临床研究

单一切口椎间孔镜治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄合并腰椎间盘突出症的效果

  • 王子桓 ,
  • 张翼升 ,
  • 余熙荣 ,
  • 马楚杰 ,
  • 莫泳皓 ,
  • 钟远鸣
展开
  • 1.广西中医药大学第一临床医学院 (广西 南宁 530200 )
    2.广西中医药大学第一附属医院脊柱骨伤科 ;(广西 南宁 530023 )

收稿日期: 2024-06-08

  网络出版日期: 2025-01-14

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(81760874)

Clinical observation of single incision intervertebral foramen in the treatment of double⁃segment lumbar spinal stenosis complicated with lumbar disc herniation

  • Zihuan WANG ,
  • Yisheng ZHANG ,
  • Xirong YU ,
  • Chujie MA ,
  • Yonghao MO ,
  • Yuanming ZHONG
Expand
  • The First Clinical School,Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine,Nanning 530200,Guangxi,China

Received date: 2024-06-08

  Online published: 2025-01-14

摘要

目的 探讨单一切口椎间孔镜治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄并腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。 方法 回顾性分析2016年3月至2018年5月在广西中医药大学第一附属医院脊柱骨伤科就诊的40例双节段腰椎管狭窄并腰椎间盘突出症患者临床资料,其中通过单一切口同时穿刺椎间孔镜治疗的患者11例(A组),通过单一切口前后穿刺椎间孔镜治疗的患者13例(B组),通过双切口前后穿刺椎间孔镜治疗的患者16例(C组)。记录患者的一般临床资料,三组不同时间点(术前、术后即刻、术后1周、术后1个月、末期随访)的VAS评分、JOA评分及临床疗效,并运用统计学进行分析。 结果 三组间手术时间、术中透视次数、皮肤切开长度和满意度差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);手术时间与手术方式在VAS、JOA评分上存在交互作用;手术时间、手术方式在VAS、JOA评分上存在主效应(P < 0.05);三组术后即刻、术后1周、术后1个月、末期随访与术前在VAS、JOA评分上比较差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);三组间术后即刻在VAS、JOA评分上差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);三组间术后1周在VAS评分上差异有统计意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 单一切口椎间孔镜技术同时减压双节段腰椎管狭窄并腰椎间盘突出症的有效手段,具有手术时间短、术中透视少,损伤小等优势,患者满意,值得临床推广应用。

本文引用格式

王子桓 , 张翼升 , 余熙荣 , 马楚杰 , 莫泳皓 , 钟远鸣 . 单一切口椎间孔镜治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄合并腰椎间盘突出症的效果[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(1) : 41 -47 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.01.007

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of single?incision intervertebral foraminotomy in treating double?segment lumbar spinal stenosis accompanied by lumbar disc herniation. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 cases of double?segment lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation treated in our orthopedic (spinal surgery) department from March 2016 to May 2018. Among these cases, 11 patients (Group A) were treated with percutaneous discectomy, 13 patients (Group B) underwent percutaneous endoscopic discectomy, and 16 patients (Group C) received double?incision percutaneous surgery. General clinical data for all patients were recorded. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and clinical outcomes were assessed at five different time points: preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, one week postoperatively, one month postoperatively, and at the final follow?up. Statistical analysis was performed on the collected data. Results The operation time, the number of fluoroscopies performed on the hands, the length of the skin incision, and patient satisfaction were all statistically significant (P < 0.05). An interaction effect was observed between the operation time and the surgical procedure on both the VAS and JOA scores. Both the operation time and the surgical method had significant main effects on the VAS and JOA scores (P < 0.05). Significant differences in VAS and JOA scores were found among the three groups immediately post?surgery, one week post?surgery, one month post?operation, and at the end of the study (P < 0.05). Immediately after surgery, there were statistically significant differences in VAS and JOA scores among the three groups (P < 0.05). One week post?surgery, there were also statistically significant differences in VAS scores among the three groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions The single?incision intervertebral foramen technique is an effective approach for simultaneously addressing double?segment lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation through decompression. This method boasts a shorter operative duration, reduced intraoperative radiation exposure, and minimal tissue damage. Patient satisfaction is high, making it a valuable addition to clinical practice.

参考文献

1 范祚然,吴晓淋,郭柱,等. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜腰椎融合术与单通道脊柱内镜下经椎间孔腰椎融合术治疗合并椎间盘突出的腰椎管狭窄症疗效比较研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2023,37(9):1098-1105.
2 王晓陆,刘艺明,杜怡斌,等. 微创经椎间孔入路椎体间融合术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症中远期疗效[J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(2):149-153.
3 王寒辉,刘界,徐亚勇,等. 显微镜辅助微创通道下经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术与开放经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症的短中期疗效[J]. 实用医学杂志,2022,38(11):1373-1377.
4 MINETAMA M, KAWAKAMI M, TERAGUCHI M,et al. MRI grading of spinal stenosis is not associated with the severity of low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis[J] . BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022,23(1):857. doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05810-y
5 张翼升,孙亚如,唐福波,等. 神经根造影加封闭的精确诊断在脊柱内镜镜下融合治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄合并腰椎失稳症中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志,2023,39(21):2827-2833.
6 SUN W, XUE C, TANG X Y,et al. Selective versus multi-segmental decompression and fusion for multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis with single-segment degenerative spondylolisthesis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019,14(1):46. doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1092-2
7 ZAINA F, TOMKINS-LANE C, CARRAGEE E,et al. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016,2016(1):CD010264. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010264.pub2
8 KIM J S, BAE J, LEE D C,et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and interlaminar full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-F trial): Protocol for a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial[J]. PLoS One, 2023,18(4):e0283924. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283924
9 WANG Y, DOU Q, YANG J,et al. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Spinal Canal Stenosis: Classification of Lateral Region of Lumbar Spinal Canal and Surgical Approaches[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018,119:e276-e283. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.133
10 MA T, ZHOU T, GU Y,et al. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) compared with MIS-TLIF for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disease in elderly patients: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Front Surg, 2023,17(9):1083953.
11 AHN Y, KIM C H, LEE J H,et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A prospective study[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013,38(7):617-625. doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e318275ca58
12 LI Z, YANG H, ZHANG Y,et al. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a comparative analysis of learning curves[J]. Eur Spine J, 2024,33(6):2154-2165. doi:10.1007/s00586-024-08293-8
13 HARTMANN S, LANG A, LENER S,et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A prospective, controlled observational study of short-term outcome[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2022,45(5):3417-3426. doi:10.1007/s10143-022-01845-w
14 DOBBS R, MAY S, HOPE P. The validity of a clinical test for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Man Ther, 2016,25:27-34. doi:10.1016/j.math.2016.05.332
15 TANG Y, LIU Z, LIU H,et al. A comparative study of single and double incision for L4/5 and L5/S1 double-level percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9:955987. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.955987
文章导航

/