基于左心声学造影及三维超声全自动定量技术参数预测冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后心血管不良事件的价值
收稿日期: 2025-10-11
网络出版日期: 2026-01-14
基金资助
湖南省卫生健康委科研计划项目(D202309026583);长沙市自然科学基金项目(kq2403198)
Value of left ventricular contrast echocardiography and three-dimensional echocardiography heart model parameters on predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention
Received date: 2025-10-11
Online published: 2026-01-14
目的 基于左心声学造影及三维超声全自动定量技术(3D-HM)参数预测冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)术后心血管不良事件(MACE)的价值。 方法 选取2023年6月至2024年12月于长沙市第一医院心内科行冠脉造影确诊及PCI治疗的197例冠心病患者,另择同期健康志愿者104例,对比两组一般资料及入院时的3D-HM参数[左心室舒张末容积(LVEDV)、左心室收缩末容积(LVESV)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)]、心肌声学造影(MCE)参数[平台峰值强度(A)、曲线斜率(β)、心肌血流量(A×β)、灌注计分指数(PSI)];PCI术后随访6个月,统计冠心病患者PCI术后MACE发生情况并分为发生MACE组(26例)和未发生MACE组(171例),比较两组患者一般资料及PCI术前、术后1周、术后3个月、术后6个月的3D-HM参数、MCE参数,冠心病患者PCI术后MACE发生的危险因素及左心声学造影、3D-HM参数对冠心病患者PCI术后发生MACE的预测价值,分别采用多因素logistic回归分析和绘制受试者工作曲线(ROC)进行评价。 结果 与健康志愿者比较,冠心病患者的LVEDV、LVESV、PSI均更高,LVEF、A、β、A×β均更低(P < 0.05);与未发生MACE组比较,发生MACE组存活心肌节段< 4个的患者例数占比更高(P < 0.05);较同组术前,两组冠心病患者术后1周、术后3个月、术后6个月的LVEDV、LVESV、PSI均逐渐降低,且术后6个月为最低,LVEF、A、β、A×β均逐渐升高且术后6个月为最高(P < 0.05),较未发生MACE组,发生MACE组患者术后1周、术后3个月、术后6个月的LVEDV、LVESV、PSI均更高,LVEF、A、β、A×β均更低(P < 0.05);多因素分析结果显示:术后1周的高水平PSI(OR = 2.351)是冠心病患者PCI术后发生MACE的危险因素,而术后1周的高水平LVEF(OR = 0.381)、A(OR = 0.500)、β(OR = 0.521)、A×β(OR = 0.538)是保护因素(P < 0.05);ROC分析结果显示:术后1周LVEF、A、β、A×β、PSI联合预测冠心病患者PCI术后发生MACE的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.891,均大于LVEF、A、β、A×β、PSI单一诊断,AUC分别为0.647、0.697、0.676、0.681、0.709(P < 0.05)。 结论 左心声学造影及3D-HM参数(LVEF、A、β、A×β、PSI)与冠心病患者PCI术后MACE的发生密切相关,左心声学造影及3D-HM参数联合对该类患者临床预后具有较高的预测效能。
骆周展 , 胡庆玲 , 王巧凤 , 雷国龙 , 唐梦瑶 , 彭超 , 唐英英 . 基于左心声学造影及三维超声全自动定量技术参数预测冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后心血管不良事件的价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(1) : 110 -118 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.01.014
Objective To explore the value of left ventricular contrast echocardiography and three-dimensional echocardiography Heart Model (3D-HM) parameters in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods A total of 197 patients with coronary heart disease, diagnosed by coronary angiography and treated with PCI in the Department of Cardiology of the First Hospital of Changsha from June 2023 to December 2024, were selected. Meanwhile, 104 healthy volunteers during the same period were also recruited. The general data, 3D-HM parameters [left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)], and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) parameters [platform peak intensity (A), curve slope (β), myocardial blood flow (A × β), perfusion score index (PSI)] at the time of admission were compared between the two groups. All patients were followed up for 6 months after PCI. The occurrence of MACE after PCI in patients with coronary heart disease was recorded. Subsequently, the patients were divided into the MACE group (26 cases) and the non-MACE group (171 cases). The general data, 3D-HM parameters, and MCE parameters before PCI and at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after PCI were compared between the two groups of patients. The risk factors for the occurrence of MACE after PCI in patients with coronary heart disease and the predictive value of left ventricular contrast echocardiography and 3D-HM parameters for MACE after PCI in patients with coronary heart disease were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), respectively. Results Compared with healthy volunteers, the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and pressure-strain index (PSI) of patients with coronary heart disease were higher, whereas the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), A, β, and A × β were lower (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with fewer than 4 viable myocardial segments in the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) group was higher than that in the non-MACE group (P < 0.05). When compared with the same group before surgery, in the two groups of patients with coronary heart disease, the LVEDV, LVESV, and PSI at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery gradually decreased, reaching the lowest levels at 6 months after surgery. Meanwhile, the LVEF, A, β, and A × β gradually increased, reaching the highest levels at 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05). Compared with the non-MACE group, the LVEDV, LVESV, and PSI of patients in the MACE group were higher at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, while the LVEF, A, β, and A × β were lower (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that a high level of PSI at 1 week after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (OR = 2.351) was a risk factor for MACE in patients with coronary heart disease after PCI. In contrast, high levels of LVEF (OR = 0.381), A (OR = 0.500), β (OR = 0.521), and A × β (OR = 0.538) at 1 week after PCI were protective factors (P < 0.05). The results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) of the combination of LVEF, A, β, A × β, and PSI in predicting MACE in patients with coronary heart disease after PCI was 0.891, which was greater than that of LVEF (0.647), A (0.697), β (0.676), A × β (0.681), or PSI (0.709) (P < 0.05). Conclusions Left ventricular contrast echocardiography and 3D-HM parameters (LVEF, A, β, A × β, PSI) are strongly associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary heart disease. The combination of left ventricular contrast echocardiography and 3D-HM parameters exhibits high predictive efficiency for the clinical prognosis of these patients.
| [1] | DUGGAN J P, PETERS A S, TRACHIOTIS G D, et al. Epidemiology of coronary artery disease[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2022, 102(3): 499-516. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.01.007 . |
| [2] | 刘庆爽, 杨志强, 贾崇富, 等. 负荷动态CT心肌灌注成像对疑似冠心病患者的预后价值[J]. 放射学实践, 2025, 40(3): 356-361. doi: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2025.03.011 . |
| [3] | GRECO A, CAPODANNO D. Differences in coronary artery disease and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in women and men[J]. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 2021, 19(4): 301-312. doi: 10.1080/14779072. 2021. 1902806 . |
| [4] | 张启贤, 高松原, 方舒, 等. 基于冠状动脉造影的微循环阻力指数对冠心病患者PCI术后的预后价值[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2025, 53(5): 505-513. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250123-00065 . |
| [5] | SHAH B, SMILOWITZ N R, XIA Y, et al. Major Adverse cardiovascular events after colchicine administration before percutaneous coronary intervention: Follow-up of the colchicine-PCI trial[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2023, 204: 26-28. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.029 . |
| [6] | 高玲, 刘金涛, 刘岩, 等. 高压氧联合心脏康复训练对冠心病PCI后患者临床疗效及MACE的影响[J]. 中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志, 2024, 31(5): 625-629. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311847-20240130-00022 . |
| [7] | 吴方芳, 陈建华, 宋钰, 等. 3D-HM联合2D-STI评价慢性肾脏病HFpEF患者左心房功能的应用价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2025, 41(4): 430-433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101. 2025. 04.021 . |
| [8] | 杨芳, 岳文胜, 于粒粒, 等. 三维超声心动图及心肌声学造影对缺血性二尖瓣反流患者左心室及乳头肌功能的评估[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2023, 39(1): 21-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn. 1002-0101.2023.01.006 . |
| [9] | QI Y, GU R, XU J, et al. Index of microcirculatory resistance predicts long term cardiac systolic function in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2021, 21(1): 66. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01887-w . |
| [10] | CAPDEVILLE S, GHOLSON B A, LINDNER J R. Contrast echocardiography for assessing myocardial perfusion[J]. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2023, 25(11): 1581-1587. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01970-y . |
| [11] | 中国康复医学会心脏介入治疗与康复专业委员会, 世界中医药学会联合会心脏康复专业委员会, 世界中医药学会联合会介入心脏病学专业委员会. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后中西医结合心脏康复专家共识[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(11): 1517-1528. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2022.11.013 . |
| [12] | AMPONSAH D K, FEARON W F. Medical therapy alone, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting for treatment of coronary artery disease[J]. Annu Rev Med, 2025, 76(1): 267-281. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-050423-085207 . |
| [13] | 刘梅颜, 张丽军, 鲍彦平, 等. 双心治疗对PCI术后冠心病患者发生心血管事件的影响及其经济学效益[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2025, 105(16): 1248-1255. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250102-00018 . |
| [14] | ROLDAN P, RAVI S, HODOVAN J, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of perfusion abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Cardiovasc Ultrasound, 2022, 20(1): 23-25. doi: 10.1186/s12947-022-00293-2 . |
| [15] | 包道日娜, 梁思颖, 朱天刚. 心脏声学造影对冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病并发症的诊断及心功能的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(5): 482-486. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.05.008 . |
| [16] | 刘银萍, 吴秀琴, 许善玲, 等. 二维斑点追踪联合三维超声定量评价慢性肾脏病患者左心室收缩功能受损[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2024, 40(11): 1272-1276. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2024.11.023 . |
| [17] | 代爽, 冯艳红. 全自动三维超声右心室定量软件评价系统性红斑狼疮患者右心室收缩功能[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(5): 636-641. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.05.019 . |
| [18] | WANG J, YANG M, YANG Z, et al. Long-Term prognostic value of myocardial viability by myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients after acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(10): 1429. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101429 . |
| [19] | GUERRA E, BERGAMASCHI L, TUTTOLOMONDO D, et al. Contrast stress echocardiography findings in myocardial bridging compared to normal coronary course, with and without coronary artery disease[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2023, 36(10): 1092-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.06.008 . |
| [20] | HUANG W, MORELLO M, GHOLSON B A, et al. Precision medicine in ischemic heart disease through point-of-care myocardial contrast echocardiography[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2024, 17(10): 1246-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.07.022 . |
| [21] | 黄琨, 张红利, 张春来, 等. 早期多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图监测预测急性心肌梗死患者不良心血管事件的价值[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2025, 17(5): 55-62. doi: 10.12037/YXQY.2025.05-10 . |
| [22] | WANG L, MA Y, JIN W, et al. Coronary microcirculation dysfunction evaluated by myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts poor prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2022, 22(1): 572. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02947-5 . |
| [23] | ZHANG R, LIANG S, ZHAO F, et al. Association between segmental noninvasive longitudinal strain and quantitative microvascular perfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Implications for clinical outcomes[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2025, 25(1): 109. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04547-5 . |
| [24] | CHEN F, WENG W, YANG D, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction to Predict MACEs in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction follow-up[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2024, 24(1): 496. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04173-7 . |
| [25] | LI L, HU N, LI L, et al. Low-dose dobutamine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography for evaluating myocardial microcirculation perfusion and predicting long-term prognosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2025, 20(1): 125. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03216-6 . |
| [26] | LYU W Y, QIN C Y, WANG X T, et al. The application of myocardial contrast echocardiography in assessing microcirculation perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2022, 22(1): 233-235. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02404-9 . |
| [27] | ZHANG J, GUAN L, LI X, et al. Value of myocardial contrast echocardiography in detecting coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2023, 49(9): 2089-2094. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.05.014 . |
| [28] | 汤勇, 罗裕, 颜艳, 等. 心肌声学造影对急性心肌梗死患者存活心肌及经皮冠状动脉介入术后临床预后的评估价值[J]. 心脑血管病防治, 2024, 24(9): 9-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-816x.2024.09.003 . |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |