临床研究

基于扫描式葡萄糖监测技术研究血糖波动与2型糖尿病足的相关性

  • 冯秀丽 ,
  • 郑之陈 ,
  • 张桐毓 ,
  • 周丽 ,
  • 徐宁 ,
  • 赵仁豪 ,
  • 杨腾 ,
  • 王娜 ,
  • 王国凤
展开
  • 1.南京医科大学连云港临床医学院内分泌科 (江苏 连云港 222000 )
    2.南京医科大学康达学院附属医院内分泌科 (江苏 连云港 222000 )
    3.盐城市第一人民医院内分泌科 (江苏 盐城 224000 )
    4.邹城市人民医院内分泌科 (山东 济宁 273500 )

收稿日期: 2024-11-05

  网络出版日期: 2025-02-28

基金资助

江苏省老龄健康科研项目(LKM2022065);2021年连云港市老龄健康科研项目(L202105);2022年连云港市科协软课题研究项目(Lkxyb22087);2022年连云港市卫生健康科技项目(202206);2022年连云港市科技项目(SF2210);2023年连云港市科协软课题研究项目(Lkxyb23130);2023年连云港市第六期“521”工程科研资助立项项目(LYG06521202372)

Study on the correlation between blood glucose fluctuations and type 2 diabetic foot based on flash glucose monitoring technology

  • Xiuli FENG ,
  • Zhichen ZHENG ,
  • Tongyu ZHANG ,
  • Li ZHOU ,
  • Ning XU ,
  • Renhao ZHAO ,
  • Teng YANG ,
  • Na WANG ,
  • Guofeng. WANG
Expand
  • Department of Endocrinology,Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University,Lianyungang 222000,Jiangsu,China

Received date: 2024-11-05

  Online published: 2025-02-28

摘要

目的 本研究应用扫描式葡萄糖监测技术(FGM)探讨血糖波动指标与2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者发生糖尿病足风险的相关性。 方法 回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年5月连云港市第一人民医院内分泌科住院治疗且佩戴FGM的伴或不伴有糖尿病足的T2DM患者233例。根据是否合并糖尿病足,将患者分为非糖尿病足组(n = 147)和糖尿病足组(n = 86)。比较两组患者一般临床资料、生化指标及血糖波动指标,同时进行亚组分析。采用二元logistic回归法分析T2DM患者发生糖尿病足的影响因素,通过受试者工作(ROC)曲线评估血糖波动指标对糖尿病足的预测价值。 结果 与非糖尿病足组相比,糖尿病足组患者病程长,体质量指数(BMI)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、尿微量白蛋白/肌酐(UACR)、谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、尿酸(SUA)以及平均血糖波动幅度(MAGE)、血糖变异系数(CV)、日间血糖平均绝对差(MODD)和平均血糖(MBG)升高,而空腹C肽(FCP)、空腹胰岛素(FINS)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)以及葡萄糖目标范围内时间(TIR)降低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。亚组分析发现TIR水平与糖尿病足和糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的发生率有关。二元logistic回归提示HbA1c、MAGE、MODD和MBG是T2DM患者发生糖尿病足的危险因素,而TIR是其保护因素(P < 0.05)。ROC曲线分析提示HbA1c、TIR、MAGE、MODD、MBG及联合预测T2DM患者发生糖尿病足的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.646、0.850、0.868、0.764、0.619及0.967,联合预测效果更佳。 结论 HbA1c、TIR、MAGE、MODD和MBG是T2DM患者发生糖尿病足的影响因素,及早干预上述血糖波动指标可有助于减少糖尿病足的发生。

本文引用格式

冯秀丽 , 郑之陈 , 张桐毓 , 周丽 , 徐宁 , 赵仁豪 , 杨腾 , 王娜 , 王国凤 . 基于扫描式葡萄糖监测技术研究血糖波动与2型糖尿病足的相关性[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(4) : 569 -574 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.04.016

Abstract

Objective To investigate the correlation between glycemic variability metrics and the risk of diabetic foot (DF) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) utilizing flash glucose monitoring (FGM) technology. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 233 hospitalized patients with T2DM, with or without DF, who were treated in the Department of Endocrinology at Lianyungang First People's Hospital from January 2021 to May 2022 and monitored using FGM. Patients were categorized into a non?DF group (n = 147) and a DF group (n = 86) based on the presence of DF. The study compared general clinical characteristics, biochemical parameters, and glycemic variability metrics between the two groups and performed subgroup analyses. Binary logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with the risk of DF, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to assess the predictive value of glycemic variability metrics for DF. Results Compared with the non?DF group, patients in the DF group exhibited significantly longer disease duration, higher body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), urinary albumin?to?creatinine ratio (UACR), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum uric acid (SUA), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), coefficient of variation (CV), mean of daily differences (MODD), and mean blood glucose (MBG), but lower fasting C?peptide (FCP), fasting insulin (FINS), high?density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL?C), and time in range (TIR), with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that TIR was associated with the incidence of DF and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Binary logistic regression analysis identified HbA1c, MAGE, MODD, and MBG as risk factors for DF, while TIR was a protective factor (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting DF using HbA1c, TIR, MAGE, MODD, MBG, and their combination were 0.646, 0.850, 0.868, 0.764, 0.619, and 0.967, respectively, indicating superior performance of the combined prediction model. Conclusions HbA1c, TIR, MAGE, MODD, and MBG are critical factors associated with the development of DF in patients with T2DM. Targeted early interventions aimed at optimizing these glycemic variability indicators may effectively reduce the incidence of DF.

参考文献

1 ANONYMOUS. Summary of revisions: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2020 [J]. Diabetes Care, 2020, 43(): S4-S6. doi:10.2337/dc20-srev
2 申晶,窦京涛. 糖尿病大血管并发症管理的思考: 历史与未来 [J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2020,12(11): 857-860.
3 李婉媚,杨旭斌,黄懿文,等. 血糖波动对糖尿病大鼠心脏自主神经功能的影响及其机制 [J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(16): 2065-2068+2074. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.16.006
4 GUO Q, ZANG P, XU S, et al. Time in range, as a novel metric of glycemic control, is reversely associated with presence of diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy independent of HbA1c in Chinese type 2 diabetes [J]. J Diabetes Res, 2020, 2020(1): 5817074. doi:10.1155/2020/5817074
5 KIM M Y, KIM G, PARK J Y, et al. The association between continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in outpatients with type 2 diabetes [J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021, 23(6): 434-442. doi:10.1089/dia.2020.0599
6 LU J, MA X, SHEN Y, et al. Time in range is associated with carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes [J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020, 22(2): 72-78. doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0251
7 COSTANTINO S, PANENI F, BATTISTA R, et al. Impact of glycemic variability on chromatin remodeling, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes and with target HbA1c levels [J]. Diabetes, 2017, 66(9): 2472-2482. doi:10.2337/db17-0294
8 TAYA N, KATAKAMI N, MITA T, et al. Associations of continuous glucose monitoring-assessed glucose variability with intima-media thickness and ultrasonic tissue characteristics of the carotid arteries: A cross-sectional analysis in patients with type 2 diabetes [J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2021, 20(1): 95. doi:10.1186/s12933-021-01288-5
9 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2017年版) [J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2018,10(1): 4-67.
10 中华医学会糖尿病学分会,中华医学会感染病学分会,中华医学会组织修复与再生分会,等. 中国糖尿病足防治指南(2019版)(Ⅰ) [J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2019,11(2): 92-108.
11 CHATZIRALLI I P. The role of glycemic control and variability in diabetic retinopathy [J]. Diabetes Ther, 2018, 9(1): 431-434. doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0345-5
12 张艳,余维巍,姚济华,等. 老年2型糖尿病患者血糖变异性与糖尿病肾病的关系 [J]. 实用医学杂志,2013,29(2): 202-204.
13 TORIMOTO K, OKADA Y, MORI H, et al. Relationship between fluctuations in glucose levels measured by continuous glucose monitoring and vascular endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus [J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2013, 12(1):1. doi:10.1186/1475-2840-12-1
14 TANG X, LI S, WANG Y, et al. Glycemic variability evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring system is associated with the 10-y cardiovascular risk of diabetic patients with well-controlled HbA1c [J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2016, 461: 146-150. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2016.08.004
15 KLIMONTOV V V, SAIK O V, KORBUT A I. Glucose variability: How does it work? [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(15): 7783. doi:10.3390/ijms22157783
16 AKAZA M, AKAZA I, KANOUCHI T, et al. Nerve conduction study of the association between glycemic variability and diabetes neuropathy [J]. Diabetol Metab Syndr, 2018, 10(1):69. doi:10.1186/s13098-018-0371-0
17 DHATARIYA K K, SIN E L P W P, CHENG J O S, et al. The impact of glycaemic variability on wound healing in the diabetic foot?A retrospective study of new ulcers presenting to a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2018, 135: 23-29. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.022
18 PELED S, POLLACK R, ELISHOOV O, et al. Association of inpatient glucose measurements with amputations in patients hospitalized with acute diabetic foot [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2019, 104(11): 5445-5452. doi:10.1210/jc.2019-00774
19 LU J, MA X, ZHANG L, et al. Glycemic variability modifies the relationship between time in range and hemoglobin A1c estimated from continuous glucose monitoring: A preliminary study [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2020, 161: 108032. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108032
20 VIGERSKY R A, MCMAHON C. The relationship of hemoglobin A1C to time-in-range in patients with diabetes [J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019, 21(2): 81-85. doi:10.1089/dia.2018.0310
21 BELLIDO V, PINéS-CORRALES P J, VILLAR-TAIBO R, et al. Time-in-range for monitoring glucose control: Is it time for a change? [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2021, 177: 108917. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108917
22 YANG J, YANG X, ZHAO D, et al. Association of time in range, as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring, with painful diabetic polyneuropathy [J]. J Diabetes Investig, 2021, 12(5): 828-836. doi:10.1111/jdi.13394
23 YAPANIS M, JAMES S, CRAIG M E, et al. Complications of diabetes and metrics of glycemic management derived from continuous glucose monitoring [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2022, 107(6): e2221-e2236. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac034
24 HUANG Z X, ZHANG H H, HUANG Y, et al. Association of time in range with postoperative wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers [J]. Int Wound J, 2022, 19(6): 1309-1318. doi:10.1111/iwj.13725
25 BECK R W, BERGENSTAL R M, RIDDLESWORTH T D, et al. Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials [J]. Diabetes Care, 2019, 42(3): 400-405. doi:10.2337/dc18-1444
26 MAYEDA L, KATZ R, AHMAD I, et al. Glucose time in range and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease [J]. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2020, 8(1): e000991. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000991
27 LU J, WANG C, SHEN Y, et al. Time in range in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study [J]. Diabetes Care, 2021, 44(2): 549-555. doi:10.2337/dc20-1862
文章导航

/