收稿日期: 2024-04-14
网络出版日期: 2024-08-26
基金资助
安徽省高等学校科学研究项目(2023AH050687);安徽医科大学校科研基金项目(2020xkj050)
Prognostic analysis of patients with bone metastases from primary non-small cell lung cancer with different pathologic staging
Received date: 2024-04-14
Online published: 2024-08-26
目的 了解不同病理类型的初治非小细胞肺癌(Non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)骨转移患者经过不同一线治疗方案的预后,以便对临床预测疾病进展、指导治疗、改善预后提供帮助。 方法 选择安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院2019年1月1日至2023年12月31日收入初治伴有骨转移的403名NSCLC患者,运用生存分析(Log-rank检验)进行单因素分析,Cox回归多因素分析,发现组织病理分型是影响患者预后的独立因素(P = 0.001, HR = 1.952),之后去除该因素对预后的影响,将全部人数按照病理组织分型分为腺癌组(316例)、鳞癌组(87例)两组后再次使用Cox回归模型进行多因素分析,分析影响生存预后的因素。 结果 在此次数据分析中,病理类型为鳞癌的患者的中位生存期(median overall survival, mOS)为15月(95% CI: 12.85 ~ 17.15),中位无进展生存期(median progression-free survival,mPFS)为9月(95% CI:7.34 ~ 10.67),而腺癌组患者的mOS为25月(95% CI: 23.26 ~ 26.74),mPFS为16月(95% CI: 14.43 ~ 17.57),差异有统计学意义。整体组的OS受到多方面因素的影响,包括初诊时美国东部肿瘤协作组织(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG)评分状态(1分/> 1分)、骨转移至躯干+四肢骨+颅骨、骨转移灶数量≥ 4个、ALK靶点基因突变、以及一线治疗使用化疗+靶向治疗等因素影响;同样地,PFS也受到上述因素的影响。另外在以病理组织分型为依据的腺癌组模型以及鳞癌组模型中得出化疗+靶向治疗,化疗+免疫治疗分别为两组的保护因素,ALK靶点基因突变仅为腺癌组的保护因素。 结论 本研究进一步确认了初治NSCLC骨转移患者的预后影响因素,为临床治疗提供了重要参考。
胡雪艳 , 孟凡亮 , 董娟娟 . 不同病理分型的初治非小细胞肺癌骨转移患者的预后分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024 , 40(16) : 2316 -2325 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.16.019
Objective To understand the prognosis of patients with bone metastases from first-treatment non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) of different pathological types after different first-line treatment regimens, in order to provide clinical prediction of disease progression, guidance of treatment, and improvement of prognosis. Methods 403 NSCLC patients with bone metastases who received primary treatment with bone metastases from Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2023 were selected for univariate analysis using survival analysis (Log-rank test) and multifactorial analysis with Cox regression, and it was found that histopathological subtyping was an independent factor affecting the prognosis of patients (P = 0.001, HR = 1.952), after which the effect of this factor on prognosis was removed, and the total number of patients was divided into two groups according to histopathological classification: adenocarcinoma group (316) and squamous carcinoma group (87), and then multifactorial analysis was performed again using Cox regression model to analyse the factors affecting survival prognosis. Results In this data analysis, patients with the pathological type of squamous carcinoma had a median overall survival (mOS) of 15 months (95% CI: 12.85 ~ 17.15) and a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 9 months (95% CI: 7.34 ~ 10.67), whereas patients in the adenocarcinoma group had a mOS of 25 months (95% CI: 23.26 ~ 26.74) and mPFS was 16 months (95% CI:14.43 ~ 17.57), a statistically significant difference. The OS of the overall group was affected by multiple factors, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score status (1/> 1) at the time of initial diagnosis, bone metastases to Trunk + limb bones + cranium, number of bone metastases ≥ 4, mutation of ALK target genes, and the use of chemotherapy+targeted therapy as the first line of treatment. therapy; similarly, PFS was also affected by the above factors. In addition, in the adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma models based on histopathological classification, chemotherapy + targeted therapy and chemotherapy + immunotherapy were found to be the protective factors for the two groups, and ALK target gene mutation was only a protective factor for the adenocarcinoma group. Conclusion This study further confirmed the prognostic factors influencing the prognosis of patients with bone metastases from primary NSCLC, which provides an important reference for clinical treatment.
| 1 | SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660 |
| 2 | PETERS S, DANSON S, HASAN B, et al. A randomised open-label phase Ⅲ trial evaluating the addition of denosumab to standard first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC-the ETOP and EORTC SPLENDOUR trial[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2020, 15(10), 1647-1656. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.06.011 |
| 3 | RECK M, BORGHAEI H, O′BYRNE K J. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. Future Oncol, 2019, 15(19): 2287-2302. doi:10.2217/fon-2019-0031 |
| 4 | GROSSI F, KUBOTA K, CAPPUZZO F, et al. Future Scenarios for the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on Taxane-Containing Regimens[J]. Oncologist, 2010, 15(10):1102-1112. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0322 |
| 5 | ALESSANDRO C D, ELISA C D, ELISA B, et al. Bone Metastasis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Microenvironment and Possible Clinical Implications [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23 (12): 1-11. doi:10.3390/ijms23126832 |
| 6 | CIBOROWSK M, KISLUK J, PIETROWSKA K, et al. Development of LC-QTOF-MS method for human lung tissue fingerprinting. A preliminary application to non small cell lung cancer[J]. Electrophoresis, 38(18), 2304-2312. doi:10.1002/elps.201700022 |
| 7 | ETTINGER D, WOOD D, AISNER D, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2017: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2017, 15:504-535. |
| 8 | CASTELLO A, LOPCI E. Response assessment of bone metastatic disease: seeing the forest for the trees RECIST, PERCIST, iRECIST, and PCWG-2[J]. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2019, 63(2): 150-158. doi:10.23736/s1824-4785.19.03193-5 |
| 9 | BAN J, FOCK V, ARYEE D N T, et al. Mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment of bone metastases[J]. Cells, 2021, 10(11): 1-30. doi:10.3390/cells10112944 |
| 10 | 刘宇,张幸平,吴红宇,等. 258例肺癌骨转移患者的临床及治疗相关因素分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2012, 39(13):914-918. doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2012.13.010 |
| 11 | HONG S, YOUK T, LEE S J, et al. Bone metastasis and skeletal-related events in patients with solid cancer: A Korean nationwide health insurance database study[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(7): 1-13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234927 |
| 12 | LI W, GUO Z, ZOU Z, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for bone metastasis from lung cancer: A large population-based study[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 1-11. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.1005668 |
| 13 | LI Y, XU C, YU Q. Risk factor analysis of bone metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2022, 14(9): 6696-6702. |
| 14 | 方园, 孙耕耘. 血清标记物的变化与肺癌骨转移患者预后的相关性 [J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2018, 23 (04): 583-586+594. |
| 15 | 李秋实, 杨洁, 庄琰, 等. 观察血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌骨转移诊断中的价值 [J]. 航空航天医学杂志, 2021, 32 (12): 1432-1433. |
| 16 | SATOSHI T, HIROHISA K, TAKAE K, et al. Serum tumor markers in skeletal metastasis[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2006, 36 (7): 439-444. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyl046 |
| 17 | 王琳,高松涛,张莎莎,等. 血清肿瘤标志物联合检测对肺癌的诊断价值[J]. 肿瘤基础与临床, 2019, 32(4):04-017. |
| 18 | XU G, WENJUAN M, HAIXIAO W, et al. Synchronous bone metastasis in lung cancer: retrospective study of a single center of 15,716 patients from Tianjin, China [J]. BMC cancer, 2021, 21 (1): 1-9. doi:10.1186/s12885-021-08379-2 |
| 19 | XIAO C, YANG X, HAO J,et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic analysis of metastatic pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: a SEER analysis[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2021,13(2):893-905. doi:10.21037/jtd-20-2826 |
| 20 | WAKELEE H, KELLY K, EDELMAN M J. 50 Years of Progress in the Systemic Therapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 2014, 34(34):177-189. doi:10.14694/edbook_am.2014.34.177 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |