临床诊疗新技术与应用

超声引导前路胸膜外间隙阻滞在机器人辅助胸腔镜肺手术中的应用

  • 殷国江 ,
  • 黄维 ,
  • 桂交交 ,
  • 王文杰 ,
  • 王思佳 ,
  • 宋晓阳 ,
  • 黎笔熙
展开
  • 中国人民解放军中部战区总医院麻醉科 (湖北 武汉 430070 )

收稿日期: 2025-08-25

  网络出版日期: 2026-02-25

基金资助

湖北省自然科学基金计划项目(2024AFC067);吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金立项课题(320.6750.2024-15-72)

Application of ultrasound⁃guided anterior extrapleural space block in robot⁃assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery

  • Guojiang YIN ,
  • Wei HUANG ,
  • Jiaojiao GUI ,
  • Wenjie WANG ,
  • Sijia WANG ,
  • Xiaoyang SONG ,
  • Bixi LI
Expand
  • Department of Anesthesiology,General Hospital of Central Theater Command of PLA,Wuhan 430070,Hubei,China

Received date: 2025-08-25

  Online published: 2026-02-25

摘要

目的 探讨超声引导前路胸膜外间隙阻滞用于机器人辅助胸腔镜肺手术患者的围术期镇痛效果 方法 纳入2024年1月至2025年3月择期行机器人辅助胸腔镜肺手术患者64例,随机分为前路胸膜外间隙阻滞联合全麻组(A组,n = 32)和全麻组(G组,n = 32)。记录入手术室时(T0)、全麻诱导后(T1)、手术切皮即刻(T2)、肺组织开始切除即刻(T3)、手术结束即刻(T4)及出手术室即刻(T5)的MAP及HR,记录术中麻药用量,记录术后首次阿片类药物镇痛时间,记录术后12、24及48 h的VAS评分,记录麻醉苏醒、出手术室、术后住院时间及不良反应发生情况。 结果 A组T2 ~ T5时MAP及HR低于G组(P < 0.05)。A组术中环泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量少于G组(P < 0.05)。A组术后首次阿片类药物镇痛时间长于G组(P < 0.05)。A组术后12、24及48 h静息和咳嗽时VAS评分低于G组(P < 0.05)。A组麻醉苏醒、出手术室及术后住院时间短于G组(P < 0.05),总体不良反应发生率低于G组(P < 0.05)。 结论 超声引导前路胸膜外间隙阻滞可为机器人辅助胸腔镜肺手术提供良好的围术期镇痛,减少术中麻醉药物用量,降低术后阿片类药物镇痛需求,有利于术后恢复。

本文引用格式

殷国江 , 黄维 , 桂交交 , 王文杰 , 王思佳 , 宋晓阳 , 黎笔熙 . 超声引导前路胸膜外间隙阻滞在机器人辅助胸腔镜肺手术中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(4) : 626 -632 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.04.012

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the perioperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided anterior extrapleural space block in patients undergoing robot-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery. Methods A total of 64 patients scheduled for elective robot-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery between January 2024 and March 2025 were randomly assigned to two groups: the anterior extrapleural space block combined with general anesthesia group (Group A, n = 32) and the general anesthesia-alone group (Group G, n = 32). The following parameters were recorded: mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at baseline (T0, upon entering the operating room), after anesthesia induction (T1), at skin incision (T2), at the start of lung resection (T3), at the end of surgery (T4), and upon leaving the operating room (T5). Intraoperative consumption of anesthetic, time to first postoperative opioid analgesic requirement, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively, anesthesia recovery time, operating room exit time, postoperative hospital stay, and adverse events were also documented. Results At the T2 to T5 time points, Group A exhibited lower MAP and HR values in comparison with Group G (P < 0.05). Group A required substantially smaller dosages of ciprofol and remifentanil during the surgical procedure compared with Group G (P < 0.05). The time to first postoperative opioid analgesia in Group A was longer than that in Group G (P < 0.05). The VAS scores for rest and coughing in Group A were lower than those in Group G at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h following surgery (P < 0.05). Group A exhibited shorter anesthesia recovery time, shorter time to leave the operating room, and reduced postoperative hospital stay compared to Group G(P < 0.05), with a lower overall incidence of adverse reactions (P < 0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided anterior extrapleural space block delivers effective perioperative analgesia in robot-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery, reduces intraoperative anesthetic requirements, decreases postoperative opioid demand, and facilitates recovery.

参考文献

[1] JIANG L, WANG C, TONG J, et al. Comparison between thoracic epidural analgesia VS patient controlled analgesia on chronic postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2025, 100:111685. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane. 2024. 111685 .
[2] VAN DEN BROEK R J C, POSTEMA J M C, KOOPMAN J S H A, et al. Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A prospective randomized open-label non-inferiority trial[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2025, 50(1):11-19. doi:10.1136/rapm-2023-105047 .
[3] SPAANS L N, DIJKGRAAF M G W, SUSA D, et al. Intercostal or Paravertebral Block vs Thoracic Epidural in Lung Surgery: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2025, 160(8):855-864. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1899 .
[4] SANDEEP B, HUANG X, LI Y, et al. A comparison of regional anesthesia techniques in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: A network meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2022, 105:106840. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106840 .
[5] ZHANG F, ZHANG J, CHEN J, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block for analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2024, 90(6):520-529. doi:10.23736/S0375-9393. 24.17927-8 .
[6] WU Z, WANG Q, WU C, et al. Paravertebral vs Epidural Anesthesia for Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Trial[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2023, 116(5): 1006-1012. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.07.038 .
[7] SANTAMARINA M G, BEDDINGS I, LERMANDA HOLMGREN G V, et al. Multidetector CT for Evaluation of the Extrapleural Space[J]. Radiographics, 2017, 37(5):1352-1370. doi:10.1148/rg.2017160180 .
[8] PILLENAHALLI MAHESHWARAPPA R, RAJDEV M, NAGPAL P, et al. "Multimodality imaging of the extrapleural space lesions"[J]. Clin Imaging, 2021, 79:64-84. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.03.038 .
[9] VALENTE T, TORTORA G, BOCCHINI G, et al. MDCT and US of intrathoracic extrapleural space soft tissue-containing lesions: US extrapleural fat sign and MDCT fat ghost ribs sign[J]. Radiol Med, 2017, 122(7):479-486. doi:10.1007/s11547-017-0744-8 .
[10] OHGOSHI Y, USUI Y, TERADA S, et al. Visualization of injectate spread of intercostal nerve block: A cadaveric study[J]. JA Clin Rep, 2018, 4(1):65. doi:10.1186/s40981-018-0204-z .
[11] BRAY F, LAVERSANNE M, SUNG H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3):229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834 .
[12] 曹梦迪, 陈万青. GLOBOCAN 2022全球癌症统计数据解读[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2024, 16(6):1-5. doi:10.12037/YXQY.2024.06-01 .
[13] MERRITT R E, ABDEL-RASOUL M, D'SOUZA D M, et al. Lymph Node Upstaging for Robotic, Thoracoscopic, and Open Lobectomy for Stage T2-3N0 Lung Cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2023, 115(1): 175-182. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.041 .
[14] ESBEIH D, IDKEDEK M, AKAR F ABU. Video-Assisted vs. Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques and Outcomes[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(5):1598. doi:10.3390/jcm14051598 .
[15] RICCIARDI R, SESHADRI-KREADEN U, YANKOVSKY A, et al. The COMPARE Study: Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic, da Vinci Robotic, and Open Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence[J]. Ann Surg, 2025, 281(5): 748-763. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006572 .
[16] PAI P, HONG J, PHILLIPS A, et al. Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Intercostal Block with Incision Infiltration in Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2022, 36(8 Pt A):2287-2294. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2021.10.022 .
[17] KAWAGUCHI K, OGURA T, KANEDA S, et al. A prospective multi-institutional study to verify the non-inferiority of postoperative pain in robot-assisted thoracic surgery in comparison with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: The Japanese RATS interest group 01 (J-RATSIG 01)[J]. Lung Cancer, 2024, 196:107961. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107961 .
[18] CHENESSEAU J, FOURDRAIN A, PASTENE B, et al. Effectiveness of Surgeon-Performed Paravertebral Block Analgesia for Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2023, 158(12):1255-1263. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5228 .
[19] XU X, XIE Y X, ZHANG M, et al. Comparison of Thoracoscopy-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Postoperative Analgesia of Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Radical Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Pain Ther, 2024, 13(3):577-588. doi:10.1007/s40122-024-00593-7 .
[20] HOTTA K, ENDO T, TAIRA K, et al. Comparison of the analgesic effects of continuous extrapleural block and continuous epidural block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2011, 25(6):1009-1013. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2011.07.026 .
[21] QU T, HAN T, YANG W, et al. Efficacy and safety of Extrapleural block in patients with coronary artery disease after thoracoscopic surgery[J]. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol, 2023, 28(3):e13050. doi:10.1111/anec.13050 .
[22] SHAO P, LI H, SHI R, et al. Understanding fascial anatomy and interfascial communication: Implications in regional anesthesia[J]. J Anesth, 2022, 36(4):554-563. doi:10.1007/s00540-022-03082-3 .
[23] 李美睿, 张广建. 罗哌卡因、倍他米松联合亚甲蓝经胸膜外肋间神经阻滞治疗肺癌开胸术后慢性切口痛的疗效观察[J]. 中华疼痛学杂志, 2023, 19(1): 93-98. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101658-20210522-00074 .
[24] 陈秀秀, 蔡乐男, 卢建波, 等. 经胸膜外间隙导管注入局麻药对胸腔镜术后镇痛效果、并发症的影响[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2023, 36(2):138-142,148. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429. 2023.02.029 .
[25] LI J, DONG Y, GUO J, et al. Thoracoscopic Intercostal Nerve Block with Cocktail Analgesics for Pain Control After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study[J]. J Pain Res, 2024, 17: 1183-1196. doi:10.2147/JPR.S446951 .
文章导航

/