收稿日期: 2024-10-14
网络出版日期: 2025-02-19
基金资助
广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z-A20230503)
Effect of rhythm on sedation depth of remazolam toluene sulfonate during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing general anesthesia
Received date: 2024-10-14
Online published: 2025-02-19
目的 探讨近日节律对甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑全麻手术患者麻醉诱导期镇静深度的影响。 方法 选取年龄18 ~ 65岁全身麻醉下行择期手术的患者,根据麻醉诱导开始时间将患者分为日间组(7:00 ~ 19:00)和夜间组(19:00至次日7:00),每组70例,每组再分为0.11、0.13、0.16、0.18 和0.22 mg/kg 5个等比亚剂量组,每个亚组各14例。观察给药3 min后的MOAA/S 评分和脑电双频指数(BIS)值,计算两者的相关系数,记录MOAA/S 评分≤ 1时甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑的诱导剂量和单位体质量剂量,记录日间组和夜间组以及不同性别患者日间和夜间瑞马唑仑的诱导剂量,计算日间组和夜间组的半数有效量(ED50)、95%有效量(ED95)及其95%置信区间(CI)。 结果 当MOAA/S ≤ 1时,与日间组(13.98 ± 4.21)mg相比,夜间组瑞马唑仑的诱导剂量(12.34 ± 3.51)mg减少,与日间组(0.22 ± 0.056)mg/kg相比,夜间组瑞马唑仑的单位体质量剂量(0.20 ± 0.049)mg/kg减少,日间组与夜间组瑞马唑仑的ED50和ED95差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);日间组BIS与MOAA/S相关系数为0.902(95%CI:0.876 ~ 0.925),夜间组BIS与MOAA/S相关系数为0.905(95%CI:0.888 ~ 0.927),两组MOAA/S与BIS呈极强相关性,组间相关系数差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);日间组女性患者BIS与MOAA/S相关系数为0.763(95%CI:0.726 ~ 0.799),夜间组女性患者BIS与MOAA/S相关系数为0.777(95%CI:0.739 ~ 0.808)。日间组男性患者BIS与MOAA/S相关系数为0.768(95%CI:0.723 ~ 0.804),夜间组男性患者BIS与MOAA/S相关系数为0.771(95%CI:0.723 ~ 0.811)。男性患者和女性患者日间组和夜间组的MOAA/S与BIS呈强相关性,组间相关系数差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);夜间组的BIS明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);男性患者瑞马唑仑总诱导剂量在日间和夜间均高于女性患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);女性患者夜间组的BIS值明显降低(P < 0.05)。 结论 近日节律对甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑全麻手术患者麻醉诱导镇静效应产生影响,夜间组患者的镇静效应更强,并且存在性别的差异,夜间女性患者的镇静效果更好。
许庆龄 , 吕远志 , 宁恒艺 , 谢玉波 , 钟妤 . 近日节律对全麻手术患者麻醉诱导期甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑镇静深度的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(3) : 403 -408 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.03.015
Objective To investigate the impact of recent rhythmic interventions on the depth of sedation during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing general anesthesia with remazolam toluene sulfonate. Methods Patients aged 18 ~ 65 years who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia were selected and divided into a day group (7:00 ~ 19:00) and a night group (19:00 ~ 7:00 the following day) based on the start time of anesthesia induction. Each group comprised 70 patients, further subdivided into five equal dose groups of remazolam toluene sulfonate at 0.11, 0.13, 0.16, 0.18, and 0.22 mg/kg, with 14 patients in each subgroup. The Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score and Bispectral Index (BIS) value were recorded 3 minutes post?administration, and the correlation coefficient between these two parameters was calculated. The induction dose and unit body weight dose of remazolam toluene sulfonate were documented when the MOAA/S score was ≤ 1. Additionally, the induction dose of remazolam for both day and night groups as well as for patients of different genders was recorded. The half effective dose (ED50), 95% effective dose (ED95), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for both the day and night groups were also calculated. Results When MOAA/S ≤ 1, the induced dose of remazolam in the night group (12.34 ± 3.51) mg was significantly lower than that in the day group (13.98 ± 4.21) mg. Additionally, the dose per unit body weight of remazolam in the night group (0.20 ± 0.049) mg/kg was also significantly lower than that in the day group (0.22 ± 0.056) mg/kg. Statistically significant differences were observed in the ED50 and ED95 values of remazolam between the day and night groups (P < 0.05). The correlation coefficient between BIS and MOAA/S was 0.902 (95%CI: 0.876 ~ 0.925) in the day group and 0.905 (95%CI: 0.879 ~ 0.929) in the night group, indicating a strong correlation between MOAA/S and BIS in both groups. However, there was no significant difference in the correlation coefficients between the two groups (P > 0.05). The correlation coefficients between BIS and MOAA/S were 0.763 (95%CI: 0.726 ~ 0.799) in the daytime group and 0.777 (95%CI: 0.739 ~ 0.808) in the nighttime group. In a separate analysis, the correlation coefficients were 0.768 (95% CI: 0.723 ~ 0.804) for the daytime group and 0.771 (95% CI: 0.723 ~ 0.811) for the nighttime group. A strong correlation was observed between MOAA/S and BIS in both male and female patients during both day and night, with no significant difference in correlation coefficients between groups (P > 0.05). However, BIS values were significantly lower in the nighttime group compared to the daytime group (P < 0.05). Additionally, male patients required a higher total induced dose of remazolam than female patients during both day and night, with this difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05). Furthermore, female patients exhibited a significant decrease in BIS values at night (P < 0.05). Conclusions Recent studies have shown that circadian rhythm significantly influences anesthesia?induced sedation in patients undergoing general anesthesia with remazolam toluenesulfonate. Specifically, the sedation effect is more pronounced in nighttime procedures, and there is a notable gender difference, with female patients exhibiting better sedation outcomes during nighttime surgeries.
| 1 | MONTARULI A, CASTELLI L, MULè A, et al. Biological Rhythm and Chronotype: New Perspectives in Health [J]. Biomolecules, 2021, 11(4):487. doi:10.3390/biom11040487 |
| 2 | ZHANG W, XIONG Y, TAO R, et al. Emerging Insight Into the Role of Circadian Clock Gene BMAL1 in Cellular Senescence [J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13: 915139. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.915139 |
| 3 | XUAN W, KHAN F, JAMES C D, et al. Circadian regulation of cancer cell and tumor microenvironment crosstalk [J]. Trends Cell Biol, 2021, 31(11): 940-950. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2021.06.008 |
| 4 | SUGANO A, MURAI H, HORIGUCHI S, et al. Influence of light-dark cycle on delayed recovery from isoflurane anesthesia induced by hypnotics in mice [J]. J Pharmacol Sci, 2021, 145(4): 335-339. doi:10.1016/j.jphs.2021.02.003 |
| 5 | 旷光华, 徐伟, 夏瑞. 瑞马唑仑的应用现状及其研究进展 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(13): 1695-1700. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.13.025 |
| 6 | BUYSSE D J, REYNOLDS C F 3 RD, MONK T H,et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research [J]. Psychiatry Res, 1989, 28(2): 193-213. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 |
| 7 | PASTIS N J, YARMUS L B, SCHIPPERS F, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Compared With Placebo and Midazolam for Moderate Sedation During Bronchoscopy [J]. Chest, 2019, 155(1): 137-146. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.015 |
| 8 | SCHOBER P, BOER C, SCHWARTE L A. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation [J]. Anesth Analg, 2018, 126(5): 1763-1768. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000002864 |
| 9 | SHEN J H, YE M, CHEN Q, et al. Effects of circadian rhythm on Narcotrend index and target-controlled infusion concentration of propofol anesthesia [J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2021, 21(1): 215. doi:10.1186/s12871-021-01445-z |
| 10 | WANG D, HUANG Y, WANG X, et al. Circadian differences in emergence from volatile anaesthesia in mice: Involvement of the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2020, 125(4): 548-559. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.012 |
| 11 | DENG J, WEI C, LIU L, et al. Circadian Variation in the Median Effective Dose of Epidural Ropivacaine for Labor Analgesia [J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2021, 8: 669264. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.669264 |
| 12 | SONG B, LI Y, TENG X, et al. Comparison of Morning and Evening Operation Under General Anesthesia on Intraoperative Anesthetic Requirement, Postoperative Sleep Quality, and Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Nat Sci Sleep, 2020, 12: 467-475. doi:10.2147/nss.s257896 |
| 13 | LEVI F, BENAVIDES J, TOUITOU Y, et al. Circadian rhythm in peripheral type benzodiazepine binding sites in human platelets [J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 1986, 35(15): 2623-2625. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(86)90062-6 |
| 14 | 王岩, 叶虹, 王庆波. 昼夜节律对咪达唑仑靶控输注镇静效果的影响 [J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2015, 19(3): 488-490. |
| 15 | POZA J J, PUJOL M, ORTEGA-ALBáS J J, et al. Melatonin in sleep disorders [J]. Neurologia (Engl Ed), 2022, 37(7): 575-585. doi:10.1016/j.nrleng.2018.08.004 |
| 16 | SAMANTA S. Physiological and pharmacological perspectives of melatonin [J]. Arch Physiol Biochem, 2022, 128(5): 1346-1367. doi:10.1080/13813455.2020.1770799 |
| 17 | POSA L, DE GREGORIO D, LOPEZ-CANUL M, et al. Supraspinal melatonin MT(2) receptor agonism alleviates pain via a neural circuit that recruits mu opioid receptors [J]. J Pineal Res, 2022, 73(4): e12825. doi:10.1111/jpi.12825 |
| 18 | CHALLET E, GOURMELEN S, PEVET P, et al. Reciprocal relationships between general (Propofol) anesthesia and circadian time in rats [J]. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2007, 32(3): 728-735. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301081 |
| 19 | ZHANG Y Y, HUANG Y F, LIANG J, et al. Improved up-and-down procedure for acute toxicity measurement with reliable LD(50) verified by typical toxic alkaloids and modified Karber method [J]. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol, 2022, 23(1): 3. doi:10.1186/s40360-021-00541-7 |
| 20 | DIXON W J. Staircase bioassay: The up-and-down method [J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 1991, 15(1): 47-50. doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80090-9 |
| 21 | QI X R, SUN J Y, AN L X, et al. Effect of intravenous lidocaine on the ED(50) of propofol for inserting gastroscope without body movement in adult patients: A randomized, controlled study [J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2022, 22(1): 319. doi:10.1186/s12871-022-01861-9 |
| 22 | 张萱, 高静. 麻醉深度监测指标在围术期麻醉中的应用研究 [J]. 医学信息, 2022, 35(14): 168-171. |
| 23 | 张俊杰, 杨晓春, 刘卓懿, 等. 基于BIS和微旁流EtCO2监护下甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在日间宫腔镜手术麻醉中的有效性和安全性 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(8): 1047-1051. |
| 24 | SEO K H, KIM K, LEE S K, et al. Changes in electroencephalographic power and bicoherence spectra according to depth of dexmedetomidine sedation in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia [J]. Int J Med Sci, 2021, 18(10): 2117-2127. doi:10.7150/ijms.54677 |
| 25 | ANTONIK L J, GOLDWATER D R, KILPATRICK G J, et al. A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): Part I. Safety, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics [J]. Anesth Analg, 2012, 115(2): 274-283. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e31823f0c28 |
| 26 | STADER F, MARZOLINI C. Sex-related pharmacokinetic differences with aging [J]. Eur Geriatr Med, 2022, 13(3): 559-565. doi:10.1007/s41999-021-00587-0 |
| 27 | ZUCKER I, PRENDERGAST B J. Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics [J]. Handb Exp Pharmacol, 2023, 282: 25-39. doi:10.1007/164_2023_669 |
| 28 | PLEYM H, SPIGSET O, KHARASCH E D, et al. Gender differences in drug effects: Implications for anesthesiologists [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2003, 47(3): 241-259. doi:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00036.x |
| 29 | DAVIS J P, EDDIE D, PRINDLE J, et al. Sex differences in factors predicting post-treatment opioid use [J]. Addiction, 2021, 116(8): 2116-2126. doi:10.1111/add.15396 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |