收稿日期: 2024-12-27
网络出版日期: 2025-04-23
基金资助
常州市“十四五”高层次卫生健康高层次人才培养工程项目(2024CZBJ028);常州市科技计划项目(CJ20230005)
The long⁃term prognosis of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) patients after radiofrequency catheter ablation
Received date: 2024-12-27
Online published: 2025-04-23
目的 探讨沙库巴曲缬沙坦对接受射频消融术(RFCA)的非阵发性房颤(NPAF)患者的长期预后的影响,并分析可能的影响因素。 方法 采用前瞻性、随机对照方法,2021年10月至2023年6月在江苏大学附属武进医院心内科接受RFCA的183例NPAF患者被连续纳入并随机分为沙库巴曲缬沙坦组(ARNI组,n = 91)和对照组(n = 92)。收集基线数据、手术相关参数、低电压区域(LVAs)、左心房平均压力(LMP)和术后12个月随访数据。主要终点:导管消融术后12个月无房颤(AF)复发。次要终点包括RFCA并发症发生率、术后12个月平均动脉血压(MAP)、左心房直径(LAD)和左心功能。 结果 两组基线资料差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。ARNI组术后12个月的无房颤复发率显著高于对照组(79.12% vs. 66.30%,HR = 0.56,P = 0.039)。与对照组相比,ARNI组的LAD明显缩小[(40.17 ± 4.72) mm vs. (42.29 ± 6.08)mm, P = 0.013],N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平也明显降低[98.00(45.00,456.00) vs. 128.50(73.50,586.50), P = 0.039]。两组在消融并发症发生率和术后12个月MAP上差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。Cox回归分析显示,ARNI、LAD和左房容积与术后12个月的房颤复发显著相关。ARNI是术后12个月无房颤复发的保护因素(HR = 0.524,P = 0.038)。亚组分析显示,高左房压组患者的无房颤复发率显著低于正常左房压组(51.61% vs. 83.47%, P < 0.001)。然而,ARNI可以显著改善高左房压患者的无房颤复发率(64.52% vs. 38.71%, P = 0.042)。 结论 ARNI可改善RFCA后非阵发性房颤患者的预后,在高左房压房颤患者中具有潜在的应用价值。
凤伟祥 , 王娟 , 宋艳斌 , 薛社亮 , 李文华 . 沙库巴曲缬沙坦在行导管消融的非阵发性心房颤动患者中的远期疗效[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(7) : 1036 -1043 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.07.016
Objective To assess the long?term prognosis of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) patients after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and identify influencing factors. Methods A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted from October 2021 to June 2023 at our center. A total of 183 consecutive NPAF patients undergoing RFCA were randomly assigned to the ARNI group (n = 91) or control group (n = 92). Data collected included baseline characteristics, procedure?related parameters, low voltage areas (LVAs), left atrial mean pressure (LMP), and clinical outcomes at 12 months. The primary endpoint included freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence at 12 months post?ablation and secondary endpoints comprised complication rates, mean arterial pressure (MAP), left atrial diameter (LAD), and cardiac function. Results The two groups presented no significant differences in baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). The ARNI group demonstrateda significantly higher rate of freedom from AF recurrence compared to the control group at 12 months (79.12% vs. 66.30%, HR = 0.56, P = 0.039). Moreover, the ARNI group showed significantly smaller LAD[(40.17 ± 4.72) mm vs. (42.29 ± 6.08) mm, P = 0.013) and a significantly lower N?terminal proB?type natriuretic peptide(NT?proBNP) level [98.00 (45.00, 456.00) vs. 128.50 (73.50, 586.50), P = 0.039]. Both groups showed no significant differences in complication rates or MAP post?ablation (P > 0.05). Cox regression analysis identified ARNI as an independent predictor for maintaining freedom from AF recurrence at 12 months post?ablation(HR = 0.524, P = 0.038). Subgroup analyses showed that high LMP patients had a lower rate of freedom from AF recurrence than those with normal pressures (51.61% vs. 83.47%, P < 0.001), and demonstrated significantly improved ARNIoutcomes (64.52% vs. 38.71%, P = 0.042). Conclusion ARNI improves long?term outcomes for NPAF patients following RFCA, particularly in those with highLMP.
| 1 | 张茸祯,贾敏,娄豆豆,等. 合并心血管疾病的高血压患者强化降压治疗研究进展[J]. 新医学,2024,55(4):248-254. |
| 2 | 黄鑫,张普,高瑜,等. 房颤合并糖尿病患者影响轻度认知功能障碍发生的多因素分析及预测模型建立[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(16):2236-2243. |
| 3 | MANFRIN M, MUGNAI G, RAUHE W, et al. Left Atrial Pressure as a Predictor of Success in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in a Real-Life Cohort[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(15):8. doi:10.3390/jcm10153208 |
| 4 | KINGMA J, SIMARD C, DROLET B. Overview of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatment Strategies[J]. Pharmaceuticals, 2023, 16(6):20. doi:10.3390/ph16060844 |
| 5 | MAID A E, JOSEPH A Q, ROBERTO M P J, et al. Recurrence After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Investigational Biomarkers of Cardiac Remodeling[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2024, 13(6):e031029. |
| 6 | PRANATA R, HENRINA J, YONAS E, et al. BMI and atrial fibrillation recurrence post catheter ablation: A dose-response meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2021, 51(6):e13499. doi:10.1111/eci.13499 |
| 7 | AYU S, KENSUKE M, NAO I, et al. Ability of Left Atrial Distensibility After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation to Predict Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2022, 181:59-65. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.07.009 |
| 8 | MARROUCHE N F, WILBER D, HINDRICKS G, et al. Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study[J]. JAMA, 2014, 311(5):498-506. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3 |
| 9 | TAKANORI Y. Atrial structural remodeling and atrial fibrillation substrate: A histopathological perspective [J]. J Cardiol, 2024, 27:S0914-5087(24)00096-0. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.05.007 |
| 10 | LARISSA A D L, MARCOS A A F, CAMILA M G, et al. Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, 2024, 25(2):157-167. doi:10.1007/s40256-024-00691-z |
| 11 | TORRADO J, CAIN C, MAURO A G, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan Averts Adverse Post-Infarction Ventricular Remodeling and Preserves Systolic Function in Rabbits[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 72(19):2342-2356. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.102 |
| 12 | BURKE R M, LIGHTHOUSE J K, MICKELSEN D M, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan Decreases Cardiac Fibrosis in Left Ventricle Pressure Overload by Restoring PKG Signaling in Cardiac Fibroblasts[J]. Circ-Heart Fail, 2019, 12(4):15. doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.118.005565 |
| 13 | MARTENS P, NUYENS D, RIVERO-AYERZA M, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan reduces ventricular arrhythmias in parallel with left ventricular reverse remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2019, 108(10):1074-1082. doi:10.1007/s00392-019-01440-y |
| 14 | SUO Y, YUAN M, LI H M, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan Improves Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage Function in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and in Pressure Overload-Induced Mice[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2019, 10:11. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01285 |
| 15 | LIUY, MIN Z, ZHIHENG H,et al. Sacubitril/valsartan attenuates atrial structural remodelling in atrial fibrillation patients[J].ESC Heart Fail, 2022, 9(4):2428-2434. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13937 |
| 16 | MASUDA M, ASAI M, IIDA O, et al. Additional low-voltage-area ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Results of the randomized controlled VOLCANO trial[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2020, 9(13): e015927. doi:10.1161/jaha.120.015927 |
| 17 | PARK J, YANG P S, KIM T H, et al. Low Left Atrial Compliance Contributes to the Clinical Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation in Patients with Structurally and Functionally Normal Heart[J]. PloS One, 2015, 10(12):e0143853. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143853 |
| 18 | MANFRIN M, MUGNAI G, RAUCHE W, et al. Left Atrial Pressure as a Predictor of Success in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in a Real-Life Cohort[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(15):3208. doi:10.3390/jcm10153208 |
| 19 | PACKER D L, MARK D B, ROBB R A, et al. Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(13):1261-1274. |
| 20 | 念思琦,赵璐露,华宝桐. 心房颤动导管消融术后房性心律失常复发的研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(10):1338-1443. |
| 21 | 曹鹏. 心房颤动与miRNA[J]. 新医学,2023,54(1):55-58. |
| 22 | VON LUEDER T G, WANG B H, KOMPA A R, et al. Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 Attenuates Cardiac Remodeling and Dysfunction After Myocardial Infarction by Reducing Cardiac Fibrosis and Hypertrophy[J]. Circ-Heart Fail, 2015, 8(1):71-U130. doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.114.001785 |
| 23 | LI L Y F, LOU Q, LIU G Z, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan attenuates atrial electrical and structural remodelling in a rabbit model of atrial fibrillation[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2020, 881:10. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173120 |
| 24 | GUERRA F, PIMPINI L, FLORI M, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan reduces atrial fibrillation and supraventricular arrhythmias in patients with HFrEF and remote monitoring: Preliminary data from the SAVE THE RHYTHM[J]. Eur Heart J, 2020. DOI:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0926 . |
| 25 | ZHU T Y, ZHANG W C, YANG Q, et al. Effect of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor on atrial electrical instability in atrial fibrillation[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9:14. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1048077 |
| 26 | XIAOBIAO Z, ZHIHAN Z, KE C, et al. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Hypertension and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation[J]. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther, 2023, 25(2):157-167. |
| 27 | WANG Q, ZHUO C, XIA Q, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan can Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation[J]. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther, 2023, 37(3):549-560. doi:10.1007/s10557-022-07315-1 |
| 28 | YANG L, ZHANG M, HAO Z, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan at attenuates atrial structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation patients[J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2022, 9(4):2428-2434. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13937 |
| 29 | JAE-HYUK L, OH-SEOK K, JAEMIN S, et al. Left Atrial Wall Stress and the Long-Term Outcome of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Atrial Wall Stress[J]. Front Physiol, 2021, 12:686507. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.686507 |
| 30 | MANFRIN M, MUGNAI G, CHIERCHIA G B, et al. Left atrial hypertension invasively measured during pulmonary vein isolation predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence[J]. Minerva Cardiol Angiol, 2022, 70(5):529-536. doi:10.23736/s2724-5683.20.05418-3 |
| 31 | BADOZ M, DAOU O, GUIGNIER A, et al. Mean Left Atrial Pressure Predicts Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Endocardial Ablation: Results From a Single-Centre Prospective Cohort[J]. Circulation, 2018, 138():A12264-A. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |