Effect of the frequency of Foley balloon placement after hysteroscopic transcervical resection of adhesion on re-adhesion in patients with severe intrauterine adhesions
Received date: 2025-09-03
Online published: 2026-01-14
目的 探讨宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术(TCRA)后留置Foley球囊次数对重度宫腔粘连(IUA)患者再粘连的影响。 方法 对2022年1月至2025年1月在我院行TCRA的128例重度IUA患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究,根据其术后留置Foley球囊次数分为对照组(单次留置,n = 68)和观察组(两次留置,n = 60)。比较两组临床疗效、治疗前后IUA评分、月经变化、术后再粘连及妊娠情况。 结果 观察组总有效率90.00%(54/60),高于对照组的76.47%(52/68),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后,观察组美国生育协会(AFS)评分(3.12 ± 1.06)分,低于对照组的(4.35 ± 1.21)分;IUA评分改善值(6.70 ± 1.57),高于对照组的(5.26 ± 1.62),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后,观察组的月经量(40.22 ± 3.91)mL,高于对照组的(37.39 ± 4.10)mL;经期时间(5.06 ± 1.12)d,长于对照组的(4.41 ± 1.20)d,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组再粘连发生率比较差异有统计学意义(15.00% vs. 32.35%,P > 0.05)。 结论 重度IUA患者TCRA术后两次留置Foley球囊可有效缓解IUA程度,提高月经量,改善经期,降低再粘连发生风险,值得临床研究。
关键词: 宫颈宫腔粘连; 宫腔镜; 宫腔镜下宫腔重度粘连分离术
蔡昱 , 陈燕 , 刘建国 . 宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术后留置Foley球囊次数对重度宫腔粘连患者再粘连的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026 , 42(1) : 157 -162 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.01.021
Objective To investigate the effect of the frequency of Foley balloon placement after hysteroscopic transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA) on re-adhesion in patients with severe intrauterine adhesions (IUA). Methods The clinical data of 128 patients with severe IUA who underwent TCRA at the hospital from January 2022 to January 2025 were reviewed. According to the number of Foley balloon insertions after surgery, they were divided into a control group (single insertion, n = 68) and an observation group (two insertions, n = 60). The clinical efficacy, IUA scores before and after treatment, menstrual changes, postoperative re-adhesion, and pregnancy status were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate reached 90.00% (54/60) in the observation group, which was higher than 76.47% (52/68) in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the American Fertility Society (AFS) Score of the observation group (3.12 ± 1.06) was lower than that of the control group (4.35 ± 1.21). The improvement value of IUA score (6.70 ± 1.57) was higher than that of the control group (5.26 ± 1.62) (P < 0.05). After treatment, menstrual blood volume of the observation group [(40.22 ± 3.91) mL] was larger than that of the control group [(37.39 ± 4.10) mL], and menstrual period [(5.06 ± 1.12) d] was longer than that of the control group [(4.41 ± 1.20) d] (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of re-adhesion between the two groups (15.00% vs. 32.35%, P > 0.05). Conclusion The placement of Foley balloons twice after TCRA surgery in patients with severe IUA can effectively alleviate the degree of IUA, increase menstrual flow, improve menstruation, and reduce the risk of re adhesion. It is worthy of clinical research.
| [1] | HOOKER A B. Prevention of Intrauterine Adhesions: The Way to Go[J]. BJOG, 2025, 132(2):165-166. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17968 . |
| [2] | CARUGNO J, OKOHUE J, MOAWAD N. Intrauterine adhesions. A sticky problem without a solution[J]. Fertil Steril, 2024, 122(2):274-275. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.039 . |
| [3] | 姚欣怡,俞凌. 宫腔粘连治疗的新进展[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志,2023,42(5):431-436. doi: 10.12280/gjszjk. 20230224 . |
| [4] | JACKSON M M, EDMONDS K A, JONES-COX C E. Strategies to avoid recurrence of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2025, 37(4):241-246. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000001029 . |
| [5] | 何惠娴,肖勇,纪燕琴. 三角球囊与金属圆形节育器在中重度宫腔粘连术后患者中的应用比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2023,17(2):159-164. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2023.02.009 . |
| [6] | 蒋建发,游卉,赵行平,等. 宫腔粘连中西医结合诊疗中国专家共识(2024年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2024,40(8):819-825. doi: 10.19538/j.fk2024080111 . |
| [7] | AFLOAREA O T, NACU I, VERESTIUC L, et al. In Vitro and Ex Vivo Evaluation of Novel Methacrylated Chitosan-PNIPAAm-Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels Loaded with Progesterone for Applications in Vaginal Delivery[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2024, 16(15):2160. doi: 10.3390/polym16152160 . |
| [8] | FERNANDEZ H, MIQUEL L, SROUSSI J, et al. Effectiveness of degradable polymer film in the management of severe or moderate intrauterine adhesions (PREG-2): A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, stratified, superiority trial[J]. Fertil Steril, 2024, 122(6):1124-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.020 . |
| [9] | 徐单,陈小平,陈文玉,等. 冷刀系统与宫腔镜下能量系统分别联合芬吗通治疗中重度宫腔粘连疗效对比[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2023,23(22):4380-4384. doi: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb. 2023.22.036 . |
| [10] | 陈丽,杨霞. 中重度宫腔粘连的高危因素分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2023,39(8):599-602. |
| [11] | ZHAO Y, HUANG X, HUANG R, et al. A retrospective cohort study to examine factors affecting live birth after hysteroscopic treatment of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Fertil Steril, 2024, 121(5):873-880. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.022 . |
| [12] | 许阡,王祎祎,臧春逸. 宫腔粘连临床病因学及诊疗研究进展[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志,2021,48(2):224-229,240. doi: 10.12280/gjfckx.20200820 . |
| [13] | ZHANG X Y. New potential in the treatment of moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions: Influencing factors for menstrual improvement[J]. Front Reprod Health, 2025, 8,7:1608143. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1608143 . |
| [14] | 刘程,桑美英,方群英,等. 宫腔粘连分离术后冻融周期囊胚移植对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2024,40(17):2390-2394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.17.006 . |
| [15] | GU L, ZHANG C, LUO J, et al. Efficacy and prognostic factors of combined administration of progesterone and estriol valerate tablets for preventing intrauterine adhesions in patients with early missed abortion following dilation and curettage[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2024, 16(7):3164-3170. doi: 10.62347/AMEB4153 . |
| [16] | 方丽娟,潘惠珍. 宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术后粘连复发因素分析及预防对策[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2023,31(11):2683-2687. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2023.11.033 . |
| [17] | 年妍,仲佳雯,李晓荣. 地屈孕酮联合戊酸雌二醇预防IUA术后宫腔再粘连的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志,2025,41(5):621-625. doi: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.05.005 . |
| [18] | 章孔娟,王红梅,叶脉延. 宫内节育器预防宫腔粘连电切术后再粘连的效果[J]. 临床与病理杂志,2022,42(7):1657-1662. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.07.021 . |
| [19] | FENG L, SUN Y, ZHANG S, et al. A novel intrauterine estrogen-releasing system for preventing the postoperative recurrence of intrauterine adhesion: A multicenter randomized controlled study[J]. BMC Med, 2024, 22(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03608-4 . |
| [20] | ZHUANG L L, WWANG K, SHEN H L, et al. A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesion[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2023, 307(6):1873-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06993-y . |
| [21] | DING H, ZHANG H, QIAO R, et al. Comparing the efficacy and pregnancy outcome of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contraceptive device in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in infertile women: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial study[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2024, 22(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01222-w . |
| [22] | TSAI N C, HSIAO Y Y, SU Y T, et al. The efficacy of early office hysteroscopy in preventing intrauterine adhesions after abortion: A randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2024, 24(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03247-0 . |
| [23] | 杨霈馨,韦娜,吴敏,等. 宫腔镜电切术后球囊导尿管联合透明质酸钠凝胶对宫腔形态恢复、超声学指标的影响[J]. 中国性科学,2023,32(1):97-100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993. 2023.01.024 . |
| [24] | ZHAO J, ZHANG L, LIANG J, et al. The effect of the combined use of an intrauterine device and a Foley balloon in the prevention of adhesion following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis[J]. Women Health, 2023, 63(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/03630242. 2022. 2144984 . |
| [25] | 张亭亭,赵淑霞,胡玉芳. 宫腔镜粘连松解术中三种宫腔屏障方式治疗宫腔粘连的疗效及对再粘连的预防效果[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志,2023,24(1):83-84. doi: 10.13390/j.issn.1672-1861.2023.01.028 . |
| [26] | ZHANG H, SHAO L, WANG L, et al. Chitosan combined with intrauterine device prevents intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: A target trial emulation study[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2023, 49(6):1571-1578. doi: 10.1111/jog. 15629 . |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |