临床研究

目标导向液体治疗联合竖脊肌平面阻滞对机器人辅助脊柱手术患者应激反应及术后恢复的影响

  • 胡丹丹 ,
  • 丁颖 ,
  • 陈捷 ,
  • 吴琪
展开
  • 1.淮安八十二医院,麻醉科,(江苏 淮安 223000 )
    2.淮安八十二医院,骨科,(江苏 淮安 223000 )

收稿日期: 2025-07-30

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-13

Effect of goal⁃directed fluid therapy combined with erector spinae plane block on stress response and postoperative recovery after robot⁃assisted spine surgery

  • Dandan HU ,
  • Ying DING ,
  • Jie CHEN ,
  • Qi. WU
Expand
  • 1.*Department of Anesthesiology,Huai'an, Hospital, Huai'an 223000,Jiangsu,China

Received date: 2025-07-30

  Online published: 2025-11-13

摘要

目的 探讨目标导向液体治疗(GDFT)联合超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)对机器人辅助椎弓根钉内固定术患者围术期应激反应及术后恢复的影响。 方法 将80例择期手术患者随机分为常规组(全麻+常规液体管理,n = 40)和观察组(全麻 + GDFT + ESPB,n = 40)。记录并比较两组患者不同时点[术前(T?)、置钉(T?)、术毕(T?)、拔管后30 min(T?)、术后24 h(T?)、术后48 h(T?)]的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、血清皮质醇(Cor)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、血糖(GLU)水平和静息VAS评分。记录术中输液量、瑞芬太尼用量、术后补救镇痛次数、首次下床时间、术后住院时间及并发症(躁动、恶心呕吐、呼吸抑制)。 结果 两组基线(T?)指标差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。观察组在T?、T?、T?时点的HR、MAP、Cor、NE、GLU水平均显著低于常规组(P < 0.05),其中T?时Cor、NE、GLU降幅> 30%(P < 0.05)。观察组术中输液量、瑞芬太尼用量显著减少(P < 0.05)。观察组T?、T?、T?时VAS评分更低,补救镇痛次数更少(P < 0.01)。观察组首次下床时间缩短、术后住院时间减少(P < 0.01)。观察组术后躁动、恶心呕吐及总并发症发生率显著低于常规组(P < 0.05),呼吸抑制发生率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 GDFT联合ESPB可有效抑制机器人辅助脊柱手术围术期应激反应,显著减少术中阿片类药物用量及输液量,优化术后镇痛,加速康复并降低并发症风险,是提升手术安全性与康复质量的有效ERAS策略。

本文引用格式

胡丹丹 , 丁颖 , 陈捷 , 吴琪 . 目标导向液体治疗联合竖脊肌平面阻滞对机器人辅助脊柱手术患者应激反应及术后恢复的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(21) : 3385 -3391 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.21.013

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effects of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) combined with ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on perioperative stress response and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation surgery. Methods Eighty patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups: control (general anesthesia + conventional fluid management, n = 40) and intervention (general anesthesia + GDFT + ESPB, n = 40). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), serum cortisol (Cor), norepinephrine (NE), blood glucose (GLU) levels, and resting VAS scores were measured and compared between the two groups preoperatively (T?), at screw placement (T?), at end of surgery (T?), 30 minutes after extubation (T?), at 24 hours (T?), and 48 hours (T?) postoperatively. Intraoperative fluid volume, remifentanil consumption, postoperative rescue analgesia frequency, time to first ambulation, length of stay, and complications (agitation, nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression) were recorded. Results There were no differences in baseline (T?) indicators between the two groups (P > 0.05). The intervention group exhibited significantly lower levels of HR, MAP, Cor, NE, and GLU at T?, T?, and T? compared with the control group (P < 0.05), with Cor, NE, and GLU reduced by > 30% at T? (P < 0.05). Intraoperative fluid volume and remifentanil dosage were significantly reduced (both P < 0.05). VAS scores and the number of rescue analgesia requests were lower at T?, T?, and T? (P < 0.01). Time to first ambulation time and postoperative hospital stay were shortened (both P < 0.01). The incidence of agitation, nausea/vomiting and overall complications was lower in the intervention group (P < 0.05), whereas respiratory depression rates did not differ (P > 0.05). Conclusion GDFT plus ESPB can effectively suppress perioperative stress response in robot-assisted spinal surgery, significantly reduce intraoperative opioid dosage and fluid volume, optimize postoperative analgesia, enhance recovery, and lower complication risk. This combination provides an effective ERAS strategy for improving surgical safety and recovery quality.

参考文献

[1] DE BIASE G, AKINDURO O O, GARCIA D, et al. Awake Robotic Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Study with 1-Year Follow-up[J]. World Neurosurg, 2024, 189:e941-e947. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.044
[2] 伏徐徐,彭玉慧. 激励理论联合协同干预对天玑骨科手术机器人治疗后的颈脊髓损伤患者功能康复和应对倾向的影响[J].机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2024,5(3):459-465.
[3] PODDER D, STALA O, HIRANI R, et al. Comprehensive Approaches to Pain Management in Postoperative Spinal Surgery Patients: Advanced Strategies and Future Directions[J]. Neurol Int, 2025, 17(6):94. doi:10.3390/neurolint17060094
[4] CHEN D J, TANG L, CHEN B, et al. IRF8-Cathepsin S/PAR2 axis-mediated spinal microglia-neuron crosstalk is responsible for the exacerbation of postsurgical pain induced by preoperative stress[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2025, 161:115034. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2025.115034
[5] 杨曦,张钰,孟双双,等. 超声引导下星状神经节阻滞对脊柱手术患者的应用效果及对消化功能、应激反应的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2024,24(2):376-380.
[6] 吴瑞阳,韩灵龙. 艾司氯胺酮联合舒芬太尼术后自控镇痛对脊柱手术患者疼痛、应激激素及免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国合理用药探索,2024,21(7):81-88.
[7] NAFTALOVICH R, SINGAL A, ISKANDER A J. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for spine surgery-review of literature[J]. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 2022, 54(1):71-79. doi:10.5114/ait.2022.113961
[8] KAN C F K, SKAGGS J D. Current Commonly Used Dynamic Parameters and Monitoring Systems for Perioperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy: A Review[J]. Yale J Biol Med, 2023, 96(1):107-123. doi:10.59249/joap6662
[9] 周立君,张伟,张璐,等. 区域神经阻滞联合全身麻醉对胫腓骨骨折手术患者应激反应、认知功能及睡眠质量的影响[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版),2024,59(1):83-87.
[10] CHIN KJ, EL-BOGHDADLY K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A narrative review. Mécanismes d′action du bloc du plan des muscles érecteurs du rachis (erector spinae, ESP): un compte rendu narratif[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2021, 68(3):387-408. doi:10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2
[11] MATUR A V, PALMISCIANO P, DUAH H O, et al. Robotic and navigated pedicle screws are safer and more accurate than fluoroscopic freehand screws: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Spine J, 2023, 23(2):197-208. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.006
[12] NAIK A, SMITH A D, SHAFFER A, et al. Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: A systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2022, 52(1):E10. doi:10.3171/2021.10.focus21509
[13] CHEN D, LIU P, SONG W, LIU S. Effect of posterior de compression and bone grafting combined with minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation on pain and functional recovery in patients with thoracolumbar spinal fractures[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2025, 22(5):489-495. doi:10.1080/17434440.2025.2485291
[14] 苑国峰,何宇,张印. 基于创伤应激指标和脊柱功能探讨经伤椎短节段椎弓根钉固定术与跨伤椎椎弓根固定术治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床价值[J]. 哈尔滨医药,2024,44(4):16-19.
[15] 马验,刘立峰,许正伟. 3D打印辅助经后路椎弓根钉棒内固定对强直性脊柱炎并胸腰椎骨折患者手术应激及腰椎功能的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(33):47-50.
[16] JOHANSSON A C, GUNNARSSON L G, LINTON S J, et al. Pain, disability and coping reflected in the diurnal cortisol variability in patients scheduled for lumbar disc surgery[J]. Eur J Pain, 2008, 12(5):633-640. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.10.009
[17] 谢柯祺,张永洪,李秀泽,等. 不同麻醉深度老年患者全麻手术中脑氧代谢、应激反应及术后认知功能的影响[J]. 海南医学院学报,2019,25(9):691-694+699.
[18] KANG N, HUANG J, HAN X, et al. The role of osteocalcin in regulating the acute stress response[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2025, 16:1646558. doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1646558
[19] 马茂潇,崔国峰,张雪,等. 代谢综合征患者脊柱融合术后的并发症:系统回顾和Meta分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2023,27(22):3602-3608.
[20] 徐慧,马璐璐. 竖脊肌平面阻滞在脊柱外科手术中应用进展[J]. 中国医学科学院学报,2024,46(4):560-564.
[21] KAN C F K, SKAGGS J D. Current Commonly Used Dynamic Parameters and Monitoring Systems for Perioperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy: A Review[J]. Yale J Biol Med, 2023, 96(1):107-123. doi:10.59249/joap6662
[22] KUMPHUNE S, SEENAK P, PAIYABHROM N, et al. Cardiac endothelial ischemia/reperfusion injury-derived protein damage-associated molecular patterns disrupt the integrity of the endothelial barrier[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(2):e24600. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24600
[23] GILBERTSON L E, MUHLY W T, MONTANA M C, et al. A survey of practice in the anesthetic management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spine fusion by the North American Pediatric Spine Anesthesiologists Collaborative[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2024, 34(7):645-653. doi:10.1111/pan.14895
[24] 曾建强,钟昭迎,袁磊,等. 超声引导下不同剂量右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因TPVB对全麻胸腔镜手术患者生命体征及应激反应的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2024,40(24):3527-3533.
[25] 于凌佳, 孟海, 杨雍, 等. 国产“天玑”骨科机器人辅助微创椎弓根钉置入的新技术报道[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2024,19(14): 1514-1518.
[26] SUN Y, LIANG X, CHAI F, et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy using stroke volume variation on length of stay and postoperative gastrointestinal function after major abdominal surgery-a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2023, 23(1):397. doi:10.1186/s12871-023-02360-1
[27] 刘辉,熊立红,徐晓晴,等. 椎旁神经阻滞联合目标导向液体治疗在开胸术中的应用研究[J]. 长春中医药大学学报,2023,39(3):310-314.
[28] LI H, ZHANG H, CHENG Z, et al. Effects of alfentanil hydrochloride on cough and hemodynamics during induction of general anesthesia in daytime surgery[J]. Minerva Surg, 2023, 78(6):730-732. doi:10.23736/s2724-5691.21.09341-2
[29] REISINGER K W, WILLIGERS H M, JANSEN J, et al. Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy does not affect intestinal cell damage but increases global gastrointestinal perfusion in colorectal surgery: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(12):1081-1091. doi:10.1111/codi.13923
[30] CHE L, YU J W, ZHANG Y L, et al. Intraoperative Blood Pressure Lability Acts as a Key Mediator in the Impacts of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Spine Surgery[J]. Chin Med Sci J, 2023, 38(4):257-264. doi:10.24920/004202
[31] OH S K, LIM B G, WON Y J, et al.Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2022, 78:110647. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110647
[32] 钱玥,马正良. 快速康复外科理念下日间手术的麻醉与围术期质量控制[J]. 实用医学杂志,2024,40(8):1042-1046.
文章导航

/