Application value study of cervical shear wave elasticity imaging combined with cervical length and anterior cervical angle in assessing cervical function and predicting spontaneous preterm birth
Received date: 2024-11-19
Online published: 2025-03-31
目的 本研究旨在评估宫颈机能不全(cervical insufficiency, CI)与自发性早产(spontaneous preterm birth, SPB)之间的关联,并探讨宫颈剪切波弹性成像(shear wave elasticity, SWE)、宫颈长度(cervical length, CL)和宫颈前角(anterior cervical angle, ACA)在预测CI引起的SPB中的应用价值。 方法 本研究纳入了2023年6月至2024年1月期间在南通大学附属医院及江南大学附属妇产医院产前门诊就诊或住院治疗的786例孕妇,其中足月组723例孕妇,早产组63例孕妇。使用迈瑞Resona R9 Pro/Eagus R9s超声仪,配备剪切波弹性成像软件,进行宫颈SWEI、CL和ACA的测量。此外,按照受检孕周将孕妇分为19 ~ 23+6周、24 ~ 27+6周、28 ~ 33+6周、34 ~ 36+6周4组,评估孕周与超声参数的关系。 结果 早产组孕妇的CL平均为25.42 mm,显著低于足月组的29.71 mm(P < 0.001)。ACA在早产组平均为121°,高于足月组的99°(P < 0.001)。宫颈各部位的SWE值在早产组也显著低于足月组:外口前唇(AE)为6.47 kPa对比9.91 kPa(P < 0.001)、内口前唇(AI)为10.98 kPa对比18.62 kPa(P < 0.001)、内口后唇(PI)为11.32 kPa对比21.09 kPa(P < 0.001)、外口后唇(PE)为8.16 kPa对比13.24 kPa(P < 0.001)。CL与孕周存在显著的负相关(r = -0.278,P = 0.001)。联合预测指标在预测早产方面显示出较高的准确性和特异性,曲线下面积(AUC)达到0.952,灵敏度和特异度分别为95%和86%。 结论 宫颈SWE、CL和ACA的联合使用可以显著提高对CI导致SPB的预测效能,可以为临床医生提供了一个更全面、准确的工具,以识别高危孕妇并及时采取干预措施,减少早产的发生,改善母婴预后。
蔡敏绥 , 崔琪 , 丁苏君 , 倪雪君 . 宫颈剪切波弹性成像联合宫颈长度及宫颈前角评估宫颈机能状态并预测自发性早产的应用价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(6) : 896 -903 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.06.019
Objective To evaluate the association between cervical insufficiency (CI) and spontaneous preterm birth (SPB), and to investigate the predictive value of shear wave elastography (SWE), cervical length (CL), and anterior cervical angle (ACA) in identifying SPB resulting from CI. Methods This study recruited 786 pregnant women who attended prenatal outpatient clinics or were hospitalized for treatment at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and the Maternity Hospital affiliated with Jiangnan University from June 2023 to January 2024. Among these participants, 723 were full-term pregnancies and 63 were preterm pregnancies. Cervical SWEI, CL, and cervical ACA were measured using a Mindray Resona R9 Pro/Eagus R9s ultrasound device equipped with shear wave elasticity imaging software. Additionally, the participants were categorized into four gestational age groups: 19-23+6 weeks, 24-27+6 weeks, 28-33+6 weeks, and 34-36+6 weeks, to evaluate the relationship between gestational age and ultrasound parameters. Results The mean CL in the preterm group was 25.4 mm, significantly shorter than the 29.7 mm observed in the full-term group (P < 0.001). The ACA in the preterm group was 121°, which was significantly higher than the 99° in the full-term group (P < 0.001). Additionally, SWE values were significantly lower in the preterm group compared to the full-term group at all measured cervical sites: anterior external os (AE) 6.47 kPa versus 9.91 kPa (P < 0.001), anterior internal os (AI) 10.98 kPa versus 18.62 kPa (P < 0.001), posterior internal os (PI) 11.32 kPa versus 21.09 kPa (P < 0.001), and posterior external os (PE) 8.16 kPa versus 13.24 kPa (P < 0.001). A significant negative correlation was found between CL and gestational age (r = -0.278, P = 0.001). The combined predictive indicators demonstrated high accuracy and specificity for predicting preterm birth, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.952, sensitivity of 95%, and specificity of 86%. Conclusions The integration of cervical SWE, CL measurement, and assessment of the angle of ACA can substantially enhance the predictive accuracy for SPB due to CI. This multimodal approach offers clinicians a more robust and precise tool for identifying high-risk pregnancies, enabling timely interventions that can reduce the incidence of preterm birth and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
| 1 | 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 早产的临床诊断与治疗指南(2014)[J]. 中国实用乡村医生杂志, 2015(12):3. |
| 2 | TSIKOURAS P, BOTHOU A, GEREDE A, et al. Premature Birth, Management, Complication [M]. Global Women′s Health, 2021. doi:10.5772/intechopen.98324 |
| 3 | 张文, 丁依玲. 子宫颈机能不全的可能病因 [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2023, 39(8): 780-783. |
| 4 | 孙丽洲, 杨娜娜. 子宫颈机能不全的热点问题与诊治策略 [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2023, 39(8): 769-771. |
| 5 | 孙笑, 时春艳. 子宫颈机能不全和短子宫颈的孕期超声检测和监管 [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2023, 39(8): 776-779. |
| 6 | 潘江皓, 孙健铭, 宋家明, 等. 急性下肢深静脉血栓形成患者行CDT联合ART治疗前后监测超声弹性成像参数变化对疗效的评估价值 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(18): 2362-2367. |
| 7 | 胡敏霞, 温德惠, 王立坤, 等. 高频超声与剪切波弹性成像在跟腱损伤术后评估中的应用研究 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(8): 1017-1021. |
| 8 | SUTHASMALEE S, MOUNGMAITHONG S. Cervical shear wave elastography as a predictor of preterm delivery during 18?24 weeks of pregnancy [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2019, 45(11): 2158-2168. doi:10.1111/jog.14094 |
| 9 | 周汇恩, 陈婉明, 王梦蝶, 等. 基于临床-超声影像组学列线图模型预测孕晚期早产的价值 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(14): 1835-1841. |
| 10 | QU Y, SUN H, CHEN J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Gray-scale ultrasound and shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of primipara pregnancy and delivery [J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2021, 10(11): 116641677-116611677. doi:10.21037/apm-21-2672 |
| 11 | FENG Q, CHAEMSAITHONG P, DUAN H, et al. Screening for spontaneous preterm birth by cervical length and shear-wave elastography in the first trimester of pregnancy [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 227(3): 500.e1-500.e14. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.014 |
| 12 | SUN J, LI N, JIAN W, et al. Clinical application of cervical shear wave elastography in predicting the risk of preterm delivery in DCDA twin pregnancy [J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22(1): 202. doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04526-0 |
| 13 | 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 早产临床防治指南(2024版) [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2024, 59(4): 257-269. |
| 14 | 唐修武, 倪观太. 宫颈机能不全的诊疗进展 [J]. 黑龙江医药, 2013, 26(4): 672-676. |
| 15 | 杨雅琴,李佳慧,赵莉萍,等.自发性早产预测的研究进展[J].中国生育健康杂志,2023,34(5):492-497. |
| 16 | YANG X, DING Y, MEI J, et al. Second-trimester cervical shear wave elastography combined with cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2022, 48(5): 820-829. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.01.003 |
| 17 | SHAO J, SHI G, QI Z, et al. Advancements in the application of ultrasound elastography in the cervix [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2021, 47(8): 2048-2063. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.04.009 |
| 18 | AKBAS M, KOYUNCU F M. The Utility of Myometrial and Cervical Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography in the Diagnosis of Ectopic Pregnancy [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2020, 46(9): 2215-2221. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.035 |
| 19 | KUUSELA P, JACOBSSON B, HAGBERG H, et al. Second‐trimester transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length for prediction of preterm birth: A blinded prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study [J]. BJOG, 2021, 128(2): 195-206. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16519 |
| 20 | 丁苗苗, 栗河莉, 郭瑞霞. 经会阴超声测量宫颈长度及宫颈前角对孕期经阴道宫颈环扎术后早产的预测价值 [J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2024, 59(1): 1-4. |
| 21 | 杜柳, 古裕均, 吴利红,等. E-Cervix弹性成像评估不同分娩史孕妇妊娠期宫颈组织差异的研究 [J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学, 2024, 33(1): 63-70. |
| 22 | MYERS K M, FELTOVICH H, MAZZA E, et al. The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy [J]. J Biomech, 2015, 48(9): 1511-1523. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.065 |
| 23 | 左喜芳, 杜雨峰, 杨静, 等. 双胎孕妇妊娠中晚期的子宫颈长度对早产的预测价值 [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2019, 54(5): 318-323. |
| 24 | PACHULIIA O V, KHALENKO V V, SHENGELIIA M O, et al. Biomechanisms of cervical remodeling and current approaches to maturity assessment[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2023, 72(1): 81-95. doi:10.17816/jowd114934 |
| 25 | 李雪, 张弘. 宫颈机能不全环扎与早产 [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(2): 146-150. |
| 26 | 柯宇莉, 魏玉梅. 超声监测宫颈长度预测单胎妊娠早产的研究进展 [J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2023, 32(8): 630-632. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |