临床研究

基于脓毒性休克治疗期间液体负平衡量建立患者预后预测模型

  • 张震 ,
  • 王东浩 ,
  • 吕扬
展开
  • 天津医科大学肿瘤医院,国家恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心,天津市恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心,天津市肿瘤防治重点实验室,天津市肿瘤医院重症监护科 (天津 300060 )

收稿日期: 2025-01-25

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-19

基金资助

天津市医学重点学科(专科)建设项目(TJYXZDXK-009A);天津市卫生健康科技项目(TJWJ2022MS006);天津医科大学肿瘤医院科研项目(2107)

A prognostic model for patients was established based on negative fluid balance during septic shock treatment

  • Zhen ZHANG ,
  • Donghao WANG ,
  • Yang LYU
Expand
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Tianjin′s Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy,Department of Intensive Care Unit,Tianjin 300060,Tianjin,China

Received date: 2025-01-25

  Online published: 2025-06-19

摘要

目的 明确脓毒性休克患者在液体复苏治疗后液体负平衡量对脓毒性休克患者死亡风险中的预测能力。 方法 回顾性收集2022年3月至2024年12月在天津医科大学肿瘤医院重症监护科收治的脓毒性休克患者的病历资料,最终结局定义为住院期间28 d内死亡。将研究对象随机分为训练集和验证集,然后采用logistic回归法建模,并绘制列线图,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),利用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验评价预测模型的校准度,并绘制校准曲线,评估预测模型的区分度,用决策曲线分析(DCA)对预测模型的效能进行测试。 结果 研究共纳入286例脓毒性休克患者,其中训练集200例、验证集86例,二者具有可比性。多因素logistic回归分析显示,液体负平衡量、APACHE Ⅱ评分、SOFA评分是ICU脓毒性休克患者不良生存预后的独立危险因素(均P < 0.05)。根据多因素logistic回归分析结果构建列线图,用于临床预测ICU脓毒性休克患者的生存预后。在训练集和验证集中,ROC曲线预测模型的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.83(95%CI:0.73 ~ 0.93)和0.83(95%CI:0.66 ~ 1.00),Hosmer-Lemeshow校准曲线拟合度较好(训练集P = 0.169;验证集P = 1.000),不具有显著性。DCA显示当患者的阈值概率为0.05 ~ 0.7时,使用列线图预测模型预测脓毒性休克患者死亡风险更有益。 结论 脓毒性休克患者液体复苏后液体负平衡量与患者的生存预后相关,联合APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分建立脓毒性休克患者死亡风险的预测模型,具有良好的预测能力和临床实用性。

本文引用格式

张震 , 王东浩 , 吕扬 . 基于脓毒性休克治疗期间液体负平衡量建立患者预后预测模型[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(11) : 1687 -1693 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.11.012

Abstract

Objective To determine the predictive power of negative fluid balance in the risk of death in septic shock patients after fluid resuscitation therapy. Methods The medical records of patients with septic shock admitted to the Intensive Care Department of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital from March 2022 to December 2024 were retrospectively collected, and the final outcome was defined as death within 28 days during hospitalization. The study objects were randomly divided into the training set and the validation set, and then the model was built by Logistic regression method, and the nomogram and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) were drawn. Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to evaluate the calibration degree of the prediction model, and the calibration curve was drawn to evaluate the differentiation degree of the prediction model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to test the efficiency of the prediction model. Results A total of 286 patients with septic shock were included in the study, including 200 in the training set and 86 in the verification set, which were comparable. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that negative fluid balance, APACHE II score and SOFA score were independent risk factors for poor survival and prognosis of ICU septic shock patients (all P < 0.05). Based on the results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis, a nomogram was constructed to predict the survival and prognosis of patients with septic shock in ICU. In the training set and validation set, the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve prediction model was 0.83 (95%CI:0.73 ~ 0.93) and 0.83 (95%CI:0.66 ~ 1.00), respectively. Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration curve has a good fit (training set P= 0.169; The verification set P = 1.000) is not significant. DCA showed that when the threshold probability of patients was 0.05~0.70, it was more beneficial to use the nomogram prediction model to predict the risk of death in septic shock patients. Conclusion Negative fluid balance after fluid resuscitation is associated with survival and prognosis of patients with septic shock. The predictive model of mortality risk of patients with septic shock was established by combining APACHEⅡ score and SOFA score, which has good predictive ability and clinical practicability.

参考文献

1 张杨. 亚甲蓝治疗难治性脓毒性休克的疗效研究[D]. 昆明:昆明医科大学, 2023.
2 XIE J, WANG H, KANG Y, et al. The Epidemiology of Sepsis in Chinese ICUs: A National Cross-Sectional Survey[J]. Crit Care Med, 2020, 48(3):e209-e218. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000004155
3 CHEN Y, JIANG H, WEI Y, et al. Blood pressure response index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a multicenter cohort study[J]. EBioMedicine, 2024, 106:105257. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105257
4 NAPOLITANO L M. Sepsis 2018: Definitions and Guideline Changes[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2018, 19(2):117-125. doi:10.1089/sur.2017.278
5 王美平, 席修明, 朱波, 等. 液体超负荷与脓毒症患者死亡风险的剂量-反应关系研究[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2023, 62(5):513-519.
6 VAARA S T, KORHONEN A M, KAUKONEN K M, et al. Fluid overload is associated with an increased risk for 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with renal replacement therapy: data from the prospective FINNAKI study[J]. Crit Care, 2012, 16(5):R197. doi:10.1186/cc11682
7 KELLUM J A, CHAWLA LS, KEENER C, et al. The Effects of Alternative Resuscitation Strategies on Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Septic Shock[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2016, 193(3):281-287. doi:10.1164/rccm.201505-0995oc
8 姜志钊, 刘玉琪, 任建安. 液体治疗降阶梯策略在腹腔脓毒性休克中的应用进展[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2020, 32(11):1403-1408.
9 SINGER M, DEUTSCHMAN C S, SEYMOUR C W, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287
10 FLEISCHMANN C, SCHERAG A, ADHIKARI N K, et al. Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2016, 193(3):259-272. doi:10.1164/rccm.201504-0781oc
11 PATEL J J, WILLOUGHBY R, PETERSON J, et al. High-Dose IV Hydroxocobalamin (Vitamin B12) in Septic Shock: A Double-Blind, Allocation-Concealed, Placebo-Controlled Single-Center Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (The Intravenous Hydroxocobalamin in Septic Shock Trial)[J]. Chest, 2023, 163(2):303-312. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.021
12 DANIEL M, BEDOUI Y, VAGNER D, et al. Pathophysiology of Sepsis and Genesis of Septic Shock: The Critical Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(16):9274. doi:10.3390/ijms23169274
13 EVANS L, RHODES A, ALHAZZANI W, et al. Executive Summary: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021[J]. Crit Care Med, 2021, 49(11):1974-1982.
14 NORSE A B, GUIRGIS F, BLACK L P, et al. Updates and controversies in the early management of sepsis and septic shock[J]. Emerg Med Pract, 2021, 23(Suppl 4-2):1-24.
15 LOFLIN R, WINTERS M E. Fluid Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis[J]. Emerg Med Clin North Am, 2017, 35(1):59-74. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2016.08.001
16 PRISM Investigators; ROWAN KM, ANGUS DC, BAILEY M, et al. Early, Goal-Directed Therapy for Septic Shock-A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(23):2223-2234. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1701380
17 SAKR Y, RUBATTO BIRRI P N, KOTFIS K, et al. Higher Fluid Balance Increases the Risk of Death From Sepsis: Results From a Large International Audit[J]. Crit Care Med, 2017, 45(3):386-394. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000002189
18 FLORES-GONZáLEZ J C, VALLADARES C M, YUN CASTILLA C, et al. Association of Fluid Overload With Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children With Bronchiolitis: Bronquiolitis en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (BRUCIP) Study[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2019, 20(3):e130-e136. doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000001841
19 LORENCIO CáRDENAS C, YéBENES JC, VELA E, et al. Trends in mortality in septic patients according to the different organ failure during 15 years[J]. Crit Care, 2022, 26(1):302. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-04176-w
20 钱际银, 张晶. 基于液体复苏完成时间及液体负平衡量建立脓毒性休克患者预后预测模型[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2024, 36(3):244-248.
21 DHONDUP T, TIEN J C, MARQUEZ A, et al. Association of negative fluid balance during the de-escalation phase of sepsis management with mortality: A cohort study[J]. J Crit Care, 2020, 55:16-21. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.025
22 ALSOUS F, KHAMIEES M, DEGIROLAMO A, et al. Negative fluid balance predicts survival in patients with septic shock: A retrospective pilot study[J]. Chest, 2000, 117(6):1749-1754. doi:10.1378/chest.117.6.1749
23 WANG Y M, CHEN Y, ZHENG Y J, et al. Low fluid intake volume during the first 24 h and persistent negative fluid balance from the second day are associated with favorable prognosis for patients with sepsis[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2021, 21(4):387. doi:10.3892/etm.2021.9818
24 ZHANG L, XU F, LI S, et al. Influence of fluid balance on the prognosis of patients with sepsis[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2021, 21(1):269. doi:10.1186/s12871-021-01489-1
文章导航

/