实用医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (23): 3293-3296.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2020.23.026

• 新技术新方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

靶区形变在体部立体定向放射治疗三维适形计划设计中的应用研究

吴魁, 水永杰, 张怀文   

  1. 1浙江大学医学院附属第二医院放疗科(杭州310009);2 江西省肿瘤医院放疗中心(南昌330029)
  • 出版日期:2020-12-10 发布日期:2020-12-23
  • 通讯作者: 张怀文E⁃mail:wuming830822@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省自然科学基金(编号:LQ18H160013)

Application of target deformation method in design for 3⁃dimensional conformal plan of stereotactic body radiotherapy

WU Kui,SHUI Yongjie,ZHANG Huaiwen   

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology,the Second Affiliated Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou 310009,China
  • Online:2020-12-10 Published:2020-12-23
  • Contact: ZHANG Huaiwen E⁃mail:wuming830822@163.com

摘要:

目的 本文提出一种新的体部立体定向放射治疗(stereotactic body radiotherapy,SBRT)的三维适形计划设计方法并评估其剂量学优势。方法 随机选30 例以SBRT 技术治疗的患者进行回顾性分析研究,每位患者分别设计常规三维适形计划(conventional 3⁃dimensional conformal planning,CCP)和靶区形变后的三维适形计划(deformed target 3⁃dimensional conformal planning,DCP)。每个计划的处方剂量定义为计划靶区(PTV)50 Gy/5次,且要求95 % 的PTV体积达到处方剂量。比较两种计划适形指数(CI)、剂量梯度(DG)、靶区近似最小剂量(D99%)、离靶区2 cm处最大剂量(D2 cm)和机器跳数(MU)的差异。结果 两组计划均能达到临床治疗的要求。但DCP与CCP相比,CI、DG、D99%、和D2 cm有明显改善(t = 4.55、5.95、4.37、3.86,P<0.05),MU 也大幅减少(t = 2.82,P<0.05)。结论 DCP 剂量学优势明显,且机器跳数显著减少,大幅缩短治疗时间,可以作为一种新的计划设计方法加以推广。

关键词: 体部立体定向放射治疗, 三维适形计划, 剂量梯度, 适形指数

Abstract:

Objective A new method of 3⁃dimensional conformal planning design is proposed and itsdosimetric advantages in stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)are evaluated. Methods A retrospective studywas conducted in 30 patients treated with SBRT technology. The conventional 3⁃dimensional conformal planning(CCP and the deformed target 3⁃dimensional conformal planning (DCP were designed respectively. Theprescription dose of each plan is defined as the planning target volume(PTV)50 Gy/5 fractions,and the PTVcoverage was required to be >95% for prescription dose. The plans were compared by assessing the conformityindex(CI),dose gradient(DG),approximate minimum dose of PTV(D99%),maximum dose at 2 cm from PTV inany direction(D2 cm)and monitor unit(MU). Results Both groups of plans satisfied all clinical requirements.CI,DG,D99%,and D2 cm in the group DCP were significantly improved(t = 4.55,5.95,4.37,3.86,P < 0.05)andMU decreased(t = 2.82,P < 0.05)compared with the group CCP. Conclusions DCP has obvious dosimetricadvantages,and reduces the number of MU while shortening the treatment time. It can be promoted as a new planningdesign method.

Key words: SBRT, 3?dimensional conformal planning, dose gradient, conformity index