肿瘤诊治与预后专栏

手机水平仪联合激光引导装置在CT引导下经皮肺穿刺的应用

  • 张杰 ,
  • 孟凡亮
展开
  • 1.霍邱县人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科 (安徽 六安 237400 )
    2.安徽医科大学第四附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科(安徽巢湖 238000 )

收稿日期: 2025-11-27

  修回日期: 2025-12-30

  录用日期: 2025-12-31

  网络出版日期: 2026-04-13

基金资助

吴阶平医学基金会科研专项资助项目(320.6750.2025-1-15)

Application of smartphone inclinometer with laser guidance in CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy

  • Jie ZHANG ,
  • Fanliang MENG
Expand
  • 1.Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Huoqiu County People's Hospital,Lu'an 237400,Anhui,China
    2.Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,the Fourth Affiliated Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University,Chaohu 238000,Anhui,China

Received date: 2025-11-27

  Revised date: 2025-12-30

  Accepted date: 2025-12-31

  Online published: 2026-04-13

摘要

目的 探讨手机水平仪联合激光引导装置在CT引导下经皮肺穿刺中的应用价值。 方法 采用历史对照研究方法,选取2023年10月至2025年7月安徽医科大学第四附属医院收治需进行CT引导下经皮肺穿刺患者共60例(男45例,女15例),年龄(72.90 ± 8.82)岁, CT引导下肺穿刺患者的30例患者作为对照组,应用手机水平仪辅助的30例患者作为观察组。比较两组患者的同轴针进针次数、气胸发生率、出血程度、穿刺时间及穿刺角度等指标。 结果 观察组同轴针进针次数显著少于对照组[1.00(1.00,2.00)次 vs. 2.00(2.00,3.00)次,P < 0.001],气胸发生率更低(13.3% vs. 36.6%,P = 0.037),穿刺时间更短[(24.90 ± 4.68)min vs. (29.93 ± 10.11)min,P = 0.02],穿刺角度更大[19.50(7.75,41.00)°vs. 7.00(1.75,25.25)°,P = 0.04],两组出血程度差异无统计学意义(P = 0.481)。 结论 手机水平仪联合激光引导装置可有效减少CT引导下经皮肺穿刺的同轴针进针次数,降低气胸发生率,缩短穿刺时间,且穿刺角度更大。

本文引用格式

张杰 , 孟凡亮 . 手机水平仪联合激光引导装置在CT引导下经皮肺穿刺的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(7) : 1171 -1176 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.07.008

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the application value of smartphone level meter combined with laser guidance device in CT-guided percutaneous lung puncture. Methods A historical control study was conducted, and enrolling 60 patients who underwent CT-guided lung puncture at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from October 2023 to July 2025. A total of 60 patients (45 males, 15 females) with a mean age of (72.90 ± 8.82) years were included. 30 patients who underwent CT-guided lung puncture, and 30 patients who received smartphone level meter-assisted procedures as the experimental group. The following parameters were compared between the two groups: coaxial needle insertion attempts, pneumothorax incidence, bleeding severity, puncture duration, and achievable puncture angle. Results The experimental group demonstrated significantly fewer coaxial needle insertion attempts [1.00 (1.00, 2.00) vs. 2.00 (2.00, 3.00), P < 0.001], lower pneumothorax incidence (13.3% vs. 36.6%, P = 0.037), shorter puncture duration [(24.90 ± 4.68)min vs. (29.93 ± 10.11)min, P = 0.02], and larger achievable puncture angles [19.50° (7.75°, 41.00°) vs. 7.00° (1.75°, 25.25°), P = 0.04] compared to the control group. No statistically significant difference was observed in bleeding severity (P = 0.481). Conclusions The combination of a smartphone level meter and laser guidance device effectively reduces the number of coaxial needle insertion attempts, lowers the incidence of pneumothorax, shortens the procedure duration, and enables a wider achievable puncture angle in CT-guided percutaneous lung puncture. This technique shows promising clinical application value for improving the safety and efficiency of the procedure.

参考文献

[1] DAS M. M?glichkeiten und Limitationen der CT-gesteuerten Intervention [Possibilities and Limitations of CT-guided Intervention][J]. Zentralbl Chir, 2025, 150(S01): S50-S57. doi: 10.1055/a-2665-4806 .
[2] VIEITES B I, MARTINS S, MONTEIRO J P, et al. Fluoro-ct guided biopsy of lung nodules: A step by step revision[J]. Port J Card Thorac Vasc Surg, 2022, 28(4): 43-46. doi: 10.48729/pjctvs.223 .
[3] SONG Z, LI Y, TIAN Q, et al. Augmented reality guided versus computed tomography guided percutaneous lung nodule localization: A noninferiority randomized clinical trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2025, 111(4): 2933-2941. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002308 .
[4] BALBI M, RIGHI L, CULASSO N C, et al. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: How we do it[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2025, 184: 111994. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111994 .
[5] ZHANG Z, LIU R, LI J, et al. Usefulness of computed tomography-guided puncture biopsy coupled with rapid on-site evaluation for diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2024, 19(3): 299-307. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17895 .
[6] ZHAO X, BIE M. Comparative study of geometric localization technique and CT-guided percutaneous localization technique for peripheral GGO in wedge resection: A randomized controlled trial [J]. BMC Surg, 2025, 25(1): 117. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02848-2 .
[7] QAFESHA R M, NASSOURAH A L, AMRO S, et al. Laser positioning versus conventional CT-Guided lung biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes[J]. Radiography (Lond), 2025, 11: 103280. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2025.103280 .
[8] LIU W, XU C, LI L, et al. The value of computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy combined with rapid on-site evaluation in diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules[J]. Technol Cancer Res Treat, 2022, 21: 15330338221118718. doi: 10.1177/15330338221118718 .
[9] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺癌学组, 中国肺癌防治联盟专家组. 肺结节诊治中国专家共识(2018年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2018, 41(10): 763-771. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2018.10.004 .
[10] 北京医师协会呼吸内科专科医师分会咯血诊治专家共识编写组. 咯血诊治专家共识[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2020, 19(1): 1-11. doi: 10.7507/1671-6205.201911006 .
[11] WANG L, SONG B, ZHANG Z, et al. Evaluating efficacy and safety of a novel registration-free CT-guided needle biopsy navigation system (RC 120): A multicenter, prospective clinical trial[J]. Lung Cancer, 2024, 198: 108025. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.108025 .
[12] ZHANG H, WANG S, ZHONG F, et al. Risk factors for air embolism following computed tomography-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2023, 29(3): 478-491. doi: 10.4274/dir.2022.221187 .
[13] LI Y, YANG F, HUANG Y Y, et al. Comparison between computed tomography-guided core and fine needle lung biopsy: A meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2022, 101(9): e29016. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029016 .
[14] DEMPSEY P J, RIDGE C A, SOLOMON S B. Advances in interventional oncology: Lung cancer[J]. Cancer J, 2016, 22(6): 393-400. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000229 .
[15] 薛渭萍, 刘康, 马娅琼, 等. 智能穿刺导航系统在CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检中的临床应用[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2025, 41(7): 1207-1210. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2025.07.028 .
[16] 韩蕃颉, 王海滨, 李淋淋, 等. CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检术后气胸风险的预测模型[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025, 41(15): 2412-2417. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.15.018 .
[17] YEOW K M, TSAY P K, CHEUNG Y C, et al. Factors affecting diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsy: Retrospective analysis of 631 procedures[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003, 14(5): 581-588. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000071087.76348.c7 .
文章导航

/