肿瘤病灶体积与子宫体积比值和组织中Ki-67、p16蛋白表达与子宫内膜癌病理特征及复发的关联
收稿日期: 2024-08-14
网络出版日期: 2024-12-16
基金资助
贵州省科技支撑计划项目([2020]4Y139号)
Correlation between the ratio of tumor volume to uterine volume and the expression of Ki⁃67 and p16 protein in tissues with the pathological features and recurrence of endometrial carcinoma
Received date: 2024-08-14
Online published: 2024-12-16
目的 探讨肿瘤病灶体积与子宫体积比值(T/U)、病灶组织中Ki-67蛋白、p16蛋白表达与子宫内膜癌病理学特征及复发的关系。 方法 选取经黔东南州人民医院病理学检查证实的150例子宫内膜癌患者进行随访观察,其中有28例患者随访2年后出现复发,122例患者未出现复发,对比两组患者手术时T/U及病灶组织中Ki-67蛋白、p16蛋白表达差异,并按照不同病理学特征分别对比上述指标,并对比不同T/U、Ki-67蛋白、p16蛋白表达患者的无复发生存时间差异。 结果 复发组患者的T/U值、Ki-67蛋白阳性表达率均显著高于非复发组,p16蛋白阳性表达率显著低于非复发组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);T/U ≥ 0.18的子宫内膜癌患者中Ⅲ期患者占比、组织学低分化患者占比均显著高于T/U < 0.18的子宫内膜癌患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);Ki-67蛋白阳性表达的子宫内膜癌患者中Ⅲ期患者占比、组织学低分化患者占比、发生淋巴结转移的患者占比均显著高于Ki-67蛋白阴性表达的子宫内膜癌患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);p16蛋白阳性表达的子宫内膜癌患者中Ⅲ期患者占比、组织学低分化患者占比、发生淋巴结转移的患者占比均显著低于p16蛋白阴性表达的子宫内膜癌患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。T/U ≥ 0.18的子宫内膜癌患者术后2年无复发生存时间短于T/U < 0.18的患者(χ2 = 6.962,P = 0.008);Ki-67阳性表达的子宫内膜癌患者术后2年无复发生存时间短于Ki-67阴性表达的患者(χ2 = 4.815,P = 0.028);p16蛋白阳性表达的子宫内膜癌患者术后2年无复发生存时间长于p16蛋白阴性表达的患者(χ2 = 4.279,P = 0.039)。FIGO分期为Ⅲ期、发生淋巴结转移、肌层浸润深度≥ 1/2、T/U值≥ 0.18、Ki-67蛋白阳性表达是子宫内膜癌手术后复发的危险因素(P < 0.05);p16蛋白阳性表达是子宫内膜癌手术后复发的保护性因素(P < 0.05)。 结论 子宫内膜癌患者T/U、Ki-67蛋白和p16蛋白表达与肿瘤发生发展有一定的关系,可能会增大患者手术后复发的风险。
陈丽萍 , 罗菊玉 , 彭章艳 , 吴秀兰 , 杨宇宏 , 石连炎 , 李笑云 , 王灵 . 肿瘤病灶体积与子宫体积比值和组织中Ki-67、p16蛋白表达与子宫内膜癌病理特征及复发的关联[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(23) : 3367 -3372 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.23.014
Objective To investigate the correlation between the ratio of lesion volume to uterine volume (T/U), the expression levels of Ki-67 and p16 proteins in lesion tissue, and the recurrence risk of endometrial cancer. Methods A total of 150 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma through pathological examination at Qiandongnan Prefecture People's Hospital were enrolled for follow-up observation. Among them, 28 patients experienced recurrence after a 2-year follow-up period, while 122 patients remained recurrence-free. The expression differences of Ki-67 protein and p16 protein in T/U and lesion tissues during surgery were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, these indexes were analyzed based on different pathological features, and the variation in relapse-free survival time was assessed among patients with distinct T/U status as well as Ki-67 and p16 protein expressions. Results The T/U value and the positive expression rate of Ki-67 protein were significantly higher in the relapsed group compared to the non-relapsed group, while the positive expression rate of p16 protein was significantly lower in the relapsed group (P < 0.05). Additionally, patients with T/U ≥ 0.18 had a significantly higher proportion of stage Ⅲ patients and patients with low histological differentiation compared to those with T/U < 0.18 (P < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with positive expression of Ki-67 protein exhibited a significantly higher proportion of stage Ⅲ patients, patients with low histological differentiation, and lymph node metastasis compared to those with negative expression of Ki-67 protein (P < 0.05). The proportion of stage Ⅲ patients exhibiting positive p16 protein expression, low histological differentiation, and lymph node metastasis was significantly lower compared to those with negative p16 protein expression (P < 0.05). Patients with endometrial cancer having a T/U ≥ 0.18 experienced shorter recurrence-free survival time 2 years post-surgery in comparison to patients with T/U < 0.18 (χ2 = 6.962, P = 0.008). Patients displaying positive Ki-67 expression had a shorter recurrence-free survival time 2 years after surgery than those with negative Ki-67 expression (χ2 = 4.815, P = 0.028). The recurrence-free survival time 2 years after surgery for patients expressing p16 protein positively was longer than that for patients expressing it negatively (χ2 = 4.279, P = 0.039). The presence of FIGO stage Ⅲ, lymph node metastasis, depth of myographic invasion ≥1/2, T/U value ≥ 0.18, and positive expression of Ki-67 protein were identified as significant risk factors for postoperative recurrence in endometrial cancer (P < 0.05). Conversely, the positive expression of p16 protein was found to be a protective factor against recurrence in endometrial carcinoma following surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusion The expression of T/U, Ki-67 protein, and p16 protein in endometrial cancer patients is associated with tumor progression and may augment the risk of postoperative recurrence.
| 1 | KARPEL H C, SLOMOVITZ B, COLEMAN R L, et al. Treatment options for molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer in 2023[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2023,35(3):270-278. doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000855 |
| 2 | TRONCONI F, NERO C, GIUDICE E, et al. Advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer: State of the art and future perspectives[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2022,180(8):e103851. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103851 |
| 3 | CLARKE M A, LONG B J, SHERMAN M E, et al. Risk assessment of endometrial cancer and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia in women with abnormal bleeding and implications for clinical management algorithms[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020,223(4):e549. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.032 |
| 4 | MOAR K, PANT A, SAINI V, et al. Potential biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A narrative review[J]. Biomarkers,2023,28(4):358-371. doi:10.1080/1354750x.2023.2179114 |
| 5 | HOIVIK E A. Using an MRI-based radiomics model to predict recurrence of endometrial cancer: A step towards meeting a key clinical need[J]. Eur Radiol, 2023,33(8):5812-5813. doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09764-0 |
| 6 | KULINCZAK M, SROMEK M, PANEK G, et al. Endometrial Cancer-Adjacent Tissues Express Higher Levels of Cancer-Promoting Genes than the Matched Tumors[J]. Genes (Basel), 2022,13(9):1611-1613. doi:10.3390/genes13091611 |
| 7 | 林培培,周晓冬,宋伟. 子宫内膜癌肿瘤体积与子宫体积比值联合肿瘤ADC值对病理分级的预测价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(23):3071-3075. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.23.008 |
| 8 | KARPEL H, SLOMOVITZ B, COLEMAN R L, et al. Biomarker-driven therapy in endometrial cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2023,33(3):343-350. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2022-003676 |
| 9 | WONG R W, CHEUNG A N Y. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in female genital tract tumours: An update highlighting their clinical relevance and practical issues[J]. Pathology, 2024, 56(2):214-227. doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2023.10.013 |
| 10 | 周琦,吴小华,刘继红,等. 子宫内膜癌诊断与治疗指南(第四版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(8):880-886. |
| 11 | GHALIB FARHOOD R, AL-HUMAIRI I ABD ALI. Immunohistochemical Study of Ki-67 in Hyperplastic and Endometrium Carcinoma: A Comparative Study[J]. Arch Razi Inst,2022,77(1):229-234. |
| 12 | 邓茜,俞文英. 子宫内膜癌的临床病理学进展[J]. 现代实用医学,2021,33(5):565-568. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2021.05.002 |
| 13 | VOLINSKY-FREMOND S, HOREWEG N, ANDANI S, et al. Prediction of recurrence risk in endometrial cancer with multimodal deep learning [J]. Nat Med,2024,30(7):1962-1973. doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02993-w |
| 14 | BRUNO V, BETTI M, D'AMBROSIO L, et al. Machine learning endometrial cancer risk prediction model: Integrating guidelines of European Society for Medical Oncology with the tumor immune framework[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2023,33(11):1708-1714. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2023-004671 |
| 15 | DE VITIS L A, MULTINU F. Advancing endometrial cancer management in the era of molecular classification: Insights into pattern of recurrence[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2024,34(5):667-668. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005527 |
| 16 | LABAN M, EL-SWAIFY S T, ALI S H, et al. The Prediction of Recurrence in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Is It Time for a Paradigm Shift in Adjuvant Therapy?[J]. Reprod Sci, 2022,29(4):1068-1085. doi:10.1007/s43032-021-00565-8 |
| 17 | RIEDINGER C J, PATTERSON J M, BACKES F J, et al. The contemporary presentation and diagnosis of endometrial cancer recurrence: When, where, and how?[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2022,167(2):174-180. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.014 |
| 18 | OAKNIN A, BOSSE T J, CREUTZBERG C L, et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol,2022,33(9):860-877. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.009 |
| 19 | 朱争艳,王彩霞,梁菲梅,等. 早期高危子宫内膜癌患者术后辅助治疗与预后的关系[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志,2023,30(2):99-103. |
| 20 | MAHESHWARI E, NOUGARET S, STEIN E B, et al. Update on MRI in Evaluation and Treatment of Endometrial Cancer[J]. Radiographics,2022,42(7):2112-2130. doi:10.1148/rg.220070 |
| 21 | 孔伟,余裕珍,王康,等. 术前MRI影像组学模型预测子宫内膜癌风险分层[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2023, 39(12):1857-1861. |
| 22 | DING S X, SUN Y F, MENG H, et al. Radiomics model based on multi-sequence MRI for preoperative prediction of ki-67 expression levels in early endometrial cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2023,13(1):e22052. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49540-0 |
| 23 | YASUTAKE N, YAMAMOTO H, KUGA R, et al. Immunohistochemical p16 overexpression and Rb loss correlate with high-risk human papillomavirus infection in endocervical adenocarcinomas[J]. Histopathology, 2024,84(7):1178-1191. doi:10.1111/his.15169 |
| 24 | KALKAN H E, AKMAN L, SERIN G, et al. The usefulness of p16 and COX-2 expression on the prediction of progression to endometrial cancer[J]. Histol Histopathol, 2024,39(5):565-571. |
| 25 | YANG Z, YANG X, LIU X, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic characterization of endometrial carcinoma: A comparative analysis of molecular typing protocols[J]. BMC Cancer,2023,23(1):243-245. doi:10.1186/s12885-023-10706-8 |
| 26 | 张继屏,范锶丝,江洁丽,等. Ki67、突变型P53、突变型P16、CK7与宫颈病复发相关性临床研究[J]. 大医生,2023,8(22):102-105. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |