收稿日期: 2024-06-17
网络出版日期: 2024-09-30
基金资助
广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2022487);汕头市医疗卫生科技计划项目(编号(汕府科(2021)3号-8)
Nociceptive level index guides the effect of remifentanil infusion target concentration on cellular immunity and HIF-1α in patients undergoing radical mastectomy
Received date: 2024-06-17
Online published: 2024-09-30
目的 探讨伤害感受水平(NOL)指数应用于乳腺癌根治术对患者的细胞免疫和缺氧诱导因子(HIF)-1α的影响。 方法 招募2022年12月至2023年12月行乳腺癌根治术的80例患者,随机将患者分为观察组和对照组。观察组控制NOL指数在30 ~ 50,依此调整瑞芬太尼靶浓度,对照组起始采用瑞芬太尼4 ng/mL靶控输注,依据血流动力学调整瑞芬太尼靶浓度。记录瑞芬太尼平均靶浓度;记录手术前1 d及手术后1 d患者的静脉血CD4+、CD8+以及NK细胞值,测定血清中HIF-1α水平。 结果 两组患者的麻醉时间、手术时间、术中MAP、HR、丙泊酚靶浓度和术后VAS评分均差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),观察组术中的瑞芬太尼平均靶浓度低于对照组(P < 0.05);在术后1 d,观察组的CD4+、CD4+/CD8+、NK细胞值均高于对照组,HIF-1α水平低于对照组(P < 0.05)。相比术前1 d,观察组患者在术后1 d的CD4+、CD4+/CD8+较低,HIF-1α水平较高(P < 0.05);相比术前1 d,对照组患者在术后1天的CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+及NK细胞值较低,HIF-1α水平较高(P < 0.05)。 结论 NOL指数应用于全麻下乳腺癌根治术可以减少术中瑞芬太尼的靶浓度,降低瑞芬太尼对细胞免疫的抑制,保护NK细胞的活性,同时减少HIF-1α升高水平,由此推断对患者肿瘤免疫微环境的影响更小。
詹银周 , 陈俊衡 , 陈超 , 蔡楚源 , 马学珠 , 郭春明 . 伤害感受水平指数指导瑞芬太尼输注靶浓度对接受乳腺癌根治术患者细胞免疫和缺氧诱导因子-1α的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(18) : 2566 -2570 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.18.010
Objective To investigate the impact of nociceptive level (NOL) index on cellular immunity and HIF-1α in patients with radical breast cancer. Methods A total of 80 patients undergoing radical mastectomy between December 2022 and December 2023 were randomly assigned into an experimental group and a control group using a random number table method. The NOL index in the experimental group was maintained within the range of 30 to 50, with corresponding adjustments made to achieve the target concentration of remifentanil. In contrast, the control group initially received remifentanil at a target controlled infusion rate of 4 ng/mL, which was adjusted based on hemodynamics. The average target concentration of remifentanil was recorded for both groups. Venous blood samples were collected from all participants one day before and one day after surgery to measure CD4+, CD8+ cell counts, NK cell activity, as well as serum levels of HIF-1α. Results There were no significant differences observed in anesthesia time, operation time, intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores between the two groups. The average target concentration of remifentanil in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the experimental group exhibited higher values of CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and NK cells compared to the control group, while demonstrating a lower level of HIF-1α expression (P < 0.05). In addition, within the experimental group, there was a decrease in CD4+ count and CD4+/CD8+ ratio one day after surgery compared to one day before surgery; meanwhile, HIF-1α expression increased significantly after surgery when compared to preoperative levels (P < 0.05). Similarly, within the control group, there was a decrease observed in CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+ ratio as well as NK cell values one day after surgery when compared to preoperative levels; additionally, HIF-1α expression showed a significant increase after surgery when compared to preoperative levels(P < 0.05). Conclusion The implementation of NOL monitoring during radical mastectomy under general anesthesia can effectively lower the required remifentanil concentration, thereby mitigating its suppressive effects on T lymphocytes, preserving NK cell activity, and reducing elevated levels of HIF-1α. Consequently, this approach exerts minimal impact on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in patients.
| 1 | SENOGA A, WASIKE R, MWANZI S ALI, et al. Quality of life of patients one year after breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy for early breast cancer: A Kenyan tertiary hospital five-year review[J]. Pan Afr Med J, 2023,46:69. doi:10.11604/pamj.2023.46.69.39151 |
| 2 | DUBOWITZ J A, SLOAN E K, RIEDEL B J. Implicating anaesthesia and the perioperative period in cancer recurrence and metastasis[J]. Clin Exp Metastasis,2018. 35(4): 347-358. doi:10.1007/s10585-017-9862-x |
| 3 | MINCER J S, BUGGY D J. Anaesthesia, analgesia, and cancer outcomes: Time to think like oncologists?[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2023,131(2):193-196. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.001 |
| 4 | ZHAO M, ZHU S, ZHANG D, et al. Long-lasting postoperative analgesia with local anesthetic-loaded hydrogels prevent tumor recurrence via enhancing CD8(+)T cell infiltration[J]. J Nanobiotechnology, 2023,21(1):50. doi:10.1186/s12951-023-01803-8 |
| 5 | HU C, WANG B, LIU Z, et al. Sevoflurane but not propofol enhances ovarian cancer cell biology through regulating cellular metabolic and signaling mechanisms[J]. Cell Biol Toxicol, 2023,39(4):1395-1411. doi:10.1007/s10565-022-09766-6 |
| 6 | SUN W, ZHUANG S, CHENG M, et al. Mu opioid receptor mRNA overexpression predicts poor prognosis among 18 common solid cancers: A pan-cancer analysis[J]. Front Oncol, 2023,13:1134744. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1134744 |
| 7 | 李帅, 孙莉, 郑晖. 麻醉与肿瘤免疫微环境[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2021,42(7): 780-784,C1. |
| 8 | LV B, WANG Y, MA D, et al. Immunotherapy: Reshape the tumor immune microenvironment[J]. Front Immunol, 2022,13:844142. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.844142 |
| 9 | COWMAN S J, KOH M Y. Revisiting the HIF switch in the tumor and its immune microenvironment[J]. Trends Cancer, 2022,8(1):28-42. doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2021.10.004 |
| 10 | SHAHIRI T S, RICHEBé P, RICHARD-LALONDE M, et al. Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: A systematized review[J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2022,36(3):623-635. doi:10.1007/s10877-021-00772-3 |
| 11 | MEIJER F, HONING M, ROOR T, et al. Reduced postoperative pain using Nociception Level-guided fentanyl dosing during sevoflurane anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2020,125(6):1070-1078. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.057 |
| 12 | FUNCKE S, PINNSCHMIDT H O, BRINKMANN C, et al. Nociception level-guided opioid administration in radical retropubic prostatectomy: A randomised controlled trial[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2021,126(2):516-524. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.051 |
| 13 | KAWAGUCHI K, MAESHIMA Y, TOI M. Tumor immune microenvironment and systemic response in breast cancer[J]. Med Oncol, 2022,39(12):208. doi:10.1007/s12032-022-01782-0 |
| 14 | DUBOWITZ J, HILLER J, RIEDEL B. Anesthetic technique and cancer surgery outcomes[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2021,34(3):317-325. doi:10.1097/aco.0000000000001002 |
| 15 | BERGERON C, BRULOTTE V, PELEN F, et al. Impact of chronic treatment by β1-adrenergic antagonists on Nociceptive-Level (NOL) index variation after a standardized noxious stimulus under general anesthesia: A cohort study[J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2022,36(1):109-120. doi:10.1007/s10877-020-00626-4 |
| 16 | GHIYASINASAB M, MORISSON L, LAFERRIèRE-LANGLOIS P, et al. Identification of the intraoperative antinociceptive effect of intravenous fentanyl using the Nociception Level (NOL) index versus clinical parameters in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A secondary analysis of the NOLGYN study[J]. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2022,41(4):101102. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101102 |
| 17 | RUETZLER K, MONTALVO M, ROTEM O M, et al. Generalizability of nociception level as a measure of intraoperative nociceptive stimulation: A retrospective analysis[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2023,67(9):1187-1193. doi:10.1111/aas.14286 |
| 18 | 刘军, 黄婉, 王卓丹,等. 全凭静脉麻醉下镇痛-伤害性刺激指数对于腹腔镜手术疼痛刺激评估的有效性[J]. 实用医学杂志,2019,35(3):403-406,411. |
| 19 | MEIJER F S, MARTINI C H, BROENS S, et al. Nociception-guided versus Standard Care during Remifentanil-Propofol Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Anesthesiology, 2019,130(5):745-755. doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000002634 |
| 20 | JIAO B, CHEN M, WANG W, et al. The opioid-sparing effect of nociception level (NOL) index monitoring for adult patients undergoing surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Asian J Surg, 2023,46(4):1731-1732. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.146 |
| 21 | 王虹伊, 陆军. 肿瘤免疫治疗的临床研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018,34(6):917-919. |
| 22 | NOY R, POLLARD J W. Tumor-associated macrophages: From mechanisms to therapy[J]. Immunity,2014,41(1): 49-61. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.010 |
| 23 | GERSTBERGER S, JIANG Q, GANESH K. Metastasis[J]. Cell, 2023,186(8):1564-1579. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.003 |
| 24 | LI C, GUAN R, LI W, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals tumor immune microenvironment in human hypopharygeal squamous cell carcinoma and lymphatic metastasis[J]. Front Immunol, 2023,14:1168191. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1168191 |
| 25 | SCROOPE C A, SINGLETON Z, HOLLMANN M W, et al. Opioid Receptor-Mediated and Non-Opioid Receptor-Mediated Roles of Opioids in Tumour Growth and Metastasis[J]. Front Oncol, 2021,11:792290. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.792290 |
| 26 | 吴勇, 陈健, 李成洁,等. 不同浓度瑞芬太尼对胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者围手术期免疫功能及肺功能的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版),2021,14(4): 508-510. |
| 27 | 王振宝, 施志波, 赖江琼. 超声下腰方肌阻滞对肾癌切除围手术期细胞免疫功能的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2019,35(12):1989-1992. |
| 28 | 迪拉热·努尔太, 热娜古力·阿不都热以木, 依马木, 张利. 乳腺癌缺氧诱导因子-1α、Ki-67表达与超声声像特征的关系[J]. 癌症进展, 2020, 18(5): 467-469,504. |
| 29 | CAO J, CAO R, LIU Y, et al. CPNE1 mediates glycolysis and metastasis of breast cancer through activation of PI3K/AKT/HIF-1α signaling[J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2023,248:154634. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2023.154634 |
| 30 | ZHUANG Y, LI X, ZHAN P, et al. HIF?1α and MBP1 are associated with the progression of breast cancer cells by repressing β?catenin transcription[J]. Oncol Rep, 2022,48(3):149. doi:10.3892/or.2022.8361 |
| 31 | WEI Y, ZHANG D, SHI H, et al. PDK1 promotes breast cancer progression by enhancing the stability and transcriptional activity of HIF-1α[J]. Genes Dis, 2024,11(4):101041. doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2023.06.013 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |