收稿日期: 2025-01-21
网络出版日期: 2025-06-19
基金资助
河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划项目(20201436)
Combined value of multimodal fMRI and MRS in the differential diagnosis of postoperative recurrence and pseudoprogression of glioma
Received date: 2025-01-21
Online published: 2025-06-19
目的 探讨多模态功能磁共振成像(functional magnetic resonance imaging,fMRI)联合磁共振波谱(magnetic resonance spectroscopy,MRS)在脑胶质瘤术后复发与假性进展(pseudoprogression,PsP)鉴别诊断中的价值。 方法 选取2021年9月至2024年3月就诊于石家庄平安医院的104例经手术病理证实为脑胶质瘤的患者,并根据修订版脑胶质瘤治疗反应评估标准将脑胶质瘤患者分为两组,70例术后复发的患者分为复发组,34例术后PsP的患者分为PsP组,并选择同期就诊的73例脑胶质瘤患者为模型验证对象。比较两组的一般资料、多模态fMRI参数表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)、标准化脑血容量(cerebral blood volume,CBV)与MRS指标,采用logistic回归分析脑胶质瘤术后复发的影响因素,并采用受试者工作曲线(receiver operator characteristic,ROC)分析多模态fMRI和MRS在诊断脑胶质瘤术后复发与PsP的临床效能。 结果 复发组的ADC水平低于PsP组(P<0.05);CBV、胆碱(choline,Cho)/肌酸(creatine,Cr)和Cho/N-乙酰天门冬氨酸(N-acetylaspartic acid,NAA)水平高于PsP组(P<0.05);logistic回归分析结果显示ADC、CBV、Cho/Cr和Cho/NAA水平均是脑胶质瘤术后复发的危险因素(P<0.05);ROC结果显示多模态fMRI联合MRS在脑胶质瘤术后复发与PsP鉴别诊断中的AUC为0.916,联合后的AUC优于各指标单独诊断。对多模态fMRI联合MRS构建的联合模型进行预测验证,结果显示AUC为0.929,95%CI(0.844 ~ 0.976),敏感度88.46%,特异度91.49%,与前期模型建立时联合预测ROC曲线AUC比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 多模态fMRI联合MRS在脑胶质瘤术后复发与PsP鉴别诊断中具有较高的临床应用价值,值得推广使用。
关键词: 多模态功能磁共振成像; 磁共振波谱; 脑胶质瘤; 术后复发; 假性进展。
秦晓晓 , 李晓茁 , 郭泓利 , 张利静 . 多模态功能磁共振成像联合磁共振波谱对脑胶质瘤术后复发与假性进展鉴别诊断价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(11) : 1736 -1741 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.11.019
Objective To investigate the combined value of multimodal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in the differential diagnosis of postoperative recurrence and pseudoprogression (PsP) of glioma. Methods One hundred and four patients with glioma confirmed by surgical pathology were selected from our hospital from September 2021 to March 2024, and the patients were divided into recurrence group (n = 70) and PsP group (n = 34) according to the revised glioma treatment response assessment criteria. Another group of 73 patients with glioma were selected for model validation. The general data, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of multimodal fMRI parameters, standardized cerebral blood volume (CBV) and MRS indexes of the two groups were compared. The influencing factors of postoperative glioma recurrence were analyzed by logistic regression, and clinical efficacy of the combined treatment in the diagnosis of postoperative glioma recurrence and PsP was analyzed by receiver operating curve (ROC). Results The level of ADC in the recurrence group was lower than that in the PsP group (P < 0.05), and the levels of CBV, choline (Cho)/creatine (Cr) and Cho/ N-acetylaspartic acid (NAA)were higher (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the levels of ADC, CBV, Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA were risk factors for postoperative recurrence of glioma (P < 0.05). ROC showed that the combined use of multimodal fMRI and MRS in the differential diagnosis of postoperative glioma recurrence and PsP had an AUC of 0.916, outperforming the diagnostic accuracy of each individual modality. Validation of the combined model constructed with multimodal fMRI and MRS yielded an AUC of 0.929, 95% CI (0.844 ~ 0.976), with a sensitivity of 88.46% and specificity of 91.49%. There was no statistical difference when compared to the AUC of the combined predictive model established in the earlier phase. Conclusion Multi-mode fMRI combined with MRS demonstrate high clinical value in the differential diagnosis of postoperative glioma recurrence and PsP, and it is worth to be popularized.
| 1 | NDUOM E K, GLOD J, BROWN D A, et al. Clinical protocol: Feasibility of evaluating abemaciclib neuropharmacokinetics of diffuse midline glioma using intratumoral microdialysis[[J]. PLoS One, 2023, 18(9):e0291068. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291068 |
| 2 | 周佳南, 朱正阳, 田传帅, 等. 多模态多参数磁共振成像在脑胶质瘤Ki-67表达中的研究[J]. 磁共振成像, 2024, 15(5):34-40. |
| 3 | KOH E S, GAN H K, SENKO C, et al. [18F]-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine (FET) in glioblastoma (FIG) TROG 18.06 study: protocol for a prospective, multicentre PET/CT trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(8):e071327. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071327 |
| 4 | 严君, 徐瑾, 林慧慧, 等. MR动态磁敏感对比增强灌注成像鉴别脑胶质瘤复发与假性进展的应用研究[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2023, 21(10):8-10,22. |
| 5 | 白雪菲, 吴琼, 高阳, 等. 联合应用mTI-ASL和IVIM技术在鉴别高级别胶质瘤术后复发与假性进展中的应用价值[J]. 内蒙古医科大学学报, 2022, 44(3):299-301,315. |
| 6 | POUESSEL D, KEN S, GOUAZE-ANDERSSON V, et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation and anti-PDL1 durvalumab combination in recurrent glioblastoma: STERIMGLI phase I results[J]. Oncologist, 2023, 28(9):825-e817. doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyad095 |
| 7 | 杜竑兵, 张福洲, 徐彬. DCE-MRI、IVIM-DWI、MRS技术在脑胶质瘤术后复发与假性进展鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2024, 22(1):25-27. |
| 8 | 王永锋, 肖辉, 苏香存. 磁共振功能成像检查联合64排螺旋CT在老年原发性恶性脑肿瘤诊断中的价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2022, 42(2):300-303. |
| 9 | ELLINGSON B M, WEN P Y, CLOUGHESY T F. Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials[J]. Neurotherapeutics, 2017, 14(2):307-320. doi:10.1007/s13311-016-0507-6 |
| 10 | 国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 脑胶质瘤诊疗规范(2018年版)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2019, 35(3):217-239. |
| 11 | UMEMURA Y, ORRINGER D, JUNCK L, et al.Combined cytotoxic and immune-stimulatory gene therapy for primary adult high-grade glioma: A phase 1, first-in-human trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2023, 24(9):1042-1052. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00347-9 |
| 12 | 薛伟, 朱家宝, 安良良, 等. 多模态磁共振成像联合术中超声在功能区脑胶质瘤手术中的应用研究[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2023, 21(6):17-20. |
| 13 | 肖仕和, 李钢, 刘仲海, 等. 脑胶质瘤组织ZEB2、CCL20表达及其与患者预后的相关性[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(9):1262-1267. |
| 14 | 庞瑜丹, 张玮, 胡喆. 磁共振波谱成像检查对脑胶质瘤的诊断价值[J]. 癌症进展, 2022, 20(24):2527-2529,2533. |
| 15 | 姜华, 张丽敏, 王丹, 等. 脑脊液联合血常规检测在多发性脑胶质瘤与原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤鉴别诊断中的临床价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(13):1864-1868+1873. |
| 16 | 王丽英, 许仙花. MR 3D-ASL、DWI联合MGMT在高级别脑胶质瘤术后复发与假性进展鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2024, 40(4):528-530. |
| 17 | SIDIBE I, TENSAOUTI F, GILHODES J, et al. Pseudoprogression in GBM versus true progression in patients with glioblastoma: A multiapproach analysis[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2023, 181(1):109486. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109486 |
| 18 | 白雪菲, 吴琼, 高阳, 等. 联合应用mTI-ASL和IVIM技术在鉴别高级别胶质瘤术后复发与假性进展中的应用价值[J]. 内蒙古医科大学学报, 2022, 44(3):299-301,315. |
| 19 | MADER M M, DEUTER D, SAUVIGNY T, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging changes in patients with glioma-associated seizures[J]. J Neurooncol, 2022, 160(2):311-320. doi:10.1007/s11060-022-04139-9 |
| 20 | LI Z, SONG Y, FARRUKH HAMEED N U, et al. Effect of high-field iMRI guided resection in cerebral glioma surgery: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2024, 199(1):113528. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113528 |
| 21 | 张绪翠, 曲宝俊, 张敏, 等. 脑胶质瘤患者MRS测量值与病理分级的关系及对术后复发的预测价值[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2024, 27(9):1071-1076. |
| 22 | 韩静波, 贺苗, 王新文. 动脉自旋标记联合MR波谱对高级别脑胶质瘤患者术后复发与假性进展的鉴别价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2024, 40(10):1582-1586. |
| 23 | 康飞, 张海三. MRS对脑转移瘤和恶性胶质瘤的鉴别诊断价值研究[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2022, 43(2):44-46,50. |
| 24 | TODO T, ITO H, INO Y, et al. Intratumoral oncolytic herpes virus G47? for residual or recurrent glioblastoma: A phase 2 trial[J]. Nat Med, 2022, 28(8):1630-1639. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01897-x |
| 25 | 钱利萍, 张玉明, 陈华芳, 等. 多模式fMRI应用于脑胶质瘤术后复发诊断中的价值及对放化疗的指导意义[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2024, 34(5):9-14. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |