医学检查与临床诊断

肿瘤病灶体积与子宫体积比值和组织中Ki-67、p16蛋白表达与子宫内膜癌病理特征及复发的关联

  • 陈丽萍 ,
  • 罗菊玉 ,
  • 彭章艳 ,
  • 吴秀兰 ,
  • 杨宇宏 ,
  • 石连炎 ,
  • 李笑云 ,
  • 王灵
展开
  • 1.黔东南苗族侗族自治州人民医院,妇科,(贵州 凯里 556000 )
    2.黔东南苗族侗族自治州人民医院,病理科,(贵州 凯里 556000 )
    3.黔东南苗族侗族自治州人民医院,重症医学科,(贵州 凯里 556000 )

收稿日期: 2024-08-14

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-16

基金资助

贵州省科技支撑计划项目([2020]4Y139号)

Correlation between the ratio of tumor volume to uterine volume and the expression of Ki⁃67 and p16 protein in tissues with the pathological features and recurrence of endometrial carcinoma

  • Liping CHEN ,
  • Juyu LUO ,
  • Zhangyan PENG ,
  • Xiulan WU ,
  • Yuhong YANG ,
  • Lianyan SHI ,
  • Xiaoyun LI ,
  • Ling. WANG
Expand
  • *.Department of Gynecology,Qiandongnan Prefecture People's Hospital,Kaili 556000,Guizhou,China

Received date: 2024-08-14

  Online published: 2024-12-16

摘要

目的 探讨肿瘤病灶体积与子宫体积比值(T/U)、病灶组织中Ki-67蛋白、p16蛋白表达与子宫内膜癌病理学特征及复发的关系。 方法 选取经黔东南州人民医院病理学检查证实的150例子宫内膜癌患者进行随访观察,其中有28例患者随访2年后出现复发,122例患者未出现复发,对比两组患者手术时T/U及病灶组织中Ki-67蛋白、p16蛋白表达差异,并按照不同病理学特征分别对比上述指标,并对比不同T/U、Ki-67蛋白、p16蛋白表达患者的无复发生存时间差异。 结果 复发组患者的T/U值、Ki-67蛋白阳性表达率均显著高于非复发组,p16蛋白阳性表达率显著低于非复发组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);T/U ≥ 0.18的子宫内膜癌患者中Ⅲ期患者占比、组织学低分化患者占比均显著高于T/U < 0.18的子宫内膜癌患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);Ki-67蛋白阳性表达的子宫内膜癌患者中Ⅲ期患者占比、组织学低分化患者占比、发生淋巴结转移的患者占比均显著高于Ki-67蛋白阴性表达的子宫内膜癌患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);p16蛋白阳性表达的子宫内膜癌患者中Ⅲ期患者占比、组织学低分化患者占比、发生淋巴结转移的患者占比均显著低于p16蛋白阴性表达的子宫内膜癌患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。T/U ≥ 0.18的子宫内膜癌患者术后2年无复发生存时间短于T/U < 0.18的患者(χ2 = 6.962,P = 0.008);Ki-67阳性表达的子宫内膜癌患者术后2年无复发生存时间短于Ki-67阴性表达的患者(χ2 = 4.815,P = 0.028);p16蛋白阳性表达的子宫内膜癌患者术后2年无复发生存时间长于p16蛋白阴性表达的患者(χ2 = 4.279,P = 0.039)。FIGO分期为Ⅲ期、发生淋巴结转移、肌层浸润深度≥ 1/2、T/U值≥ 0.18、Ki-67蛋白阳性表达是子宫内膜癌手术后复发的危险因素(P < 0.05);p16蛋白阳性表达是子宫内膜癌手术后复发的保护性因素(P < 0.05)。 结论 子宫内膜癌患者T/U、Ki-67蛋白和p16蛋白表达与肿瘤发生发展有一定的关系,可能会增大患者手术后复发的风险。

本文引用格式

陈丽萍 , 罗菊玉 , 彭章艳 , 吴秀兰 , 杨宇宏 , 石连炎 , 李笑云 , 王灵 . 肿瘤病灶体积与子宫体积比值和组织中Ki-67、p16蛋白表达与子宫内膜癌病理特征及复发的关联[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(23) : 3367 -3372 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.23.014

Abstract

Objective To investigate the correlation between the ratio of lesion volume to uterine volume (T/U), the expression levels of Ki-67 and p16 proteins in lesion tissue, and the recurrence risk of endometrial cancer. Methods A total of 150 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma through pathological examination at Qiandongnan Prefecture People's Hospital were enrolled for follow-up observation. Among them, 28 patients experienced recurrence after a 2-year follow-up period, while 122 patients remained recurrence-free. The expression differences of Ki-67 protein and p16 protein in T/U and lesion tissues during surgery were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, these indexes were analyzed based on different pathological features, and the variation in relapse-free survival time was assessed among patients with distinct T/U status as well as Ki-67 and p16 protein expressions. Results The T/U value and the positive expression rate of Ki-67 protein were significantly higher in the relapsed group compared to the non-relapsed group, while the positive expression rate of p16 protein was significantly lower in the relapsed group (P < 0.05). Additionally, patients with T/U ≥ 0.18 had a significantly higher proportion of stage Ⅲ patients and patients with low histological differentiation compared to those with T/U < 0.18 (P < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with positive expression of Ki-67 protein exhibited a significantly higher proportion of stage Ⅲ patients, patients with low histological differentiation, and lymph node metastasis compared to those with negative expression of Ki-67 protein (P < 0.05). The proportion of stage Ⅲ patients exhibiting positive p16 protein expression, low histological differentiation, and lymph node metastasis was significantly lower compared to those with negative p16 protein expression (P < 0.05). Patients with endometrial cancer having a T/U ≥ 0.18 experienced shorter recurrence-free survival time 2 years post-surgery in comparison to patients with T/U < 0.18 (χ2 = 6.962, P = 0.008). Patients displaying positive Ki-67 expression had a shorter recurrence-free survival time 2 years after surgery than those with negative Ki-67 expression (χ2 = 4.815, P = 0.028). The recurrence-free survival time 2 years after surgery for patients expressing p16 protein positively was longer than that for patients expressing it negatively (χ2 = 4.279, P = 0.039). The presence of FIGO stage Ⅲ, lymph node metastasis, depth of myographic invasion ≥1/2, T/U value ≥ 0.18, and positive expression of Ki-67 protein were identified as significant risk factors for postoperative recurrence in endometrial cancer (P < 0.05). Conversely, the positive expression of p16 protein was found to be a protective factor against recurrence in endometrial carcinoma following surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusion The expression of T/U, Ki-67 protein, and p16 protein in endometrial cancer patients is associated with tumor progression and may augment the risk of postoperative recurrence.

参考文献

1 KARPEL H C, SLOMOVITZ B, COLEMAN R L, et al. Treatment options for molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer in 2023[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2023,35(3):270-278. doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000855
2 TRONCONI F, NERO C, GIUDICE E, et al. Advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer: State of the art and future perspectives[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2022,180(8):e103851. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103851
3 CLARKE M A, LONG B J, SHERMAN M E, et al. Risk assessment of endometrial cancer and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia in women with abnormal bleeding and implications for clinical management algorithms[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020,223(4):e549. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.032
4 MOAR K, PANT A, SAINI V, et al. Potential biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A narrative review[J]. Biomarkers,2023,28(4):358-371. doi:10.1080/1354750x.2023.2179114
5 HOIVIK E A. Using an MRI-based radiomics model to predict recurrence of endometrial cancer: A step towards meeting a key clinical need[J]. Eur Radiol, 2023,33(8):5812-5813. doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09764-0
6 KULINCZAK M, SROMEK M, PANEK G, et al. Endometrial Cancer-Adjacent Tissues Express Higher Levels of Cancer-Promoting Genes than the Matched Tumors[J]. Genes (Basel), 2022,13(9):1611-1613. doi:10.3390/genes13091611
7 林培培,周晓冬,宋伟. 子宫内膜癌肿瘤体积与子宫体积比值联合肿瘤ADC值对病理分级的预测价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(23):3071-3075. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.23.008
8 KARPEL H, SLOMOVITZ B, COLEMAN R L, et al. Biomarker-driven therapy in endometrial cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2023,33(3):343-350. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2022-003676
9 WONG R W, CHEUNG A N Y. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in female genital tract tumours: An update highlighting their clinical relevance and practical issues[J]. Pathology, 2024, 56(2):214-227. doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2023.10.013
10 周琦,吴小华,刘继红,等. 子宫内膜癌诊断与治疗指南(第四版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(8):880-886.
11 GHALIB FARHOOD R, AL-HUMAIRI I ABD ALI. Immunohistochemical Study of Ki-67 in Hyperplastic and Endometrium Carcinoma: A Comparative Study[J]. Arch Razi Inst,2022,77(1):229-234.
12 邓茜,俞文英. 子宫内膜癌的临床病理学进展[J]. 现代实用医学,2021,33(5):565-568. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2021.05.002
13 VOLINSKY-FREMOND S, HOREWEG N, ANDANI S, et al. Prediction of recurrence risk in endometrial cancer with multimodal deep learning [J]. Nat Med,2024,30(7):1962-1973. doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02993-w
14 BRUNO V, BETTI M, D'AMBROSIO L, et al. Machine learning endometrial cancer risk prediction model: Integrating guidelines of European Society for Medical Oncology with the tumor immune framework[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2023,33(11):1708-1714. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2023-004671
15 DE VITIS L A, MULTINU F. Advancing endometrial cancer management in the era of molecular classification: Insights into pattern of recurrence[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2024,34(5):667-668. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005527
16 LABAN M, EL-SWAIFY S T, ALI S H, et al. The Prediction of Recurrence in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Is It Time for a Paradigm Shift in Adjuvant Therapy?[J]. Reprod Sci, 2022,29(4):1068-1085. doi:10.1007/s43032-021-00565-8
17 RIEDINGER C J, PATTERSON J M, BACKES F J, et al. The contemporary presentation and diagnosis of endometrial cancer recurrence: When, where, and how?[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2022,167(2):174-180. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.014
18 OAKNIN A, BOSSE T J, CREUTZBERG C L, et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol,2022,33(9):860-877. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.009
19 朱争艳,王彩霞,梁菲梅,等. 早期高危子宫内膜癌患者术后辅助治疗与预后的关系[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志,2023,30(2):99-103.
20 MAHESHWARI E, NOUGARET S, STEIN E B, et al. Update on MRI in Evaluation and Treatment of Endometrial Cancer[J]. Radiographics,2022,42(7):2112-2130. doi:10.1148/rg.220070
21 孔伟,余裕珍,王康,等. 术前MRI影像组学模型预测子宫内膜癌风险分层[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2023, 39(12):1857-1861.
22 DING S X, SUN Y F, MENG H, et al. Radiomics model based on multi-sequence MRI for preoperative prediction of ki-67 expression levels in early endometrial cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2023,13(1):e22052. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49540-0
23 YASUTAKE N, YAMAMOTO H, KUGA R, et al. Immunohistochemical p16 overexpression and Rb loss correlate with high-risk human papillomavirus infection in endocervical adenocarcinomas[J]. Histopathology, 2024,84(7):1178-1191. doi:10.1111/his.15169
24 KALKAN H E, AKMAN L, SERIN G, et al. The usefulness of p16 and COX-2 expression on the prediction of progression to endometrial cancer[J]. Histol Histopathol, 2024,39(5):565-571.
25 YANG Z, YANG X, LIU X, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic characterization of endometrial carcinoma: A comparative analysis of molecular typing protocols[J]. BMC Cancer,2023,23(1):243-245. doi:10.1186/s12885-023-10706-8
26 张继屏,范锶丝,江洁丽,等. Ki67、突变型P53、突变型P16、CK7与宫颈病复发相关性临床研究[J]. 大医生,2023,8(22):102-105.
文章导航

/