论著·机制与实践

中孕期羊膜腔穿刺羊水沉淀性状的影响因素及对妊娠结局的影响

  • 李琴 ,
  • 陈薇 ,
  • 吴仁花 ,
  • 袁静 ,
  • 胡艳平
展开
  • 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科产前诊断中心 (安徽 合肥 230022 )

收稿日期: 2026-05-18

  修回日期: 2026-06-15

  录用日期: 2026-06-17

  网络出版日期: 2026-08-13

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2021YFC1005303)

Factors influencing the characteristics of amniotic fluid sediment during mid-trimester amniocentesis and their impact on cell culture and pregnancy outcomes

  • Qin LI ,
  • Wei CHEN ,
  • Renhua WU ,
  • Jing YUAN ,
  • Yanping? HU
Expand
  • Prenatal Diagnosis Center,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230022,Anhui,China

Received date: 2026-05-18

  Revised date: 2026-06-15

  Accepted date: 2026-06-17

  Online published: 2026-08-13

摘要

目的 分析中孕期产前诊断羊膜腔穿刺术后羊水性状及沉淀差异性的可能原因、可能影响因素及其对羊水细胞培养与妊娠结局的影响,为临床标本处理、风险评估与咨询提供依据。 方法 回顾性选取2025年1—12月于安徽医科大学第一附属医院产前诊断中心行中孕期(18 ~ 24周)单胎羊膜腔穿刺的孕妇共2 489例,最终纳入96例作为研究对象。抽取20 mL羊水经离心后按羊水沉淀性状与沉淀量分为4组:少量乳白色沉淀组(A组,n = 20)、多量乳白色沉淀组(B组,n = 24)、少量血性沉淀组(C组,n = 29)、少量茶褐色沉淀组(D组,n = 23)。收集各组基线资料、实验室指标,采用原位细胞培养法记录培养周期、换液次数、细胞计数,随访妊娠结局;采用单因素方差分析、χ2检验及二元logistic回归模型分析进行统计学分析。 结果 4组在RBC、CRP、培养周期、换液次数、细胞计数及孕期出血史等方面差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。其中D组母体RBC水平最高,为(4.93 ± 1.55)×1012/L,显著高于其他组(F = 5.20,P = 0.002);B组CRP水平最高为(9.63 ± 2.87)mg/L,4组间差异有统计学意义(F = 5.69,P = 0.001)。培养相关指标方面,4组在培养周期、换液次数及细胞计数方面差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.001)。D组培养周期最长,为(13.52 ± 0.88)d;换液次数最多(5.57 ± 0.650)次;细胞计数最少,为(1.09 ± 0.56)×105/mL。4组间受孕方式、抗凝剂使用史、双胎之一自减及胎盘位置比较差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。孕期出血史在4组间分布差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 14.04,P = 0.003)。通过二元logistic回归模型分析提示RBC、培养周期、换液次数、孕期出血史及与D组发生可能性显著相关(OR = 2.27、6.89、4.25、4.88)。妊娠结局显示D组出现流产、羊水渗漏、早产等不良事件,其余3组均未发生不良事件。 结论 中孕期羊水性状及沉淀差异性较大,茶褐色羊水可能会降低体外细胞培养效率同时增加不良妊娠结局风险,临床需结合高危因素提前评估,实施标本分层处理与孕期个体化管理。?

本文引用格式

李琴 , 陈薇 , 吴仁花 , 袁静 , 胡艳平 . 中孕期羊膜腔穿刺羊水沉淀性状的影响因素及对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(15) : 2770 -2778 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.15.013

Abstract

Objective To investigate the factors influencing the characteristics of amniotic fluid sediment following second-trimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis, and to evaluate their impact on amniotic fluid cell culture and pregnancy outcomes, thereby providing a basis for clinical specimen processing, risk assessment, and genetic counseling. Methods A total of 2 489 pregnant women who underwent mid-trimester (18 - 24 weeks) amniocentesis for singleton pregnancies at the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2025 to December 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 96 cases with distinct sediment characteristics were ultimately included. Based on the visual characteristics and volume of the sediment from 20 mL centrifuged amniotic fluid aliquots, patients were categorized into four groups: small-volume milky-white sediment (Group A, n = 20), large-volume milky-white sediment (Group B, n = 24), small-volume bloody sediment (Group C, n = 29), and small-volume dark-brown sediment (Group D, n = 23). Baseline demographics and laboratory parameters were collected. Using the in situ amniotic fluid cell culture method, we recorded the culture duration, number of media changes, and total cell yield. Pregnancy outcomes were subsequently tracked. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance, chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression. Results There were statistically significant differences between the four groups in terms of RBC, CRP, culture cycle, number of fluid changes, cell count, and history of bleeding during pregnancy (all P < 0.05). Among them, RBC and CRP levels were significantly different among the four groups. Group D had the highest RBC level, which was (4.93 ± 1.55)× 1012/L, which was significantly higher than other groups (F = 5.20, P = 0.002); group B had the highest CRP level, which was (9.63 ± 2.87) mg/L, and the difference between the four groups was statistically significant (F = 5.69, P = 0.001). In terms of culture-related indicators, there were significant differences among the four groups in terms of culture cycle, number of medium changes, and cell count (all P < 0.001). Group D had the longest culture period, (13.52 ± 0.88) days; the most number of medium changes, (5.57 ± 0.650) times; and the lowest cell count, (1.09 ± 0.56)× 105/mL. There were no statistically significant differences in conception methods, history of anticoagulant use, twin reduction, and placental position among the four groups (all P > 0.05). The distribution of history of bleeding during pregnancy was significantly different among the four groups (χ2 = 14.04, P = 0.003). Binary logistic regression model analysis showed that RBC, culture cycle, number of fluid changes, history of bleeding during pregnancy were significantly related to the occurrence of group D (OR = 2.27, 6.89, 4.25, 4.88 respectively). Pregnancy outcomes showed that adverse events such as miscarriage, amniotic fluid leakage, and premature birth occurred in group D, while no adverse events occurred in the other three groups. Conclusions Amniotic fluid sediment characteristics exhibit significant variations during the second trimester. Specifically, dark-brown sediment is associated with impaired in vitro cell culture efficiency and an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings underscore the necessity for early risk assessment, stratified specimen processing, and individualized prenatal management in clinical practice.

参考文献

[1] KIM N, JOO E H, KIM S, et al. Comparative analysis of obstetric, perinatal, and neurodevelopmental outcomes following chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis[J]. Front Med, 2024, 11:1407710. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1407710 .
[2] GOTO S, SUZUMORI N, KUMAGAI K, et al. Trends of fetal chromosome analysis by amniocentesis before and after beginning of noninvasive prenatal testing: A single-center experience in Japan[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2021, 47(11): 3807-3812. doi: 10. 1111/jog.14965 .
[3] 方玉琴, 张苗苗, 李景然, 等. 基于毛细管电泳平台的单基因病携带者筛查应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(23): 2973-2979. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.23.015 .
[4] REZAGHOLI P, RASOULI M A, ZARE , S. Indications of Amniocentesis and its Early and Late Complications[J]. Adv Biomed Res, 2024, 13: 103. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr40823.
[5] BETA J, LESMES-HEREDIA C, BEDETTI C, et al. Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: A systematic review of the literature[J]. Minerva Ginecol, 2018, 70(2): 215-219. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04178-8 .
[6] 邓国生, 何才通, 赖玉青. 改良同步化G显带及染色体微阵列分析在脐血产前诊断中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(24): 3168-3173. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.24. 014 .
[7] SHORT D, SHETH S, KELLEHER M, et al. The safety, acceptability, and success rates of amniocentesis in the context of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and threatened preterm labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2024, 37(1): 2332784. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024. 2332784 .
[8] 冯艺帆, 王云梦, 马婵婵. 全自动滴片在羊水细胞染色体制备中的应用价值[J]. 实用医学杂志. 2023, 39(6): 667-671. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.06.003 .
[9] SIMMONS P M, WHITTINGTON J R, ESTRADA S M, et al. What is the Impact of Abnormal Amniotic Fluid Volumes on Perinatal Outcomes in Normal Compared with At-Risk Pregnancies?[J]. Int J Womens Health, 2020, 12: 805-812. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S263329 .
[10] DAMMANN A N, CHAMBY A B, CATOMERIS A J, et al. Genome-Wide fitness analysis of group B Streptococcus in human amniotic fluid reveals a transcription factor that controls multiple virulence traits[J]. PLoS Pathog, 2021, 17(3): e1009116. doi: 10.1371/ journal.ppat.1009116 .
[11] 曾艳, 范佳鸣, 张丽芳. 产前诊断中羊水性状对羊水细胞培养的影响[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2016, 51(10): 779-782. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2016.10.014 .
[12] RAHMAWATI A, WULANDARI R C L, ARISANTI A Z, et al. The Effect of Date Juice and Honey OnIncreasing Hemoglobin in Pregnant Women with Anemia[J]. Int J Islamic Complemen Med, 2022, 3(2): 57-64. doi: 10.55116/ijicm.v3i2.43 .
[13] LOUKAS N, VRACHNIS D, ANTONAKOPOULOS N, et al. Prenatal Exposure to Bisphenol A: Is There an Association between Bisphenol A in Second Trimester Amniotic Fluid and Fetal Growth?[J]. Medicina. 2023, 59(5): 882. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050882 .
[14] WU J, LU Y, ZHENG Z, et al. A primary study: high-throughput sequencing analysis of amniotic fluid microbiota in 50 high-risk pregnant women during the second trimester[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2026, 16: 1748232. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2026. 1748232 .
[15] 陈晓玲,黄向贵,周泳宜,等. 宫内高血糖对新生儿炎症因子水平及婴儿过敏性疾病发生的影响[J]. 新医学,2024,55(6):437-442.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9802.2024.06.006 .
[16] ROMERO R, GERVASI M T, DIGIULIO D B, et al. Are bacteria, fungi, and archaea present in the midtrimester amniotic fluid?[J]. J Perinat Med, 2023,51 (7): 886-890. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0604 .
[17] CAMPESI I, CAPOBIANCO G, CANO A, et al. Stratification of Amniotic Fluid Cells and Amniotic Fluid by Sex Opens Up New Perspectives on Fetal Health[J]. Bio medicines, 2023, 11(10): 2830. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102830 .
[18] ZEMBALA-SZCZERBA M, JAWOROWSKI A, HURAS H, et al. Low-Grade Metabolically-Induced Inflammation Mediators Interleukin-6, Adiponectin, and TNF-α Serum Levels in Obese Pregnant Patients in the Perinatal Period[J]. Med Sci Monit Basic Res, 2017, 23: 1-7. doi: 10.12659/msmbr.902273 .
[19] WARINTAKSA P, ROMERO R, LERTRAT W, et al. Quantitative cervicovaginal fluid fetal fibronectin: A liquid biopsy for intra-amniotic inflammation[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol, 2024, 103(11): 2252-2263. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14899 .
[20] GOMEZ-LOPEZ N, ROMERO R, XU Y, et al. The immunophenotype of amniotic fluid leukocytes in normal and complicated pregnancies[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2018, 79(4): e12827. doi: 10. 1111/aji.12827 .
[21] JUNG E J, ROMERO R, GOMEZ-LOPEZ N, et al. Cervical insufficiency, amniotic fluid sludge, intra-amniotic infection, and maternal bacteremia: the need for a point-of-care test to assess inflammation and bacteria in amniotic fluid[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(24): 4775-4781. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020. 1863369 .
[22] GOTO M, NAKAMURA M, TAKITA H, et al. Study for risks of amniocentesis in anterior placenta compared to placenta of other locations[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 60(4): 690-694. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.05.018 .
文章导航

/