1.88 | 20.18 ± 1.93 | 23.63 ± 1.76* | 3.45 ± 1.22# |
ML-MR/mm | 32.06 ± 1.34 | 35.60 ± 1.55* | 3.53 ± 0.44 | 32.53 ± 2.06 | 36.70 ± 1.62* | 4.17±0.75# |
Tab.5
Comparison of maxillary and mandibular indexes between the two groups of patients"
指标 | 对照组 | 观察组 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 差值 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 差值 | |
ANB/° | 7.00 ± 0.66 | 3.79 ± 0.58? | -3.21 ± 0.43 | 7.07 ± 0.64 | 3.22 ± 0.60? | -3.85 ± 0.51# |
SNB/° | 74.13 ± 1.32 | 78.03 ± 1.15? | 3.90 ± 1.00 | 74.12 ± 1.50 | 78.37 ± 1.21? | 4.25 ± 1.07 |
SNA/° | 80.00 ± 1.64 | 79.67 ± 1.49 | -0.33 ± 0.80 | 80.76 ± 1.73 | 80.33 ± 1.88 | -0.42 ± 0.91 |
GoGn-SN/° | 32.62 ± 1.75 | 35.14 ± 1.06? | 2.52 ± 2.01 | 32.48 ± 1.81 | 35.81 ± 1.03? | 3.33 ± 2.08 |
ANS-PNS/mm | 40.09 ± 1.58 | 40.57 ± 1.50 | 0.48 ± 2.34 | 39.90 ± 1.45 | 40.00 ± 1.38 | 0.10 ± 2.02 |
Go-Gn/mm | 63.90 ± 2.13 | 66.51 ± 2.26? | 2.61 ± 0.56 | 63.88 ± 1.92 | 67.94 ± 2.05? | 3.06 ± 0.84# |
Co-Gn/mm | 101.95 ± 2.42 | 107.19 ± 2.56? | 5.23 ± 3.43 | 102.52 ± 2.85 | 108.57 ± 3.64? | 6.05 ± 1.69 |
Co-Go/mm | 50.14 ± 1.96 | 53.24 ± 1.73? | 3.10 ± 0.97 | 49.52 ± 1.86 | 53.00 ± 1.82? | 3.47 ± 0.54 |
Ar-Go/mm | 37.11 ± 2.50 | 39.58 ± 2.63? | 2.47 ± 0.89 | 37.08 ± 2.69 | 41.34 ± 2.00? | 4.26 ± 1.01# |
U1-SN/° | 104.90 ± 5.86 | 101.05 ± 4.78? | -3.85 ± 2.64 | 104.37 ± 5.34 | 99.10 ± 3.27? | -5.27 ± 3.10 |
U1-NA/° | 25.91 ± 5.37 | 23.09 ± 3.12? | -2.82 ± 2.11 | 25.99 ± 5.42 | 22.56 ± 4.09? | -3.43 ± 2.28 |
U1-NA/mm | 6.00 ± 2.04 | 4.45 ± 1.97? | -1.55 ± 1.00 | 6.08 ± 2.13 | 4.40 ± 1.46? | -1.68 ± 0.88 |
L1-NB/° | 25.42 ± 3.60 | 28.15 ± 3.29? | 2.73 ± 1.23 | 25.40 ± 3.39 | 28.90 ± 3.52? | 3.50 ± 1.07# |
L1-NB/mm | 5.30 ± 0.97 | 6.34 ± 1.02? | 1.04 ± 0.67 | 5.33 ± 1.24 | 6.86 ± 1.30? | 1.53 ± 0.51# |
L1-MP/° | 97.65 ± 2.21 | 99.11 ± 2.18? | 1.46 ± 1.03 | 97.70 ± 2.99 | 99.54 ± 2.68? | 1.84 ± 1.21 |
L1-MP/mm | 37.19 ± 1.13 | 37.91 ± 1.14? | 0.72 ± 0.48 | 37.21 ± 1.42 | 38.02 ± 0.95? | 0.81 ± 0.39 |
SL/mm | 40.68 ± 3.31 | 43.20 ± 2.89? | 2.52 ± 1.07 | 40.64 ± 3.17 | 44.47 ± 2.17? | 3.83 ± 1.01# |
SE/mm | 19.01 ± 0.80 | 19.50 ± 0.64? | 0.49 ± 0.11 | 19.00 ± 1.31 | 19.82 ± 1.22? | 0.82 ± 0.37# |
FCA/° | 15.83 ± 2.11 | 9.72 ± 1.50? | -6.11 ± 1.42 | 15.81 ± 2.28 | 9.31 ± 1.44? | -6.50 ± 1.33 |
Z/° | 60.36 ± 4.24 | 64.38 ± 3.94? | 4.02 ± 2.25 | 60.60 ± 4.51 | 65.13 ± 4.00? | 4.53 ± 2.56 |
UI-PP/mm | 26.52 ± 1.84 | 27.63 ± 1.04? | 1.11 ± 0.66 | 26.55 ± 1.69 | 27.70 ± 1.13? | 1.15 ± 0.70 |
U6-PP/mm | 19.30 ± 0.80 | 19.59 ± 0.77 | 0.29 ± 0.15 | 19.24 ± 0.76 | 19.61 ± 0.78 | 0.37 ± 0.19 |
L6-MP/mm | 29.14 ± 1.19 | 30.08 ± 1.48? | 0.94 ± 0.30 | 29.17 ± 1.18 | 30.47 ± 1.80? | 1.30 ± 0.53# |
Tab.6
Comparison of temporomandibular joint indexes in two groups of patients"
指标 | 对照组 | 观察组 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | |
颞下颌关节窝面积/mm2 | 96.35 ± 8.11 | 98.40 ± 7.96 | 2.05 ± 0.98 | 95.97 ± 8.64 | 98.42 ± 8.00 | 2.45 ± 1.01 |
关节窝矢状总间隙面积/mm2 | 57.78 ± 6.92 | 58.17 ± 6.53 | 0.39 ± 0.15 | 57.69 ± 7.00 | 58.06 ± 6.87 | 0.37 ± 0.10 |
关节前间隙/mm | 2.79 ± 0.55 | 2.56 ± 0.64 | -0.23 ± 0.71 | 2.77 ± 0.59 | 2.54 ± 0.60 | -0.23 ± 0.62 |
关节上间隙/mm | 2.90 ± 0.51 | 2.71 ± 0.48 | -0.19 ± 0.44 | 2.93 ± 0.54 | 2.72 ± 0.52 | -0.21 ± 0.40 |
关节后间隙/mm | 3.12 ± 0.49 | 3.65 ± 0.60 | 0.53 ± 0.32 | 3.17 ± 0.49 | 3.66 ± 0.57 | 0.49 ± 0.28 |
关节窝深度/mm | 10.39 ± 1.33 | 10.53 ± 1.31 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 10.41 ± 1.07 | 10.54 ± 1.08 | 0.14 ± 0.05 |
关节窝宽度/mm | 19.39 ± 0.72 | 20.06 ± 0.68? | 0.67 ± 0.10 | 19.40 ± 0.79 | 20.10 ± 0.60? | 0.70 ± 0.45 |
关节结节倾斜角/° | 53.90 ± 3.93 | 45.30 ± 3.95? | -8.60 ± 6.75 | 53.60 ± 4.25 | 45.70 ± 3.40? | -7.90 ± 3.96 |
髁突顶部矢状面面积/mm2 | 41.80 ± 8.79 | 50.14 ± 8.37? | 8.34 ± 3.44 | 41.21 ± 8.07 | 50.53 ± 7.38? | 9.32 ± 4.51 |
髁状突高度/mm | 5.27 ± 0.34 | 5.93 ± 0.27? | 0.66 ± 0.39 | 5.25 ± 0.40 | 6.14 ± 0.25? | 0.89 ± 0.33 |
髁状突宽度/mm | 7.54 ± 0.37 | 7.74 ± 0.38 | 0.20 ± 0.09 | 7.56 ± 0.40 | 7.81 ± 0.41 | 0.24 ± 0.05 |
髁突最大轴面面积/mm2 | 114.76 ± 13.38 | 108.07 ± 15.88 | -6.69 ± 3.66 | 115.83 ± 16.98 | 109.79 ± 19.09 | -6.04 ± 4.66 |
髁突前后径/mm | 8.61 ± 0.50 | 8.67 ± 0.42 | 0.06 ± 0.16 | 8.60 ± 0.47 | 8.64 ± 0.49 | 0.04 ± 0.11 |
髁突内外径/mm | 16.96 ± 1.51 | 16.71 ± 1.68 | -0.24 ± 0.61 | 16.97 ± 1.81 | 16.71 ± 1.52 | -0.26 ± 0.79 |
关节内间隙/mm | 2.13 ± 0.20 | 2.16 ± 0.18 | 0.03 ± 0.06 | 2.12 ± 0.21 | 2.15 ± 0.22 | 0.03 ± 0.06 |
关节中间隙/mm | 2.47 ± 0.28 | 2.70 ± 0.25 | 0.23 ± 0.38 | 2.48 ± 0.38 | 2.76 ± 0.39 | 0.28 ± 0.65 |
关节外间隙/mm | 2.27 ± 0.23 | 2.51 ± 0.29 | 0.24 ± 0.15 | 2.26 ± 0.24 | 2.50 ± 0.33 | 0.24 ± 0.11 |
髁突顶部冠状面面积/mm2 | 70.92 ± 16.14 | 88.41 ± 10.72? | 17.49 ± 10.87 | 70.03 ± 11.16 | 89.96 ± 13.93? | 19.93 ± 3.51 |
1 | HUO B, CHE X, LI X. Timing of early correction of mandibular hypoplasia in skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion: A review[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2023, 47(6):11-20. |
2 |
FADEL R, NICOT R, SCHLUND M, et al. Simultaneous mandibular anterior segmental osteotomy and genioplasty: A novel technique[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2023, 34(3):1064-1066. doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000009049
doi: 10.1097/scs.0000000000009049 |
3 |
KONG L, LIU X Q. Efficacy of invisible advancement correction for mandibular retraction in adolescents based on Pancherz analysis[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2023, 11(6):1299-1309. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v11.i6.1299
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i6.1299 |
4 | 樊文君, 杜娟, 王颖, 等. Twin-block矫治器与无托槽隐形矫治器对下颌后缩患者舌骨位置及上气道矢状径的影响比较[J]. 中国美容医学, 2023, 32(5):167-170. |
5 |
杨彤彤, 王之瑜, 刘莉萍. AngleⅡ类1分类下颌后缩患者舌体腭部形态及位置相关性研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(20):3516-3518. doi:10.11655/zgywylc2019.20.020
doi: 10.11655/zgywylc2019.20.020 |
6 |
王世雄, 闫卉. 成人矢状骨面型与舌系带长度间相关性的初步分析[J]. 继续医学教育, 2020, 34(12):90-91. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2020.12.046
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2020.12.046 |
7 |
JOHNSON J S, SATYAPRASAD S, SHARATH CHANDRA H, et al. A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using Twin Block appliance and myobrace system on class Ⅱ division Ⅰ malocclusion[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2021, 14():S10-S17. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2013
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2013 |
8 | KHAN M I, NEELA P K, Unnisa N, et al. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block appliance in patients with Class Ⅱ malocclusion[J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2022, 95(2):191-196. |
9 |
CAMPBELL C, MILLETT D, KELLY N, et al. Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Angle Orthod, 2020, 90(2):202-208. doi:10.2319/042419-290.1
doi: 10.2319/042419-290.1 |
10 | 胡静, 沈国芳, 刘彦普, 等. 牙颌面畸形诊断与治疗指南[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2011, 9(5):415-419. |
11 | 王超然, 李洪发, 李志勤, 等. Forsus矫治器矫治下颌后缩患者牙颌及颞下颌关节变化的CBCT分析[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2016, 22(3):5. |
12 |
AMIR L H, JAMES J P, DONATH S M. Reliability of the hazelbaker assessment tool for lingual frenulum function[J]. Int Breastfeed J, 2006, 1(1):3. doi:10.1186/1746-4358-1-3
doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-1-3 |
13 |
刘立访. Nd:YAG激光联合Er:YAG激光行舌系带过短矫正术218例的临床分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2020, 36(21):2966-2970. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2020.21.016
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2020.21.016 |
14 | SEPET E, YILDIZ C, ERDEM A P, et al. Relationship between mandibular incisor irregularity and type of occlusion in ankyloglossia[J]. Oral Health Prev Dent, 2015, 13(1):59-63. |
15 | 傅民魁. 口腔正畸专科教程[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2007. |
16 |
张明欣, 马艳宁, 金作林. 隐形功能矫治在青少年骨性Ⅱ类下颌后缩患者治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志电子版, 2024, 18(1):61-64. doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2024.01.010
doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2024.01.010 |
17 |
MOSS M L. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1997, 112(1):8-11. doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70267-1
doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70267-1 |
18 |
ZHAO W, CHEN Y, KYUNG H M, et al. Effectiveness of tongue crib combination treating severe skeletal angle class Ⅲmalocclusion in mixed dentition[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2020, 13(6):668-676. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1855
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1855 |
19 |
ASSAF D D C, KNORST J K, BUSANELLO-STELLA A R, et al. Association between malocclusion, tongue position and speech distortion in mixed-dentition schoolchildren: An epidemiological study[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2021, 29:e20201005. doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2020-1005
doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-1005 |
20 |
WALLS A, PIERCE M, WANG H, et al. Parental perception of speech and tongue mobility in three-year olds after neonatal frenotomy[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 78(1):128-131. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.11.006
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.11.006 |
21 |
HAUG A C, MARKESTAD T, TJORA E, et al. Tongue-tie in neonates[J]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 2021,141. doi:10.4045/tidsskr.21.0515
doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.21.0515 |
22 | CUESTAS G, DEMARCHI V, MARTÍNEZ CORVALÁN M P, et al. Surgical treatment of short lingual frenulum in children[J]. Arch Argent Pediatr, 2014, 112(6):567-570. |
23 |
DUAN J, LI X., ZHANG F, et al. Palatal morphology after treatment of children with obstructive sleep apnoea using the modified Twin-Block appliance[J]. Int Dent J, 2024, S0020-6539(24)00094-7. doi:10.1016/j.identj.2024.03.007
doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.03.007 |
24 |
CHOI Y, KIM Y I, KIM S S, et al. Immediate effects of mandibular posterior displacement on the pharyngeal airway space: A preliminary study[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2020, 50(2):129-135. doi:10.4041/kjod.2020.50.2.129
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.2.129 |
25 |
RAPAPORT B H J, BROWN J S. Systematic review of lingual nerve retraction during surgical mandibular third molar extractions[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 58(7):748-752. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.02.022
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.02.022 |
26 |
GUILLEMINAULT C, HUSENI S, LO L. A frequent phenotype for paediatric sleep apnoea: short lingual frenulum[J]. ERJ Open Res, 2016, 2(3):00043-2016. doi:10.1183/23120541.00043-2016
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00043-2016 |
27 |
CORREA E J, O'CONNOR-REINA C, RODRÍGUEZ-ALCALÁ L, et al. Does frenotomy modify upper airway collapse in OSA adult patients?Case report and systematic review[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 12(1):201. doi:10.3390/jcm12010201
doi: 10.3390/jcm12010201 |
28 |
TAHMASBI S, SEIFI M, SOLEYMANI A A, et al. Comparative study of changes in the airway dimensions following the treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusion patients with the twin-block and Seifi appliances[J]. Dent Med Probl, 2023, 60(2):247-254. doi:10.17219/dmp/142292
doi: 10.17219/dmp/142292 |
29 |
王威, 莫仕诚, 王林. Twin-block矫治下颌后缩患者前、后的气道变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(6):607-611. doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.06.009
doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2018.06.009 |
30 |
SINGARVEL CHILDAMBARANATHAN A, MADAN V, BALASUBRAMANIUM M. Tongue training technique for guiding the mandible in establishing horizontal jaw relation in edentulous patients[J]. Gerodontology, 2023, 40(4):526-528. doi:10.1111/ger.12682
doi: 10.1111/ger.12682 |
31 |
ZHANG Y, ZHENG J, WU Q, et al. Three-dimensional spatial analysis of temporomandibular joint in adolescent Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion patients: Comparison of Twin-Block and clear functional aligner[J]. Head Face Med, 2024, 20(1):4. doi:10.1186/s13005-023-00404-y
doi: 10.1186/s13005-023-00404-y |
32 | 刘洋, 冯泽伟, 葛晓磊, 等. Forsus矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类下颌后缩患者颞下颌关节变化的CBCT分析[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2023, 37(3):150-154. |
[1] | LIU Li⁃ fang. Clinical analysis of 218 cases of ankylotomy managed with Nd:YAG laser and Er:YAG laser [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2020, 36(21): 2966-2970. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||