收稿日期: 2023-06-16
网络出版日期: 2024-01-08
基金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目(U2004124);河南省科技攻关计划项目(212102310717)
Changes and role of CD74 and CXCL9 positive macrophage subsets in rejection of rat liver transplantation
Received date: 2023-06-16
Online published: 2024-01-08
目的 探讨在肝移植排斥反应中巨噬细胞亚群分类及变化。 方法 建立大鼠肝移植模型分为：免疫耐受组（B-B），将BN大鼠供体的肝脏移植至BN大鼠受体；免疫排斥组（L-B），将Lewis大鼠供体的肝脏移植至BN大鼠受体，使用单细胞RNA测序和高通量RNA测序区分大鼠移植肝巨噬细胞亚群，发现排斥反应高度差异的基因，免疫组化确定蛋白表达和细胞亚群的变化和分布。 结果 CD68阳性巨噬细胞在排斥组多于耐受组（P < 0.05），巨噬细胞可分为9个亚群，排斥反应中巨噬细胞第8群的CXC趋化因子配体9（CXCL9）明显升高，第5群的白细胞分化抗原74（CD74）基因明显升高（P < 0.05）。排斥反应中巨噬细胞差异基因综合第1位的是CD74，第2位是CXCL9。与耐受组比较，排斥组肝脏汇管区可见大量CD74阳性巨噬细胞浸润，并且在肝血窦CD74阳性巨噬细胞浸润也明显增加（P < 0.05），在排斥肝脏汇管区和肝血窦可见大量CXCL9阳性巨噬细胞浸润以汇管区为著（P < 0.05），在排斥肝脏汇管区CD14阳性细胞明显增加（P < 0.05）。 结论 在肝移植排斥反应中CD74阳性巨噬细胞亚群和CXCL9阳性巨噬细胞亚群是促进肝移植排斥反应中的关键亚群，完善了巨噬细胞在肝移植排斥反应中作用机制。
关键词： 肝移植; 排斥反应; 巨噬细胞; 白细胞分化抗原74; CXC 趋化因子配体9
魏思东 , 陈凯歌 , 张继翔 , 轩娟娟 , 王耀权 , 苗舜 , 赵开心 , 王维伟 , 陈国勇 . 白细胞分化抗原74和 CXC 趋化因子配体9阳性巨噬细胞亚群在大鼠肝移植排斥反应中的作用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023 , 39(23) : 3027 -3033 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.23.002
Objective To explore the classification and changes of macrophage subsets in liver transplant rejection. Methods Rat liver transplantation model were established and divided into immune tolerance group （B-B）， where the liver of BN rat donors was transplanted to BN rat recipients， and immune rejection group （L-B）， in which the liver of Lewis rat donors was transplanted to BN rat recipients. Single-cell RNA sequencing and high-throughput RNA sequencing were used to distinguish the macrophage subsets of rat liver transplantation， and to find differential gene in rejection reactions. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the changes and distribution of protein expression and cell subsets. Results CD68 positive macrophages were higher in the rejection group than that in the tolerance group （P < 0.05）， and macrophages could be divided into 9 subsets. During the rejection reaction， the CXC chemokine ligand 9 （CXCL9） in the 8th subsets of macrophages was significantly increased， while the gene for white blood cell differentiation antigen 74 （CD74） in the 5th subsets was significantly increased （P < 0.05）. CD74 ranked first in the differential gene synthesis of macrophages during rejection， followed by CXCL9. Compared with the tolerance group， a large number of CD74 positive macrophages were observed in the hepatic portal area of the rejection group， and the infiltration of CD74 positive macrophages in the hepatic sinuses was also significantly increased （P < 0.05）， while a large number of CXCL9 positive macrophages were observed in the hepatic portal area and hepatic sinuses of the rejection group， especially in the portal area （P < 0.05）， and CD14 positive cells were significantly increased （P < 0.05）. Conclusions The CD74 positive macrophage subsets and CXCL9 positive macrophage subsets may be key subgroups in promoting liver transplant rejection， improving the mechanism of macrophage action in liver transplant rejection.
| 1 | 周结学， 刘东， 蒙善东， 等. 体外光化学疗法对大鼠肾移植抗排斥反应的研究［J］. 实用医学杂志， 2023， 39（8）： 944-947. |
| 2 | MONTANO-LOZA A J， RODRíGUEZ-PERáLVAREZ M L， PAGEAUX G P， et al. Liver transplantation immunology： Immunosuppression， rejection， and immunomodulation ［J］. J Hepato， 2023， 78（6）： 1199-1215. |
| 3 | FAHRNER R， DONDORF F， ARDELT M， et al. Role of NK， NKT cells and macrophages in liver transplantation［J］. World J Gastroenterol， 2016， 22（27）： 6135-6144. |
| 4 | JIA J， TIAN X， JIANG J， et al. Structural shifts in the intestinal microbiota of rats treated with cyclosporine A after orthotropic liver transplantation ［J］. Front Med， 2019， 13（4）： 451-460. |
| 5 | MENG Q， WU W， ZHANG W， et al. IL-18BP improves early graft function and survival in lewis-brown norway rat orthotopic liver transplantation model［J］. Biomolecules， 2022， 12（12）： 1801. |
| 6 | MO J， CHEN Y， CHENG Y， et al. miR-199a-3p may be an early warning marker for acute rejection after liver transplantation in rats ［J］. Cytokine， 2021， 148：155689. |
| 7 | 张继翔， 闫宏宪， 轩娟娟， 等. 门脉优先反向吻合快速建立肝移植大鼠模型［J］. 中国组织工程研究， 2022， 26（17）： 2696-2701. |
| 8 | ZHOU M， HUI J， GAO L， et al. Extracellular vesicles from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells alleviate acute rejection injury after liver transplantation by carrying miR-22-3p and inducing M2 polarization of Kupffer cells［J］. J Gene Med， 2023， e3497. |
| 9 | OLDANI G， PELOSO A， VIJGEN S， et al. Chimeric liver transplantation reveals interspecific graft remodelling［J］. J Hepatol， 2018， 69（5）： 1025-1036. |
| 10 | SONG C， WANG G， MA X， et al. The effect of miR-155-5p on M1 polarization of Kupffer cells and immune response during liver transplantation through regulating the expression of KDM5D［J］. Mol Immunol， 2023， 155： 17-26. |
| 11 | MISUMI M， YAMAGUCHI Y， MORI K， et al. In situ macrophage distribution in the hepatic allograft associated with rejection in the rat［J］. J Surg Res， 1993， 55（2）： 115-121. |
| 12 | GOMAA A I， EHSAN N A， ELREFAEI A A， et al. The role of monocyte/macrophage and CXCR3 in differentiation between recurrent hepatitis C and acute cellular rejection postliver transplantation［J］. J Immunol Res， 2018， 2018： 2726939. |
| 13 | SAWADA T， SHIMIZU A， KUBOTA K， et al. Lobular damage caused by cellular and humoral immunity in liver allograft rejection［J］. Clin Transplant， 2005， 19（1）： 110-114. |
| 14 | ABDOU A G， ASAAD N Y， EHSAN N， et al. The diagnostic impact of C4d， CD68， and NF-κB expression in the differentiation between recurrent hepatitis C and acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation［J］. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol， 2016， 24（9）： 639-647. |
| 15 | 李泽桦， 曾宇宏， 冯丽芸， 等. 氧化三甲胺促进M1型巨噬细胞极化加剧心肌梗死后心室重构［J］. 实用医学杂志， 2022， 38（20）： 2531-2537，2544. |
| 16 | CAO Z R， ZHENG W X， JIANG Y X， et al. miR-449a ameliorates acute rejection after liver transplantation via targeting procollagen-lysine1， 2-oxoglutarate5 -dioxygenase 1 in macrophages［J］. Am J Transplant， 2023， 23（3）： 336-352. |
| 17 | YANG P， ZHANG X， LIN Z， et al. Adoptive transfer of polarized M2c macrophages ameliorates acute rejection in rat liver transplantation［J］. Am J Transl Res， 2020， 12（6）： 2614-2626. |
| 18 | ANGERMüLLER S， STEINMETZ I， WEBER T， et al. Significant increase of Kuppfer cells associated with loss of Na+，K+-ATPase activity in rat hepatic allograft rejection［J］. Transplantation， 1997， 63（11）：1562-1570. |
| 19 | LI X， LI S， WU B， et al. Landscape of Immune Cells Heterogeneity in Liver Transplantation by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis［J］. Front Immunol， 2022， 13： 890019. |
| 20 | SU H， NA N， ZHANG X， et al. The biological function and significance of CD74 in immune diseases［J］. Inflamm Res， 2017， 66（3）： 209-216. |
| 21 | XIAO N， LI K， ZHU X， et al. CD74+ macrophages are associated with favorable prognosis and immune contexture in hepatocellular carcinoma［J］. Cancer Immunol Immunother， 2022， 71（1）： 57-69. |
| 22 | YANG Z， HAN X， WANG K， et al. Combined with multiplex and network analysis to reveal the key genes and mechanisms of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease［J］. Int Immunopharmacol， 2023， 123： 110708. |
| 23 | MARCOVECCHIO P M， THOMAS G， SALEK-ARDAKANI S. CXCL9-expressing tumor-associated macrophages： new players in the fight against cancer［J］. J Immunother Cancer， 2021， 9（2）： e002045. |
| 24 | MEHANNA R G， MOHIEDEEN K， KASSEM M， et al. Assessment of serum CXCL9 and pentraxin 3 as novel markers for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic hepatitis C patients［J］. Clin Exp Hepatol， 2023， 9（1）：14-20. |
| 25 | ASAOKA T， MARUBASHI S， KOBAYASHI S， et al. Intragraft transcriptome level of CXCL9 as biomarker of acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation［J］. J Surg Res， 2012， 178（2）： 1003-1014. |
| 26 | DENG J F， GENG L， QIAN Y G， et al. The role of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in acute allograft rejection after liver transplantation［J］. Transplant Proc， 2007， 39（10）： 3222-3224 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |