专题报道:糖尿病

不同制备方法自体富血小板凝胶治疗糖尿病足溃疡的效果比较及体外抑菌的时效性

  • 刘师 ,
  • 文斌 ,
  • 李伟 ,
  • 朱恩芳 ,
  • 徐雪飞 ,
  • 陈明胜 ,
  • 桂莉
展开
  • 1.大理大学临床医学院 (云南 大理 671003 )
    2.云南省第三人民医院内分泌科 (云南 昆明 650011 )

收稿日期: 2026-01-17

  网络出版日期: 2026-05-27

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(82160175);云南省“高层次人才培养支持计划”名医专项计划(YNWRMY2020010);云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2025Y1178)

Comparative effect of autologous platelet-rich gel with different preparation methods on treating diabetic foot ulcers and its time-dependent bacteriostatic activity in vitro

  • Shi LIU ,
  • Bin WEN ,
  • Wei LI ,
  • Enfang ZHU ,
  • Xuefei XU ,
  • Mingsheng CHEN ,
  • Li GUI
Expand
  • 1.School of Clinical Medicine,Dali University,Dali 671003,Yunnan,China
    2.Department of Endocrinology,the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province,Kunming 650011,Yunnan,China

Received date: 2026-01-17

  Online published: 2026-05-27

摘要

目的 探讨不同制备方法自体富血小板凝胶(APG)对糖尿病足伤口愈合及体外抑菌的疗效。 方法 伤口愈合试验:将云南省第三人民医院2024—2025年收治的80例糖尿病足溃疡患者随机分为一次离心法APG组、二次离心法APG组、机采法APG组及清创胶对照组(各20例),比较4组治疗前后的空腹血糖(FBG)、血沉(ESR)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、降钙素原(PCT)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、抗凝血酶Ⅲ(AT-Ⅲ)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、溃疡面积缩小率。体外抑菌试验:另纳入20例糖尿病患者,以3种方法制备APG为试验组,设PPP组及SALINE SOLUTION对照组,观察对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希杆菌、产酶大肠埃希杆菌及铜绿假单胞菌的抑菌作用。 结果 治疗后4组实验室指标差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两两比较显示,3组试验组AT-Ⅲ高于对照组,其余7项指标低于对照组(P < 0.05)。3次换药后,4组在第1次换药、第3次换药溃疡面积及溃疡面积缩小率、最终疗效上差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),对照组效果均差于试验组;对照组各时间点溃疡面积缩小率均显著低于3组试验组(P < 0.001),试验组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);溃疡面积缩小率随时间显著上升 (P < 0.001),组间时间变化模式不同,对照组各时间点愈合率均低于试验组;治疗分组、基线溃疡面积及上述多项实验室指标组间分布(P < 0.05)。对于更严重的Wagner 3级溃疡,APG治疗能带来确切的、优于常规治疗的临床改善。多因素logistic显示3组试验组均为疗效显效的强预测因素 (P < 0.05),其余基线溃疡面积、空腹血糖等指标对显效结局无统计学显著影响(P 均> 0.05)。3组试验组4 ~ 12 h对大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌抑菌活性显著,且各实验组组间分布水平十分接近;5组对产酶大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌均无抑菌作用,PPP组、对照组对所有菌株均无效;所有组的抑菌活性均随时间延长而减弱,24 h基本消失。 结论 3种制备方法APG均能有效地降低糖尿病足患者血糖水平、改善临床指标、促进创面愈合,且富血小板凝胶具有特定的抑菌谱,且对不同菌属的抑菌作用具有时效性。

本文引用格式

刘师 , 文斌 , 李伟 , 朱恩芳 , 徐雪飞 , 陈明胜 , 桂莉 . 不同制备方法自体富血小板凝胶治疗糖尿病足溃疡的效果比较及体外抑菌的时效性[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(10) : 1692 -1702 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.10.002

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich gel (APG) prepared by different methods on diabetic foot wound healing and antibacterial activity in vitro. Methods In the wound healing trial, 80 patients with diabetic foot ulcers admitted to The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from 2024 to 2025 were randomly divided into four groups (n=20 each): Single centrifugation APG group, double centrifugation APG group, machine-harvested APG group, and debridement gel control group. fasting blood glucose (FBG), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), antithrombin Ⅲ(AT-III), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), homocysteine (Hcy), and ulcer area reduction rate were compared before and after treatment. In the in vitro antibacterial test, 20 diabetic patients were additionally enrolled. Three types of APG were used as experimental groups, with platelet-poor plasma (PPP) group and saline solution as controls. Antibacterial effects against Staphylococcus aureusEscherichia coli, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were observed. Results After treatment, significant differences were found in laboratory parameters among the four groups (P < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed that AT-Ⅲ was higher in the three experimental groups than in the control group, while the other seven indicators were lower (P < 0.05). After the first and third dressings, significant differences were observed in ulcer area, ulcer area reduction rate, and final efficacy among the four groups (P < 0.05); the control group was inferior to the experimental groups. The ulcer area reduction rate was significantly lower in the control group than in the three experimental groups at each time point (P < 0.001), with no significant difference among experimental groups (P > 0.05). The ulcer area reduction rate increased significantly over time (P < 0.001), with different temporal patterns between groups; the control group had lower healing rates than experimental groups at all time points. Treatment group, baseline ulcer area, and the aforementioned laboratory parameters were significantly different among groups (P < 0.05). For more severe Wagner grade 3 ulcers, APG treatment provided definite clinical improvement superior to conventional therapy. Multivariate logistic regression showed that all three experimental groups were strong predictors of marked efficacy (P < 0.05), whereas baseline ulcer area, fasting blood glucose, and other indicators had no significant effect (all P > 0.05). All three experimental groups exhibited significant antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus at 4 ? 12 hours, with similar levels among groups. None of the five groups showed antibacterial activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa; the PPP group and control group had no effect on any strain. Antibacterial activity decreased over time and was almost absent at 24 hours. Conclusions APG prepared by the three methods effectively reduces blood glucose, improves clinical parameters, and promotes wound healing in diabetic foot patients. Autologous platelet-rich gel displays a specific antibacterial spectrum, and its antibacterial effect against different bacterial genera is time-dependent.

参考文献

[1] SUMPIO B J, MEZGHANI I, WANG E, et al. Experimental treatments in clinical trials for diabetic foot ulcers: Wound healers in the pipeline[J]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2023, 32(2): 95-99. doi:10.1080/13543784.2023.2178418 .
[2] ZHANG P, LU J, JING Y, et al. Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Ann Med, 2017, 49(2):106-116.doi:10.1080/07853890.2016.1231932 .
[3] SORBER R, ABULARRAGE C J. Diabetic foot ulcers: Epidemiology and the role of multidisciplinary care teams[J]. Semin Vasc Surg, 2021, 34(1): 47-53.doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.006 .
[4] 邓品, 孙志波, 吴琼, 等. 糖尿病足溃疡的现代医学研究现状[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2025, 31(10): 1867-1872. doi:10.19945/j.cnki.issn.1006-3250.2025.10.036 .
[5] BARDILL J R, LAUGHTER M R, STAGER M, et al. Topical gel-based biomaterials for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers[J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2022, 138: 73-91. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.10.045 .
[6] SHEEAN A J, ANZ A W, BRADLEY J P. Platelet-rich plasma: Fundamentals and clinical applications[J]. Arthroscopy, 2021, 37(9): 2732-2734.doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.07.003 .
[7] ABOELSAAD E, MOUSTAFA S, AMINE A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma as a potential antimicrobial agent against multidrug-resistant bacteria in diabetic foot infections[J/OL]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 15145. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-97418-0 .
[8] AGHALOO T L, MOY P K, FREYMILLER E G. Investigation of platelet-rich plasma in rabbit cranial defects: A pilot study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002, 60(10): 1176-1181.doi:10.1053/joms.2002.34994 .
[9] 张娅丽, 周晖, 刘攀影. 自体富血小板凝胶辅助负压引流治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效及对血管新生的影响[J]. 临床医学, 2025, 45(4): 15-18. doi:10.19528/j.issn.1003-3548.2025.04.005 .
[10] ?ETINKAYA R A, YENILMEZ E, PETRONE P, et al. Platelet-rich plasma as an additional therapeutic option for infected wounds with multi-drug resistant bacteria: In vitro antibacterial activity study[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2019, 45(3): 555-565. doi:10.1007/s00068-018-0957-0 .
[11] 肖洁, 李翠莹, 张利, 等. 富血小板血浆体外抑菌作用研究[J]. 四川医学, 2015, 36(4): 470-473. doi:10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2015.04.010 .
[12] 蔡鸿娇, 张斌阳, 陈融斌, 等. 槲皮素和没食子酸对七种水产病原菌抑菌效果测定[J]. 中国饲料, 2025(17): 117-121, 165. doi:10.15906/j.cnki.cn11-2975/s.2024050059-07 .
[13] 李卓男. 自体富血小板血浆与传统方法治疗糖尿病足溃疡疗效的Meta分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2019.
[14] ZANZOV E, ANASTASOVA V, IVANOVA K, et al. Platelet-rich plasma for wound healing in diabetic patients[J]. Medicina, 2025, 61(9): 1535.doi:10.3390/medicina61091535 .
[15] 相佳宁,钟华,任嘉毅,等.门诊应用负压微引流联合超声清创治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026, 42(5): 102-108. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.05.013 .
[16] BURNOUF T, CHOU M L, WU Y W, et al. Antimicrobial activity of platelet (PLT)-poor plasma, PLT-rich plasma, PLT gel, and solvent/detergent-treated PLT lysate biomaterials against wound bacteria[J]. Transfusion, 2013, 53(1): 138-146. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03668.x .
[17] PLATINI H, ADAMMAYANTI K, MAULANA S, et al. The potential of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel for diabetic foot ulcer care among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2024, 20: 21-37.doi:10.2147/TCRM.S433033 .
[18] SHENG X, HU L, LI T, et al. Clinical efficacy and mechanism of the combination of autologous platelet-rich gel and recombinant human acidic fibroblast growth factor in the management of refractory diabetic foot[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2024, 15: 1374507. doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1374507 .
[19] LI T, MA Y, WANG M, et al. Platelet-rich plasma plays an antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and cell proliferation-promoting role in an in vitro model for diabetic infected wounds[J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2019, 12: 297-309. doi:10.2147/IDR.S186651 .
[20] RAMAKANT P, VERMA A K, MISRA R, et al. Changing microbiological profile of pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot infections: Time for a rethink on which empirical therapy to choose[J]. Diabetologia, 2011, 54(1): 58-64. doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1893-7 .
[21] 罗富强, 余电柏, 谢康麒, 等. 糖尿病足溃疡创面修复相关机制的研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(2): 158-163.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.02.006 .
[22] EVERTS P A, LANA J F, ALEXANDER R W, et al. Profound properties of protein-rich, platelet-rich plasma matrices as novel, multi-purpose biological platforms in tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(14): 7914. doi:10.3390/ijms25147914 .
[23] DU F, MA J, GONG H, et al. Microbial infection and antibiotic susceptibility of diabetic foot ulcer in China: Literature review[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13: 881659.doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.881659 .
[24] SMITH O J, WICAKSANA A, DAVIDSON D, et al. An evaluation of the bacteriostatic effect of platelet-rich plasma[J]. Int Wound J, 2021, 18(4): 448-456.doi:10.1111/iwj.13545 .
[25] CIE?LIK-BIELECKA A, BOLD T, ZIó?KOWSKI G, et al. Antibacterial activity of leukocyte- and platelet-rich plasma: An in vitro study[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 1-8.doi:10.1155/2018/9471723 .
[26] BIELECKI T M, GAZDZIK T S, ARENDT J, et al. Antibacterial effect of autologous platelet gel enriched with growth factors and other active substances: AN IN VITRO STUDY[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(3): 417-420.doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18491 .
[27] 赵连前, 张宇, 回蔷, 等. 富血小板凝胶对金黄色葡萄球菌的体外抗菌性研究[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2016, 27(6): 371-374. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7040.2016.06.016 .
文章导航

/