医学检查与临床诊断

生长方位量化联合S-Detect技术对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的预测价值

  • 邓雅倩 ,
  • 李文肖 ,
  • 徐泽林 ,
  • 马金梅 ,
  • 杜婷婷 ,
  • 刘文 ,
  • 李军
展开
  • 1.石河子大学第一附属医院超声科 (新疆 石河子 832008 )
    2.国家卫健委中亚高发病防治重点实验室 (新疆 石河子 832008 )

收稿日期: 2024-10-16

  网络出版日期: 2025-01-14

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(82060318);天山英才科技创新团队:中亚地区高发疾病防治应用研究创新团队(2023TSYCTD0020);兵团科技攻关项目(2022CB002-04);石河子大学第一附属医院青年基金项目(QN202126);石河子大学科研项目(自然科学)(ZZZC2023040)

Predictive value of growth orientation quantification combined with S⁃Detect technique for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

  • Yaqian DENG ,
  • Wenxiao LI ,
  • Zelin XU ,
  • Jinmei MA ,
  • Tingting DU ,
  • Wen LIU ,
  • Jun LI
Expand
  • Department of Ultrasound,the First Afiliated Hospital of Shihezi University,Shihezi 832008,Xinjiang,China

Received date: 2024-10-16

  Online published: 2025-01-14

摘要

目的 探讨乳腺肿块生长方位量化联合S-Detect技术对预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结(ALN)转移的价值。 方法 收集2023年3月至2024年10月于医院住院的163例乳腺癌患者资料,依据ALN病理结果分为转移组(n = 62)与未转移组(n = 101)。所有患者术前行常规超声及S-Detect检查。采用单因素和多因素回归分析各观察指标与ALN转移的相关性,筛选出有意义的指标并建立logistic回归预测模型,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价该模型的预测价值。 结果 单因素分析显示,肿块的最大径、边界、边缘、钙化、方位角、血流在两组间的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素分析结果显示钙化、边界、方位角、边缘、最大径是预测ALN状态的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。依此构建的logistic回归预测模型:Y = -7.995 + 2.299 × 最大径 + 1.171 × 边界 + 2.137 × 边缘 + 1.397 × 钙化 + 0.034 × 方位角。该联合预测模型的AUC为0.869,均大于各独立影响因素的AUC(P < 0.05),联合预测模型与病理结果的一致性良好(Kappa = 0.701,P < 0.05)。 结论 量化乳腺肿块的方位角有助于预测ALN转移,并增强对非平行取向的解释和应用。乳腺肿块生长方位量化联合S-Detect技术对乳腺癌ALN转移具有较好的预测价值,可以给个性化治疗提供参考依据。

本文引用格式

邓雅倩 , 李文肖 , 徐泽林 , 马金梅 , 杜婷婷 , 刘文 , 李军 . 生长方位量化联合S-Detect技术对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的预测价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025 , 41(1) : 100 -107 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.01.017

Abstract

Objective To investigate the utility of combining breast mass growth orientation quantification with the S-Detect technique for predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast cancer. Methods Data was collected from 163 breast cancer patients admitted to our hospital between March 2023 and October 2024, who were categorized into metastatic (n = 62) and non-metastatic (n = 101) groups based on ALN pathology results. All patients underwent routine preoperative ultrasound and S-Detect examination. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess the correlation between each observational index and ALN metastasis. Significant indexes were identified through screening, leading to the establishment of a logistic regression prediction model. The predictive value of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in the maximum diameter of the mass, border characteristics, margin features, calcification patterns, orientation angle, and blood flow between the two groups. Multifactorial analysis demonstrated that calcification, border characteristics, orientation angle, margin features, and maximum diameter independently influenced the prediction of axillary lymph node (ALN) status in breast cancer patients (P < 0.05). Consequently, a logistic regression prediction model was constructed as follows: Y = -7.995 + 2.299 × maximal diameter + 1.171 × border + 2.137 × margin + 1.397 × calcication + 0.034 × orientation angle. The area under curve (AUC) for this combined prediction model was 0.869 which significantly outperformed each independent influencing factor alone (P < 0.05), indicating good agreement between this joint prediction model and pathological results (Kappa = 0.701, P < 0.05). Conclusions Quantification of the orientation angle of a breast mass aids in predicting axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis and enhances the interpretation and application of non-parallel orientations. The combination of quantifying growth orientation based on breast mass with artificial intelligence S-Detect technique demonstrates promising predictive value for ALN metastasis in breast cancer, providing a reference basis for personalized treatment.

参考文献

1 HYUNA S, JACQUES F, SIEGEL R L, et al.Global cancer statistics2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
2 TO B, ISAAC D, ANDRECHEK E R. Studying Lymphatic Metastasis in Breast cancer: Current Models, Strategies, and Clinical Perspectives[J].J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia, 2020, 25(3):191-203. doi:10.1007/s10911-020-09460-5
3 MARINO M A, AVENDANO D, ZAPATA P, et al. Lymph node imagingin patients with primary breast cancer: Concurrent diagnostic tools[J].Oncologist, 2020, 25(2):e231-e242. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0427
4 ZHU Y Y, JIA Y Y, PANG W J, et al. Ultrasound contrast-enhancedpatterns of sentinel lymph nodes: Predictive value for nodal statusand metastatic burden in early breast cancer[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2023, 13(1):160-170. doi:10.21037/qims-22-234
5 LI J, LI H, GUAN L, et al. The value of preoperative sentinellymph node contrast-enhanced ultrasound for breast cancer: Alarge, multicenter trial[J]. BMC Cancer, 2022, 22(1):455. doi:10.1186/s12885-022-09551-y
6 HANKó-BAUER O, PODOLEANU C, GEORGESCU R, et al.The accuracy of the preoperative axillary ultrasound examination in predicting the status of the sentinel lymph node involvement in patients with infiltrating breast carcinoma[J]. Chirurgia(Bucur), 2019, 114(3):384-391. doi:10.21614/chirurgia.114.3.384
7 BARTOLOTTA T V, ORLANDO A A M, SPATAFORA L, et al. S-Detect characterization of focal breast lesions according to the US BI RADS lexion:A pictorial essay[J]. J Ultrasound, 2020, 23 (2) :207-215. doi:10.1007/s40477-020-00447-w
8 GU Y, TIAN J W, RAN H T, et al. The utility of the fifth edition of the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon in category 4 breast lesions:A prospective multicenter study in China[J]. Acad Radiol, 2022, 29 :S26–S34. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.027
9 GUO Q, ZHANG L, DI Z, et al. Assessing risk category of breast cancer by ultrasound imaging characteristics[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2018, 44(4):815–824. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.12.001
10 FENG C, ZHAN Y, SHAO H, et al. Postoperative expressions of TRACP5b and CA125 in patients with breast cancerand their values for monitoring bone metastasis[J]. J BUON, 2020, 25(2):688-695.
11 韩文, 李卫民, 吴晓明, 等. 纵横比大于1乳腺肿块的X线再评估及临床、超声特征分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(24):3179-3183.
12 WATANABE T, YAMAGUCHI T, TOHNO E, et al. B-mode ultrasound diagnostic flowchart for solid breast masses: JABTSBC-01 study[J]. J Med Ultrason, 2021, 48(1):71-81. doi:10.1007/s10396-020-01072-0
13 WANG B, ZHU L, HE C, et al. Growth pattern can be used as a new characteristic to predict malignancy in breast cancer[J].Breast Cancer, 2020, 27(3):445-455. doi:10.1007/s12282-019-01041-7
14 WANG H, ZHAN W, CHEN W, et al. Sonography with vertical orientation feature predicts worse disease outcome in triple negative breast cancer[J]. Breast,2020,49:33-40. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.006
15 CHEN K, WU S.The utility of quantifying the orientation of breast masses in ultrasound imaging[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1):4578. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55298-w
16 桑田, 张海俊, 曹玉文, 等. Logistic回归分析乳腺癌常规超声征象与腋窝淋巴结转移的关系[J].中国医学影像技术, 2021, 37(8):1158-1162.
17 石丽楠, 曹春莉, 桑田, 等. 基于乳腺癌超声特征及临床病理指标的列线图预测腋窝淋巴结转移风险[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2024, 32(4):332-338.
18 ZONG Q, DENG J, GE W, et al. Establishment of simple nomograms for predicting axillary lymph node involvement in early breast cancer[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2020, 12:2025-2035. doi:10.2147/cmar.s241641
19 LIU H, XU G, YAO M H, et al. Association of conventional ultrasound, elastography and clinicopathological factors with axillary lymph node status in invasive ductal breast carcinoma with sizes > 10 mm [J]. Oncotarget, 2018, 9(2):2819-2828. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.18969
20 LI X L, XU H X, LI D D, et al. A risk model based on ultra-sound,ultrasound elastography,and histologic parameters for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast in-vasive ductal carcinoma [J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):3029-3039. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03582-3
21 YI C B, DING Z Y, DENG J, et al.Combining the ultrasound features of primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes can reduce false-negative rate dueing the prediction of high axillary node burden in BI-RADS category 4 or 5 breast cancer lesions[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2020, 46(8):1941-1948. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.003
22 XUE S, ZHAO Q, TAI M, et al.Correlation between breast ultrasound microcalcification and the prognosis of breast cancer[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2021, 2021:6835963. doi:10.1155/2021/6835963
23 OGRADY S, MORGAN M P.Microcalcifications in breastcancer: From pathophysiology to diagnosis and prognosis[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2018, 1869(2):310-320. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.04.006
24 熊朝月, 周敏, 何小芳, 等. 基于超声特征联合临床资料的预测模型对早期乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移的评估价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(12):14-18, 22.
25 YU X Q, HAO X Y, WAN J, et al. Correlation between ultrasound appearance of small breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2018, 44(2):342-349. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.020
26 LI L, YU T, SUN J, et al. Prediction of the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer by radiomic signature based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. Acta Radiol, 2022, 63(8):1014-1022. doi:10.1177/02841851211025857
27 YI C B, DING Z Y, DENG J, et al. Combining the ultrasound features of primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes can reduce false-negative rate during the prediction of high axillary node burden in BI-RADS category 4 or 5 breast cancer lesions[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2020, 46(8):1941-1948. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.003
28 ZHANG H, SUI X, ZHOU S, et al. Correlation of Conventional Ultrasound Characteristics of Breast Tumors With Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis and Ki-67 Expression in Patients With Breast Cancer[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2019, 38(7):1833-1840. doi:10.1002/jum.14879
29 XIONG J, ZUO W, WU Y, et al. ultrasonography and clinicopathological features of breast cancer in predicting axillary lymph node metastases[J]. BMC Cancer, 2022, 22(1):1155. doi:10.1186/s12885-022-10240-z
30 郑碧玉, 张晓东, 苏毅明, 等. 年轻乳腺癌69例超声征象与腋窝淋巴结转移的关系[J]. 超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(6):525-531.
31 ZHAO Q, SUN J W, ZHOU H, et al. Pre-operative Conventional Ultrasound and Sonoelastography Evaluation for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Malignant Breast Lesions[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2018, 44 (12): 2587-2595. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.07.017
32 ZHU A Q, LI X L, AN L W, et al. Predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma with negative axillary ultrasound results using conventional altrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2020, 39(10):2059-2070. doi:10.1002/jum.15314
文章导航

/