实用医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (19): 2546-2550.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.19.023

• 医学检查与临床诊断 • 上一篇    下一篇

高频超声在糖尿病周围神经病变中的诊断价值

陈晓怡1,陈翠花1,韦秋凤1,谢玉波1,2()   

  1. 1.广西医科大学第一附属医院麻醉科 (南宁 530021 )
    2.广西消化道肿瘤加速康复外科基础研究重点实验室 ;(南宁 530021 )
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-11 出版日期:2023-10-10 发布日期:2023-11-22
  • 通讯作者: 谢玉波 E-mail:xybdoctor@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2018YFC2001905);广西重点研发计划(编号:桂科AB20159019);广西自然科学基金重点项目(2020GXNSFDA238025)

High⁃frequency ultrasound for diabetic peripheral Neuropathy

Xiaoyi CHEN1,Cuihua CHEN1,Qiufeng WEI1,Yubo. XIE1,2()   

  1. *.Department of Anesthesiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Nanning 530021,China
  • Received:2023-04-11 Online:2023-10-10 Published:2023-11-22
  • Contact: Yubo. XIE E-mail:xybdoctor@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨高频超声在辅助诊断糖尿病周围神经病变(diabetic perphery neuropathy,DPN)的应用。 方法 选取141例糖尿病患者,将其分为糖尿病周围神经病变组(DPN组,n = 44)、糖尿病组(DM组,n = 56)和非糖尿病组(NDM组,n = 41)。应用高频超声测量各组患者坐骨神经、胫神经、腓总神经、胫后神经以及正中神经的横截面积(cross sectional area, CSA),应用密歇根神经病变筛查量表(michigan neuropathy screening instrument, MNSI)和多伦多临床评分系统(toronto clinical scoring system, TCSS)评估DM组和DPN组患者周围神经功能。ROC曲线分析周围神经CSA在诊断DPN中的价值。 结果 与NDM及DM组相比,DPN 组所测量坐骨神经、胫神经、胫后神经CSA明显增大(P < 0.05);与DM组比较,DPN组MNSI评分明显升高(P < 0.05);CSA与MNSI评分及TCSS评分呈正相关(P < 0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,在诊断DPN中,胫后神经CSA有较高的预测价值。 结论 DPN患者高频超声测量的坐骨神经、胫神经、胫后神经CSA较DM、NDM患者明显增大。CSA与MNSI评分及TCSS评分有较好的相关性。高频超声测量的坐骨神经、胫神经和胫后神经CSA在诊断DPN中有潜在价值。

关键词: 高频超声, 糖尿病周围神经病变, 横截面积, 密歇根神经病变筛查量表, 多伦多临床评分系统

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the application of high?frequency ultrasound for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Methods A total of 141 diabetic patients were selected and divided into diabetic peripheral neuropathy group (DPN group,n = 44),diabetic group (DM group,n = 56) and non?diabetic group (NDM group,n = 41). The cross?sectional area (CSA) of the sciatic, tibial, common peroneal, posterior tibial and median nerves were measured by high?frequency ultrasound in each group, and the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) and the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) were applied to assess peripheral nerve function in patients in the DM and DPN groups. The ROC curves were used to analyze the value of peripheral nerve cross?sectional area (CSA) in the diagnosis of DPN. Results Compared with the NDM and DM groups, the measured sciatic, tibial, and posterior tibial nerve CSA was significantly greater in the DPN group (P < 0.05); he MNSI scores was significantly higher in the DPN group compared with the DM group (P < 0.05), CSA was positively correlated with the MNSI score and TCSS score (P < 0.05);ROC curve analysis showed that the posterior tibial nerve CSA had a significant predictive value in the diagnosis of DPN. Conclusion The CSA of sciatic nerve, tibial nerve, and posterior tibial nerve measured by high?frequency ultrasound was significantly greater in the DPN group compared with the DM and NDM groups. CSA correlated well with MNSI scores and TCSS scores. High?frequency ultrasound?measured CSA of the sciatic, tibial, and posterior tibial nerves has potential value in the diagnosis of DPN.

Key words: high?frequency ultrasound, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, cross?sectional area, michigan neuropathy screening scale, torontoclinical scoring system

中图分类号: