调查研究

河北地区孕妇胎盘早剥流行现状及危险因素分析

  • 王润芳 ,
  • 段雅 ,
  • 杜立燕 ,
  • 刘晓丹 ,
  • 连文宁 ,
  • 霍琰 ,
  • 杨丹丹
展开
  • 1.河北省人民医院妇产科 (河北 石家庄 050057 )
    2.河北省妇幼保健中心信息管理科 (河北 石家庄 050000 )
    3.苏州大学附属第四医院(苏州市独墅湖医院)妇产科 (江苏 苏州 215004 )

收稿日期: 2024-11-13

  网络出版日期: 2025-03-31

基金资助

河北省科技厅基金项目(22377776D);河北省医学科学研究课题项目(20200740);河北省“三三三人才工程”资助项目(C2024067)

Epidemiological status and risk factors associated with placental abruption among pregnant women in Hebei Province

  • Runfang WANG ,
  • Ya DUAN ,
  • Liyan DU ,
  • Xiaodan LIU ,
  • Wenning LIAN ,
  • Yan HUO ,
  • Dandan. YANG
Expand
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Hebei General Hospital,Shijiazhuang 050057,Hebei,China

Received date: 2024-11-13

  Online published: 2025-03-31

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨河北省孕晚期胎盘早剥的发病率及其相关危险因素,并构建相应的列线图预测模型。 方法 收集2013—2023年间河北省22所监测医院的孕产妇资料,分析胎盘早剥的发病率、趋势及相关危险因素。通过R语言绘制预测模型的列线图,并利用受试者工作特征曲线下面积及校准曲线指标评估其预测效能。 结果 在2013—2023年期间,共纳入480 690名孕妇进行研究,孕晚期胎盘早剥的患病率为0.29%(1 395/480 690),平均年百分比变化为2.73%,且保持稳定趋势(P = 0.34)。多因素回归分析显示,妊娠合并贫血、子痫前期、前置胎盘、28周以下阴道出血以及妊娠28 ~ 31+6周均为胎盘早剥的高危因素(P < 0.05);而规律产检(7 ~ 11次)和多胎妊娠是胎盘早剥保护因素(P < 0.05)。基于上述独立影响因素构建的列线图模型对胎盘早剥的预测曲线下面积为0.79,校准曲线显示预测值与实测值基本相符。 结论 应重视产前检查,特别关注子痫前期、前置胎盘及妊娠28周以下阴道出血的孕妇,同时加强对妊娠28 ~ 31+6周期间的管理,以降低胎盘早剥的发生率。基于此构建的列线图模型预测效能好,为胎盘早剥的预防与临床管理提供理论依据。

本文引用格式

王润芳 , 段雅 , 杜立燕 , 刘晓丹 , 连文宁 , 霍琰 , 杨丹丹 . 河北地区孕妇胎盘早剥流行现状及危险因素分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(6) : 904 -910 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.06.020

Abstract

Objective To investigate the incidence of placental abruption in the third trimester of pregnancy in Hebei Province, identify its associated risk factors, and develop a corresponding nomogram prediction model. Methods Data from pregnant women at 22 monitored hospitals in Hebei Province, collected between 2013 and 2023, were analyzed to assess the incidence, trends, and associated risk factors of placental abruption. A prediction model was developed and visualized using R programming to generate the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curve parameters. Results A total of 480 690 pregnant women were included in this study over the specified period. The incidence of placental abruption was 0.29% (1 395 out of 480 690), with an average annual percentage change of 2.73%, indicating a stable trend (P = 0.34). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pregnancy-related anemia, preeclampsia, placenta previa, vaginal bleeding before 28 weeks' gestation, and between 28 and 31+6 weeks' gestation were significant risk factors for placental abruption (all P < 0.05). In contrast, regular prenatal examinations (7 ~ 11 visits) and multiple pregnancies were identified as protective factors against placental abruption (both P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the nomogram model constructed based on independent risk factors for placental abruption was 0.79, and the calibration curve demonstrated that the predicted values closely aligned with the observed values. Conclusions Prenatal examinations should be prioritized, especially for women with preeclampsia, placenta previa, or a history of vaginal bleeding before 28 weeks of gestation. Management of pregnancies between 28 and 31+6 weeks is also crucial to reduce the incidence of placental abruption and mitigate adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The nomogram model constructed based on these factors exhibits excellent predictive performance, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the prevention and clinical management of placental abruption.

参考文献

1 孔北华,马丁,段涛. 妇产科学:第10版[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2024.
2 GAO C Q, ANANTH C V, KEYES K M, et al. An International Contrast of Rates of Placental Abruption: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis[J]. PLoS One,2015,10(5):e0125246. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125246
3 SCHUR E, BAUMFELD Y, ROTEM R, et al. Placental abruption: Assessing trends in risk factors over time[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2022,306(5):1547-1554. doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06638-6
4 李思思,郭广丽,于璨,等. 河北省孕产妇前置胎盘流行病学特点和危险因素分析[J]. 实用医学杂志,2020,36(2):249-253.
5 BRANDT J S, ANANTH C V. Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2023,228(5):S1313-S1329. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.059
6 程晓利,杨淑萍. 胎盘早剥孕妇的流行病学特点及危险因素分析[J]. 中国实用医刊,2019,46(24):75-78.
7 SHI H, CHEN L, WANG Y, et al. Severity of Anemia During Pregnancy and Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes[J].JAMA Network Open,2022,5(2):e2147046. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47046
8 LAO T T, HUI S Y A, WONG L L, et al. Iron deficiency anaemia associated with increased placenta praevia and placental abruption: A retrospective case-control study[J].Eur J Clin Nutr,2022,76(8):1172-1177. doi:10.1038/s41430-022-01086-6
9 VENKATA SUREKHA M, SINGH S, SARADA K, et al. Study on the Effect of Severity of Maternal Iron Deficiency Anemia on Regulators of Angiogenesis in Placenta[J]. Fetal Pediatr Pathol,2019,38(5):361-375. doi:10.1080/15513815.2019.1587120
10 TANG G, LAUSMAN A, ABULREHMAN J, et al. Prevalence of Iron Deficiency and Iron Deficiency Anemia during Pregnancy: A Single Centre Canadian Study[J]. Blood,2019,134():3389-3389. doi:10.1182/blood-2019-127602
11 COCHEN Y, GUTVIRTZ G, AVNON T, et al. Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy and Placenta-Mediated Complications Regardless of Preeclampsia[J]. J Clin Med,2024,13(4):1111. doi:10.3390/jcm13041111
12 王玉婷, 张夏兰, 黄若玲, 等. 重度子痫前期患者发生胎盘早剥的相关因素分析[J]. 汕头大学医学院学报,2024,37(3):142-146.
13 ANANTH C V, OYELESE Y, PRASAD V, et al. Evidence of placental abruption as a chronic process: Associations with vaginal bleeding early in pregnancy and placental lesions[J]. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B,2006,128(1-2):15-21. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.016
14 SPRADLEY F T, ANDERSON E, RAJA E A, et al. Changing risk factors for placental abruption: A case crossover study using routinely collected data from Finland, Malta and Aberdeen[J].PLoS One,2020,15(6):e0233641. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233641
15 KOVO M, GONEN N, SCHREIBER L, et al. Histologic chorioamnionitis concomitant placental abruption and its effects on pregnancy outcome[J]. Placenta,2020,94:39-43. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2020.03.012
16 李江恒,钟柳育,马聆桦,等. 高龄孕产妇的妊娠结局与孕检的关系[J]. 实用医学杂志,2022,38(7):884-888.
17 SAAKA M, SULLEY I. Independent and joint contributions of inadequate antenatal care timing, contacts and content to adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Ann Med,2023,55(1):2197294. doi:10.1080/07853890.2023.2197294
18 NARUSE K, SHIGEMI D, HASHIGUCHI M, et al. Placental abruption in each hypertensive disorders of pregnancy phenotype: A retrospective cohort study using a national inpatient database in Japan[J]. Hypertens Res,2020,44(2):232-238. doi:10.1038/s41440-020-00537-6
19 中华医学会围产医学分会胎儿医学学组, 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 双胎妊娠临床处理指南(2020年更新)[J].中国产前诊断杂志(电子版),2021,13(1):51-63.
20 谷鸿秋, 王俊峰, 章仲恒,等. 临床预测模型:模型的建立[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2019,11(1):14-16,23.
文章导航

/