实用医学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 1396-1401.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.10.011

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

经皮介入治疗主动脉缩窄合并二叶式或三叶式主动脉瓣术后左心室逆重构的临床研究

马培尧1,孔深柯1,赵强1,王坤1,王鑫1,王文志1,赵法允1,李艳鑫1,王鹏飞1,刘瑞闪1,张戈军2(),徐仲英2,徐亮2,宋会军2,李易航2   

  1. 1.河南省胸科医院心血管内科 (郑州 450000 )
    2.中国医学科学院阜外医院结构性心脏病中心 (北京 100037 )
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-15 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-05-21
  • 通讯作者: 张戈军 E-mail:zhanggj2023@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(2018020541)

Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on left ventricular reverse remodeling after transcatheter percutaneous intervention for coarctation of aorta complicated by bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve

Peiyao MA1,Shenke KONG1,Qiang ZHAO1,Kun WANG1,Xin WANG1,Wenzhi WANG1,Fayun ZHAO1,Yanxin LI1,Pengfei WANG1,Ruishan LIU1,Gejun ZHANG2(),Zhongying XU2,Liang XU2,Huijun SONG2,Yihang. LI2   

  1. *.Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,He′nan Provincial Chest Hospital,Zhengzhou 450000,China
  • Received:2023-09-15 Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-05-21
  • Contact: Gejun ZHANG E-mail:zhanggj2023@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨主动脉缩窄(CoA)合并二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)和三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)行经皮介入手术后患者左心室逆重构的差异。 方法 回顾性分析2014年1月至2021年12月因主动脉缩窄于中国医学科学院阜外医院行经皮主动脉缩窄球囊扩张和支架置入术47例患者的临床资料。根据术前影像学资料合并BAV 18例,TAV 29例。对比患者术前和术后1年的超声心动图检查结果。 结果 与术前相比,经皮介入治疗后CoA患者术后1年的CoA Vmax、CoA PG、LVEDd、LVEDdi、LVM、LVMI均明显改善,23.4%患者出现了左室逆重构。合并BAV的患者AV Vmax、AV PG、LVEDdi均高于TAV组(P = 0.005,P = 0.007,P = 0.03),BAV患者左室逆重构率低于TAV患者,但无统计学意义。多因素分析未发现影响术后1年左室逆重构的影响因素。 结论 部分CoA患者经皮介入手术术后1年发生左心室重构逆转。且合并BAV的患者改善情况亚于TAV患者,仍需要进一步探索。

关键词: 主动脉缩窄, 二叶式主动脉瓣, 经皮介入手术, 左心室重构逆转

Abstract:

Objective To explore the difference in left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) between coarctation of aorta (CoA) complicated by bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and that by tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) after percutaneous intervention. Methods The clinical data on 47 patients undergoing percutaneous balloon dilation and stent implantation due to CoA in Fuwai Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2014 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the preoperative imaging data, there were 18 patients with BAVA and 29 with TAV. The results of echocardiography before and one year after the procedure were compared. Results CoA Vmax, CoA PG, LVEDd, LVEDdi, LVM and LVMI were significantly improved in CoA patients one year after percutaneous intervention, and 23.4% of the patients developed left ventricular reverse remodeling. AV Vmax, AV PG and LVEDdi in the patients with BAV were higher than those in the TAV group (P = 0.005 and P = 0.007; P = 0.03), and the rate of left ventricular reverse remodeling in BAV patients was lower than that in TAV patients, but there was no statistical significance. Multivariate analysis did not find any influence factors affecting left ventricular reverse remodeling one year after the procedure. Conclusions Part of the CoA patients develops left ventricular remodeling reversal one year after percutaneous intervention. LVRR in patients with BAV is lower than that in those with TAV, which still needs further clinical research.

Key words: coarctation of aorta, bicuspid aortic valve, percutaneous intervention, left ventricular reverse remodeling

中图分类号: