实用医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (18): 2318-2330.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.18.012

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

一种新型微创腰椎融合工具治疗腰椎峡部裂的临床应用 

付拴虎1 覃海飚1 钟远鸣1 覃浩然1 韦家鼎1 伍亮1 陈勇喜1 宋泉生1 卢大汉1 谷金1 许伟2    

  1. 1 广西中医药大学第一附属医院脊柱外科(南宁530000);2 广西中医药大学(南宁 530023)

  • 出版日期:2022-09-25 发布日期:2022-09-25
  • 通讯作者: 覃海飚 E⁃mail:gclzljqhb@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81760874);广西重点研发计划项目(编号:桂科 AB20159018);广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会(编号:Z20210147);广西中医药大学 2020 年博士研究生科研创新项目(编号:YCBSZ2020001)

Efficacy of a new minimally invasive lumbar fusion device for lumbar spondylolysis

FU Shuanhu*,QIN Haibiao,ZHONG Yuanming,QIN Haoran,WEI Jiading,WU Liang,CHEN Yongxi,SONG Quansheng,LU Dah⁃ an,GU Jin,XU Wei.   

  1. Department of Spinal Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine,Nanning 530000,China

  • Online:2022-09-25 Published:2022-09-25
  • Contact: QIN Haibiao E⁃mail:gclzljqhb@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨一种新型腰椎融合技术工具在临床上治疗腰椎峡部裂的安全性及可行性。 方法 前瞻性选择2021年1~8月在广西中医药大学第一附属医院住院诊断为腰椎峡部裂的20例患者,根据 随机数字表法分为A组(新型腰椎融合工具治疗组)和B组(后路腰椎间融合术PLIF组)。记录两组患者的年 龄、性别、体质量指数(BMI)、手术节段、手术时间、术中出血量、下床时间、伤口长度、术中X线透视次数、术后并发症、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、日本骨科协会评估治疗分数(JOA)、Oswestry功能障碍指数问卷表(ODI)评分 等情况,并对以上指标进行统计学分析。结果 A组和B组在年龄、性别、BMI、手术节段、术前VAS评分、术前 JOA评分、术前ODI评分方面对比,差异无统计学意义(> 0.05);A组在术中出血量、下床时间、伤口长度、术 中X线透视次数、手术时间与B组对比,差异有统计学意义(< 0.05);A组和B组在术后第1天、术后第7天术 口疼痛VAS评分方面对比,差异有统计学意义(< 0.05);A组和B组在术后第1天、术后第14天、术后1个月 JOA评分及ODI评分对比,差异有统计学意义(< 0.05)。结论 A组在治疗腰椎峡部裂方面,具有术中出血 量少、伤口小、恢复快等优势,同时症状缓解明显、疗效满意。然而与PLIF技术对比,术中X线透视次数较多。

关键词: 腰椎融合; , 腰椎峡部裂; , 前瞻性研究

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of a new lumbar fusion technique in the treat⁃ ment of lumbar spondylolysis. Methods Twenty patients with lumbar spondylolysis diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine from January 2021 to August 2021 were prospectively selected and randomly divided into group A(new type of lumbar fusion device group)and group B(PLIF group),with 10 patients in each group. Age,sex,body mass index(BMI),operative segment,operative time,intraoperative blood loss,ambulation time,wound length,intraoperative X ⁃ ray fluoroscopy times,postoperative complications,VAS score,JOA score and ODI score were recorded and compared in the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in terms of age,sex,BMI,surgical segment,preoperative VAS score,preoperative JOA score and preop⁃ erative ODI score between group A and B(P > 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss,ambulation time,wound length intraoperative X ⁃ ray fluoroscopy frequency and operation time in group A were significantly different from those in group B(P < 0.05). There was statistically significant difference in VAS score of postoperative pain on the 1st and 7th day between group A and B(P < 0.05). There was significant difference in JOA score and ODI score between group A and B on the 1st,and 14th day and 1 month after operation(P < 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis,the new type of lumbar fusion device has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss small wound and rapid recovery. At the same time,the symptoms are relieved obviously and the curative effect is sat⁃ isfactory. However,intraoperative X⁃ray fluoroscopy is more frequently needed when compared with PLIF technique. 

Key words:  , lumbar fusion , lumbar spondylolysis , prospective study