临床研究

直肠黏膜柱状缝合联合聚桂醇注射治疗女性直肠前突的有效性和安全性

  • 翁和语 ,
  • 张伟伟 ,
  • 陈启
展开
  • 南京医科大学附属逸夫医院肛肠外科 (江苏 南京 211112 )

收稿日期: 2024-08-09

  网络出版日期: 2025-03-20

基金资助

南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目(YKK24258)

Clinical study on combined rectal mucosal columnar suture with lauromacrogol injection for the treatment of female rectocele

  • Heyu WENG ,
  • Weiwei ZHANG ,
  • Qi. CHEN
Expand
  • Department of Colorectal Surgery,Sir Run Run Hospital,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 211112,Jiangsu,China

Received date: 2024-08-09

  Online published: 2025-03-20

摘要

目的 观察评估直肠黏膜柱状缝合(Block)术联合聚桂醇注射在治疗女性直肠前突中的临床疗效和安全性。 方法 该研究回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年12月在南京医科大学附属逸夫医院接受治疗的90例女性直肠前突患者。按手术治疗方式分为三组:Block术联合聚桂醇注射术(BP组)30例、单纯Block术(B组)30例和传统吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, PPH)术(H组)30例。比较三组患者的一般临床资料,围术期各项指标、围术期患者Longo′s 排便梗阻综合征(Longo′s ODS)评分、手术前后直肠前突程度、手术前后肛门直肠测压相关指标、手术疗效及围术期并发症情况。 结果 H组患者术中出血量显著高于B组和BP组(P < 0.05)。BP组在术后24 h VAS评分和住院时间方面优于H组和B组(P < 0.05)。术前三组患者的Longo′s ODS评分、直肠前突深度、肛管静息压和残余压差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);术后BP组的Longo′s ODS评分和直肠前突深度显著优于B组和H组(P < 0.05)。术后肛管静息压和残余压在三组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但BP组更接近正常范围。BP组的总体显效率为93.3%,高于B组的73.3%和H组的66.7%(P < 0.05);三组患者并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 Block术联合聚桂醇注射术是治疗女性直肠前突的安全有效的方法,疗效优于单纯行PPH术及Block术,可有效恢复女性直肠生理解剖形态,改善患者临床症状。

本文引用格式

翁和语 , 张伟伟 , 陈启 . 直肠黏膜柱状缝合联合聚桂醇注射治疗女性直肠前突的有效性和安全性[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(5) : 711 -715 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.05.014

Abstract

Objective To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of rectal mucosal columnar suturing (Block technique) in combination with lauromacrogol injection for the treatment of female rectocele. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 90 female patients with rectocele who were treated at Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, from January 2022 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups according to their surgical treatments: Block combined with lauromacrogol injection (BP group, n = 30), Block alone (B group, n = 30), and Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH, H group, n = 30). The study compared general clinical data, perioperative indicators, Longo′s Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (Longo′s ODS) scores, the degree of rectocele before and after surgery, anorectal manometry parameters, surgical efficacy, and perioperative complications among the three groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss in Group H was significantly higher compared to Groups B and BP (P < 0.05). In terms of the 24?hour postoperative VAS score and hospital stay duration, Group BP demonstrated superior outcomes relative to Groups H and B (P < 0.05). Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the three groups regarding Longo′s ODS score, rectocele depth, resting anal pressure, or residual anal pressure (P > 0.05). Postoperatively, Group BP exhibited significantly better Longo′s ODS scores and rectocele depth compared to Groups B and H (P < 0.05). Although no significant differences were observed in postoperative resting and residual anal pressures among the three groups (P > 0.05), the values in Group BP were closer to the normal range. The overall efficacy rate in Group BP was 93.3%, which was higher than the 73.3% in Group B and 66.7% in Group H (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate across the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions Block combined with lauromacrogol injection is a safe and effective treatment for female rectocele, demonstrating superior efficacy compared to both PPH and Block alone. This method not only effectively restores the physiological anatomy of the female rectum but also significantly improves clinical symptoms.

参考文献

1 VAN DEN BROECK S, JACQUEMYN Y, HUBENS G, et al. Rectocele: victim of availability bias? Results of a Belgian survey of colorectal and gynecological surgeons[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2022, 33(12): 3505-3517. doi:10.1007/s00192-022-05118-4
2 MUSTAIN W. Functional Disorders: Rectocele[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2016, 30(1): 63-75. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1593425
3 翟文杰,李明森,李玉玮,等. 直肠前突手术治疗的研究进展[J]. 结直肠肛门外科,2023,29(6):551-556.
4 WEN C C, HUANG S M, WANG Y W. Anatomical Anal Stenosis after PPH: Insights from a Retrospective Study and Rat Model[J]. IJMS, 2024, 25(6): 3543. doi:10.3390/ijms25063543
5 AUBERT M, MEGE D, LE HUU NHO R, et al. Surgical management of the rectocele - An update[J]. J Visc Surg, 2021, 158(2): 145-157. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.10.001
6 GUTTADAURO A, CHIARELLI M, MATERNINI M, et al. Value and limits of stapled transanal rectal repair for obstructed defecation syndrome: 10 years-experience with 450 cases[J]. Asian J Surg, 2018, 41(6): 573-577. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.05.002
7 刘妮妮,李君毅,潘贺欢,等. 吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合直肠黏膜柱状缝合固定术治疗女性直肠前突的临床研究[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2023,51(3):330-333.
8 中国医学会外科学分会肛肠外科学组. 便秘诊治暂行标准[J]. 现代实用医学, 2003, 16(4): 258-259.
9 DURNEA C M, KHASHAN A S, KENNY L C, et al. Prevalence, etiology and risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse in premenopausal primiparous women[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2014, 25(11): 1463-1470. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2382-1
10 DIETZ H P, KORDA A. Which bowel symptoms are most strongly associated with a true rectocele?[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2005, 45(6): 505-508. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2005.00486.x
11 樊鹏,任翔,徐红丽,等. 直肠前突的诊疗进展[J]. 中国医药科学,2021,11(10):49-52.
12 ZHUMANOVA E N, KONEVA E S, EPIFANOV V A,et al. Influence of various rehabilitation complexes on sexual function in fertile females and women of perimenopausal and menopausal age after surgery for rectocele[J]. Khirurgiia, 2020,2020(12): 76. doi:10.17116/hirurgia202012176
13 邹劲林,彭培建,莫湘琼. 经阴道修补和痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突性便秘临床疗效的比较[J]. 实用医学杂志,2018,34(6):995-997+1002.
14 BALCI B, LEVENTOGLU S, OSMANOV I, et al. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs. transperineal mesh repair for obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele: comparison of selectively distributed patients[J]. BMC Surg, 2023, 23(1): 359. doi:10.1186/s12893-023-02206-0
15 张立,田泽阳,张海旺,等. 选择性痔上黏膜吻合术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗重度混合痔的效果比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2021,15(9):678-682.
16 周寒璞,杨巍,陈天,等. TST联合术式治疗环状混合痔的应用现状 [J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2023, 29(3): 317-320.
17 张林祥,吴晓玲,亓敏,等. STARR术治疗直肠黏膜内脱垂合并直肠前突50例[J]. 中国肛肠病杂志,2023,43(3):39-41.
18 RIPAMONTI L, GUTTADAURO A, BIANCO G LO, et al. Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (Starr) in the Treatment of Obstructed Defecation: A Systematic Review[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 790287. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.790287
19 邵继华, 黄英, 陈芳. 吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗环状脱垂痔的疗效及术后发生尿潴留的影响因素[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38 (23): 2986-2990.
20 IIDA Y, SAITO H, TAKASHIMA Y, et al. Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) with low rectal anastomosis using a PPH 03 stapler: low rate of recurrence and postoperative complications[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2017, 32(12): 1687-1692. doi:10.1007/s00384-017-2908-3
21 BELLIO G, PASQUALI A, SCHIANO DI VISCONTE M. Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: Results at 10-Year Follow-up[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2018, 61(4): 491-498. doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000001025
22 罗毅. PPH术与经直肠闭式修补术治疗直肠前突的效果研究[J]. 结直肠肛门外科,2018,24(1):53-56.
23 范雷涛,孙源,李春雨. RPH联合外剥内扎和聚桂醇治疗混合痔的临床疗效[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2021,24(7):564-567.
24 ZHOU J, LIU C, MA L, et al. Complications and management of elective endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection with lauromacrogol for gastric varices[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2021, 33(5): 680-685. doi:10.1097/meg.0000000000002099
文章导航

/