收稿日期: 2025-09-04
网络出版日期: 2025-12-18
基金资助
浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2024KY1394);浙江省中医药科技计划项目(2024ZL679)
Predictive value of multimodal nomogram on the risk of metastasis and recurrence in patients with stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer without adjuvant treatment
Received date: 2025-09-04
Online published: 2025-12-18
目的 构建多模态列线图预测未辅助治疗的Ⅱ期结直肠癌(CRC)患者术后转移复发风险。 方法 回顾性纳入2016年1月至2021年12月于本院行根治性手术的Ⅱ期CRC未辅助治疗患者424例。提取患者临床病理特征(T分期、CEA、分化程度等)、炎症指标(术前中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞计数比值、术前淋巴细胞计数与单核细胞计数比值)、影像组学参数(MRI纹理熵值)及分子标志物(KRAS突变状态)。以影像学证实的转移复发为主要终点,通过单因素及多因素logistic回归分析筛选独立危险因素,构建列线图模型,ROC曲线分析模型的预测价值,Bootstrap法进行内部验证,Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验评价模型的校准度,绘制决策曲线分析,检验模型获益,并进行风险分层。 结果 104例(24.53%)患者术后3年内发生转移复发。多因素分析显示:CEA > 5 μg/L、中低分化、有脉管癌栓、有神经侵犯、NLR升高、熵值升高、有KRAS基因突变为独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。基于上述因素构建的列线图预测效能显著(AUC = 0.870,95%CI: 0.850 ~ 0.930),校准曲线显示模型拟合良好。风险分层后:低危组复发率仅6.1%,而高危组达74.2%(P < 0.05)。 结论 在未辅助治疗Ⅱ期CRC人群中构建的临床-炎症-影像组学联合预测模型,可用于识别该类患者术后转移复发风险。
魏义 , 饶春晖 , 刘慧泽 , 陈文 . 临床-炎症-影像组学联合预测模型对Ⅱ期结直肠癌未辅助治疗患者转移复发风险的预测价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(23) : 3723 -3729 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.23.014
Objective To develop a multimodal nomogram for predicting the risk of postoperative metastasis and recurrence in patients with stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer (CRC) who do not receive adjuvant therapy. Methods A total of 424 patients with stage Ⅱ CRC who underwent radical resection without adjuvant therapy at our institution between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Clinicopathological characteristics [including T stage, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and tumor differentiation], inflammatory markers (preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio), radiomic features (MRI texture entropy), and molecular biomarkers (KRAS mutation status) were collected. Radiologically confirmed metastasis or recurrence was defined as the primary endpoint. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors and construct a predictive nomogram. The model’s discriminatory performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Internal validation was conducted via bootstrapping, and model calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer?Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Decision curve analysis was applied to assess the clinical utility of the nomogram, and risk stratification was subsequently performed. Results Among the patients, 104 (24.53%) developed metastasis or recurrence within three years after surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed the following independent risk factors (all P < 0.05): CEA > 5 μg/L, moderate to poor differentiation, presence of lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), increased radiomic entropy, and KRAS mutation. The nomogram demonstrated strong predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.870, 95%CI: 0.850 ~ 0.930), and the calibration curve indicated excellent agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Following risk stratification, the recurrence rate was only 6.1% in the low-risk group, compared to 74.2% in the high-risk group (P < 0.05). Conclusions This study develops a clinical-inflammatory-radiomic integrated prediction model specifically for stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer patients who do not receive adjuvant therapy. The model effectively identifies the risk of postoperative metastasis and recurrence, enabling the establishment of a risk stratification system to guide subsequent treatment decisions.
| [1] | SIMILLIS C, SINGH H, AFXENTIOU T, et al. Postoperative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with resected high‐risk Stage II colorectal cancer: Results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2020, 22(10): 1231-1244. doi:10.1111/codi.14994 |
| [2] | GOH V, MALLETT S, JUSTO R M, et al. Evaluation of prognostic models to improve prediction of metastasis in patients following potentially curative treatment for primary colorectal cancer: The PROSPECT trial[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2025, 29(8): 1-91. |
| [3] | 中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心肿瘤防控专家组, 吴静, 王宝华, 等. 中国社区居民结直肠癌筛查专家共识[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2024, 14(4): 273-285. |
| [4] | 上海市抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会. 结直肠癌早筛、早诊、早治上海方案(2023年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(1): 13-66. |
| [5] | 中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组, 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会, 中国医师协会肛肠医师分会, 等. 结直肠(癌)手术永久性肠造口专家共识(2025版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2025, 28(6): 587-598. |
| [6] | BENSON A B, VENOOK A P, ADAM M, et al. Colon cancer, version 3.2024, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2024, 22(2 D): e240029. |
| [7] | WANG K, MA L, CHEN L, et al. The clinical value of a nomogram constructed from CEA, CA199, PT, FIB, tumor differentiation and TNM stage in colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2023, 38(4): 537-549. doi:10.3233/cbm-230116 |
| [8] | QUAH H M, CHOU J F, GONEN M, et al. Identification of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer for adjuvant therapy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51(5): 503-507. doi:10.1007/s10350-008-9246-z |
| [9] | CAI M, HE H, Hong S, et al. Synergistic diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells and tumor markers CEA/CA19-9 in colorectal cancer[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2023, 58(1): 54-60. doi:10.1080/00365521.2022.2106152 |
| [10] | CHOI M S, HUH J W, SHIN J K, et al.Prognostic Factors and Treatment of Recurrence after Local Excision of Rectal Cancer[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2021, 62(12): 1107-1116. doi:10.3349/ymj.2021.62.12.1107 |
| [11] | WANG L, HIRANO Y, ISHII T, et al. Left colon as a novel high-risk factor for postoperative recurrence of stage II colon cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2020, 18(1): 54. doi:10.1186/s12957-020-01818-7 |
| [12] | BAI F, LIU X, ZHANG X, et al. p18INK4C and BRCA1 inhibit follicular cell proliferation and dedifferentiation in thyroid cancer[J]. Cell Cycle, 2023, 22(13): 1637-1653. doi:10.1080/15384101.2023.2225938 |
| [13] | WANG Q, ZHU X F, SHI M.Clinical and pathological features of advanced rectal cancer with submesenteric root lymph node metastasis: Meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2024, 16(7): 3299-3307. doi:10.4251/wjgo.v16.i7.3299 |
| [14] | BAI Z, WANG J, WANG T, et al. Clinicopathologic parameters associated with postoperative complications and risk factors for tumor recurrence and mortality after tumor resection of patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2018, 20(2): 176-192. doi:10.1007/s12094-017-1708-0 |
| [15] | 郑江江, 余晶晶, 谢晶晶, 等. 结直肠癌患者三级淋巴结构成熟的临床意义[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2024, 53(6): 765-771. |
| [16] | TSAI Y, KE T, HUANG C, et al. Prognostic relevance of immunosuppressive CD155/TIGIT signaling in locally advanced rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy[J]. Anticancer Res, 2025, 45(1): 323-333. doi:10.21873/anticanres.17420 |
| [17] | LIU Q, MA Z, CAO Q, et al. Perineural invasion-associated biomarkers for tumor development[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2022, 155(3): 113691-113709. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113691 |
| [18] | SUI Q, ZHANG X, CHEN C, et al. Inflammation promotes resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in high microsatellite instability colorectal cancer[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1): 7316-7327. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35096-6 |
| [19] | 李丽丽, 刘洋, 孙涛. 恶性肿瘤患者血小板计数、纤维蛋白原及中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值与肿瘤分期的关系[J]. 癌症进展, 2025, 23(15): 1791-1816. |
| [20] | NG F, GANESHAN B, KOZARSKI R, et al. Assessment of primary colorectal cancer heterogeneity by using whole-tumor texture analysis: Contrast-enhanced CT texture as a biomarker of 5-year survival[J]. Radiology, 2013, 266(1): 177-184. doi:10.1148/radiol.12120254 |
| [21] | 何遐遐, 陈超, 杨晓萍, 等. 多参数MRI纹理分析预测小病灶乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移[J]. 中国现代医生, 2024, 62(23): 21-25. |
| [22] | 赵勇强, 王媛媛, 刘春鹏, 等. 结直肠癌微卫星不稳定状态与KRAS、NRAS、BRAF基因突变和临床病理特征及预后的关系[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2024, 45(8): 969-975. |
| [23] | YAEGER R, CHATILA W K, LIPSYC M D, et al. Clinical sequencing defines the genomic landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer cell, 2018, 33(1): 125-136. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.12.004 |
| [24] | KUMAR S, SINGH S K, SRIVASTAVA P, et al. Interplay between MAP kinases and tumor microenvironment: Opportunity for immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer[J]. Adv Cancer Res, 2023, 159(4): 113-143. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |