实用医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1236-1245.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.10.012

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死伴射血分数减少型心力衰竭患者左心室逆重构的预测因素

王晓敏 徐亚威 毛云 郑璐 裴小鑫 杨海波    

  1. 郑州大学第一附属医院心内科(郑州 450000)

  • 出版日期:2022-05-25 发布日期:2022-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 杨海波 E⁃mail:yanghaibo1975@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(编号:81800377)

Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure af⁃ ter ST ⁃ segment elevation myocardial infarction

WANG Xiaomin,XU Yawei,MAO Yun,ZHENG Lu,PEI Xiaoxin,YANG Haibo.   

  1. Department of Cardiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450000,China

  • Online:2022-05-25 Published:2022-05-25
  • Contact: YANG Haibo E⁃mail:yanghaibo1975@126.com

摘要:

目的 本研究分析急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)伴射血分数减少型心力衰竭(HFrEF 患者出现左心室逆重构(LVRR)的影响因素。方法 收集 2018 1 月至 2020 12 月于郑大一附院心内 科诊断 STEMI 行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者,将术后首次超声心动图测得 LVEF 小于 40% 的患者纳入,共 108 例。根据 6 个月后心脏彩超结果,将患者分为 LVRR 组和 NLVRR 组。比较两组基线 及手术资料,采用多因素 logistic 分析 LVRR 的影响因素,ROC 曲线分析其预测价值。结果 LVRR 组的 NT ⁃proBNP 峰值、cTnT 峰值、IBil、LVEDV、LVESV、总缺血时间(TIT)低于 NLVRR 组,左室短轴缩短率(FS)、完 全血运重建高于 NLVRR 组(P < 0.05)。回归分析发现,LVRR 的独立影响因素为 cTnT 峰值、TIT、完全血运 重建(P < 0.05),cTnT 峰值、TIT 为危险因素,完全血运重建为保护因素。ROC 曲线分析:cTnT 峰值联合 TIT AUC 高于 cTnT 峰值、TIT 单一检测(AUC 分别为 0.817、0.714、0.737,P < 0.05)。结论 cTnT 峰值、 TIT、完全血运重建为 STEMI HFrEF 患者出现 LVRR 的独立影响因素,其中 cTnT 峰值、TIT 为危险因素, 完全血运重建为保护因素。cTnT 峰值联合TIT 对LVRR 的预测价值高于二者单独的预测价值。

关键词:

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死, 射血分数减少型心力衰竭, 左心室逆重构

Abstract:

Objective To explore the influential factors of left ventricular reverse remod⁃eling(LVRR)in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure after ST⁃segment eleva⁃tion myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 108 patients who were confirmed with STEMI and had LVEF less than 40% after primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)were enrolled. According to the results of echocardiogram indicators after six months all patients were divided into LVRR group and NLVRR group. The routine baseline and operation data collected through the electronic medical record system were compared between the two groups. The multivariate Logistic regression model was used to explore the influential factors of LVRR. The receiver operating curve(ROC curve was used to analyze the predictive values of related factors. Results Compared with NLVRR group,the prevalence of peak NT⁃proBNP,peak cTnT,IBil,LVEDV,LVESV,TIT were lower,while FS,complete revascularization were higher in LVRR group(P < 0.05). Regression analysis found the influential factors of LVRR were peak cTnT TIT and complete revascularization(P < 0.05). Peak cTnT and TIT were risk factors for LVRR,while complete revascularization was protective factor. ROC curve analysis showed the AUC of TIT combined with peak cTnT detec⁃ tion was higher than peak cTnT or TIT alone(AUC were 0.817,0.714 and 0.737,P < 0.05). Conclusion Peak cTnT,TIT and complete revascularization were independent influential factors of LVRR in patient with HFrEF after STEMI. Peak cTnT and TIT were risk factors for LVRR,while complete revascularization was protective factor. The predictive value of peak cTnT combined with TIT for LVRR was higher than that of peak cTnT or TIT alone.

Key words:

STEMI, reduced ejection fraction heart failure, left ventricular reverse remodeling