临床诊疗新技术与应用

闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定在不同时机治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的效果及并发症比较

  • 孙少松 ,
  • 朱少羽 ,
  • 张星晨 ,
  • 邓斌
展开
  • 徐州医科大学附属医院骨科 (江苏 徐州 221000 )

收稿日期: 2025-11-05

  网络出版日期: 2026-02-25

基金资助

江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(ZD2022064)

Comparison on the effect and complications of different timing of CRPP in the treatment of children with humeral supracondylar fractures

  • Shaosong SUN ,
  • Shaoyu ZHU ,
  • Xingchen ZHANG ,
  • Bin DENG
Expand
  • Department of Orthopedics,the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University,Xuzhou 221000,Jiangsu,China

Received date: 2025-11-05

  Online published: 2026-02-25

摘要

目的 探讨不同时机闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定(CRPP)治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的临床疗效及对并发症的影响。 方法 回顾性研究,选取2022年2月至2025年2月徐州医科大学附属医院收治的肱骨髁上骨折患儿100例,所有患儿均接受CRPP治疗,根据受伤至手术时间分为早期组(≤ 12 h,n = 58)和延期组(> 12 h,n = 42)。对比两组围术期相关指标、骨折愈合时间;于术后3个月评估患儿患侧肘关节活动度、Baumann角、提携角,并采用Flynn肘关节评分标准评估临床疗效,记录并发症发生率。 结果 早期组手术时间、术中出血量及术中透视次数均短(少)于延期组(P < 0.05),但两组住院时间和骨折愈合时间对比无差异(P > 0.05);术后3个月,两组肘关节活动度及Baumann角、提携角对比差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。早期组优良率高于延期组(94.83% vs. 80.95%)(P < 0.05)。早期组肘内翻畸形发生率及总并发症发生率均低于延期组(P < 0.05)。单因素logistic回归分析,结果显示,手术时机、手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视次数均与儿童肱骨髁上骨折CRPP治疗后疗效有关(P < 0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,早期手术是影响儿童肱骨髁上骨折 CRPP 治疗后疗效优良的独立保护因素(P < 0.05)。 结论 与延期手术相比,早期(受伤至手术时间≤ 12 h)行CRPP治疗肱骨髁上骨折患儿,可显著缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量,提升肘关节功能优良率,并降低并发症风险。

本文引用格式

孙少松 , 朱少羽 , 张星晨 , 邓斌 . 闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定在不同时机治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的效果及并发症比较[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(4) : 655 -662 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.04.016

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical curative effect of different timings of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) and its influences on complications in children with humeral supracondylar fractures. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 100 children with humeral supracondylar fractures who underwent CRPP at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between February 2022 and February 2025 were enrolled. Based on the interval from injury to surgery, the children were divided into an early-treatment group (interval ≤ 12 hours, n = 58) and a delayed-treatment group (interval > 12 hours, n = 42). The perioperative indexes and fracture healing time were compared between the two groups. Three months after surgery, the elbow range of motion on the affected side, Baumann angle, and carrying angle were evaluated. The clinical curative effect was assessed using the Flynn elbow scoring standard, and the incidence of complications was recorded. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in the early group were all significantly shorter or less than those in the delayed group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay or fracture healing time between the two groups (P > 0.05). Three months after surgery, there was no significant difference in the elbow range of motion, Baumann angle, or carrying angle between the two groups (P > 0.05). The good-outcome rate of the early group was significantly higher than that of the delayed group (94.83% vs. 80.95%, P < 0.05). The incidence of cubitus varus and the total incidence of complications in the early group were significantly lower than those in the delayed group (P < 0.05). The results of univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that surgical timing, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency were all associated with the curative effect in children with humeral supracondylar fractures following CRPP (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that early surgery was an independent protective factor for a good curative effect in children with humeral supracondylar fractures after CRPP (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with delayed surgery, early CRPP (interval from injury to surgery ≤ 12 h) can significantly shorten the operation time, reduce the intraoperative blood loss, increase the good rate of elbow function, and reduce the risk of complications in children with humeral supracondylar fractures.

参考文献

[1] DUFFY S, FLANNERY O, GELFER Y, et al. Overview of the contemporary management of supracondylar humeral fractures in children[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2021, 31(5): 871-881. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02932-2 .
[2] ALAYED Y, ALRASHEDAN B S, ALMISFER S K, et al. Impact of Preoperative Neuropraxia on Surgical Duration Following Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture of the Humerus: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj, 2023, 18(1): e27-e31. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771012 .
[3] MUSLU O, CENGIZ T, AYDIN ?IM?EK ?, et al. Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Patients With a Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Surgically Treated With Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(11): e49358. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49358 .
[4] COUPAL S, LUKAS K, PLINT A, et al. Management of Gartland Type 1 Supracondylar Fractures: A Systematic Review[J]. Front Pediatr, 2022, 10: 863985. doi: 10.3389/fped. 2022. 863985 .
[5] REHM A, SEAH M, KABWAMA S, et al. Conservative versus surgical treatment of Gartland type II supracondylar humeral fractures in children[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B, 2024, 33(6): 607-608. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000001194 .
[6] ALI S, KUMAR S, NATH R, et al. Prospective Study of Functional and Radiological Outcome after Operative Management of Supracondylar Fracture Humerus in Children[J]. J Orthop Case Rep, 2025, 15(3): 257-264. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i03. 5406 .
[7] ABOUSALEH M A, ZEIDAN A A, MUKHTAR I, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Closed Reduction With Percutaneous Pinning and Open Reduction With Internal Fixation in the Operative Management of Pediatric Type III Supracondylar Fractures[J]. Cureus, 2022, 14(2): e22707. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22707 .
[8] BARIK S, GARG V, SINHA S K, et al. A Meta-Analysis on Comparison of Open vs Closed Reduction of Gartland Type 3 Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children[J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2023,90(3):198-205. PMID:. doi:10.55095/achot2023/023
[9] ULUS S A, AKAR M S. Comparison of complications and results of early vs. delayed surgery for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2023, 27(24): 11764-11770. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202312_34774 .
[10] PRABHAKAR P, HO C A. Delaying Surgery in Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Does Not Lead to Longer Surgical Times or More Difficult Reduction[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2019, 33(8): e285-e290. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001491 .
[11] HAN Q L, WANG Y H, LIU F. Comparison of complications and results of early versus delayed surgery for Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fractures in pediatric patients[J]. Orthop Surg, 2011, 3(4): 242-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00153.x .
[12] 孙振球, 徐勇勇. 医学统计学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014.
[13] ZENG T, WANG L G, LIU W Q. Our experience with a modified prying-up technique for closed reduction of irreducible supracondylar humeral fractures[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 23048. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74467-5 .
[14] YüZüGüLDü U, YE?IL M, ?ZCAN ?, et al. Reliability of radiographic union score and correlation of clinical outcomes in children operated for supracondylar humerus fracture: A prospective study[J]. J Child Orthop, 2025, 19(3): 221-228. doi: 10.1177/18632521251331773 .
[15] JOSHI P, DAWADI P, RANA K, et al. Epidemiological and Clinical Pattern of Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture of Humerus in A Provincial Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study[J]. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc, 2021, 59(233): 12-14. doi: 10.31729/jnma.6047 .
[16] FAMILIARI F, ZAPPIA A, GASPARINI G, et al. Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture: When Should We Surgically Treat A Case-Series[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(1): 237. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010237 .
[17] ALSHAYNAWI S O, ALSHOMRANY A A, ALSHEBROMI A, et al. A Systemic Review of Adolescent Supracondylar Fractures: What Is the Surgical Treatment, Open Reduction With Internal Fixation (ORIF) or Closed Reduction With Percutaneous Pinning (CRPP) [J].Cureus, 2024,16(4): e58123. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58123 .
[18] OKKAOGLU M C, OZDEMIR F E, OZDEMIR E, et al. Is there an optimal timing for surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures in the first 24 hours [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 484. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02638-5 .
[19] 俞皋, 单斌斌, 邹承达, 等. 早期闭合复位经皮克氏针固定治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2025, 25(6): 348-353. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2025.06.005 .
[20] 潘天龙 侯相华, 张敬东. 手术时机对闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定术治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折疗效影响的研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2025, 39(5): 569-573. doi:10.7507/1002-1892.202503106 .
[21] WANG Q, WANG Y, HE M, et al. Research: Construction and validation of elbow function prediction model after supracondylar humerus fracture in children[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2023, 102(52): e36775. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036775 .
[22] 沈濬, 徐大鹏, 王晓东, 等. 儿童移位肱骨髁上骨折手术时间的多中心分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2024, 32(4): 308-313.doi:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2024.04.04 .
[23] 詹翼, 贝朝涌. 儿童肱骨髁上骨折相关的神经损伤研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(1): 115-117. doi:10. 13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.01.023 .
[24] CHAUDHRY S. Value-Driven Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Care: Implementing Evidence-Based Practices[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev, 2024, 8(4): e24.00058. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00058 .
[25] ERDO?AN F, ?ZTüRK ?, CENGIZ T,et al. The Impact of Surgical Timing on Complications and Clinical Outcomes in Surgery for Displaced Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture[J]. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2024, 26(6): 257-263. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0055.0633 .
[26] GUPTA S K, ESPOSITO E R, PHILLIPS R, et al. Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infection Rates in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Treated with Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2024, 32(9): 410-416. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00795 .
[27] SUGANUMA S, TADA K, YASUTAKE H, et al. Timing of Surgery for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures and Early Postoperative Results[J]. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol, 2020, 25(2): 226-231. doi: 10.1142/S2424835520500277 .
文章导航

/