Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine TPVB under ultrasound guidance on vital signs and stress response of patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery under general anesthesia
Received date: 2024-09-26
Online published: 2024-12-23
目的 探讨全麻胸腔镜手术患者应用右美托咪定(0.5、1.0、2.0 μg/kg)复合罗哌卡因超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)对生命体征、应激反应等指标的影响,为临床优化麻醉方案提供参考。 方法 选取全麻胸腔镜手术患者99例,按照随机数字表法将患者分为低、中、高剂量组,各为33例。麻醉诱导结束后,低、中、高剂量组分别给予右美托咪定0.5、1.0、2.0 μg/kg复合0.375%罗哌卡因超声引导下TPVB,三组均观察至术后3 d。比较各组围手术期指标,苏醒质量,术后2、6、12、24 h的疼痛程度,麻醉前(T1)、气管拔管时(T2)、气管拔管5 min时(T3)的生命体征,术前、术后3 d的免疫功能、应激反应及观察时间内的不良反应。 结果 较低剂量组,瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚用量在中、高剂量组中更低,术后自控镇痛次数更少(P < 0.05)。苏醒、气管拔管及恢复室停留时间在低、中、高剂量组之间延长(P < 0.05)。视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分在三组术后2、6、12、24 h逐渐降低(P < 0.05),较低剂量组,中、高剂量组VAS评分在术后2、6、12 h更低(P < 0.05)。较T1时,三组心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)在T2、T3时均升高,T2、T3时的HR、MAP在低、中、高剂量组之间升高(P < 0.05);与T2时比较,三组T3时的HR、MAP均降低(P < 0.05)。较术前,三组全血CD8+、血清皮质醇(Cor)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、肾上腺素(E)水平在术后3 d升高,术后3 d上述指标在低、中、高剂量组之间升高(P < 0.05);三组全血CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+水平在术后3 d降低,术后3 d上述指标在低、中、高剂量组之间降低(P < 0.05)。三组安全性比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 1.0 μg/kg右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因超声引导下TPVB在减轻全麻胸腔镜手术患者疼痛程度,减少瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚用量及术后自控镇痛次数方面具有一定的优势,而0.5 μg/kg右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因超声引导下TPVB在改善患者生命体征,减轻免疫抑制、应激反应及促进麻醉后苏醒方面具有一定的优势,临床可根据患者实际情况合理选择麻醉方案。
曾建强 , 钟昭迎 , 袁磊 , 彭冬兰 . 超声引导下不同剂量右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因TPVB对全麻胸腔镜手术患者生命体征及应激反应的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(24) : 3527 -3533 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.24.015
Objective To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 μg/kg) combined with ropivacaine ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery under general anesthesia on the vital signs, stress response and other indexes, and to provide reference for the optimization of anesthesia regimen in the clinic. Methods A total of 99 cases of patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were selected, and the patients were divided into the low, medium, and high-dose groups of 33 cases each according to the method of randomized numerical table. At the end of anesthesia induction, dexmedetomidine 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg/kg compounded with 0.375% ropivacaine ultrasound-guided TPVB was administered to the low, medium, and high-dose groups, respectively, and all three groups were observed until 3 d postoperatively. Perioperative indicators, quality of awakening, degree of pain at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, vital signs before anesthesia (T1), at tracheal extubation (T2), and at 5 min of tracheal extubation (T3), and immune function, stress response, and adverse reactions during the observation time were compared between the groups. Results Compared with the low-dose group, remifentanil and propofol dosages were lower in the medium- and high-dose groups, and the number of postoperative self-controlled analgesia was lower (P < 0.05). Awakening, tracheal extubation, and recovery room stay were prolonged between the low, medium, and high dose groups (P < 0.05). Scores of visual analog scale (VAS) were progressively lower in the three groups at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.05), and compared with the low-dose group, scores of VAS were lower in the medium and high-dose groups at 2, 6, and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). Compared with T1, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) were higher in all three groups at T2, T3, and HR, MAP at T2, T3 were higher between the low, medium, and high dose groups (P < 0.05); compared with T2, HR, MAP were lower in all three groups at T3 (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative period, levels of whole blood CD8+, serum cortisol (Cor), C-reactive protein (CRP), norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine (E) were increased in the three groups at 3 d postoperatively, and the above indexes were elevated between the low, medium, and high dosage groups at 3 d postoperatively (P < 0.05); levels of whole blood CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ were decreased in the three groups at 3 d postoperatively, and the above indexes were elevated between the low, medium, and high dosage groups at 3 d postoperatively (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the safety comparison among the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions 1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine ultrasound guided TPVB had certain advantages in reducing the degree of pain of general anesthesia thoracoscopic surgery patients, reducing the dosage of remifentanil and propofol and the number of postoperative self-controlled analgesia, while 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine ultrasound guided TPVB had certain advantages in improving patients' vital signs, reducing immunosuppression, stress reaction and promoting post-anesthesia awakening. Clinical anesthesia protocols could be rationally selected according to the actual situation of patients.
| 1 | LI H, LIU J, LI C, et al. Influencing factors of dexmedetomidine on postoperative myocardial protection in patients with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2023, 39(3): 650-655. doi:10.12669/pjms.39.3.7594 |
| 2 | ZHONG S, SUN Q, WEN J, et al. Dexmedetomidine attenuates inflammatory response and chronic pain following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer[J]. Surgery, 2024, 176(4): 1263-1272. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.001 |
| 3 | 袁方, 任胜杰, 郎堡. 超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022, 38(9): 1001-1003. |
| 4 | 王玥, 范东毅, 杨禄坤. 氢吗啡酮复合右美托咪定在胸腹腔镜术后静脉镇痛中的应用[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2021, 40(11): 764-766. |
| 5 | 王雁, 邵建林, 杨伟. 不同剂量右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因胸椎旁神经阻滞在非插管胸腔镜手术中的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(4): 323-326. |
| 6 | 颜艳, 王彤. 医学统计学[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2020: 252-254. |
| 7 | HORVATH B, KLOESEL B, TODD M M, et al. The evolution, current value, and future of the american society of anesthesiologists physical status classification system[J]. Anesthesiology, 2021, 135(5): 904-919. doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003947 |
| 8 | 周利, 周大春. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞联合电针刺激对老年胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者的麻醉效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2024, 44(13): 3127-3130. |
| 9 | YAN H, CHEN W, CHEN Y, et al. Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia on postoperative pain after thoracoscopic surgery: the use of intravenous and epidural esketamine[J]. Anesth Analg, 2023, 137(2): 399-408. |
| 10 | KOH L Y, HWANG N C. Anesthesia for nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2023, 37(7): 1275-1283. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2023.02.048 |
| 11 | 周宁博, 梁晓雨, 雷华娟, 等. 瑞芬太尼联合甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑对老年胸腔镜食管癌切除患者术后疼痛、应激反应及血清炎性因子的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2024, 44(12): 2863-2866. |
| 12 | TSUKAMOTO Y, ODAKA M, NAKADA T, et al. Comparative study of local versus general anesthesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for empyema[J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(10): 4208-4214. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.11.103 |
| 13 | 王迪, 丁颖, 纪木火, 等. 超声引导下区域神经阻滞用于腹腔镜减重手术后镇痛的研究进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2024, 40(7): 746-750. |
| 14 | 赵聪, 尹泓, 蔡敏, 等. 改良经肋软骨膜入路胸腹神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞用于腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022, 38(6): 569-573. |
| 15 | 张继如, 简金金, 曹亮亮, 等. 罗哌卡因伍用右美托咪定前锯肌平面阻滞联合静脉自控镇痛对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者术后恢复质量的改善作用[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2023, 54(1): 155-160. |
| 16 | 逯欣宇, 苗壮, 杨昕, 等. 右美托咪定复合不同镇痛药物静脉自控镇痛对胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(8): 727-732. |
| 17 | LI M, ZHANG K, LU H, et al. Utility of dexmedetomidine on surgical site wound pain undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis[J]. Int Wound J, 2024, 21(4): 14629-14629. doi:10.1111/iwj.14629 |
| 18 | GUO Y, WANG J, JIANG P, et al. Effect of erector spinae plane block with different doses of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant for ropivacaine on the postoperative quality of recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2023, 23(1): 264-264. doi:10.1186/s12871-023-02231-9 |
| 19 | 陈慧, 王佳, 张春明. 瑞马唑仑注射剂联合瑞芬太尼注射剂用于老年胸腔镜手术患者的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2023, 39(11): 1552-1556. |
| 20 | 陈海涛, 王先锋, 李伟, 等. 艾司氯胺酮对胸腔镜肺癌手术患者术后抑郁状态的影响[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2022, 41(12): 743-747. |
| 21 | 易治国, 周雯, 苏艳萍, 等. 地佐辛联合罗哌卡因用于胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者中镇痛效果的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2024, 40(8): 1116-1120. |
| 22 | 何锋, 王小英, 刘宁, 等. 胸腔镜肺癌根治术对非小细胞肺癌患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群的影响及临床意义[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2022, 38(6): 725-730. |
| 23 | 邱靖, 蔡振. 0.375%罗哌卡因联合帕瑞昔布钠前锯肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜手术术后疼痛的影响[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2022, 38(15): 1739-1742, 1765. |
| 24 | 孔岚, 白玉. 右美托咪定对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者围手术期炎症反应及氧化应激反应的影响[J]. 医药导报, 2019, 38(7): 910-913. |
| 25 | 袁懋绣, 兰彩云, 周建中, 等. 胸腔镜手术治疗早期肺癌的效果及对血清CEA、CA125、PCT、CRP水平的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(20): 4310-4312. |
| 26 | ZHENG W, TIAN X, FAN J, et al. Application of dexmedetomidine in surgical anesthesia for gastric cancer and its effects on il-1beta, il-6, tnf-alpha and crp[J]. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand), 2023, 69(3): 177-181. doi:10.14715/cmb/2023.69.3.26 |
| 27 | KE H H, LIOU J Y, TENG W N, et al. Opioid-sparing anesthesia with dexmedetomidine provides stable hemodynamic and short hospital stay in non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a propensity score matching cohort study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2023, 23(1): 110. doi:10.1186/s12871-023-02032-0 |
| 28 | SUN H, ZHONG Y, WANG M, et al. Postoperative dexmedetomidine infusion and chronic postsurgical pain in thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule surgery: a retrospective study with propensity-score-matched analysis[J]. Pain Ther, 2024, 13(4): 865-881. doi:10.1007/s40122-024-00611-8 |
| 29 | SIROHIYA P, KUMAR V, MITTAL S, et al. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation during medical thoracoscopy: a pilot randomized-controlled trial (rct)[J]. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol, 2022, 29(4): 248-254. doi:10.1097/lbr.0000000000000818 |
| 30 | SONG C, LU Q. Effect of dexmedetomidine supplementation for thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2022, 17(1): 70-70. doi:10.1186/s13019-022-01803-z |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |