Diagnostic value of POCT⁃cTnT for acute myocardial infarction based on symptom onset time
Received date: 2024-03-29
Online published: 2024-08-26
目的 确定胸痛症状发作后不同时间间隔内,床边心肌肌钙蛋白T(point of care troponin-T testing, POCT-cTnT)对急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction, AMI)的诊断性能,了解其在快速排除AMI方面的意义。 方法 这项回顾性研究包括了2019年1月至2022年12月期间出现胸痛症状的6 024例患者。在入院时测量了POCT-cTnT和中心实验室cTnI水平。通过按时间窗口划分的受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristics, ROC)分析,评估POCT-cTnT在诊断AMI时的准确性。 结果 总体而言,POCT-cTnT诊断AMI的AUC为0.826(95%CI:0.816 ~ 0.836),灵敏度和特异度分别为72.81%和86.26%。根据胸痛发作的时间进行区间分组(< 3 h、3 ~ 6 h、6 ~ 12 h、12 ~ 24 h、24 ~ 72 h和≥ 72 h),6~12 h以后的分组AUC值分别为0.918、0.928、0.920和0.908,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),均要高于6 h时以内的组(P < 0.001);根据胸痛发作时间点进行分组,≥ 8 h组的AUC为0.921,阴性预测值(negative predictive value,NPV)98.1%和阴性似然比(negative likelihood ratio,-LR)0.11,其AUC高于≥3 h、≥2 h、≥1 h和overall组(P < 0.05),而与≥ 4 h以后的各时间组相比,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 胸痛发作时间对单次检测POCT-cTnT诊断AMI的性能存在一定的影响,结合胸痛发作至就诊时间,可能提高其诊断或排除AMI的可靠性。在胸痛发作4 h后,单次POCT-cTnT检测能可靠地诊断或排除AMI;当胸痛发作8 h后,其诊断或排除AMI方面具有更高的可靠性。
陈国军 , 周天恩 , 刘宏锋 , 彭丽娜 , 姜骏 , 谢春明 . 胸痛发作时床边即时检测心肌钙蛋白T诊断急性心肌梗死的价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(16) : 2326 -2332 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.16.020
The sensitivity of cardiac troponin testing for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varies over time from chest pain onset. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of point?of?care testing cardiac troponin T (POCT?cTnT) at different time intervals post?symptom onset to refine rapid rule?out approaches for AMI. Methods This retrospective study included 6,024 patients presenting with chest pain from January 2018 to December 2022. POCT?cTnT and central lab cTnI levels were measured on admission. Receiver operating characteristics analysis stratified by time windows assessed the accuracy of POCT?cTnT for diagnosing AMI. Results The overall AUC of POCT?cTnT for diagnosing AMI was 0.826 (95% CI:0.816 ~ 0.836), with a sensitivity of 72.81% and a specificity of 86.26%. According to the time intervals of chest pain onset (< 3 hours, 3 ~ 6 hours, 6 ~ 12 hours, 12 ~ 24 hours, 24 ~ 72 hours, and ≥ 72 hours), the AUC values for groups after 6 ~ 12 hours were 0.918, 0.928, 0.920 and 0.908, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05), but all were higher than the groups within 6 hours (P < 0.001). According to the time of chest pain onset, the AUC for the ≥8h group was 0.921, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1% and a negative likelihood ratio (?LR) of 0.11. Its AUC was higher than those of the ≥ 3 h, ≥ 2 h, ≥ 1 h, and overall groups (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference compared with the groups after ≥ 4 h (P > 0.05). Conclusions Chest pain onset time has a certain impact on the performance of a single POCT?cTnT test for diagnosing AMI. The duration from chest pain onset to hospital admission combined with POCT?cTnT test may improve the reliability in diagnosing AMI. Specifically, a single POCT?cTnT test at four hours after chest pain onset, especially eight hours after chest pain onset, can diagnose or exclude AMI.
| 1 | TSAO C W, ADAY A W, ALMARZOOQ Z I, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2023,147(8):e93-e621. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001137 |
| 2 | ZHOU M, WANG H, ZENG X, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet,2019,394(10204):1145-1158. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30427-1 |
| 3 | IBANEZ B, JAMES S, AGEWALL S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018,39(2):119-177. |
| 4 | COLLET J P, THIELE H, BARBATO E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation[J]. Eur Heart J,2021,42(14):1289-1367. |
| 5 | HALLANI H, LEUNG D Y, NEWLAND E, et al. Use of a quantitative point-of-care test for the detection of serum cardiac troponin T in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes[J]. Intern Med J,2005,35(9):560-562. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00897.x |
| 6 | RAHSEPAR S, JAHROMI M S S, ABIRI S, et al. Point-of-Care Tests′ Role in Time Metrics of Urgent Inter- ventions in Emergency Department; a Systematic Review of Literature[J]. Arch Acad Emerg Med, 2022,10(1):e82. |
| 7 | DAWSON L P, NEHME E, NEHME Z, et al. Chest Pain Management Using Prehospital Point-of-Care Troponin and Paramedic Risk Assessment[J]. JAMA Intern Med,2023,183(3):203-211. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6409 |
| 8 | FLORKOWSKI C, DON-WAUCHOPE A, GIMENEZ N, et al. Point-of-care testing (POCT) and evidence-based laboratory medicine (EBLM)-does it leverage any advantage in clinical decision making?[J]. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci, 2017,54(7-8):471-494. doi:10.1080/10408363.2017.1399336 |
| 9 | GOU Q, LIANG L, LIU D, et al. Clinical performance of 0/1 h cardiac troponin algorithm for diagnosing non-STEMI in an emergency setting[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2023,71:139-143. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2023.06.036 |
| 10 | EGGERS K M, LAGERQVIST B, OLDGREN J, et al. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of persistent cardiac troponin I elevation in stabilized patients after an episode of acute coronary syndrome[J]. Am Heart J, 2008,156(3):588-594. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.04.022 |
| 11 | KATUS H A, REMPPIS A, LOOSER S, et al. Enzyme linked immuno assay of cardiac troponin T for the detection of acute myocardial infarction in patients[J]. J Mol Cell Cardiol,1989,21(12):1349-1353. doi:10.1016/0022-2828(89)90680-9 |
| 12 | TWERENBOLD R, COSTABEL J P, NESTELBERGER T, et al. Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2019,74(4):483-494. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.046 |
| 13 | TWERENBOLD R, COSTABEL J P, NESTELBERGER T, et al. Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019,74(4):483-494. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.046 |
| 14 | MEHTA M D, MARWAH S A, GHOSH S, et al. A Synergistic Role of Myeloperoxidase and High Sensitivity Troponin T in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome[J]. Indian J Clin Biochem, 2016,31(1):75-80. doi:10.1007/s12291-015-0490-4 |
| 15 | SAWICKI M, SYPNIEWSKA G, KOZINSKI M, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of myeloperoxidase for the detection of acute coronary syndromes[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2011,41(6):667-671. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02457.x |
| 16 | GOLDMANN B U, RUDOLPH V, RUDOLPH T K, et al. Neutrophil activation precedes myocardial injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Free Radic Biol Med, 2009,47(1):79-83. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.04.004 |
| 17 | BALDUS S, HEESCHEN C, MEINERTZ T, et al. Myeloperoxidase serum levels predict risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes[J]. Circulation, 2003,108(12):1440-1445. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000090690.67322.51 |
| 18 | KIM K S, LEE H J, KIM K, et al. Heart-type fatty acid binding protein as an adjunct to cardiac troponin-I for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2011,26(1):47-52. doi:10.3346/jkms.2011.26.1.47 |
| 19 | INOUE K, SUWA S, OHTA H, et al. Heart fatty acid-binding protein offers similar diagnostic performance to high-sensitivity troponin T in emergency room patients presenting with chest pain[J]. Circ J, 2011,75(12):2813-2820. doi:10.1253/circj.cj-11-0598 |
| 20 | KACPRZAK M, ZIELINSKA M. Prognostic value of myeloperoxidase concentration in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2016,223:452-457. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.258 |
| 21 | LIPPI G, MATTIUZZI C, CERVELLIN G. Critical review and meta-analysis on the combination of heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) and troponin for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction[J]. Clin Biochem, 2013,46(1-2):26-30. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.10.016 |
| 22 | THYGESEN K, ALPERT J S, JAFFE A S, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012,60(16):1581-1598. doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31826e1058 |
| 23 | THYGESEN K, ALPERT J S, JAFFE A S, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018)[J]. Circulation, 2018,138(20):e618-e651. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000617 |
| 24 | ROFFI M, PATRONO C, COLLET J P, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016,37(3):267-315. |
| 25 | 郭英,罗薇,丁霏,等. 高敏肌钙蛋白T正常的胸痛患者早期排除急性心肌梗死的最佳策略[J]. 实用医学杂志,2018,34(1):63-66. |
| 26 | 郭英,罗薇,丁霏,等. 非典型ST段抬高伴高敏肌钙蛋白T正常的胸痛患者纳入与排除急性心肌梗死的方法[J]. 实用医学杂志,2018,34(20):3465-3468. |
| 27 | 李小玲,罗薇,郭英,等. 初次高敏肌钙蛋白T升高的胸痛患者纳入与排除急性心肌梗死的最佳策略[J]. 实用医学杂志,2019,35(6):920-923. |
| 28 | BRICHKO L, SCHNEIDER H G, CHAN W, et al. Rapid and safe discharge from the emergency department: A single troponin to exclude acute myocardial infarction[J]. Emerg Med Australas, 2018,30(4):486-493. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.12919 |
| 29 | TWERENBOLD R, COSTABEL J P, NESTELBERGER T, et al. Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019,74(4):483-494. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.046 |
| 30 | FLORKOWSKI C, DON-WAUCHOPE A, GIMENEZ N, et al. Point-of-care testing (POCT) and evidence-based laboratory medicine (EBLM)-does it leverage any advantage in clinical decision making?[J]. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci, 2017,54(7-8):471-494. doi:10.1080/10408363.2017.1399336 |
| 31 | PICKERING J W, YOUNG J M, GEORGE P M, et al. Validity of a Novel Point-of-Care Troponin Assay for Single-Test Rule-Out of Acute Myocardial Infarction[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2018,3(11):1108-1112. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3368 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |