肿瘤诊治与预后专栏

可解释反向传播神经网络在预测前哨淋巴结1 ~ 2枚阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结负荷中的价值

  • 农盛 ,
  • 李湛雄 ,
  • 张琪 ,
  • 卢振东 ,
  • 洪敏萍 ,
  • 陈武标 ,
  • 刘子霖
展开
  • 1.广东医科大学附属第二医院放射影像科 (广东 湛江 524000 )
    2.广东医科大学附属阳江医院放射影像科 ;广东 阳江 529500
    3.南方医科大学附属第七医院医学影像科 (广东 深圳 518107 )
    4.广东医科大学附属医院放射影像科 (广东 湛江 524000 )
    5.嘉兴市中医医院放射影像科 (浙江 嘉兴 314001 )

收稿日期: 2025-09-10

  网络出版日期: 2026-01-14

基金资助

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2023KY338)

Predictive performance of an interpretable BPNN model for axillary lymph node burden in breast cancer patients with 1 ~ 2 sentinel lymph node positive

  • Sheng NONG ,
  • Zhanxiong LI ,
  • Qi ZHANG ,
  • Zhendong LU ,
  • Minping HONG ,
  • Wubiao CHEN ,
  • Zilin LIU
Expand
  • 1.Department of Radiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University,Zhanjiang 524000,Guangdong,China
    2.Department of Radiology,Affiliated Yangjiang Hospital of Guangdong Medical University,Yangjiang 529500,Guangdong,China
    3.Department of Radiology,the Seventh Affiliated Hospital,Southern Medical University,Shenzhen 518107,Guangdong,China
    4.Department of Radiology,Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University,Zhanjiang 524000,Guangdong,China
    5.Department of Radiology,Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jiaxing 314001,Zhejiang,China

Received date: 2025-09-10

  Online published: 2026-01-14

摘要

目的 探讨基于临床及影像学特征的反向传播神经网络模型在预测前哨淋巴结活检1 ~ 2枚阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结负荷水平中的准确性。 方法 回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年12月在3家医疗机构接受腋窝淋巴结清扫的386例女性乳腺癌患者临床及影像资料。根据病理检查结果将纳入患者分为腋窝淋巴结高负荷组(n = 155)和腋窝淋巴结低负荷组(n = 231)。将中心1和中心2(广东医科大学附属医院和广东医科大学附属阳江医院)共295例患者随机分为训练集(n = 207)与验证集(n = 88),将中心3(广东医科大学附属第二医院)的患者(n = 91)作为外部验证集。在训练集上采用单因素、多因素逻辑回归筛选危险因素,并在此基础上应用逻辑回归、支持向量机、随机森林和BPNN四种算法构建风险预测模型,在内部验证集和外部验证集上评估模型的性能。结合Shapley可解释性算法对模型进行特征贡献度分析和可视化。 结果 单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析显示中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio,NLR)、瘤周水肿及腋窝淋巴结皮质增厚为淋巴结负荷的独立危险因素。基于BPNN算法构建的预测模型显示良好预测性能,模型的曲线下面积为0.793。Shapley可解释性分析显示瘤周水肿具有最高贡献,其次为淋巴结皮质增厚和中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值。 结论 整合临床及影像学特征的可解释BPNN模型能较准确预测腋窝淋巴结负荷水平,为乳腺癌腋窝管理和个体化治疗提供辅助决策。

本文引用格式

农盛 , 李湛雄 , 张琪 , 卢振东 , 洪敏萍 , 陈武标 , 刘子霖 . 可解释反向传播神经网络在预测前哨淋巴结1 ~ 2枚阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结负荷中的价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(1) : 45 -55 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.01.006

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of a backpropagation neural network (BPNN) model incorporating clinical and imaging features in predicting axillary lymph node burden among breast cancer patients with one to two positive sentinel lymph nodes. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical and imaging data from 386 female breast cancer patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection at three medical centers between January 2021 and December 2024. Based on pathological findings, patients were categorized into a high axillary lymph node burden group (n = 155) and a low burden group (n = 231). Data from Center 1 and Center 2 (Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University and Affiliated Yangjiang Hospital of Guangdong Medical University; n = 295) were randomly divided into a training set (n = 207) and an internal validation set (n = 88), while data from Center 3 (Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University; n=91) served as the external validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted in the training cohort to identify independent risk factors. Four machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest and BPNN were then used to construct predictive models, which were subsequently evaluated in the internal and external validation cohorts. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was applied to assess and visualize feature importance. Results Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), peritumoral edema, and axillary lymph node cortical thickening as independent predictors of nodal burden. The BPNN-based model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.793. SHAP analysis revealed that peritumoral edema contributed most significantly to model predictions, followed by lymph node cortical thickening and NLR. Conclusions An interpretable BPNN model integrating clinical and imaging characteristics provides reliable prediction of axillary lymph node burden in breast cancer patients. This approach offers valuable support for axillary management and personalized treatment planning.

参考文献

[1] 陈基明,朱浩雨,高静,等. 基于临床病理及常规和功能MRI影像组学模型预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2021, 37(6): 885-890.doi: 10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289. 2021.06.022 .
[2] CHANG J M, LEUNG J W T, MOY L, et al. Axillary Nodal Evaluation in Breast Cancer: State of the Art[J]. Radiology, 2020, 295(3):500-515. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192534 .
[3] WU T, LONG Q, ZENG L, et al. Axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: From historical axillary surgery to updated advances in the preoperative diagnosis and axillary management[J]. BMC Surg, 2025, 25(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02802-2 .
[4] 丘海,归奕飞,刘媛. 术前腋窝超声正常的临床T1—2 N0乳腺癌患者发生前哨淋巴结转移的预测模型[J]. 实用医学杂志,2025,41(14):2143-2151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725. 2025. 14.004 .
[5] GIULIANO A E, BALLMAN K V, MCCALL L, et al. Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(10):918-926. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470 .
[6] 逯永晋,石志强,李彤,等. 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结阳性豁免腋窝清扫后区域淋巴结放疗的回顾性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(2): 228-236. doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.02.010 .
[7] WEKKING D, PORCU M, DE SILVA P, et al. Breast MRI: Clinical Indications, Recommendations, and Future Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis[J]. Curr Oncol Rep, 2023, 25(4): 257-267. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01372-x .
[8] CASTELLOTE-HUGUET P, RUIZ-ESPANA S, GALAN-AUGE C, et al. Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Texture and Shape Features in MRI[J]. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2023, 2023:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340385 .
[9] 赵杭菲, 姚劲草, 王立平, 等. 列线图预测T1-2期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴转移负荷的研究[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2023, 39(11): 1224-1226. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2023.11.009 .
[10] 吴怡雯, 周晓华, 陈菲, 等. 基于自动乳腺全容积扫查影像组学对预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结负荷的价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2023, 39(5):499-502. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101. 2023.05.006 .
[11] LIAO H, CHEN X, LU S, et al. MRI-Based Back Propagation Neural Network Model as a Powerful Tool for Predicting the Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 56(2): 547-559. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28047 .
[12] SATAKE H, ISHIGAKI S, ITO R, et al. Radiomics in breast MRI: current progress toward clinical application in the era of artificial intelligence[J]. Radiol Med, 2022, 127(1): 39-56. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28047 .
[13] VAN DER VELDEN B H M, KUIJF H J, GILHUIJS K G A, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis[J]. Med Image Anal, 2022, 79:102470. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102470 .
[14] MARTAINDALE S R. Breast MR Imaging: Atlas of Anatomy, Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems Lexicon[J]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2018, 26 (2):179-190. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.12.001 .
[15] 杨光飞,常瑞姣,武雅婷,等. 超声与MRI对乳腺BI-RADS 3~5类肿物的诊断分类一致性比较[J].中国医学影像学杂志, 2022, 30(10): 991-995. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185. 2022. 10.004 .
[16] XU Z, DING Y, ZHAO K, et al. MRI characteristics of breast edema for assessing axillary lymph node burden in early-stage breast cancer: A retrospective bicentric study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(12): 8213-8225. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08896-z .
[17] 杨森,贾志莺,范清,等. 列线图可预测T1期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移:基于超声特征联合临床病理指标[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2025, 48(7): 848-854. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500. 2025. 07.09 .
[18] HARADA T L, UEMATSU T, NAKASHIMA K, et al. Evaluation of breast edema findings at T2-weighted breast MRI is useful for diagnosing occult inflammatory breast cancer and can predict prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Radiology, 2021, 299(1): 53-62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202604 .
[19] MALHAIRE C, SELHANE F, SAINT-MARTIN M J, et al. Exploring the added value of pretherapeutic MR descriptors in predicting breast cancer pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Eur Radiol, 2023, 33(11): 8142-8154. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09797-5 .
[20] KAISER C G, HEROLD M, KRAMMER J, et al. Prognostic value of “prepectoral edema” in MR-mammography[J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(4): 1989-1995. doi: 10.21873/anticanres. 11542 .
[21] CHEON H, KIM H J, KIM T H, et al. Invasive breast cancer: Prognostic value of peritumoral edema identified at preoperative MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2018, 287(1): 68-75. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171157 .
[22] PARK N J Y, JEONG J Y, PARK J Y, et al. Peritumoral edema in breast cancer at preoperative MRI: An interpretative study with histopathological review toward understanding tumor microenvironment[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 12992. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92283-z .
[23] YILMAZ R, AKPINAR Y, OZYAVUZ I, et al. Synchronous metastatic leiomyosarcoma and primer invasive ductal carcinoma tumors in the same breast: Mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings[J]. Breast J, 2019, 25(2): 310-311. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13211 .
[24] 冯其柱,卢曼曼,孙杰,等. 新型全身性炎症指标对急性胰腺炎早期病情严重程度的预测价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(14):1963-1968. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.14.011 .
[25] KAWAGUCHI S, KINOWAKI K, TAMURA N, et al. High-accuracy prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive lobular carcinoma using focal cortical thickening on magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Breast Cancer, 2023, 30 (4): 637-646. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01457-2 .
[26] 史娜,王爽,马兆丽,等. 超声联合免疫炎症指标构建列线图预测早期浸润性导管癌淋巴结转移[J].中国超声医学杂志,2025,41(3):265-269. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101. 2025. 03.006 .
[27] 张伟娜,钟李长,师琳,等. 超声影像组学特征联合miRNA-34a表达水平对乳腺癌新辅助化疗患者病理完全缓解的预测能力[J]. 新医学,2025,56(7):645-653. doi: 10.12464/j.issn.0253-9802.2025-0023 .
[28] BENEDETTO U, DIMAGLI A, SINHA S, et al. Machine learning improves mortality risk prediction after cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2022, 163(6): 2075-2087. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.07.105 .
[29] BELLE V, PAPANTONIS I. Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learning[J]. Front Big Data, 2021, 4:688969. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.688969 .
文章导航

/