慢性病防治专栏

超声衰减分析技术定量评估代谢相关脂肪性肝病脂肪变性的价值

  • 赵碧晴 ,
  • 朱宇莉 ,
  • 刘海荣 ,
  • 殷培培 ,
  • 刘菲菲 ,
  • 刘灿 ,
  • 王坤
展开
  • 1.滨州医学院附属医院超声医学科 (山东 滨州 256603 )
    2.复旦大学附属中山医院超声科 (上海 200032 )
    3.滨州医学院烟台附属医院超声医学科 (山东 烟台 264100 )

收稿日期: 2025-11-06

  修回日期: 2025-12-31

  录用日期: 2026-01-04

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-26

基金资助

国家卫生健康委能力建设和继续教育中心专项研究课题(GWJJZX20251001087);上海市卫健委卫生行业临床研究专项面上项目(202340087)

Quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease using ultrasound attenuation analysis

  • Biqing ZHAO ,
  • Yuli ZHU ,
  • Hairong LIU ,
  • Peipei YIN ,
  • Feifei LIU ,
  • Can LIU ,
  • Kun WANG
Expand
  • 1.Department of Ultrasound Medicine,Binzhou Medical University Hospital,Binzhou 256603,Shandong,China
    2.Department of Ultrasound,Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital,Shanghai 200032,Shanghai,China
    3.Department of Ultrasound Medicine,Binzhou Medical University Yantai Affiliated Hospital,Yantai 264100,Shandong,China

Received date: 2025-11-06

  Revised date: 2025-12-31

  Accepted date: 2026-01-04

  Online published: 2026-03-26

摘要

目的 以CT肝脾衰减比值(CTL/S)为参考标准,评估超声衰减分析(ultrasound attenuation analysis, USAT)技术在代谢相关脂肪性肝病(metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, MASLD)肝脂肪变性定量分析中的诊断效能。 方法 前瞻性纳入拟诊MASLD患者及健康成年人。所有受试者于同日完成USAT成像及CT检查。通过Bland-Altman检验、组内相关系数(interclass correlation coefficient,ICC)评估USAT稳定性。Spearman分析USAT值与肝脂肪变性分级的相关性。通过线性回归分析确定USAT值的影响因素。采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评估USAT在肝脂肪变性定量分析中的诊断效能,并与临床预测模型对比(DeLong检验)。 结果 共纳入268例受试者,基于CTL/S分级肝脂肪变性程度分布如下:正常肝脏组64例,MASLD组204例(轻度脂肪肝:78例,中度脂肪肝:69例,重度脂肪肝:57例)。Bland-Altman检验及ICC分析显示USAT测值一致性优异。USAT值与CTL/S相关性良好(r = -0.850,95%CI:-0.880 ~ -0.813),且与肝脂肪变性分级存在强相关性(r = 0.846,95%CI:0.807 ~ 0.878),均P < 0.001。随着肝内脂肪含量增加,USAT值递增,USAT在无、轻、中、重度脂肪肝的中位数分别为0.55、0.67、0.77、0.86 dB/(cm·MHz),组间差异有统计学意义,均P < 0.001。经简单线性回归、多元线性回归分析,肝脂肪变性分级为USAT值的决定性因素。USAT检测轻、中、重度肝脂肪变性分级的截断值分别为0.61、0.71、0.82 dB/(cm·MHz),对应的ROC曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)分别为0.90、0.88、0.87,显著高于临床预测模型(DeLong检验P < 0.01)。 结论 USAT为一种可定性观察、定量分析MASLD患者肝脂肪变性程度的无创、便捷新技术,未来或将广泛应用于肝内脂肪定量的筛查。

本文引用格式

赵碧晴 , 朱宇莉 , 刘海荣 , 殷培培 , 刘菲菲 , 刘灿 , 王坤 . 超声衰减分析技术定量评估代谢相关脂肪性肝病脂肪变性的价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(6) : 1008 -1017 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.06.013

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound attenuation analysis (USAT) for quantifying hepatic steatosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), the CT liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio (CTL/S) was used as the reference standard. Methods In this prospective study, we consecutively enrolled adult participants who were clinically suspected of having MASLD and healthy control volunteers. All participants underwent both USAT imaging and non-contrast CT during the same visit. The repeatability of USAT measurements was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The association between USAT values and the grade of hepatic steatosis was analyzed by means of Spearman′s rank correlation. Factors influencing USAT values were explored through linear regression analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of USAT was determined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with a clinical prediction model using the DeLong test. Results Among the 268 enrolled participants, CTL/S grading identified 64 individuals with normal liver and 204 with MASLD, which included 78 cases of mild, 69 cases of moderate, and 57 cases of severe steatosis. Bland-Altman analysis and ICC assessment demonstrated excellent agreement for USAT measurements. USAT values were strongly inversely correlated with CTL/S (r = -0.850, 95%CI: -0.880 - -0.813) and strongly positively correlated with steatosis grade (r = 0.846, 95%CI: 0.807 - 0.878; both P < 0.001). The median USAT value increased progressively as the severity of steatosis increased: 0.55 dB/cm/MHz (normal liver), 0.67 dB/cm/MHz (mild steatosis), 0.77 dB/cm/MHz (moderate steatosis), and 0.86 dB/cm/MHz (severe steatosis), with significant inter-group differences (all P < 0.001). Based on simple and multiple linear regression analyses, fatty liver grading was found to be the determining factor for USAT. The optimal USAT cut-off values for detecting mild, moderate, and severe steatosis were 0.61, 0.71, and 0.82 dB/cm/MHz, respectively, yielding areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.90, 0.88, and 0.87, which were significantly superior to those of the clinical prediction model (DeLong test, all P < 0.01). Conclusions USAT, a non-invasive, practical, and novel technique, offers both qualitative and quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis in MASLD. It has significant potential for broad adoption in screening and quantifying hepatic fat content.

参考文献

[1] ESLAM M, SANYAL A J, GEORGE J. MAFLD: A consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease[J]. Gastroenterology, 2020, 158(7): 1999-2014.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.312 .
[2] ESLAM M, FAN J G, YU M L, et al. The Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease[J]. Hepatol Int, 2025, 19(2): 261-301. doi:10.1007/s12072-024-10774-3 .
[3] SUGIMOTO K, MORIYASU F, OSHIRO H, et al. The role of multiparametric US of the liver for the evaluation of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis[J]. Radiology, 2020, 296(3): 532-540. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020192665 .
[4] DRO?D? K, NABRDALIK K, HAJZLER W, et al. Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), diabetes, and cardiovascular disease: Associations with fructose metabolism and gut microbiota[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 14(1): 103. doi:10.3390/nu14010103 .
[5] 郭智萍. 脂肪肝的定量影像学评价[J]. 中华健康管理学杂志, 2020, 14(6): 583-586. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115624-20200507-00348 .
[6] JUNG J, HAN A, MADAMBA E, et al. Direct comparison of quantitative US versus controlled attenuation parameter for liver fat assessment using MRI proton density fat fraction as the reference standard in patients suspected of having NAFLD[J]. Radiology, 2022, 304(1): 75-82. doi:10.1148/radiol.211131 .
[7] WANG M, TANG S, LI G, et al. Comparative study of ultrasound attenuation analysis and controlled attenuation parameter in the diagnosis and grading of liver steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2024, 24(1): 81. doi:10.1186/s12876-024-03160-8 .
[8] 中华医学会肝病学分会脂肪肝和酒精性肝病学组. 中国非酒精性脂肪性肝病诊疗指南(2010年修订版)[J/OL]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2012, 4(7): 4-10. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1674-7372.2012.07.002 .
[9] LEE J H, KIM D, KIM H J, et al. Hepatic steatosis index: A simple screening tool reflecting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2010, 42(7): 503-508. doi:10.1016/j.dld. 2009.08.002 .
[10] LONG M T, PEDLEY A, COLANTONIO L D, et al. Development and validation of the Framingham steatosis index to identify persons with hepatic steatosis[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 14(8): 1172-1180.e2. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.034 .
[11] WANG J, XU C, XUN Y, et al. ZJU index: A novel model for predicting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Chinese population[J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 16494. doi:10.1038/srep16494 .
[12] MAK L Y, HUI R W, FUNG J, et al. Diverse effects of hepatic steatosis on fibrosis progression and functional cure in virologically quiescent chronic hepatitis B[J]. J Hepatol, 2020, 73(4): 800-806. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.040 .
[13] 赵冉, 沙卫红. 代谢相关脂肪性肝病的概念变更及其对临床实践的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(19): 2390-2394. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.19.003 .
[14] HERNAEZ R, LAZO M, BONEKAMP S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: A meta-analysis[J]. Hepatology, 2011, 54(3): 1082-1090. doi:10.1002/hep.24452 .
[15] DULAI P S, SIRLIN C B, LOOMBA R. MRI and MRE for non-invasive quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD and NASH: Clinical trials to clinical practice[J]. J Hepatol, 2016, 65(5): 1006-1016. doi:10.1016/j.jhep. 2016. 06.005 .
[16] KINNER S, REEDER S B, YOKOO T. Quantitative imaging biomarkers of NAFLD[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2016, 61(5): 1337-1347. doi:10.1007/s10620-016-4037-1 .
[17] STAREKOVA J, HERNANDO D, PICKHARDT P J, et al. Quantification of liver fat content with CT and MRI: State of the art[J]. Radiology, 2021, 301(2): 250-262. doi:10.1148/radiol.2021204288 .
[18] WONG V W, CHAN W K, CHITTURI S, et al. Asia-Pacific Working Party on non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease guidelines 2017-Part 1: Definition, risk factors and assessment[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 33(1): 70-85. doi:10.1111/jgh.13857 .
[19] JIANG M, ZHANG X, WU X, et al. The diagnostic value of novel ultrasound attenuation analysis in detecting liver steatosis identified by the controlled attenuation parameter: A diagnostic accuracy study[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2023, 11(2): 38. doi:10.21037/atm-22-5821 .
[20] 马雪颖, 马向明. 非酒精性脂肪肝患者肝脏纤维化血清学测评方法的研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025, 41(15): 2290-2303. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.15.002 .
[21] 汪许红, 张盛敏, 杨敏, 等. 新型定量超声技术在非酒精性脂肪肝患者肝脏脂肪变性定量中的应用[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2021, 37(11): 1253-1257. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101. 2021.11.016 .
[22] MOTAMED N, NIKKHAH M, KARBALAIE NIYA M H, et al. The ability of the Framingham steatosis index (FSI) to predict non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A cohort study[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2021, 45(6): 101567. doi:10.1016/j.clinre.2020.10.011 .
[23] CHANG J W, LEE H W, KIM B K, et al. Hepatic steatosis index in the detection of fatty liver in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving antiviral therapy[J]. Gut Liver, 2021, 15(1): 117-127. doi:10.5009/gnl19301 .
[24] CHO Y K, KIM M, KIM Y J, et al. Predictive value of the Framingham steatosis index for cardiovascular risk: A nationwide population-based cohort study[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2023, 10: 1163052. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1163052 .
[25] WU C, LOH Y H, HUANG H, et al. ZJU index as a predictive tool for diabetes incidence: Insights from a population-based cohort study[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2024, 17: 715-724. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S446042 .
文章导航

/