收稿日期: 2024-10-25
网络出版日期: 2025-03-31
基金资助
国家自然科学基金青年项目(82305048);天津市教委科研计划项目(自然科学)(2023KJ165);天津中医药大学第一附属医院“拓新工程”基金科研课题(编号:院ZZ2024004)
Efficacy of transfer learning artificial intelligence model based on ultrasound in evaluating the probability of malignancy of partially cystic thyroid nodule
Received date: 2024-10-25
Online published: 2025-03-31
目的 探讨基于超声的迁移学习人工智能模型预测甲状腺囊实性结节(PCTN)恶性概率的可能性。 方法 回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年12月间就诊于山东大学齐鲁医学院威海市立医院并有明确病理结果的PCTN患者246例,以7:3的比例随机分为训练组和测试组。评估PCTN超声图像特征,经过多因素logistic回归分析,得到评估PCTN恶性概率的独立危险因素并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。另一方面,通过Python软件的PyTorch框架对数据进行预处理后,选择5种不同的预训练模型进行迁移学习,具体包括Inception_v3、EfficientNet、VGG19、ResNet50和DenseNet121,计算AUC值并进行比较。 结果 超声图像特征中实性成分> 50%、实性成分与囊性成分呈偏心锐角、病灶边界模糊不清、病灶边界呈毛刺样、蛋壳样钙化和微钙化对于评价PCTN的良恶性差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),基于以上独立危险因素计算的AUC值为0.843。另外,在5种迁移学习模型中,ResNet50模型诊断效能最高,AUC值为0.903 2。 结论 基于超声的迁移学习人工智能模型优于传统超声图像评价效能,能够准确预测PCTN的性质,从而减少不必要的超声引导下细针穿刺活检。
关键词: 超声; 甲状腺囊实性结节; 迁移学习; 人工智能模型; 超声引导下细针穿刺活检
邹颖 , 刘继华 , 李静宜 , 毕海 , 石岩 , 陆秀娣 , 张启波 . 基于超声的迁移学习人工智能模型对甲状腺囊实性结节恶性概率的评估效能[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(6) : 889 -895 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.06.018
Objective To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of an ultrasound-based transfer learning artificial intelligence model in predicting the malignancy probability of partially cystic thyroid nodules (PCTN). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 246 patients with PCTN who had definitive pathological results and were admitted to Weihai Municipal Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were randomly divided into training and test cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Ultrasonic image features of PCTN were evaluated, and independent risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis, with the area under the curve (AUC) subsequently calculated. Additionally, five different pre-trained models?Inception_v3, EfficientNet, VGG19, ResNet50, and DenseNet121?were selected for transfer learning after data preprocessing using the PyTorch framework in Python. The AUC values of these models were calculated and compared. Results Solid portion greater than 50%, eccentric acute angle, ill-defined margin, spiculated or microlobulated margin, rim calcification, and microcalcification exhibited statistically significant differences(P < 0.05) in distinguishing between benign and malignant PCTN. The AUC value derived from these independent risk factors was 0.843. Furthermore, among the five transfer learning models evaluated, the ResNet50 model demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficiency, achieving an AUC value of 0.903 2. Conclusion The ultrasound-based transfer learning artificial intelligence model demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional ultrasound image evaluation methods, enabling accurate prediction of the nature of PCTN and thereby reducing unnecessary ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsies.
| 1 | LIANG F, LI X, JI Q, et al. Revised Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS): Imitating the American College of Radiology TIRADS, a single-center retrospective study[J]. Quant Imag Med Surg, 2023, 13(6): 3862-3872. doi:10.21037/qims-22-1307 |
| 2 | TESSLER F N, MIDDLETON W D, GRANT E G. Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): A User′s Guide[J]. Radiology, 2018, 287(1): 29-36. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017171240 |
| 3 | SIEGEL R L, MILLER K D, WAGLE N S,et al. Cancer statistics, 2023[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2023, 73(1): 17-48. doi:10.3322/caac.21763 |
| 4 | DALK?RAN A, ATAKAN A, RIFAIO?LU A S, et al. Transfer learning for drug-target interaction prediction[J]. Bioinformatics, 2023, 39(): i103-i110. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad234 |
| 5 | GARG S, SINGH P. Transfer Learning Based Lightweight Ensemble Model for Imbalanced Breast Cancer Classification[J]. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform, 2023, 20(2): 1529-1539. doi:10.1109/tcbb.2022.3174091 |
| 6 | REIS H C, TURK V. Transfer Learning Approach and Nucleus Segmentation with MedCLNet Colon Cancer Database[J]. J Digit Imaging, 2022, 36(1): 306-325. doi:10.1007/s10278-022-00701-z |
| 7 | GRANI G S, FILETTI S, DURANTE C. Thyroid nodules: Diagnosis and management[J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2024, 20(12): 715-728. doi:10.1038/s41574-024-01025-4 |
| 8 | PITOIA F T. New insights in thyroid diagnosis and treatment[J]. Rev Endocr Metab Dis, 2023, 25(1): 1-3. doi:10.1007/s11154-023-09859-5 |
| 9 | SHI Y Z, JIN Y, ZHENG L. Partially cystic thyroid nodules on ultrasound: The associated factors for malignancy[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2020, 74(4): 373-381. doi:10.3233/ch-190582 |
| 10 | WANG C Y, LI Y, ZHANG M M, et al. Analysis of Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Partially Cystic Thyroid Nodules Based on Ultrasound Characterization With a TIRADS Grade-4a or Higher Nodules[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13: 861070. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.861070 |
| 11 | XIN Y, LIU F, SHI Y, et al. A Scoring System for Assessing the Risk of Malignant Partially Cystic Thyroid Nodules Based on Ultrasound Features[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 731779. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.731779 |
| 12 | 谢荣理, 张俊, 顾建华, 等. 计算机辅助诊断系统与TI-RADS分级及超声评分法对甲状腺良恶性结节诊断价值的比较[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(13): 1746-1749. |
| 13 | ZHAO H N, LIU J Y, LIN Q Z, et al. Partially cystic thyroid cancer on conventional and elastographic ultrasound: A retrospective study and a machine learning—Assisted system[J]. An Transl Med, 2020, 8(7): 495-495. doi:10.21037/atm.2020.03.211 |
| 14 | 葛肖艳, 马婷, 刘文. 人工智能技术与FNAC联合在甲状腺良恶性结节诊断中的应用价值分析[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2024, 30(5): 589?593. |
| 15 | 徐宇缘, 吴萌, 冯晓丹,等. 基于超声影像组学及临床特征构建列线图预测甲状腺囊实性结节良恶性[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2024, 40(10): 1089-1093. |
| 16 | 朱枫, 李青, 陈曦, 等. 细针穿刺活检联合高通量测序技术在甲状腺结节诊疗中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(17): 2471-2476. |
| 17 | 王承杰, 王璐瑶, 黄一律, 等. 恶性BethesdaⅢ类甲状腺结节的临床及超声危险因素研究[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2024, 40(9): 976-979. |
| 18 | PENG S, LIU Y, LV W, et al. Deep learning-based artificial intelligence model to assist thyroid nodule diagnosis and management: A multicentre diagnostic study[J]. The Lancet Digit Health, 2021, 3(4): e250-e259. doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00041-8 |
| 19 | ZHENG X Y, DONG S, ZHONG M J, et al. Progressive Transfer Learning[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2022, 31: 1340-1348. doi:10.1109/tip.2022.3141258 |
| 20 | 廖淑婷, 于向荣. 能谱CT和人工智能在甲状腺癌诊断中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(2): 129-133. |
| 21 | 胡加银, 李陶, 夏纪筑. C-TIRADS、超声造影、BRAFV600E基因对TBSRTCⅢ类甲状腺结节诊断价值分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(21): 2739-2744. |
| 22 | GIROLAMI I, MARLETTA S, PANTANOWITZ L, et al. Impact of image analysis and artificial intelligence in thyroid pathology, with particular reference to cytological aspects[J]. Cytopathology, 2020, 31(5): 432-444. doi:10.1111/cyt.12828 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |