临床研究

肝脾体积比联合纤维蛋白原在评估肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者预后中的应用

  • 陆煜 ,
  • 卞兆连
展开
  • 1.南通大学医学院 (江苏 南通 226001 )
    2.南通大学附属南通第三医院、南通市第三人民医院 (江苏 南通 226000 )

收稿日期: 2025-03-31

  网络出版日期: 2025-07-18

基金资助

江苏省“六大高峰人才”项目(YY-177);江苏省“青年医学人才”项目(QNRC2016400)

Application of liver⁃to⁃spleen volume ratio combined with fibrinogen in evaluating prognosis of liver cirrhosis patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding

  • Yu LU ,
  • Zhaolian BIAN
Expand
  • Medical College of Nantong University,Nantong 226001,Jiangsu,China

Received date: 2025-03-31

  Online published: 2025-07-18

摘要

目的 探讨肝脏/脾脏体积比值(liver-to-spleen volume ratio, LSVR)联合血浆纤维蛋白原水平(fibrinogen, FIB)对肝硬化患者食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血(esophagogastric variceal bleeding, EGVB)风险的预测效能。 方法 采用回顾性病例分析设计,将纳入2020年1月至2022年12月期间在南通市第三人民医院收治的肝硬化合并EGVB患者130例作为观察组。收集患者的临床资料、血常规、血清生化及血凝、CT等检查结果。根据1年内的预后情况将患者分为未出血组(n = 71)和再出血组(n = 59),对于连续变量比较,符合正态分布的变量,采用两样本均数比较的t检验;非正态分布变量,则使用非参数秩和检验;对于分类变量比较,根据数据分布情况,选择χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法进行分析,而后采用logistic回归模型建立LSVR联合FIB的预测模型;ROC曲线分析LSVR、FIB单独及联合的临床效能。计算LSVR联合FIB预测EGVB预后的最佳临界值,Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线。 结果 两组患者AST、FIB、D-二聚体、MELD、ALBI评分、SV、LSVR门静脉直径、脾静脉直径比较差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素分析显示 LSVR(OR = 3.347,95%CI:1.624 ~ 6.899,P = 0.001)和FIB(OR = 0.206,95%CI:0.078 ~ 0.544,P = 0.001)是影响EGVB患者预后的独立危险因素。LSVR联合FIB的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)最大(AUC = 0.825,95%CI:0.751 ~ 0.899),高于单独 LSVR(AUC = 0.731,95%CI:0.639 ~ 0.822)和FIB(AUC = 0.683,95%CI:0.589 ~ 0.777)。LSVR联合FIB最佳临界值为-2.741,特异度为81.7%,敏感度为74.6%,Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,LSVR联合FIB < -2.741的患者1年未出血率为53.4%(39/73),显著高于LSVR联合FIB ≥ 2.741患者的7.0%(4/57),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。 结论 LSVR联合FIB可以提高单独LSVR和FIB预测EGVB患者1年发生再出血的预测效能。这一模型可能作为一个客观、简单的模型可更好的应用于临床。

本文引用格式

陆煜 , 卞兆连 . 肝脾体积比联合纤维蛋白原在评估肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者预后中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(13) : 2039 -2044 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.13.014

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the utility of the liver-spleen volume ratio and fibrinogen in predicting the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Methods A total of 130 cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding were recruited from among those admitted to Nantong Third People's Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. Clinical data, blood test results, biochemical assay findings, coagulation test outcomes, and computed tomography (CT) scan results were collected. Based on their 1-year prognosis, the patients were classified into a non-bleeding group (n = 71) and a re-bleeding group (n = 59). For normally distributed continuous variables, an independent samples t-test was employed; for non-normally distributed continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney U test was used; and for categorical variables, the chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test was applied. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) in cirrhotic patients. A predictive model integrating the liver-to-spleen volume ratio (LSVR) and fibrinogen (FIB) was then established. The clinical effectiveness of LSVR, FIB alone, and their combination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal cut-off value of the combined LSVR and FIB for predicting the prognosis of EGVB was calculated, and survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Clinically relevant differences were observed in AST, FIB, D-dimer, MELD, ALBI scores, spleen volume, and the liver-to-spleen volume ratio between the two groups (P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis indicated that LSVR (OR = 3.347, 95%CI: 1.624 ~ 6.899, P = 0.001) and FIB (OR =0.206, 95% CI: 0.078 ~ 0.544, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for the prognosis of EGVB. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was the largest when LSVR was combined with FIB (AUC = 0.825, 95% CI: 0.751 ~ 0.899), which was higher than that of LSVR alone (AUC = 0.731, 95%CI: 0.639 ~0.822) and FIB alone (AUC = 0.683, 95%CI: 0.589 ~ 0.777). The optimal cutoff value of the combination of LSVR and FIB was -2.741, with a specificity of 81.7% and a sensitivity of 74.6%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients with LSVR combined with FIB < -2.741 had a 1-year non-bleeding rate of 53.4% (39/73), which was significantly higher than the 7.0% (4/57) in patients with LSVR combined with FIB ≥ -2.741, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions Compared with using LSVR or FIB alone, combining LSVR with FIB enhances the predictive efficacy for 1-year re-bleeding in EGVB patients. This model could serve as an objective and straightforward tool for better clinical implementation.

参考文献

[1] DE FRANCHIS R, BOSCH J, GARCIA-TSAO G, et al. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension [J]. J Hepatol, 2022, 76(4): 959-974.
[2] YOKOYAMA S, HONDA T, ISHIZU Y, et al. Predicting early rebleeding and mortality after endoscopic hemostasis of esophagogastric varices: Diagnostic performance of aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and model for end-stage liver disease-Na score [J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2024, 31(11): 830-839. doi:10.1002/jhbp.12057
[3] ZENG A, LI Y, LYU L, et al. Risk factors and predictive nomograms for bedside emergency endoscopic treatment following endotracheal intubation in cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding [J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 9467. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-59802-0
[4] KUTAIBA N, CHUNG W, GOODWIN M, et al. The impact of hepatic and splenic volumetric assessment in imaging for chronic liver disease: A narrative review [J]. Insights Imaging, 2024, 15(1): 146. doi:10.1186/s13244-024-01727-3
[5] SON J H, LEE S S, LEE Y, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis severity using computed tomography-Based liver and spleen volumetric indices in patients with chronic liver disease [J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(6): 3486-3496. doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06665-4
[6] KWON J H, LEE S S, YOON J S, et al. Liver-to-Spleen Volume Ratio Automatically Measured on CT Predicts Decompensation in Patients with B Viral Compensated Cirrhosis [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2021, 22(12): 1985-1995. doi:10.3348/kjr.2021.0348
[7] SINGH T, HASAN M, GAULE T G, et al. Exploiting the Molecular Properties of Fibrinogen to Control Bleeding Following Vascular Injury [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2025, 26(3):1336. doi:10.3390/ijms26031336
[8] BROWN R S, JR., BROWN K A, FLAMM S, et al. Screening and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis: Expert perspectives [J]. Hepatol Commun, 2025, 9(4):e0682. doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000682
[9] XU X, DING H, JIA J, et al. Chinese guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis : Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association [J]. Hepatol Int, 2024, 18(4): 1071-1089. doi:10.1007/s12072-024-10697-z
[10] JOBE K, HENRY Z. Endoscopic Treatment of Acute Esophageal and Gastric Variceal Bleeding [J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2024, 34(2): 249-261. doi:10.1016/j.giec.2023.09.004
[11] LI X, CUI Y, GAO S, et al. Development and validation of a score model for predicting the risk of first esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage and mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Ann Med, 2025, 57(1): 2490210. doi:10.1080/07853890.2025.2490210
[12] 王慧群, 叶超, 许朝, 等. 肝硬化食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血内镜治疗后再出血的5年随访研究 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(22): 3155-3159.
[13] CATUCCI D, HRYCYK J, LANGE N F, et al. Liver segmental volumes and their relationship with 5-year prognostication [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2025, 50(3): 1133-1142. doi:10.1007/s00261-024-04552-w
[14] 薛红, 张莉, 陈伟杰, 等. 肝体积联合血小板在评估慢加急性肝衰竭预后中的应用 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(10): 1247-1252.
[15] 漆丹. 彩超对于酒精性肝硬化与肝炎肝硬化的鉴别诊断价值研究 [J]. 中国实用医药, 2020, 15(34): 35-37.
[16] 符玉环, 贺文, 王克扬. 64排螺旋CT对原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者肝脏体积变化的研究——与乙肝肝硬化和正常人对比研究 [J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2016, 35(10): 1517-1520.
[17] YU S, CHEN W, JIANG Z. Platelet count/spleen volume ratio has a good predictive value for esophageal varices in patients with hepatitis B liver cirrhosis [J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(12): e0260774. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260774
[18] TAN B-G, TANG Z, OU J, et al. A novel model based on liver/spleen volumes and portal vein diameter on MRI to predict variceal bleeding in HBV cirrhosis [J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 33(2): 1378-1387. doi:10.1007/s00330-022-09107-5
[19] MURATA Y, ABE M, HIASA Y, et al. Liver/spleen volume ratio as a predictor of prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis [J]. J Gastroenterol, 2008, 43(8): 632-636. doi:10.1007/s00535-008-2202-9
[20] TIDWELL J, THAKKAR B, WU G Y. Etiologies of Splenic Venous Hypertension: A Review [J]. J Clin Transl Hepatol, 2024, 12(6): 594-606. doi:10.14218/jcth.2024.00054
[21] RIZZO K, VELLA K, ZAMMIT D, et al. Fibrinogen measurement in liver disease: Validation of the functional fibrinogen thromboelastography assay and a novel mathematical predictive model [J]. Blood Transfus, 2019, 17(3): 237-246.
[22] DESBOROUGH M J, KAHAN B C, STANWORTH S J, et al. Fibrinogen as an independent predictor of mortality in decompensated cirrhosis and bleeding [J]. Hepatology, 2017, 65(3): 1079-1080. doi:10.1002/hep.28915
文章导航

/