肿瘤诊治与预后专栏

贝伐珠单抗联合化疗治疗结直肠癌寡转移术后患者的疗效及对中位无进展生存期的影响

  • 于彬 ,
  • 周俭 ,
  • 田添 ,
  • 王富生
展开
  • 1.阜阳市人民医院,肿瘤内科,(安徽 阜阳 236000 )
    2.阜阳市人民医院,普外科,(安徽 阜阳 236000 )

收稿日期: 2025-12-11

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-09

基金资助

安徽省卫生健康科研项目(皖卫传〔2023〕515号-442);阜阳市卫生健康科研项目(FY2024-035)

The efficacy of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of postoperative patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer and its impact on mpfs median progression-free survival

  • Bin YU ,
  • Jian ZHOU ,
  • Tian TIAN ,
  • Fusheng WANG
Expand
  • 1.Department of Medical Oncology,Fuyang People's Hospital,Fuyang 236000,Anhui,Chin
    2.Department of General Surgery(Anorectal Disease Area),Fuyang People's Hospital,Fuyang 236000,Anhui,China

Received date: 2025-12-11

  Online published: 2026-03-09

摘要

目的 探究贝伐珠单抗联合FOLFOX标准化疗治疗结直肠癌寡转移术后患者的效果及对中位无进展生存期(mPFS)的影响。 方法 回顾性收集2021年1月至2024年6月阜阳市人民医院收治的结直肠癌寡转移术后患者的临床资料,依据术后所接受的治疗方案分为联合组(贝伐珠单抗联合FOLFOX标准化疗,n = 30)与化疗组(FOLFOX标准化疗,n = 72),均完成6个周期(21 d为1个周期)治疗,统计并比较两组治疗效果、治疗前后血清标志物水平[癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原199(CA199)、血小板计数/淋巴细胞计数比值(PLR)、淋巴细胞计数/单核细胞计数比值(LMR)、C反应蛋白/白蛋白比值(CRP/ALB)]、毒副反应,比较随访生存结局(每3个月随访1次,随访截止时间为2025年11月1日),分析血清标志物与结直肠癌寡转移术后患者生存预后的相关性,并展开Cox回归分析筛选结直肠癌寡转移患者预后影响因素。 结果 联合组整体疗效等级优于化疗组,疾病控制率(DCR)高于化疗组(P < 0.05);治疗后,联合组血清CEA、CA199、PLR、CRP/ALB低于同组治疗前及化疗组治疗后(P < 0.05),LMR高于同组治疗前及化疗组治疗后(P < 0.05),两组毒副反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);随访截止,联合组平均PFS及mPFS、平均生存时间(OS)及中位OS均长于化疗组(P < 0.05);102例患者按生存预后分为进展组(进展或肿瘤相关死亡,n = 62)与无进展组(随访存活,n = 40),进展组治疗结束血CEA、CA199、PLR、CRP/ALB高于无进展组,LMR低于无进展组(P < 0.05);结直肠癌寡转移患者治疗结束血清CEA、CA199、PLR、CRP/ALB与mPFS、中位OS均呈负相关,LMR与mPFS、中位OS均呈正相关(P < 0.05);Cox回归分析显示,高CEA、高CRP/ALB为结直肠癌寡转移患者预后的独立危险因素(P < 0.05),贝伐珠单抗+ FOLFOX化疗和高LMR水平为保护因素(P < 0.05)。 结论 贝伐珠单抗联合FOLFOX标准化疗较单独化疗可提高结直肠癌寡转移术后患者疾病控制率、降低肿瘤相关因子表达水平,且生存预后更好,不良反应可控。

本文引用格式

于彬 , 周俭 , 田添 , 王富生 . 贝伐珠单抗联合化疗治疗结直肠癌寡转移术后患者的疗效及对中位无进展生存期的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(5) : 750 -758 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.05.004

Abstract

Objective To explore the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX standard chemotherapy for the treatment of postoperative patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer and its impact on the median progression-free survival (mPFS). Methods The clinical data of postoperative patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer admitted to Fuyang People's Hospital from January 2021 to June 2024 were retrospectively collected. Based on the treatment regimens received after surgery, the patients were divided into the combination group (bevacizumab + FOLFOX standard chemotherapy, n = 30) and the chemotherapy group (FOLFOX standard chemotherapy, n = 72). All patients completed 6 cycles of treatment (with 21 days as 1 cycle). The therapeutic effects, serum marker levels before and after treatment [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), platelet count/lymphocyte count ratio (PLR), lymphocyte count/monocyte count ratio (LMR), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CRP/ALB)], and toxic and side effects of the two groups were systematically counted, analyzed, and compared. The follow-up survival outcomes were compared (with follow-up conducted once every 3 months until November 1, 2025). Additionally, the correlation between serum markers and the survival prognosis of patients was analyzed, and Cox regression analysis was employed to screen the prognostic factors of patients. Results The overall efficacy grade of the combined group was superior to that of the chemotherapy group, and the disease control rate (DCR) was higher (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of serum CEA, CA199, PLR, and CRP/ALB in the combined group were lower than those before treatment within the same group and those after treatment in the chemotherapy group (P < 0.05), whereas the LMR was higher (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of toxic and side effects between the two groups (P > 0.05). At the end of the follow-up, the combined group exhibited longer average progression-free survival (PFS), median PFS (mPFS), average overall survival (OS), and median OS (P < 0.05). A total of 102 patients were classified into the progression group (progression or tumor-related death, n = 62) and the non-progression group (surviving during follow-up, n = 40) based on survival prognosis. At the end of treatment, the levels of serum CEA, CA199, PLR, and CRP/ALB in the progression group were higher than those in the non-progression group, while the LMR was lower (P < 0.05). At the end of treatment for patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer, serum CEA, CA199, PLR, and CRP/ALB were negatively correlated with mPFS and median OS, whereas LMR was positively correlated with mPFS and median OS (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis indicated that high CEA and high CRP/ALB were independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer (P < 0.05), while bevacizumab + FOLFOX chemotherapy and high LMR level were protective factors (P < 0.05). Conclusions Bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX standard chemotherapy can enhance the disease control rate among postoperative patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer, decrease the expression level of tumor-related factors, and offer a better survival prognosis with controllable adverse reactions when compared with chemotherapy alone.

参考文献

[1] XIA C, DONG X, LI H, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: Profiles, trends, and determinants[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2022, 135(5): 584-590. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108 .
[2] SHAUKAT A, KAHI C J, BURKE C A, et al. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2021, 116(3): 458-479. doi: 10.14309/ajg. 0000000000001122 .
[3] WU M, WU X, WANG X, et al. IDO1/COX2 Expression Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer Liver Oligometastases[J]. J Pers Med, 2023, 13(3): 496. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030496 .
[4] LI B, WEI Z, WANG Z, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces oxaliplatin resistance by inhibiting ferroptosis through E-cadherin/β-catenin/GPX4 axis in colorectal cancer[J]. Free Radic Biol Med, 2024, 220: 125-138. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed. 2024. 04.226 .
[5] JU?ICA J, ?UVEROVá P, GONěC R, et al. High vs. low-dose leucovorin in regimens with fluorouracil in colorectal cancer therapy[J]. Ceska Slov Farm, 2023, 72(3): 107-112. doi:10.5817/csf2023-3-107
[6] LENZ H J, PARIKH A, SPIGEL D R, et al. Modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with and without nivolumab for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Phase 2 results from the CheckMate 9X8 randomized clinical trial[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2024, 12(3): e008409. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008409 .
[7] ROSSINI D, ANTONIOTTI C, LONARDI S, et al. Upfront Modified Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab Versus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin Plus Panitumumab for Patients With RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Phase Ⅲ TRIPLETE Study by GONO[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(25): 2878-2888. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00839 .
[8] WANG F, JIN Y, WANG M, et al. Combined anti-PD-1, HDAC inhibitor and anti-VEGF for MSS/pMMR colorectal cancer: A randomized phase 2 trial[J]. Nat Med, 2024, 30(4): 1035-1043. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02813-1 .
[9] AHN D H, BARZI A, RIDINGER M, et al. Onvansertib in Combination with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab in Second-Line Treatment of KRAS-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase Ib Clinical Study[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2024, 30(10): 2039-2047. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432 .
[10] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(6): 563-588. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20200504-00348 .
[11] ARAS M, ERDIL T Y, DANE F, et al. Comparison of WHO, RECIST 1.1, EORTC, and PERCIST criteria in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant solid tumors[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2016, 37(1): 9-15. doi: 10.1097/MNM. 0000000000000401 .
[12] FREITES-MARTINEZ A, SANTANA N, ARIAS-SANTIAGO S, et al. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE-Version 5.0) to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies[J]. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed), 2021, 112(1): 90-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.05.009 .
[13] NESS R M, LLOR X, ABBASS M A, et al. NCCN Guidelines? Insights: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Version 1.2024[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2024, 22(7): 438-446. doi: 10.6004/jnccn. 2024.0047 .
[14] SUYDAM C R, SCHLUSSEL A T. Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2024, 104(3): 619-629. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.11.011 .
[15] CARCONI C, CERRETI M, ROBERTO M, et al. The management of oligometastatic disease in colorectal cancer: Present strategies and future perspectives[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2023, 186: 103990. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103990 .
[16] 郑凯, 张天可, 付文政. XPC基因遗传变异对接受奥沙利铂辅助化疗方案的Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者的神经毒性及预后的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(10): 1301-1306. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1006-5725.2021.10.014 .
[17] WANG H, ZHENG J, PAN J, et al. Neoadjuvant triple-modality therapy with immune checkpoint blockade, anti-angiogenesis, and chemotherapy enhances pathologic response and survival in locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter cohort study[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2025, 40(1): 154. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04945-3 .
[18] MILLER E D, HITCHCOCK K E, ROMESSER P B. Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Definitions and Patient Selection for Local Therapies[J]. J Gastrointest Cancer, 2023, 54(4): 1116-1127. doi: 10.1007/s12029-022-00900-5 .
[19] YANG L, XIE H J, LI Y Y, et al. Molecular mechanisms of platinum?based chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer (Review)[J]. Oncol Rep, 2022, 47(4): 82. doi: 10.3892/or. 2022. 8293 .
[20] DE BAERE T, TSELIKAS L, DELPLA A, et al. Thermal ablation in the management of oligometastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2022, 39(1): 627-632. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1941311 .
[21] CHEN Y W, MCKAY R R. Mitigating the Risk of Skeletal Events in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2025, 11(3): 425-428. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.007 .
[22] ZHENG Y, ZHOU R, CAI J, et al. Matrix Stiffness Triggers Lipid Metabolic Cross-talk between Tumor and Stromal Cells to Mediate Bevacizumab Resistance in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases[J]. Cancer Res, 2023, 83(21): 3577-3592. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472 .
[23] WANG J, LIU C, WANG P, et al. Bioengineered Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vehicles Suppressed Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis and Bevacizumab Resistance[J]. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2025, 12(23): e2417714. doi: 10.1002/advs.202417714 .
[24] TAKAKURA Y, SHINOZAKI K, IKEDA S, et al. Preoperative Versus Postoperative Chemotherapy With CAPOX Plus Bevacizumab for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized Phase II Trial (HiSCO-01)[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2025, 9(6): 1253-1262. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70035 .
[25] BOND M J G, BOLHUIS K, LOOSVELD O J L, et al. First-Line Systemic Treatment for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Post Hoc Analysis of the CAIRO5 Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2025, 11(1): 36-45. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5174 .
[26] LIU X, CHEN Z, YAN P, et al. Treatment mechanism and research progress of bevacizumab for glioblastoma[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2025, 15(4): 1874-1901. doi: 10.62347/RNUE7193 .
[27] OHISHI T, KANEKO M K, YOSHIDA Y, et al. Current Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(2): 1702. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021702 .
[28] ELSAYED A, PLüSS L, NIDEROEST L, et al. Optimizing the Design and Geometry of T Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibodies Targeting CEA in Colorectal Cancer[J]. Mol Cancer Ther, 2024, 23(7): 1010-1020. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163 .
[29] WANG K, MA L, CHEN L, et al. The clinical value of a nomogram constructed from CEA, CA199, PT, FIB, tumor differentiation and TNM stage in colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2023, 38(4): 537-549. doi: 10.3233/CBM-230116 .
[30] 张昊晨, 周欣毅, 富栋梁, 等. rigosertib联合化疗对Kirsten大鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物突变型结直肠癌小鼠的疗效和不良反应[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2023, 45(2): 138-145. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210514-00379 .
[31] MISIEWICZ A, DYMICKA-PIEKARSKA V. Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review[J]. J Inflamm Res, 2023, 16: 69-81. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S391932 .
[32] GAWI?SKI C, MICHALSKI W, MRóZ A, et al. Correlation between Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) in Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer Patients[J]. Biology (Basel), 2022, 11(3): 385. doi: 10.3390/biology11030385 .
[33] FENG J, WANG L, WANG L, et al. Clinical significance of Osaka prognostic score based on nutritional and inflammatory status in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. BMC Cancer, 2022, 22(1): 284. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09406-6 .
[34] 张旭, 张庆, 郭帅, 等. 联合贝伐珠单抗的新辅助治疗对局部晚期直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2024, 33(10): 1623-1632. doi: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947. 2024.10.009 .
[35] 王翠翠, 乔万通, 姚俊英, 等. 营养控制状态评分联合预后营养指数评估老年结直肠癌患者合并贫血风险的临床应用价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025, 41(17): 2696-2704. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.17.013 .
文章导航

/