专题报道:呼吸系统疾病

布比卡因脂质体胸腔镜引导下肋间神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后镇痛效果的影响

  • 刘世娅 ,
  • 郭怡辛 ,
  • 刘文铜 ,
  • 尹航 ,
  • 崔益宁 ,
  • 卢锡华
展开
  • 郑州大学附属肿瘤医院(河南省肿瘤医院)麻醉与围术期医学科 (河南 郑州 450008 )

收稿日期: 2025-11-15

  修回日期: 2025-12-10

  录用日期: 2025-12-12

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-26

基金资助

国家临床重点专科建设项目(豫卫医函〔2023〕30号)

Evaluation of postoperative analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine in thoracoscopy-guided intercostal nerve block

  • Shiya LIU ,
  • Yixin GUO ,
  • Wentong LIU ,
  • Hang YIN ,
  • Yining CUI ,
  • Xihua LU
Expand
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine,the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital,Zhengzhou 450008,Henan,China

Received date: 2025-11-15

  Revised date: 2025-12-10

  Accepted date: 2025-12-12

  Online published: 2026-03-26

摘要

目的 比较布比卡因脂质体与罗哌卡因在胸腔镜引导下肋间神经阻滞(TINB)中对胸腔镜肺叶切除术(VATS)患者术后镇痛效果及恢复质量的影响。 方法 纳入2025年1—6月拟行全麻下VATS患者120例,随机分为布比卡因脂质体L组(266 mg/20 mL,n = 60)和罗哌卡因 R组(100 mg/20 mL,n = 60)。两组均在胸腔镜直视下行T4—T8 INB,术后接受72 h自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)。记录术后2、6、12、24、48、72 h 静息及活动时NRS评分。记录舒芬太尼总消耗量、PCIA首次按压时间、补救镇痛率,术后首次下床时间、胸腔引流管的留置时间,记录术后72 h PCIA有效按压次数,术前24 h及术后24、72 h 的恢复质量评分(QoR-15),记录术后恶心呕吐、肺部并发症及INB相关不良反应的发生率。 结果 与R组比较,L组术后12、24、48、72 h 静息时NRS评分及 12、24、48 h活动时NRS 评分明显降低,舒芬太尼总消耗量明显减少、PCIA 首次按压时间明显延长、首次下床时间明显缩短、补救镇痛率明显减少,术后0 ~ 24、24 ~ 48及48 ~ 72 h PCIA 有效按压次数均明显减少,术后24、72 h QoR?15评分明显升高(P < 0.05),恶心呕吐发生率明显降低(P < 0.05)。两组胸腔引流管的留置时间、肺部并发症等相关不良反应发生率差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05),两组患者均未发生神经阻滞相关并发症。 结论 布比卡因脂质体TINB可实现72 h持续镇痛,显著减少阿片类药物用量并能提高患者早期恢复质量,不良反应较少,是VATS术后镇痛的优化选择。

本文引用格式

刘世娅 , 郭怡辛 , 刘文铜 , 尹航 , 崔益宁 , 卢锡华 . 布比卡因脂质体胸腔镜引导下肋间神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(6) : 916 -922 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.06.002

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine in thoracoscopy-guided intercostal nerve block (TINB) on postoperative analgesia and recovery quality in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS). Methods A total of 120 patients who were scheduled for VATS lobectomy under general anesthesia from January to June 2025 were recruited and randomly allocated into the liposomal bupivacaine group (Group L, 266 mg/20 mL, n = 60) and the ropivacaine group (Group R, 100 mg/20 mL, n = 60). In both groups, thoracic intercostal nerve block (INB) at the T4—T8 level was performed under direct thoracoscopic visualization, followed by 72-hour patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). The resting and activity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-surgery were recorded. The total sufentanil consumption, the time to the first PCIA demand, the rescue analgesia rate, the time to the first ambulation, the duration of chest tube placement, the total effective PCIA presses within 72 hours, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores at 24 hours before surgery and 24/72 hours after surgery, as well as the incidences of nausea/vomiting, pulmonary complications, and INB-related adverse events were documented. Results Compared with Group R, Group L exhibited significantly lower resting NRS scores at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h and activity NRS scores at 12, 24, and 48 h (P < 0.05). Additionally, it showed significantly reduced total sufentanil consumption, a prolonged time to the first PCIA demand, a shorter time to the first ambulation, a reduced rescue analgesia rate, decreased effective PCIA presses during the 0 ~ 24, 24 ~ 48, and 48 ~ 72 h intervals (P < 0.05), higher QoR-15 scores at 24/72 h (P < 0.05), and a significantly lower nausea/vomiting incidence (P < 0.05). There were no inter-group differences in the chest tube duration or the incidences of pulmonary complications and other adverse events (P > 0.05). Moreover, neither group encountered nerve block-related complications. Conclusion Liposomal bupivacaine TINB offers 72-hour prolonged analgesia, significantly decreases opioid consumption, improves the quality of early recovery with fewer adverse effects, and thus represents an optimized option for postoperative analgesia in VATS.

参考文献

[1] CAO W, CHEN H D, YU Y W, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: A secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J]. Chin Med J, 2021, 134(7): 783-791. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474 .
[2] YAN T D, BLACK D, BANNON P G, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(15): 2553-2562. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7695 .
[3] MALONEY J, WIE C, PEW S, et al. Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome[J]. Curr Pain Headache Rep, 2022, 26(9): 677-681. doi:10.1007/s11916-022-01069-z
[4] FERGUSON J, TSIM S, KELLY C, et al. Staging by thoracoscopy in potentially radically treatable lung cancer associated with minimal pleural effusion (STRATIFY): Protocol of a prospective, multicentre, observational study[J]. BMJ Open Respir Res, 2023, 10(1): e001771. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001771 .
[5] 李月, 张伟新, 梁汉生,等.胸椎旁神经阻滞对老年胸腔镜肺手术患者术后体温的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025, 41(14): 2199-2203. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2025.14.002 .
[6] SUN K, LIU D, CHEN J, et al. Moderate-severe postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A retrospective study[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 795. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-57751-y .
[7] GUERRA-LONDONO C E, PRIVOROTSKIY A, COZOWICZ C, et al. Assessment of intercostal nerve block analgesia for thoracic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4(11): e2133394. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33394 .
[8] XIAO W, ZHOU W, CHEN X, et al. Analgesic effect of intercostal nerve block given preventively or at the end of operation in video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Braz J Anesthesiol, 2022, 72(5): 574-578. doi: 0.1016/j.bjane. 2021.07.010 .
[9] CHEN H, SONG W, WANG W, et al. Ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia in mediastinal mass resection by median sternotomy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2021, 21(1): 98. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01291-z .
[10] LI Y, WEI L, DU J H, et al. Comparison of thoracoscopic-guided intercostal nerve block and ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block in postoperative analgesia of uniportal video-assisted lobectomy: A pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2025, 111(2): 1995-2001. doi: 10.1097/JS9. 000000000000 2165 .
[11] 马培奇. 美FDA批准布比卡因脂质体注射用悬浮液Exparel治疗术后疼痛[J]. 上海医药, 2012, 33(15): 29. doi:10.3966/j.issn.1006-1533.2012.15.012 .
[12] SHEETS N W, DAVIS J W, DIRKS R C, et al. Intercostal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine vs epidural analgesia for the treatment of traumatic rib fracture[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2020, 231(1): 150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.044 .
[13] TONG P, GUO Y, WANG Y, et al. Opioid-free anaesthesia protocol based on thoracic paravertebral block enhances postoperative recovery after breast cancer surgery: A two-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2025, 105: 111904. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111904 .
[14] 陈巧辉, 苏东风. 罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 外科研究与新技术(中英文), 2025, 14(1): 35-38. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2025.01.008 .
[15] SPAANS L N, DIJKGRAAF M G W, SUSA D, et al. Intercostal or paravertebral block vs thoracic epidural in lung surgery: A randomized noninferiority trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2025, 160(8): 855-864. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1899 .
[16] LEE J, LEE D H, KIM S. Serratus anterior plane block versus intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesic effect after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized prospective study[J/OL]. Medicine, 2020, 99(49): e22102. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000022102 .
[17] SPAANS L N, DIJKGRAAF M G W, MEIJER P, et al. Optimal postoperative pain management after VATS lung resection by thoracic epidural analgesia, continuous paravertebral block or single-shot intercostal nerve block (OPtriAL): Study protocol of a three-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial[J/OL]. BMC Surg, 2022, 22(1). doi:10.1186/s12893-022-01765-y .
[18] 史建明, 陈乃葆, 单靖华, 等. 术后胸腔镜直视下、超声引导下INB分别联合PCIA对单孔胸腔镜肺肿物切除术患者的镇痛效果观察[J]. 山东医药, 2024, 64(33): 63-67. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2024.33.015 .
[19] ANGST M S, DROVER D R. Pharmacology of drugs formulated with DepoFoam: A sustained release drug delivery system for parenteral administration using multivesicular liposome technology[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2006, 45(12): 1153-1176.doi:10.2165/00003088-200645120-00002 .
[20] MANNA S, WU Y, WANG Y, et al. Probing the mechanism of bupivacaine drug release from multivesicular liposomes[J]. J Control Release, 2019, 294: 279-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.12.029
[21] 卢建国, 赵香梅, 甘绍印, 等. 单孔胸腔镜肺部手术应用布比卡因脂质体进行肋间神经阻滞镇痛疗效的前瞻性临床研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2024: 1-6. doi:10.7507/1007-4848.2024.01.001 .
[22] 周岚, 黎鹏, 宋绍永, 等. 超声引导下持续肋间神经阻滞对双孔胸腔镜手术患者术后早期恢复的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022, 38(6): 603-607. doi:10.12089/jca.2022.06.009 .
[23] ADMIRAAL M, MARHOFER P, HOPKINS P M, et al. Peripheral regional anaesthesia and outcomes: A narrative review of the literature from 2013 to 2023[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2024, 132(5): 1082-1096. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.013 .
[24] 徐亚杰, 夏道林, 方兆晶, 等. 胸椎旁联合肋间神经阻滞对胸腔镜手术女性患者术后反弹性疼痛的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2025, 41(8): 807-812. doi:10.12089/jca.2025.08.007 .
[25] 沈颖.右美托咪定与地塞米松复合罗哌卡因对胸腔镜直视下肋间神经阻滞效果的影响[D].上海:上海交通大学,2019.
[26] LI S, FENG J, FAN K, et al. The effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2023, 18(1): 128. doi:10.1186/s13019-023-02210-8 .
[27] ZADRAZIL M, MARHOFER P, OPFERMANN P, et al. Liposomal bupivacaine for peripheral nerve blockade: A randomized, controlled, crossover, triple-blinded pharmacodynamic study in volunteers[J]. Anesthesiology, 2024, 141(1): 24-31. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000004988 .
[28] HU D, ONEL E, SINGLA N, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile of liposome bupivacaine injection following a single administration at the surgical site[J]. Clin Drug Investig, 2013, 33(2): 109-115. doi:10.2460/ajvr.25.05.0158 .
[29] HSU D S, ELY S, ALCASID N J, et al. Reduced opioid utilization and post-operative pain in asian vs. Caucasian populations after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy with liposomal bupivacaine-based intercostal nerve blockade[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2022, 11(5): 1635-1643. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2269 .
[30] D’ANDRILLI A, RENDINA E A. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and fast-track in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: Preoperative optimisation and care-plans[J]. J Vis Surg, 2018, 4: 4. doi:10.21037/jovs.2017.12.17 .
[31] BOHANNON R W, CROUCH R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: A systematic review[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2017, 23(2): 377-381. doi:10.1111/jep.12629 .
[32] SONG W Q, WANG W, YANG Y C, et al. Parasternal intercostal block complementation contributes to postoperative pain relief in modified radical mastectomy employing pectoral nerve block I and serratus-intercostal block: A randomized trial[J]. J Pain Res, 2020, 13: 865-871. doi:10.2147/JPR.S237435 .
[33] BENDIXEN M, J?RGENSEN O D, KRONBORG C, et al. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: A randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2016, 17(6): 836-844. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X .
文章导航

/