1 |
ANONYMOUS. Summary of revisions: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2020 [J]. Diabetes Care, 2020, 43(): S4-S6. doi:10.2337/dc20-srev
doi: 10.2337/dc20-srev
|
2 |
申晶,窦京涛. 糖尿病大血管并发症管理的思考: 历史与未来 [J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2020,12(11): 857-860.
|
3 |
李婉媚,杨旭斌,黄懿文,等. 血糖波动对糖尿病大鼠心脏自主神经功能的影响及其机制 [J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(16): 2065-2068+2074. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.16.006
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.16.006
|
4 |
GUO Q, ZANG P, XU S, et al. Time in range, as a novel metric of glycemic control, is reversely associated with presence of diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy independent of HbA1c in Chinese type 2 diabetes [J]. J Diabetes Res, 2020, 2020(1): 5817074. doi:10.1155/2020/5817074
doi: 10.1155/2020/5817074
|
5 |
KIM M Y, KIM G, PARK J Y, et al. The association between continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in outpatients with type 2 diabetes [J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021, 23(6): 434-442. doi:10.1089/dia.2020.0599
doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0599
|
6 |
LU J, MA X, SHEN Y, et al. Time in range is associated with carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes [J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020, 22(2): 72-78. doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0251
doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0251
|
7 |
COSTANTINO S, PANENI F, BATTISTA R, et al. Impact of glycemic variability on chromatin remodeling, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes and with target HbA1c levels [J]. Diabetes, 2017, 66(9): 2472-2482. doi:10.2337/db17-0294
doi: 10.2337/db17-0294
|
8 |
TAYA N, KATAKAMI N, MITA T, et al. Associations of continuous glucose monitoring-assessed glucose variability with intima-media thickness and ultrasonic tissue characteristics of the carotid arteries: A cross-sectional analysis in patients with type 2 diabetes [J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2021, 20(1): 95. doi:10.1186/s12933-021-01288-5
doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01288-5
|
9 |
中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2017年版) [J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2018,10(1): 4-67.
|
10 |
中华医学会糖尿病学分会,中华医学会感染病学分会,中华医学会组织修复与再生分会,等. 中国糖尿病足防治指南(2019版)(Ⅰ) [J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2019,11(2): 92-108.
|
11 |
CHATZIRALLI I P. The role of glycemic control and variability in diabetic retinopathy [J]. Diabetes Ther, 2018, 9(1): 431-434. doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0345-5
doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0345-5
|
12 |
张艳,余维巍,姚济华,等. 老年2型糖尿病患者血糖变异性与糖尿病肾病的关系 [J]. 实用医学杂志,2013,29(2): 202-204.
|
13 |
TORIMOTO K, OKADA Y, MORI H, et al. Relationship between fluctuations in glucose levels measured by continuous glucose monitoring and vascular endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus [J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2013, 12(1):1. doi:10.1186/1475-2840-12-1
doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-1
|
14 |
TANG X, LI S, WANG Y, et al. Glycemic variability evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring system is associated with the 10-y cardiovascular risk of diabetic patients with well-controlled HbA1c [J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2016, 461: 146-150. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2016.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.08.004
|
15 |
KLIMONTOV V V, SAIK O V, KORBUT A I. Glucose variability: How does it work? [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(15): 7783. doi:10.3390/ijms22157783
doi: 10.3390/ijms22157783
|
16 |
AKAZA M, AKAZA I, KANOUCHI T, et al. Nerve conduction study of the association between glycemic variability and diabetes neuropathy [J]. Diabetol Metab Syndr, 2018, 10(1):69. doi:10.1186/s13098-018-0371-0
doi: 10.1186/s13098-018-0371-0
|
17 |
DHATARIYA K K, SIN E L P W P, CHENG J O S, et al. The impact of glycaemic variability on wound healing in the diabetic foot⁃A retrospective study of new ulcers presenting to a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2018, 135: 23-29. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.022
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.022
|
18 |
PELED S, POLLACK R, ELISHOOV O, et al. Association of inpatient glucose measurements with amputations in patients hospitalized with acute diabetic foot [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2019, 104(11): 5445-5452. doi:10.1210/jc.2019-00774
doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00774
|
19 |
LU J, MA X, ZHANG L, et al. Glycemic variability modifies the relationship between time in range and hemoglobin A1c estimated from continuous glucose monitoring: A preliminary study [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2020, 161: 108032. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108032
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108032
|
20 |
VIGERSKY R A, MCMAHON C. The relationship of hemoglobin A1C to time-in-range in patients with diabetes [J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019, 21(2): 81-85. doi:10.1089/dia.2018.0310
doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0310
|
21 |
BELLIDO V, PINÉS-CORRALES P J, VILLAR-TAIBO R, et al. Time-in-range for monitoring glucose control: Is it time for a change? [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2021, 177: 108917. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108917
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108917
|
22 |
YANG J, YANG X, ZHAO D, et al. Association of time in range, as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring, with painful diabetic polyneuropathy [J]. J Diabetes Investig, 2021, 12(5): 828-836. doi:10.1111/jdi.13394
doi: 10.1111/jdi.13394
|
23 |
YAPANIS M, JAMES S, CRAIG M E, et al. Complications of diabetes and metrics of glycemic management derived from continuous glucose monitoring [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2022, 107(6): e2221-e2236. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac034
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac034
|
24 |
HUANG Z X, ZHANG H H, HUANG Y, et al. Association of time in range with postoperative wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers [J]. Int Wound J, 2022, 19(6): 1309-1318. doi:10.1111/iwj.13725
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13725
|
25 |
BECK R W, BERGENSTAL R M, RIDDLESWORTH T D, et al. Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials [J]. Diabetes Care, 2019, 42(3): 400-405. doi:10.2337/dc18-1444
doi: 10.2337/dc18-1444
|
26 |
MAYEDA L, KATZ R, AHMAD I, et al. Glucose time in range and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease [J]. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2020, 8(1): e000991. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000991
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000991
|
27 |
LU J, WANG C, SHEN Y, et al. Time in range in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study [J]. Diabetes Care, 2021, 44(2): 549-555. doi:10.2337/dc20-1862
doi: 10.2337/dc20-1862
|